OBJECTIVE: To assess patients’ quality of life after cerebellopontine angle surgery, and in particular, quality of life related to unilateral profound hearing loss.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional in a tertiary referral center. Quality of life of 51 postoperative patients was assessed by using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). Thirty patients with unilateral profound hearing loss who had undergone the translabyrinthine approach completed a subsequent quality-of-life questionnaire on speech discrimination and sound localization.
RESULTS: Ninety-four percent of respondents to the 2nd survey reported difficulties with speech discrimination, and 97%, with sound localization. The general health and overall GBI indices correlated significantly (P >0.01) with a number of speech and localization difficulties.
CONCLUSION: Unilateral profound hearing loss may be a significant factor in a change in quality of life after cerebellopontine angle surgery.
SIGNIFICANCE: Rehabilitation devices that improve discrimination and localization, and hearing preservation surgery, if indicated, should be considered for these patients.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BetchenSAWalshJPostKD.Self-assessed quality of life after acoustic neuroma surgery. J Neurosurg2003; 99: 818–23.
2.
RobinsonKGatehouseSBrowningG.Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1996; 105: 415–22.
3.
KelleherMFernandesMSimD, Health-related quality of life in patients with skull base tumours. Br J Neurosurg2002; 16: 16–20.
4.
WiegandDFickelV.Acoustic neuroma, the patient's perspective: subjective assessment of symptoms, diagnosis, therapy, and outcome in 541 patients. Laryngoscope1989; 99: 179–87.
5.
MartinHSethiJLangD, Patient-assessed outcomes after excision of acoustic neuroma: postoperative symptoms and quality of life. J Neurosurg2001; 94: 211–6.
6.
InoueYOgawaKKanzakiJ.Quality of life of vestibular schwannoma patients after surgery. Acta Otolaryngol2001; 121: 59–61.
7.
AnderssonGEkvallLKinnerforsA, Evaluation of quality of life and symptoms after translabyrinthine acoustic neuroma surgery. Am J Otol1997; 18: 421–6.
8.
IrvingRBeynonGVianiL, The patient's perspective after vestibular schwannoma removal: quality of life and implications for management. Am J Otol1995; 16: 331–7.
9.
KaneNKazanasSMawA, Functional outcome in patients after excision of extracanalicularacoustic neuromas using the suboccipital approach. Ann R Coll Surg Engl2002; 77: 210–6.
10.
ParvingATosMThomsenJ, Some aspects of life quality after surgery for acoustic neuroma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1992; 118: 1061–4.
11.
TosTCaye-ThomasenPStangerupSE, Patients' fears, expectations and satisfaction in relation to management of vestibular schwannoma: a comparison of surgery and observation. Acta Otolaryngol2003; 123: 600–5.
12.
NikolopoulosTJohnsonIO'DonoghueG.Quality of life after acoustic neuroma surgery. Laryngoscope1998; 108: 1382–5.
13.
BatemanNNikolopoulosTRobinsonK, Impairments, disabilities, and handicaps after acoustic neuroma surgery. Clin Otolaryngol2000; 25: 62–5.
14.
CheeGHNedzelskiJMRowedD.Acoustic neuroma surgery: the results of long-term hearing preservation. Otol Neurotol2003; 24: 672–6.
15.
RigbyPLShahSBJacklerRK, Acoustic neuroma surgery: outcome analysis of patient-perceived disability. Am J Otol1997; 18: 427–35.
16.
LevoHBlomstedtGPyykkoI.Is hearing preservation useful in vestibular schwannoma surgery? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol2002; 111: 392–6.
FeuersteinJF.Monaural versus binaural hearing: ease of listening, word recognition, and attentional effort. Ear Hear1992; 13: 80–6.
19.
VaneeclooFMRuzzaIHansonJN, [The monaural pseudostereophonic hearing aid (BAHA) in unilateral total deafness: a study of 29 patients]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)2001; 122: 343–50.
20.
GraamansKVan DijkJEJanssenLW.Hearing deterioration in patients with a non-growing vestibular schwannoma. Acta Otolaryngol2003; 123: 51–4.
