OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and systemize intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (IOFNM) in middle ear and mastoid surgeries.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective study.
METHODS: IOFNM was performed in 100 patients undergoing middle ear and mastoid surgeries. We checked “surgical dehiscence” under microscopes, and also estimated the minimal threshold of electric current needed to change the electromyography of facial muscles using Nerve Integrity Monitor (NIM)-2 (Xomed, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
RESULTS: Forty-three percent of cases showed “surgical dehiscence” and responded to electric stimulation of 0.7 mA or less. “Electrical dehiscence” (≤ 0.7 mA) was presented in 73 (73.0%) cases, and 82.2% of these cases responded to 0.4 mA or less. The mean threshold of minimal electrical stimulation was 0.29 mA for tympanic segments and 0.41 mA for mastoid segments.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend an electrical stimulation of 0.7 mA for the first screening and 0.4 mA for the second exploration in order to define the facial nerve using intraoperative NIM-2 monitoring in middle ear and mastoid surgeries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WietR.Iatrogenic facial paralysis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am1982; 15:773–80.
2.
NissenABuiH.Complications of chronic otitis media. Ear Nose Throat J1996;75:284–92.
3.
WietRSchuringA.The legal aspects of surgical facial nerve injury. Ear Nose Throat J1996;75:737–8.
4.
DelgadoTEBucheitWARosenholtzHR, et al. Intraoperative monitoring of facial muscle evoked responses obtained by intracranial stimulation of the facial nerve: a more accurate technique for facial nerve dissection. Neurosurgery1979;4:418–21.
5.
National Institutes of Health.Acoustic neuroma. Consens Statement1991;9:1–24.
NakaoYPiccirilloEFalcioniM, et al. Electromyographic evaluation of facial nerve damage in acoustic neuroma surgery. Otol Neurotol2001;22:554–7.
8.
SoldnerFPapaveroLWallenfangT, et al. Intraoperative NIM-2 monitoring for facial nerve preservation in acoustic neurinoma surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol1994; 311–3.
9.
CollettiVFiorinoFG.Advances in monitoring of seventh and eighth cranial nerve function in posterior fossa surgery. Am J Otol1997; 19: 503–12.
10.
NossRSLalwaniAKYinglingCD.Facial nerve monitoring in middle ear and mastoid surgery. Laryngoscope2001;111:831–6.
11.
JasonSGSpirosMMichelGS, et al. Facial nerve monitoring in chronic ear surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2002; 126: 108–14.
12.
SamuelHSAlastairGL.The incidence of facial nerve dehiscence at surgery for cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol2001;22:129–32.
13.
GreenJJSheltonCBrackmannD.Iatrogenic facial nerve injury during otologic surgery. Laryngoscope1994;104:922–6.
14.
GreenJJSheltonCBrackmannD.Surgical management of iatrogenic facial nerve injuries. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1994; 111: 606–10.
15.
LiDCaoY.Facial canal dehiscence: a report of 1,465 stapes operations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1996;105:467–71.
16.
BaxterA.Dehiscence of the fallopian canal. J Laryngol Otol1971; 85:587–94.
17.
SheehyJBrackmannDGrahamM.Cholesteatoma surgery: residual and recurrent disease: a review of 1,024 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1977;86:451–62.
18.
HarveySFoxM.Relevant issues in revision canal-wall-down mastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1999;121:18–22.
19.
YinglingCD.Intraoperative monitoring of cranial nerves in neurotologic surgery. In: CummingsCWFredricksonJM, editors. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. 3rd ed.St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1993. p. 3331–55.
