OBJECTIVES: We sought to perform a morphometric analysis of myelinated fibers from laryngeal nerves with the aim of verifying quantitative changes due to the aging process.
METHODS: A 1-cm fragment was collected from the superior laryngeal nerves and recurrent laryngeal nerves from 12 cadavers during autopsy. The sample was divided in two groups: an adult group (aged <60 years) and an elderly group (aged ≥60 years).
RESULTS: The total number of myelinated fibers from the superior laryngeal nerves was similar in both groups (adult group = 9017 ± 1692, elderly group = 7918 ± 1624; P = 0.79). The adult group had a higher total number of myelinated fibers in the recurrent laryngeal nerves than that of the elderly group (adult group = 3276 ± 383, elderly group = 2381 ± 669; P = 0.005), as well as a higher total number of fibers in the laryngeal nerves (both superior and recurrent) than the elderly group (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: The adult group has a higher total number of myelinated fibers in the laryngeal nerves than the elderly group.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AvivJEMartinJHJonesME. Age-related changes in pharyngeal and supraglottic sensation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1994;103:749–52.
2.
EkbergOFeinbergMJAltered swallowing function in elderly patients without dysphagia: Radiologic findings in 56 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol1991;156:1181–4.
3.
McKeeGJJohnstonBTMcBrideGB. Does age or sex affect pharyngeal swallowing? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci1998;23:100–6.
4.
MalmgrenLTRingwoodMAAging of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: An ultrastructural morphometric study. In: FujimuraO, editor. Vocal physiology: voice production, mechanisms and functions. New York: Raven Press; 1988. pp. 159–80.
5.
RosenbergSIMalmgrenLTWooP.Age-related changes in the internal branch of the rat superior laryngeal nerve. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1989;115:78–86.
6.
MortellitiAJMalmgrenLTGacekRRUltrastructural changes with age in the human superior laryngeal nerve. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1990;116:1062–9.
7.
NakaiTGotoNMoriyamaH. The human recurrent laryngeal nerve during the aging process. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn2000;76:363–8.
8.
TiagoRSLMunhozMSLFariaFP. Histomorphometric aspects of the superior laryngeal nerve. Rev Bras Otorhinolaringol2002;68:157–65.
9.
NemiroffPMKatzADExtralaryngeal divisions of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: Surgical and clinical significance. Am J Surg1982;144:466–9.
10.
WuBLSandersIMuL. The human communicating nerve. An extension of the external superior laryngeal nerve that innervates the vocal cord. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1994; 120:1321–8.
11.
SanudoJRMaranilloELeonX. An anatomical study of anastomoses between the laryngeal nerves. Laryngoscope1999;109:983–7.
12.
TomaschJBrittonWAA fibre analysis of the laryngeal nerve-supply in man. Acta Anat1955;23:386–98.
13.
DomeijSCarlsooBDahlqvistA. Motor and sensory fibers of the superior laryngeal nerve in the rat. A light and electron microscopic study. Acta Otolaryngol1989; 108:469–77.
14.
GacekRRLyonMJFiber components of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in the cat. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1976;85:460–71.
15.
DahlqvistACarlsooBHellstromS. Fiber composition of the recurrent laryngeal nerve after experimental vagotomy and sympathectomy. A qualitative study by light and electron microscopy. Acta Anat1986; 125:114–20.
16.
SasakiCTKimYHSimsHS. Motor innervation of the human cricopharyngeus muscle. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1999;108:1132–9.
17.
GermainMATrotouxJBruneauX.Laryngeal nerves. A histomorphometric and cartographic study. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac1986; 103:379–88.
18.
MayhewTMSharmaAKSampling schemes for estimating nerve fibre size. I. Methods for nerve trunks of mixed fascicularity. J Anat1984; 139:45–58.
19.
RepiceF.Computerized morphometric analysis of the fiber composition of the upper and lower laryngeal nerves in humans. Arch Ital Anat Embriol1989;94:173–84.
20.
MurtaghJACampbellCJThe respiratory function of the larynx. III. The relation of fibre size to function in the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Laryngoscope1951; 61:581–90.
