OBJECTIVE: To test whether subscales should be used when analyzing the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT).
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study involved 87 acute NHS hospitals in England and Wales.
RESULTS: With the use of exploratory factor analysis we found evidence for the existence of four unique constructs within the SNOT. Two constructs address symptoms (rhinologic and ear/facial) and two address aspects of health-related quality of life (psychological issues and sleep function). Subscales of the SNOT that correspond to these constructs provided clinically meaningful information over and above that provided by the SNOT total score on the type of surgical benefits gained by patients with different sino-nasal conditions.
CONCLUSION: The SNOT is not unidimensional and a SNOT total score will mask variation in the true underlying constructs.
SIGNIFICANCE: The SNOT would have greatly improved clinical use if it was scored with appropriate subscales. Such a measure would allow us to tease out the differential impact of sino-nasal conditions, in addition to allowing greater understanding of treatment effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PiccirilloJFEdwardsDHaidukA. Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 31-item Rhinosinusitis Outcome Measure (RSOM-31). Am J Rhinol1995;9:297–306. (Grade B).
2.
DavisGEYuehBWalkerE. Psychiatric distress amplifies symptoms after surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2005;132:189–96. (Grade B).
3.
BrowneJPHopkinsCSlackR. Health-related quality of life after simple nasal polypectomy or nasal polypectomy with additional sino-nasal surgery: a prospective cohort study with three year follow up. Laryngoscope2006; 297–302. (Grade B).
4.
PiccirilloJFMerrittMGRichardsMLPsychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2002;126:41–7. (Grade B).
5.
AndersonERMurphyMPWeymullerEAClinimetric evaluation of the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2005;132:189–96. (Grade B).
6.
FahmyFFMcCombeAMckiernanDCSino nasal assessment questionnaire, a patient focused, rhinosinusitis specific outcome measure. Rhinology2002;40:195–7. (Grade B).
7.
HopkinsCBrowneJPSlackR. The National Comparative Audit of Surgery for Nasal Polyposis and Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Clin Otolaryngol2006;31:390–8. (Grade B).
8.
New classification of physical status.Anesthesiology1963; 24:111. (Grade D).
9.
LundVJMacKayISStaging in rhinosinusitis. Rhinology1993;107:183–4. (Grade B).
10.
CostelloABOsborneJWBest practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation2005; 10:1–9. (Grade D).
11.
KazisLEAndersonJJMeenanRFEffect sizes for interpreting changes in heath status. Med Care1989;27:S178–89. (Grade D).
