Gifted students are a diverse minority group with high intelligence and talent whose needs are often unrecognised and unmet. It is believed that this group of students, from a range of backgrounds, socio-economic statuses and abilities, may experience a range of social-emotional difficulties, including peer exclusion, isolation, stress, anxiety, depression and destructive perfectionism. Literature also reveals that gifted and talented students are underachieving at school. Many educators do not recognise or meet the needs of gifted students as there is a false perception that they can look after themselves (Neihard, Reis, Robinson, & Moon, 2002). As research indicates, there is a positive correlation between poor social-emotional development and scholastic underachievement in gifted students (Australian Council for Educational Research, 2010; Queensland Government, 2013). While this may be true, there is limited understanding of how these variables influence one another. Many researchers believe that social-emotional difficulties cause school underachievement, whereas others argue that school underachievement results in social and emotional problems. Furthermore, many researchers dispute these arguments altogether, and believe that these problems are a result of external factors, including family, school, and community environments. Given these contrasting viewpoints, critical investigation is necessary in order to develop a more conclusive understanding of this relationship. This article aims to critically analyse the scope of the current literature, and provides recommendations for further research, as this may result in better development of programs to further support the social-emotional and academic needs of gifted students.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2012). Social and emotional wellbeing: Development of a Children's Headline Indicator. Canberra, Australia: Author.
2.
BakerJ., BridgerR., & EvansK. (1998). Models of underachievement among gifted preadolescents: The role of personal, family, and school factors. National Association for Gifted Children, 42(1), 5–15.
3.
BaldwinA.Y., & VialleW. (1999). The many faces of giftedness: Lifting the masks. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4.
BarrettP. (2013). Pathways Health and Research Centre. Retrieved from www.pathwayshrc.com.au
5.
BaumS.M., RenzulliJ.S., & HebertT.P. (1995). Reversing underachievement: Creative productivity as a systematic intervention. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(4), 224–235.
6.
BernardM.E. (2013). You can do it! Education. Retrieved from www.youcandoit.com.au
7.
BerndtT.J. (1999). Friends’ influence on students’ adjustment to school. Educational Psychologist, 34(1), 15–28.
8.
BlattS.J. (1995). The destructiveness of perfectionism: Implications for the treatment of depression. American Psychologist, 50(12), 1003–1020.
9.
BrackenB.A. (1996). Handbook of self-concept. New York: Wiley.
10.
BrodyE., & MillsC. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review of the issues. Retrieved from http://www.ldonline.org/article/5914
11.
CauceA.M., ParadiseM., GinzlerJ.A., EmbryL., MorganC.J., & LohrY. (2000). Gifted and talented students at risk for underachievement. The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement. Retrieved from www.centerforcsri.org
12.
CornoL., CronbachL.J., KupermintzH.K., LohmanD.H., MandinachE.B., PorteusA., & TalbertJ. (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
DavisG.A., & RimmS.B. (2003). Education of the gifted and talented. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
DiazE.L. (1998). Factors influencing the academic underachievement of talented students of Puerto Rican descent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(2), 105–122.
15.
DixonD.N., & ScheckelJ.R. (1996). Gifted adolescent suicide: The empirical base. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7(3), 386–392.
FlowersL.A., ZhangY., MooreJ.L., & FlowersT.A. (2004). An exploratory phenomenological study of African American high school students in gifted education programs: Implications for teachers and school counsellors. Retrieved from www.subr.edu/coeducation/ejournal/
18.
FordD.Y. (1995). Correlates of underachievement among gifted and non-gifted Black students. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
19.
FordD.Y. (1996). Determinants of underachievement as perceived by gifted, above average, and average Black students. Roeper Review, 14(3), 130–136.
20.
FornessS.R., & KavaleK.A. (2001). ADHD and a return to the medical model of special education. Education and Treatment of Children, 24(3), 224–247.
21.
GranthamT.C., & FordD.Y. (2003). Beyond self-concept and self-esteem: Racial identity and gifted African American students. The High School Journal, 87, 18–29.
22.
GrossM., MacleodB., DrummondD., & MerrickC. (2001). Gifted students in primary schools: Differentiating the curriculum. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales.
23.
GuayF., MarshH.W., & BoivinM. (2003). Academic self-concept and achievement: Developmental perspective on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 124–136.
24.
HellerK.A., MonksF.J., SternbergR.J., & SubotnikR.F. (2000). International handbook on giftedness and talent (2nd ed.). London: Pergamon Press.
25.
HessL. (1994). Life, liberty and the pursuit of perfection. Gifted Child Today, 17(3), 28–31.
26.
HowardT.C. (2003). A tug of war for our minds: African-American high school students’ perception of their academic identities and college aspirations. The High School Journal, 87, 4–17.
27.
JacksonP.S. (1998). Bright star — black sky: A phenomenological study of depression as a window into the psyche of the gifted adolescent. Roeper Review, 20(3), 215–221.
28.
KarandeS., & KulkarniM. (2005). Poor school performance. Indian Journal of Paediatrics, 72(11), 961–967.
29.
LevinsonD.F. (2006). The genetics of depression: A review. Biological Psychiatry, 60(2), 84–92.
30.
MandelH., & MarcusS. (1995). Could do better. New York: Wiley & Sons.
31.
Manor-BullockR., LookC., & DixonD. (1995). Is giftedness socially stigmatizing? The impact of high achievement on social interactions. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18(3), 319–338.
32.
MarshH.W., ByrneB.M., & YeungA.S. (1999). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Reanalysis of a pioneering study and revised recommendations. Educational Psychologist, 34, 154–157.
33.
MarshH. W., ChessorD., CravenR., & RocheL. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 445–480.
34.
McCoachB.D., & SiegleD. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144–154.
35.
McRaeC. (2002). Addressing the social and emotional needs of gifted adolescents: Implications for counsellors. Alberta Counsellor, 27(1), 16–21.
MoonS.M., & HallA.S. (1998). Family therapy with intellectually and creatively gifted children. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24(1), 59–80.
38.
MooreJ.L. (2003). Introduction. The High School Journal, 87, 1–3.
39.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2011). Dropout rates. Retrieved online from www.nces.ed.gov/
40.
NeihardM., ReisS., RobinsonN.M., & MoonS. M. (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?Washington, DC: Prufrock Press, Inc.
41.
NSW Department of Education and Communities. (2011). What do we mean by the terms giftedness and talent?Sydney, Australia: Author. Retrieved from www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au
42.
O'MaraA.J., & MarshH.W. (2007). Support for a reciprocal effects model of self-concept and academic achievement through a contrast of multidimensional and unidimensional approaches. Retrieved from www.trove.nla.gov.au/work/
43.
OgbuJ.U. (2003). Black American students in an affluent suburb: A study of academic disengagement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44.
PintrichP.R. & SchunkD.H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
45.
PintrichP.R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The rope of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555.
46.
Queensland Government. (2013). Gifted and talented education. Retrieved from http://www.education.qld.gov.au/
47.
ReisS.M., & McCoachD.B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go?Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170.
48.
ReisS.M., & McCoachD.B. (2002). Underachievement in gifted and talented students with special needs. Exceptionality, 10(2), 113–125.
49.
ReisS.M., NeuT.W., & McGuireJ.M. (1995). Talent in two places: Case studies of high ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
50.
RenzulliJ.S., & ParkS. (2002). Giftedness and high school dropouts: Personal, family and school-related factors. Storrs, CT: The Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
51.
RimmS.B. (1995). Why bright kids get poor grades and what you can do about it. New York: Crown Publications.
52.
RimmS.B. (1997). An underachievement epidemic. Educational Leadership, 54(7), 18–22.
53.
RimmS.B. (2003). Social adjustment and peer pressures for gifted children. Retrieved from www.davidsongifted.org
54.
RimmS., Rimm-KaufmanS., & RimmI. (1999). See Jane win: The Rimm report on how 1000 girls became successful women. New York: Crown Publications.
55.
RizzaM.G., & MorrisonW.F. (2007). Identifying twice-exceptional students: A toolkit for success. Retrieved from http://escholarship.bc.edu/education/
56.
RobertsonE. (1991). Neglected dropouts: The gifted and talented. Equity and Excellence, 25, 62–74.
57.
RobinsonN.M. (1996). Counseling agendas for gifted young people: A commentary. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 128–137.
58.
Schroeder-DavisS.J. (1999). Brains, brawn, or beauty: Adolescent attitudes toward three superlatives. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10(3), 134–147.
59.
SchunkD.H. (1998). Motivation and self-regulation among gifted learners. Louisville, MO: National Association of Gifted Children.
60.
SchunkD.H., & ZimmermanB.J. (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: Guilford Press.
SwiatekM.A. (1998). Helping gifted adolescents cope with social stigma. Gifted Child Today, 11(3), 42–45.
63.
SwiatekM.A., & DorrR.M. (1998). Revision of the social coping questionnaire: Replication and extension of previous findings. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 252–259.
64.
ValentineJ.C., Du BoisD.L., & CooperH. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111–133.
65.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (2000). Curriculum policy development for secondary gifted programs: A prescription for reform coherence. National Association of Secondary School Principals, 84(15), 14–29.
