Test anxiety is experienced by 10–40% of students. The physical symptoms associated with test anxiety may be more likely to be exhibited by elementary students. Progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) has been demonstrated to reduce physical symptoms of anxiety and could be used in the classroom, but teacher acceptability of PMR for test anxiety has not been assessed. This study used a vignette format to survey 404 first through fifth grade teachers on their acceptability of classroom-based PMR as an intervention for test anxiety. Good levels of acceptability were found for implementation with a school psychologist or counsellor, CD player, or digital music player. Special education teachers reported slightly lower levels of acceptability for using PMR in the digital music player scenario. With good levels of teacher acceptability of PMR to address test anxiety, school psychologists and counsellors may be more likely to recommend the use of PMR in classrooms. Implications for implementation of PMR to reduce test anxiety, study limitations, and suggestions for future research are discussed.
Banks, J., & Smyth, E. (2015). ‘Your whole life depends on it’: Academic stress and high-stakes testing in Ireland. Journal of Youth Studies, 18, 598–616. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2014.992317
2.
Carter, S. L. (2007). Review of recent treatment acceptability research. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 301–316. Retrieved from https://www-jstor-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/23879624
3.
Connor, M. J. (2003). Pupil stress and standard assessment tasks (SATs): An update. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 8, 101–107. doi: 10.1080/13632750300507010
4.
Cross Calvert, S., & Johnston, C. (1990). Acceptability of treatments for child behavior problems: Issues and implications for future research. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 19, 61–74. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp1901_8
5.
Downey, R. G., & King, C. V. (1998). Missing data in Likert ratings: A comparison of replacement methods. Journal of General Psychology, 125, 175–191. doi: 10.1080/00221309809595542
6.
Eckert, T. L., & Shapiro, E. S. (1999). Methodological issues in analog acceptability research: Are teachers’ acceptability ratings of assessment methods influenced by experimental design?School Psychology Review, 28, 5–16.
7.
Elliott, S. N., Witt, J. C., Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2002). Selecting and evaluating classroom interventions. In M. R.Shinn, H. M.Walker, and G.Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for Academic and Behavioral Problems II: Preventive and Remedial Approaches (pp. 243–294). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
8.
Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2015).
9.
Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47–77. doi: 10.3102/00346543058001047
10.
Hill, K. T., & Wigfield, A. (1984). Test anxiety: A major educational problem and what can be done about it. The Elementary School Journal, 85(1), 105–126. doi: 10.1086/461395
11.
Hintze, J. M. (2002). Interventions for fears and anxiety problems. In M.R.Shinn, H. M.Walker, and G.Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for Academic and Behavior Problems II: Preventive and Remedial Approaches (pp. 939–960). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
12.
Howard, S. K. (2011). Affect and acceptability: Exploring teachers’ technology-related risk perceptions. Educational Media International, 48, 261–272. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2011.632275
13.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § Sec 1400 et seq. (2004).
14.
Jacobson, E. (1938). Progressive Relaxation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Larson, H. A., El Ramahi, M. K., Conn, S. R., Estes, L. A., & Ghibellini, A. B. (2010). Reducing test anxiety among third grade students through the implementation of relaxation techniques. Journal of School Counseling, 8, 1–19.
16.
Lohaus, A., & Klein-Hessling, J. (2003). Relaxation in children: Effects of extended and intensified training. Psychology and Health, 18, 237–249. doi: 10.1080/0887044021000057257
17.
Martens, B. K., Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Darveaux, D. X. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191–198. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.16.2.191
18.
Matters, G., & Burnett, P. C. (2003). Psychological predictors of the propensity to omit short-response items on a high-stakes achievement test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 239–256. doi: 10.1177/0013164402250988
19.
Miltenberger, R. G. (1990). Assessment of treatment acceptability: A review of the literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10(3), 24–38. doi: 10.1177/027112149001000304
20.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2017). Guide to National Board Certification. Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org/wp-content/uploads/Guide_to_NB_Certification.pdf
21.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002).
22.
Nyroos, M., Korhonen, J., Linnanmäki, K., & Svens-Liavåg, C. (2012). A cross-national comparison of test anxiety in Swedish and Finnish grade 3 pupils: Measured by the CTAS. Education Inquiry, 3, 615–636. doi: 10.3402/edui.v3i4.22057
23.
Putwain, D., Chamberlain, S., Daly, A. L., & Sadreddini, S. (2014). Reducing test anxiety among school-aged adolescents: A field experiment. Educational Psychology in Practice, 4, 420–440. doi: 10.1080/02667363.2014.964392
24.
Putwain, D. W., Connors, L., Woods, K., & Nicholson, L. J. (2012). Stress and anxiety surrounding forthcoming Standard Assessment Tests in English schoolchildren. Pastoral Care in Education: An International Journal of Personal, Social, and Emotional Development, 30, 289–302. doi: 10.1080/02643944.2012.688063
25.
Raaijmakers, Q. A. W. (1999). Effectiveness of different missing data treatments in surveys with Likert-type data: Introducing the relative mean substitution approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 725–748. doi: 10.1177/0013164499595001
26.
Rasid, Z. M., & Parish, T. S. (1998). The effects of two types of relaxation training on students’ levels of anxiety. Adolescence, 33, 99–102.
27.
Reimers, T. M., Wacker, D. P., & Koeppl, G. (1987). Acceptability of behavioral interventions: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review, 16, 212–227.
28.
Salend, S. J. (2011). Addressing test anxiety. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44, 58–68. doi: 10.1177/004005991104400206
29.
Segool, N. K., Carlson, J. S., Goforth, A. N., von der Embse, N., & Barterian, J. (2013). Heightened test anxiety among young children: Elementary school students’ anxious responses to high-stakes testing. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 489–499. doi: 10.1002/pits.21689
30.
State, T. M., Harrison, J. R., Kern, L., & Lewis, T. J. (2017). Feasibility and acceptability of classroom-based interventions for students with emotional/behavioral challenges at the high school level. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19, 26–36. doi: 10.1177/1098300716648459
31.
Stroud, K., & Reynolds, C. R. (2009). Assessment of learning strategies and related constructs in children and adolescents. In T. B.Gutkin, and C. R.Reynolds (Eds.), The Handbook of School Psychology (4th ed., pp. 739–765). New York, NY: Wiley.
32.
Swearer, S. M., Givens, J. E., & Frerichs, L. J. (2010). Cognitive-behavioral interventions for depression and anxiety. In G.Gimpel Peacock, R.A.Ervin, E. J.Daly, and K. W.Merrell (Eds.), Practical Handbook of School Psychology: Effective Practices for the 21st Century (pp. 440–458). New York, NY: Guilford.
33.
Tarnowski, K. J., & Simonian, S. J. (1992). Assessing treatment acceptance: The Abbreviated Acceptability Rating Profile. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 23, 101–106. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(92)90007-6
34.
Terry, W. S. (2006). Learning and Memory: Basic Principles, Processes, and Procedures (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
35.
Urbaniak, G. C., & Plous, S. (2013). Research randomizer [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.randomizer.org
36.
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). NCLB/Stronger accountability: Testing: Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/nclb/accountability/ayp/testing-faq.html
37.
U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Every Student Succeeds Act: Assessments under Title I, Part A & Title I, Part B: Summary of final regulations. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/essaassessmentfactsheet1207.pdf
38.
U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Transitioning to the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from: https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/essatransitionfaqs11817.pdf
39.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Table 209.22: Number and percentage distribution of teachers in public elementary and secondary schools, by instructional level and selected teacher and school characteristics: 1999–2000 and 2015–16. In U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (Ed.), Digest of Education Statistics (2017 ed.). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_209.22.asp
40.
Varvogli, L., & Darviri, C. (2011). Stress management techniques: Evidence-based procedures that reduce stress and promote health. Health Science Journal, 5, 74–89.
41.
Von Brock, M. B., & Elliott, S. N. (1987). Influence of treatment effectiveness information on the acceptability of classroom interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 131–144. doi: 10.1016/0022-4405(87)90022-7
42.
von der Embse, N., Barterian, J., & Segool, N. (2013). Test anxiety interventions for children and adolescents: A systematic review of treatment studies from 2000–2010. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 57–71. doi: 10.1002/pits.21660
43.
Whitaker Sena, J. D., Lowe, P. A., & Lee, S. W. (2007). Significant predictors of test anxiety among students with and without disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 360–376. doi: 10.1177/00222194070400040601
44.
Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T.Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in School Psychology (vol. 4, pp. 251–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45.
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203
46.
Wright, J. H., Basco, M. R., & Thase, M. E. (2006). Learning Cognitive-behavior Therapy: An Illustrated Guide. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
47.
Zaichkowsky, L. B., & Zaichkowsky, L. D. (1984). The effects of a school-based relaxation training program on fourth grade children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 13, 81–85. doi: 10.1080/15374418409533174
