Mapping the Structure and Dynamics of Psychological Knowledge: Forty Years of APA Journal Citations (1970

Abstract

To understand how subfields of psychology relate to each other as a whole, we analyzed 40 years (from 1979 to 2009) of journal citation data collected from 17 American Psychological Association journals. The results reveal two stable underlying dimensions of psychological knowledge—basic versus applied, and population-specific versus population-general—that organize subfields of psychology. Within the structure, personality and social psychology is located at the heart of psychological knowledge. Analysis of the dynamic flow of knowledge between subfields of psychology further reveals that although the subfields engage in clear division of labor, they also engage in dynamic transactions of knowledge. Finally, an emergent subfield would first obtain its intellectual nutrients from the established disciplines. Once it has found its own niche, it turns into a spin-off and starts to assume the role of knowledge supplier. The implications of these results for psychology as a science are discussed.

Keywords

structure dynamics development psychology multidimensional scaling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Journals listed by subject: APA journals. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/journals/by_subject.html

Borg

, & Groenen

P. J. F.

(2005). Modern multidimensional scaling (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

Boyack

K. W.

, Klavans

, & Borner

(2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64, 351–374.

Buss

(2008). Human nature and individual differences: Evolution of human personality. In John

O. P.

, Robins

R. W.

, & Pervin

L. A.

, Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 29–60). New York: Guilford Press.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2007). Psychology is a hub science. Observer, 20, 5–42.

Cason

, & Lubotsky

(1936). The influence and dependence of psychological journals on each other. Psychological Bulletin, 33, 95–103.

Constantine

A. G.

, & Gower

J. C.

(1978). Graphic representations of asymmetric matrices. Applied Statistics, 27, 297–304.

Coombs

C. H.

(1964). A theory of data. New York: Wiley.

Daniel

R. S.

, & Louttit

C. M.

(1953). Professional problems in psychology. New York: Prentice Hall.

10.

Doreian

(1985). Structural equivalence in a psychology journal network. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36, 411–417.

11.

Durkheim

(1997). The division of labor in society ( Halls

W. D.

,). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1893)

12.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

, & Hubert

L. J.

(1987). Multidimensional scaling: Some possibilities for counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 469–480.

13.

Gifi

(1990). Nonlinear multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley.

14.

Hubert

L. J.

, Arabie

, & Meulman

J. J.

(2001). Combinatorial data analysis: Optimization by dynamic programming. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

15.

Koulack

, & Keselman

H. J.

(1975). Ratings of psychology journals by members of the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 30, 1049–1053.

16.

Mace

K. C.

, & Warner

H. D.

(1973). Ratings of psychology journals. American Psychologist, 28, 184–186.

17.

Mayer

J. D.

(2005). A tale of two visions: Can a new view of personality help integrate psychology? American Psychologist, 60, 294–307.

18.

McAdams

D. P.

, & Pals

J. L.

(2006). A new big five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217.

19.

Mischel

, & Shoda

(2008). Toward a unified theory of personality: Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within the cognitive-affective processing system. In John

O. P.

, Robins

R. W.

, & Pervin

L. A.

, Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 208–241). New York: Guilford Press.

20.

Pinski

, & Narin

(1979). Structure of the psychological literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30, 161–168.

21.

Price

D. J. D.

(1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510–515.

22.

Rodgers

J. L.

, & Thomspon

T. D.

(1992). Seriation and multidimensional scaling: A data analysis approach to scaling asymmetric proximity matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 105–117.

23.

Saito

, & Yadohisa

(2005). Data analysis of asymmetric structures. New York: Marcel Dekker.

24.

Weeks

D. G.

, & Bentler

P. M.

(1982). Restricted multidimensional scaling models for asymmetric proximities. Psychometrika, 47, 201–208.

25.

Xhignesse

L. V.

, & Osgood

C. E.

(1967). Bibliographical citation characteristics of the psychological journal network in 1950 and in 1960. American Psychologist, 22, 778–791.

Mapping the Structure and Dynamics of Psychological Knowledge: Forty Years of APA Journal Citations (1970–2009)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References