Growing evidence shows that features we find attractive in members of the opposite sex signal important underlying dimensions of health and reproductive viability. It has been discovered that men with attractive faces have higher quality sperm, women with attractive bodies are more fertile, men and women with attractive voices lose their virginity sooner, men who spend more money than they earn have more sex partners, and lap dancers make more tips when they are in the fertile phase of their menstrual cycle. This paper highlights recent evidence showing that the way we perceive other people has been shaped by our evolutionary history. An evolutionary approach provides a powerful tool for understanding the consistency and diversity of mating preferences and behaviors across individuals and cultures.
ApicellaC. L., FeinbergD. R., & MarloweF. W. (2007). Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers. BiologyLetters, 3, 682–684.
2.
ArdenR., GottfredsonL. S., MillerG., & PierceA. (2009). Intelligence and semen quality are positively correlated. Intelligence, 37, 277–282.
3.
ArmstrongN. R., & WilsonJ. D. (2006). Did the “Brazilian” kill the pubic louse?Sexually Transmitted Infections, 82, 265–266.
4.
BarashD. P. (1979). The whisperings within: Evolution and the origin of human nature. New York: Harper & Row.
5.
BarrettH. C., & KurzbanR. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review, 113, 628–647.
6.
BrewerG., ArcherJ., & ManningJ. (2007). Physical attractiveness: The objective ornament and subjective self-ratings. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 29–38.
7.
CamposP., SaguyA., ErnsbergerP., OliverE., & GaesserG. (2006). The epidemiology of overweight and obesity: Public health crisis or moral panic?International Journal of Epidemiology, 35, 55–60.
8.
CashdanE. (2008). Waist-to-hip ratio across cultures: Trade-offs between androgen- and estrogen-dependent traits. Current Anthropology, 49, 1099–1107.
9.
CunninghamM. R., RobertsA. R., BarbeeA. P., DruenP. B., & WuC.-H. (1995). Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261–279.
10.
DeLamaterJ. D., & HydeJ. S. (1998). Essentialism vs. social constructionism in the study of human sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 10–18.
11.
DijkstraP., & BuunkB. P. (2001). Sex differences in the jealousy-evoking nature of a rival's body build. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 335–341.
12.
DotyR. L., FordM., PretiG., & HugginsG. R. (1975). Changes in the intensity and pleasantness of human vaginal odors during the menstrual cycle. Science, 190, 1316–1318.
13.
DufourD. L., & SautherM. (2002). Comparative and evolutionary dimensions of the energetic of human pregnancy and lactation. American Journal of Human Biology, 14, 584–602.
14.
Eibl-EibesfeltdI. (1970). Love and hate: On the natural history of behavior patterns. New York: Methuen.
15.
EtcoffN. (1999). Survival of the prettiest: The science of beauty. First Anchor: New York.
16.
FeinbergD. R., JonesB. C., LittleA. C., BurtD. M., & PerrettD. I. (2005). Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Animal Behaviour, 69, 561–568.
17.
FalkD. (1990). Brain evolution in Homo: The “radiator” theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 333–381.
18.
FesslerD. M. T., & HaleyK. J. (2006). Guarding the perimeter: The outside-inside dichotomy in disgust and bodily experience. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 3–19.
19.
FinkB., NeaveN., & SeydelH. (2007). Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 82–87.
20.
FlegalK. M., GraubardB. I., WilliamsonD. F., & GailM. H. (2005). Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293, 1861–1867.
21.
FordC. S., & BeachF. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper & Row.
22.
FrederickD. A., BuchananG. M., Sadeghi-AzarL., PeplauL. A., HaseltonM. G., BerezovskayaA., & LipinskiR. E. (2007). Desiring the muscular ideal: Men's body satisfaction in the United States, Ukraine, and Ghana. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 103–117.
23.
FrederickD. A., FesslerD. M. T., & HaseltonM. G. (2005). Do representations of male muscularity differ in men's and women's magazines?Body Image, 2, 81–86.
24.
FrederickD. A., ForbesG. B., GrigorianK., & JarchoJ. M. (2007). The UCLA Body Project I: Gender and ethnic differences in self-objectification and body satisfaction among 2,206 undergraduates. Sex Roles, 57, 317–327.
25.
FrederickD. A., & HaseltonM. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1167–1183.
26.
FrederickD. A., PeplauL. A., & LeverJ. (2008). The Barbie mystique: Satisfaction with breast size and shape across the lifespan. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20, 200–211.
27.
FrederickD. A., SwamiV., & the 56 Members of the International Body Project. (2010, April). Preferences for muscularity in 26 countries across 10 world regions: Results from the International Body Project I. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Western Psychological Association, Cancun, Mexico.
28.
FrischR. E. (2008). Body fat, puberty and fertility. Biological Reviews, 59, 161–188.
29.
GallupA. C., WhiteD. D., & GallupG. G.Jr. (2007). Handgrip strength predicts body morphology, aggression, and sexual behavior in males. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 423–429.
30.
GallupG. G.Jr. (1982). Permanent breast enlargement in human females: A sociobiological analysis. Journal of Human Evolution, 11, 597-601.
31.
GallupG. G.Jr., & CameronP. A. (1992). Modality specific metaphors: Is our mental machinery “colored” by a visual bias?Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 7, 93–98.
32.
GallupG. G.Jr., FinnM. M., & SammisB. (2009). On the origin of descended scrotal testicles: The activation hypothesis. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 517–526.
33.
GallupG. G.Jr., FrederickM. J., & PipitoneR. N. (2008). Morphology and behavior: Phrenology revisited. Review of General Psychology, 12, 297–304.
34.
GangestadS. G., HaseltonM. G., & BussD. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 75–96.
35.
GeherG. (2009). Accuracy and oversexualization in cross-sex mind-reading: An adaptationist approach. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 331–347.
36.
GrammerK., & ThornhillR. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233–242.
37.
GulledgeA. K., GulledgeM. H., & StahmannR. F. (2003). Romantic physical affection types and relationship satisfaction. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 233–242.
38.
HaseltonM. G., BussD. M., OubaidV., & AngleitnerA. (2005). Sex, lies, and strategic interference: The psychology of deception between the sexes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 3–23.
39.
HaseltonM. G., & GangestadS. W. (2006). Conditional expression of women's desires and men's mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 509–518.
40.
HaseltonM. G., MortezaieM., PillsworthE. G., Bleske-RechekA., & FrederickD. A. (2007). Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: Near ovulation, women dress to impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 40–45.
41.
HendersonJ. A., & AnglinJ. M. (2003). Facial attractiveness predicts longevity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 351–356.
42.
HughesS. M., DispenzaF., & GallupG. G.Jr. (2004). Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 295–304.
43.
HughesS. M., & GallupG. G.Jr. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Human Behavior and Evolution, 24, 173–178.
44.
HughesS. M., HarrisonM. A., & GalllupG. G.Jr. (2007). Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 612–631.
45.
HughesS. M., HarrisonM. A., & GallupG. G.Jr. (2002). The sound of symmetry: Voice as a marker of developmental instability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 173–180.
46.
HughesS. M., PastizzoM. J., & GallupG. G.Jr. (2008). The sound of symmetry revisited: Subjective and objective analyses of voice. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 32, 93–108.
47.
JasienskaG., ZiomkiewiczA., EllisonP. T., LipsonS. F., & ThuneI. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 271, 1213–1217.
48.
JokelaM. (2009). Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: Evidence from the last 20th century United States. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 342–350.
49.
KarremansJ. C., FrankenhuisW. E., & AronsS. (2010). Blind men prefer a low waist-to-hip ratio. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 182–186.
50.
KasperkC., HelmboldtA., BorcsokI., HeutheS., CloosO., NiethardF., & ZieglerR. (1997). Skeletal site-dependent expression of the androgen receptor in human osteoblastic cell populations. Calcified Tissue, 61, 464–473.
51.
KirchengastS., & GartnerM. (2002). Changes in fat distribution (WHR) and body weight across the menstrual cycle. Colleqium Antropoloqium, 26, 47–57.
52.
KrugerD. J. (2008). Male financial consumption is associated with higher mating intentions and mating success. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 603–612.
53.
LangloisJ. H., KalakanisL., RubensteinA. J., LarsonA., HallamM., & SmootM. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423.
54.
LassekW. D., & GaulinS. J. C. (2008). Waist-hip ratio and cognitive ability: Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 26–34.
55.
LassekW. D., & GaulinS. J. C. (2009). Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: Relationship to mating success, dietary requirements, and native immunity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 322–328.
56.
Law-SmithM. J., PerrettD. I., JonesB. C., CornwellR. E., MooreF. R., FeinbergD. R., & HillierS. G. (2006). Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 273, 135–140.
57.
LivshitsG., & KobylianskyE. (1991). Fluctuating asymmetry as a possible measure of developmental homeostasis in humans: A review. Human Biology, 63, 441–466.
58.
ManningJ. T. (2002). Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior, and health. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press.
59.
ManningJ. T., ScuttD., WhitehouseG. H., & LeinsterS. J. (1997). Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 223–236.
60.
MillerG., TyburJ. M., & JordanB. D. (2007). Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap dancers: Economic evidence for human estrus. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 375–381.
61.
MortensenE. L., MichaelsenK. F., SandersS. A., & ReinischJ. M. (2002). The association between duration of breastfeeding and adult intelligence. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2365–2371.
62.
PagelM., & BodmerW. (2003). A naked ape would have fewer parasites. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: B, 270, 117–119.
63.
PeplauL. A., FrederickD. A., YeeC. K., MaiselN., LeverJ., & GhavamiN. (2009). Body image satisfaction in heterosexual, gay, and lesbian adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 713.
64.
PerrettD. I., BurtD. M., Penton-VoakI. S., LeeK. J., RowlandD. A., & EdwardsR. (1999). Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 295–307.
65.
PillsworthE. G. (2008). Mate preferences among the Shuar of Ecuador: Trait rankings and peer evaluations. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 256–267.
66.
PillsworthE. G., & HaseltonM. G. (2006). Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 247–258.
67.
PinkerS. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin.
68.
PipitoneR. N., & GallupG. G.Jr. (2008). Women's voice attractiveness varies across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 268–274.
69.
PlatekS. M., & SinghD. (2010). Optimal waist-to-hip ratios in women activate neural reward centers in men. PLoS ONE, 5, e9042.
70.
PutsD. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual cycle phase affect women's preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 388–397.
71.
PutsD. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.
72.
RamseyJ. L., LangloisJ. H., HossR. A., RubensteinA. J., & GriffinA. (2004). Origins of a stereotype: Categorization of facial attractiveness by 6-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 7, 201–211.
73.
RhodesG. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226.
74.
RigbyN. (2006). Commentary: Counterpoint to Campos et al. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35, 79–80.
75.
RobertsS. C., LittleA. C., GoslingL. M., PerretD. I., CarterV., JonesB. C., … PetrieM. (2005). MHC-herterozygosity and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 213–216.
76.
RuleN. O., & AmbadyN. (2008). The face of success: Inferences from chief excecutive officer's appearance predict company profits. Psychological Science, 19, 109–111.
77.
SaxtonT. K., CarylP. G., & RobertsS. C. (2006). Vocal and facial attractiveness judgements of children, adolescents and adults: The ontogeny of mate choice. Ethology, 112, 1179–1185.
78.
SellA., BryantG. A., CosmidesL., ToobyJ., SznycerD., von ReudenC., KraussA., & GurvenM. (2010). Adaptations in humans for assessing physical strength from the voice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0769
79.
SellA., CosmidesL., ToobyJ., SznycerD., von RuedenC., & GurvenM. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 276, 575–584.
80.
ShoupM. L., & GallupG. G.Jr. (2008). Men's faces convey information about their bodies and their behavior: What you see is what you get. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 469–479.
81.
SinghD. (1993). Adaptive significance of female attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.
82.
SinghD., & BronstadP. M. (2001). Female body odour is a potential cue to ovulation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 268, 797–801.
83.
SinghD., DixsonB. J., JessopT. S., MorganB., & DixsonA. F. (2010). Cross-cultural consensus for waist-hip ratio and women's attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 176–181.
84.
SinghD., & SinghD. (2006). Role of body fat and body shape on judgement of female health and attractiveness: An evolutionary perspective. Psychological Topics, 2, 331–350.
85.
SolerC., NunezM., GutierrezR., NunezJ., MedinaP., SanchoM., … NunezA. (2003). Facial attractiveness in men provides clues to semen quality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 199–207.
86.
SpitzerB. L., HendersonK. A., & ZivianM. T. (1999). Gender differences in population versus media body sizes: A comparison over four decades. Sex Roles, 40, 545–565.
87.
SugiyamaL. S. (2005). Physical attractiveness in adaptationist perspective. In BussD. M., The handbook of evolutionary psychology. (pp. 292–343). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
88.
SwamiV., FrederickD. A., AavikT., AlcalayL., AllikJ., AndersonD., … Zivcic-BecirevicI. (2010). Body weight ideals and body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: Results of the International Body Project I. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 309–325.
89.
SwamiV., GrayM., & FurnhamA. (2007). The female nude in Rubens: Disconfirmatory evidence of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 26, 139–147.
90.
SwamiV., JonesJ., EinonD., & FurnhamA. (2009). Men's preference for women's profile waist-to-hip ratio, breast size, and ethnic group in Britain and South Africa. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 313–325.
91.
SymonsD. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder. In AbramsonP. R. & PinkersonS. D., Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
92.
ThornhillR., & GangestadS. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 452–460.
93.
ThornhillR., & GangestadS. W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 131–144.
94.
ThornhillR., & GangestadS. W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. New York: Oxford University.
95.
ToveeM. J., MasonS. M., EmeryJ. L., McCluskeyE. M., & Cohen-ToveeE. M. (1997). Supermodels: Stick insects or hourglasses?Lancet, 350, 1474–1475.
96.
ToveeM. J., SwamiV., FurnhamA., & MangalparsadR. (2006). Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 443–456.
97.
Van HoofM. H., VoorhorstF. J., KapteinM. B., HirasingR. A., KoppenaalC., & SchoemakerJ. (2000). Insulin, androgen, and gonadotropin concentration, body mass index, and waist-to-hip ratio in the first years after menarche in girls with regular menstrual cycle, irregular menstrual cycles, or oligomenorrhea. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 85, 1394–1400.
98.
VoracekM., & FisherM. L. (2002). Shapely centrefolds? Temporal change in body measures: Trend analysis. British Medical Journal, 325, 1447–1448.
99.
VoracekM., & FisherM. L. (2006). Success is all in the measures: Androgenousness, curvaceousness, and starring frequencies in adult media actresses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 297–304.
100.
WaasP., WaldenstromV., RossnerS., & HellbergD. (1997). An adroid body fat distribution in females impairs the pregnancy rate of in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Human Reproduction, 12, 2057–2060.
101.
WeedenJ., & SabiniJ. (2005). Physical attractiveness and health in western societies: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 635–653.
102.
ZaadstraB. M., SeidellJ. C., Van NoordP. A. H., Te VeldeE. R., HabbemaJ. D. F., VrieswijkB., & KarbaatJ. (1993). Fat and female fecundity: Prospective study of body fat distribution in conception rates. British Medical Journal, 306, 484–487.
103.
ZebrowitzL. A., HallJ. A., MurphyN. A., & RhodesG. (2002). Looking smart and looking good: Facial cues to intelligence and their origins. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 238–249.
