Popular culture is a subcategory of culture. Today, mass and new media appear to be interfering with the evolved mechanisms that permit the acquisition and editing of culture. We know surprisingly little about these cognitive attentional processes that enable the information acquisition and editing packed into the term “cultural transmission.” It was Michael Chance who first concluded that we attend to and learn preferentially from those high in status. For Chance, high status based on fear leads to agonistic attention and a constricted type of learning, while hedonic attention based on respect permits much broader learning possibilities. If Chance's theories are supported, then it would follow that much of the current unpredictability of popular culture and culture change in general reflects the replacement of family and community high-status figures by influential media celebrities, thereby damaging the transmission of local culture. Chance's approach would also explain why we seem to find it difficult to pay attention to those low in status and power. There may be attractors of attention involved in cultural transmission in addition to status, including physical attractiveness. We consider, from an evolutionary perspective, various researchable hypotheses that stem from Chance's and related work and from ethnography, we discuss this work's implications for how we understand culture and “popular culture,” and we argue that the kind of research in cognitive and evolutionary psychology we espouse is also needed for the next generation of mathematical models of gene–culture coevolution. We conclude with a list of research questions.
ArielyD. (2010). The upside of irrationality: The unexpected benefits of defying logic at work and at home. New York, NY: Harper.
2.
ArmstrongJ. S., GreenK. C., JonesR. J., & WrightM. J. (2010). Predicting elections from politicians' faces. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 511–522. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq038
3.
AtranS. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BallewC. C., & TodorovA. (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 17948–17953. doi:10.1073/pnas.0705435104
5.
BanduraA. (1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of Communication, 28, 12–29. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x
6.
BarkowJ. H. (1975a). Prestige and culture: A biosocial approach. Current Anthropology, 16, 553–572. doi:10.1086/201619
7.
BarkowJ. H. (1975b). Strategies for self-esteem and prestige in Maradi, Niger Republic. In WilliamsT. R., Psychological anthropology (pp. 373–388). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
8.
BarkowJ. H. (1976). Attention structure and internal representations. In ChanceM. R. A. & LarsenR. R., The social structure of attention (pp. 203–219). London, England: Wiley.
9.
BarkowJ. H. (1989). Darwin, sex, and status: Biological approaches to mind and culture. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
10.
BarkowJ. H. (1992). Beneath new culture is old psychology. In BarkowJ. H., CosmidesL., & ToobyJ., The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 627–637). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
BarkowJ. H., TaslimN. A., HadjuV., IshakE., AttamimiF., SilwanaS., … YahyaA. (2001). Social competition, social intelligence, and why the Bugis know more about cooking than about nutrition. In RuncimanW. G., Origins of Social Institutions (Vol. 110, pp. 119–147). London, England: Oxford University Press for the British Academy.
12.
BaumeisterR. F., ZhangL. Q., & VohsK. D. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8, 111–121. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.111
13.
BerggrenN., JordahlH., & PoutvaaraP. (2010). The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 8–15. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.002
14.
BeringJ. (2011). The belief instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
15.
BerryD. S. (2000). Attractiveness, attraction, and sexual selection: Evolutionary perspectives on the form and function of physical attractiveness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 273–342. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80007-6
16.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
BowlbyJ. A. (1969). Attachment and loss. Vol. I: Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
18.
BoydR., & RichersonP. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
BoyerP. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
20.
BoyntonL. L. (1986). The plain people: An ethnography of the Holdeman Mennonites. Salem, WI: Sheffield.
21.
BrownI. (1974). Effects of perceived similarity on vicarious emotional conditioning. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 12, 165–173. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(74)90113-2
22.
CarrN. G. (2010). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
23.
Cavalli-SforzaL. L., & FeldmanM. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
ChanceM. R. A. (1967). Attention structure as the basis of primate social rank. Man, 2, 503–518. doi:10.2307/2799336
25.
ChanceM. R. A. (1988). Introduction. In ChanceM. R. A., Social fabrics of the mind (pp. 1–35). East Sussex, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
ChanceM. R. A., & JollyC. J. (1970). Social groups of monkeys, apes and men. New York, NY: Dutton.
27.
ChanceM. R. A., & LarsenR. R.. (1976). The social structure of attention. London, England: Wiley.
28.
ChiaoJ. Y., & BlizinskyK. D. (2010). Culture-gene coevolution of individualism-collectivism and the serotonin transporter gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 277, 529–537. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1650
29.
ChudekM., & HenrichJ. (2011). Culture–gene coevolution, norm psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 218–226. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.003
30.
ClaidièreN., & SperberD. (2007). The role of attraction in cultural evolution. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 7, 89–111. doi:10.1163/156853707X171829
31.
CornellH. N., MarzluffJ. M., & PecoraroS. (2011). Social learning spreads knowledge about dangerous humans among American crows. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 499–508. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0957
32.
CoulehanJ. (2011). “A gentle and humane temper”: Humility in medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 54, 206–216. doi:10.1353/pbm.2011.0017
33.
DavisH., & McLeodS. L. (2003). Why humans value sensational news: An evolutionary perspective. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 208–216. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00012-6
34.
De BackerC. J. S., NelissenM., & FisherM. L. (2007). Let's talk about sex: A study on the recall of gossip about potential mates and sexual rivals. Sex Roles, 56, 781–791. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9237-x
35.
De BackerC. J. S., NelissenM., VynckeP., BraeckmanJ., & McAndrewF. T. (2007). Celebrities: From teachers to friends: A test of two hypotheses on the adaptiveness of celebrity gossip. Human Nature, 18, 334–354. doi:10.1007/s12110-007-9023-z
36.
DeWallC. N., & ManerJ. K. (2008). High status men (but not women) capture the eye of the beholder. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 328–341.
37.
DirksK. T., & FerrinD. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
38.
DobzhanskyT. (1963). Cultural direction of human evolution. Human Biology, 35, 311–316.
39.
EisenbergD. T. A., & HayesM. G. (2011). Testing the null hypothesis: Comments on “Culture-gene coevolution of individualism–collectivism and the serotonin transporter gene.”Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 329–332. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0714
40.
FolkC. L., & GibsonB. S. (2001). Attraction, distraction and action: Multiple perspectives on attentional capture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
41.
FordB. Q., TamirM., BrunyéT. T., ShirerW. R., MahoneyC. R., & TaylorH. A. (2010). Keeping your eyes on the prize. Psychological Science, 21, 1098–1105. doi:10.1177/0956797610375450
42.
FosterG. M., ApthorpeR. J., BernardH. R., BockB., BroggerJ., BrownJ. K., … WhitingB. B. (1972). The anatomy of envy: A study in symbolic behavior [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 13, 165–202. doi:10.1086/201267
43.
FoulshamT., ChengJ. T., TracyJ. L., HenrichJ., & KingstoneA. (2010). Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: Effects of social status and speaking. Cognition, 117, 319–331. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.003
44.
FrankT. (2005). What's the matter with Kansas? How conservatives won the heart of America. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
45.
GeertzC. (1962). The growth of culture and the evolution of mind. In ScherJ. M., Theories of Mind (pp. 713–740). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
46.
GlockerM. L., LanglebenD. D., RuparelK., LougheadJ. W., GurR. C., & SachserN. (2009). Baby schema in infant faces induces cuteness perception and motivation for caretaking in adults. Ethology, 115, 257–263. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01603.x
47.
GoodallJ. (1988). In the shadow of man. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University Press.
48.
GouldS. J., & VrbaE. S. (1982). Exaptation—A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8, 4–15.
49.
HaidtJ. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002. doi:10.1126/science.1137651
50.
HakimC. (2011). Erotic capital: The power of attraction in the boardroom and the bedroom. New York, NY: Basic Books.
51.
HamermeshD. S. (2010). Beauty pays: Why attractive people are more successful. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
HarrisP. L., & CorriveauK. H. (2011). Young children's selective trust in informants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 1179–1187. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0321
54.
HenrichJ., & Gil-WhiteF. (2001). The Evolution of prestige: Freely conferred status as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4
55.
HessN. H., & HagenE. H. (2006). Psychological adaptations for assessing gossip veracity. Human Nature, 17, 337–354. doi:10.1007/s12110-006-1013-z
56.
HillS. E., DelPrioreD. J., & VaughanP. W. (2011). The cognitive consequences of envy: Attention, memory, and self-regulatory depletion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 653–666. doi:10.1037/a0023904
57.
HornerV., ProctorD., BonnieK. E., WhitenA., & de WaalF. B. M. (2010). Prestige affects cultural learning in chimpanzees. PLoS ONE, 5, e10625. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010625
58.
HostetlerJ. A. (1993). Amish society (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
59.
JohnsonA., & ProctorR. W. (2004). Attention: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
KanazawaS. (2002). Bowling with our imaginary friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 167–171. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00098-8
61.
KardinerA., & LintonR. (1939). The individual and his society: The psychodynamics of primitive social organization. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
62.
KassinS. M., FeinS., & MarkusH. R. (2010). Social psychology (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
63.
KenrickD. T., NeubergS. L., GriskeviciusV., BeckerD. V., & SchallerM. (2010). Goal-driven cognition and functional behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 63–67. doi:10.1177/0963721409359281
64.
KurzweilR. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York, NY: Viking.
65.
LalandK. N. (2004). Social learning strategies. Learning & Behavior, 32, 4–14. doi:10.3758/BF03196002
66.
LalandK. N., Odling-SmeeJ., & MylesS. (2010). How culture shaped the human genome: Bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11, 137–148. doi:10.1038/nrg2734
67.
LangloisJ. H., KalakanisL., RubensteinA. J., LarsonA., HallamM., & SmootM. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
68.
LangloisJ. H., RoggmanL. A., CaseyR. J., RitterJ. M., Rieser-DannerL. A., & JenkinsV. Y. (1987). Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of a stereotype?Developmental Psychology, 23, 363–369. doi:10.1037/0012–1649.23.3.363
69.
LeVineR. A. (1982). Culture, behavior, and personality: An introduction to the comparative study of psychosocial adaptation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Aldine.
70.
LintonR. (1936). The study of man: An introduction (Student's ed.). New York, NY: D. Appleton-Century.
71.
MaioS., BaldacciS., & ViegiG. (2011). COPD, smoking behaviour, and the importance of teachers as role-models for adolescents. Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, 6, 79–81.
72.
ManerJ. K., DeWallC. N., & GailliotM. T. (2008). Selective attention to signs of success: Social dominance and early stage interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 488–501. doi:10.1177/0146167207311910
73.
ManerJ. K., GailhotM. T., & DeWallC. N. (2007). Adaptive attentional attunement: Evidence for mating-related perceptual bias. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 28–36. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.006
74.
ManerJ. K., GailliotM. T., RoubyD. A., & MillerS. L. (2007). Can't take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 389–401. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.389
75.
ManerJ. K., Holm-DenomaJ. M., Van OrdenK. A., GailliotM. T., GordonK. H., & JoinerT. E. (2006). Evidence for attentional bias in women exhibiting bulimotypic symptoms. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 39, 55–61. doi:10.1002/eat.20222
76.
ManerJ. K., KenrickD. T., BeckerD. V., DeltonA. W., HoferB., WilburC. J., & NeubergS. L. (2003). Sexually selective cognition: Beauty captures the mind of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1107–1120. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1107
77.
McAndrewF. T., BellE. K., & GarciaC. M. (2007). Who do we tell and whom do we tell on? Gossip as a strategy for status enhancement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1562–1577. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00227.x
78.
McAndrewF. T., & MilenkovicM. A. (2002). Of tabloids and family secrets: The evolutionary psychology of gossip. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1064–1082. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00256.x
79.
MesoudiA. (2009). How cultural evolutionary theory can inform social psychology and vice versa. Psychological Review, 116, 929–952. doi:10.1037/a0017062
80.
MesoudiA., & DanielsonP. (2008). Ethics, evolution and culture. Theory in Biosciences, 127, 229–240. doi:10.1007/s12064-008-0027-y
81.
MesoudiA., WhitenA., & DunbarR. (2006). A bias for social information in human cultural transmission. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 405–423. doi:10.1348/000712605X85871
82.
MorganT. J. H., RendellL. E., EhnM., HoppittW., & LalandK. N. (2011). The evolutionary basis of human social learning. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Advance online publication. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1172
83.
NaderK., & LeDouxJ. E. (1997). Is it time to invoke multiple fear learning systems in the amygdala?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 241–244. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01078-4
84.
OgburnW. F. (1964). Culture and social change: Selected papers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
85.
ÖhmanA., & MinekaS. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483
86.
PallakS. R., MurroniE., & KochJ. (1983). Communicator attractiveness and expertise, emotional versus rational appeals, and persuasion - A heuristic versus systematic processing interpretation. Social Cognition, 2, 122–141. doi:10.1521/soco.1983.2.2.122
87.
PatrickJ., ScraseG., AhmedA., & TombsM. (2009). Effectiveness of instructor behaviours and their relationship to leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 491–509. doi:10.1348/096317908X360693
88.
PosnerM. I. (2004). Cognitive neuroscience of attention. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
89.
RendellL., BoydR., EnquistM., FeldmanM. W., FogartyL., & LalandK. N. (2011). How copying affects the amount, evenness and persistence of cultural knowledge: Insights from the social learning strategies tournament. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 366, 1118–1128. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0376
90.
RendellL., FogartyL., HoppittW. J. E., MorganT. J. H., WebsterM. M., & LalandK. N. (2011). Cognitive culture: Theoretical and empirical insights into social learning strategies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 68–76. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.002
91.
RichersonP. J., & BoydR. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
92.
SchanielW. C. (1988). New technology and culture change in traditional societies. Journal of Economic Issues, 22, 493–498.
93.
SchunkD. H. (1987). Peer models and children's behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 57, 149–174.
94.
SchwenderC. (2001). Medien und Emotionen. Evolutionspsychologische Bausteine einer Medientheorie [Media and emotions. Evolutionary psychology building blocks of a media theory]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
95.
ShakespeareT. (1998). The disability reader: Social science perspectives. London, England: Cassell.
96.
SigmanA. (2009). Well connected? The biological implications of “social networking.”Biologist, 56, 14–20.
97.
SmallG. W., & VorganG. (2008). iBrain: Surviving the technological alteration of the modern mind. New York, NY: Collins Living.
98.
SperberD., & HirschfeldL. A. (2004). The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 40–46. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.002
99.
StephensS. (1998). Challenges of developing an ethnography of children and childhood. American Anthropologist, 100, 530–531. doi:10.1525/aa.1998.100.2.530
100.
StrimlingP., EnquistM., & ErikssonK. (2009). Repeated learning makes cultural evolution unique. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 13870–13874. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903180106
101.
SymonsD. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In AbramsonP. R. & PinkertonS. D., Sexual nature/sexual culture (pp. 80–119). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
102.
van der MerweP. (2011). A school-based socio-emotional programme as strategy against crime and violence. Tydskrif Vir Geesteswetenskappe [Journal of the Humanities], 51, 388–402.
