After the devastating tsunami hit the northern Sumatran coastline in December 2004, the Indonesian province of Aceh found itself at a crossroad. This crossroad intersected the three-decade-long civil war, the move towards peace and the need for post-disaster recovery. This article analyses the gendered politics embedded in Aceh's navigation through this crossroad. First, it argues that both the conflict and the subsequent peace process were marginalised by the international programmes of post-tsunami recovery. Second, it demonstrates that within this marginalisation, women's investments in both war and peace were further neglected throughout the formal peace process. Third, it highlights how the peace process reflected a narrow, masculinist and public sphere agenda that silenced both women and the gendered issues affecting them. In short, this article seeks to unveil the gendered politics of war and peace in post-tsunami Aceh. It does so with the feminist ambition of demonstrating that sustainable and comprehensive peace in Aceh cannot be secured without recognising and accounting for the impact that the conflict has upon gendered identities.
Amnesty International (2004) New Military Operations, Old Patterns of Human Rights Abuses in Aceh (NAD), New York: Amnesty International.
2.
AspinallE. (2007) ‘The construction of grievance: natural resources and identity in a separatist conflict’Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 51: 950–972.
3.
AspinallE. (2008) Peace without Justice? The Helsinki Peace Process in Aceh, Geneva: Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue.
4.
AspinallE. (2009) Islam and Nation: Separatist Rebellion in Aceh, Indonesia, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
5.
BarronP. (2008) ‘Managing the resources for peace: reconstruction and peacebuilding in Aceh’Accord, Vol. 20: 58–61.
6.
BraithwaiteJ., BraithwaiteV., CooksonM., and DunnL. (2010) Anomie and Violence: Non-truth and Reconciliation in Indonesian Peacebuilding, Canberra: ANU E Press.
7.
Brock-UtneB. (1985) Educating for Peace: A Feminist Perspective, New York: Pergamon Press.
8.
BrownW. (1995) States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.
BurkeA., and Afnan (2005) Aceh: Reconstruction in a Conflict Environment, Views from Civil Society, Donors and NGOs, Indonesian Social Development Paper No. 8, Jakarta: The World Bank.
10.
CharlesworthH. (2008) ‘Are women peaceful? Reflections on the role of women and peace-building’Feminist Legal Studies, Vol. 16: 347–361.
11.
ClarkeR., WanditaG., and Samsidar (2008) Considering Victims: The Aceh Peace Process from a Transitional Justice Perspective, New York: International Centre for Transitional Justice.
12.
Crisis Management Initiative (2006) The Aceh Peace Process: Involvement of Women, Helsinki: CMI.
13.
CunliffeS., RiyadiE., ArwalembunR., and Boli TobiH. (2009) Negotiating Peace in Indonesia: Prospects for Building Peace and Upholding Justice in Maluku and Aceh, European Union: Initiative for Peacebuilding.
14.
D'CostaB., and Lee-KooK. (2009) editors, ‘Critical feminist international relations in the Asia-Pacific’ in Gender and Global Politics in the Asia-Pacific, New York: Palgrave.
15.
DrexlerE. (2008) Aceh, Indonesia: Securing the Insecure State, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
16.
FitzpatrickD. (2008) Women's Rights to Land and Housing in Tsunami Affected Aceh, Working Paper No. 3, Indonesia: Asia Research Institute.
17.
Human Rights Watch (2001) Indonesia: The War in Aceh, Vol. 13, No. 4, New York: Human Rights Watch.
18.
Human Rights Watch (2003) Aceh under Martial Law: Inside the Secret Mar, Vol. 15, No. 10, New York: Human Rights Watch.
19.
International Crisis Group (2006) Islamic Law and Criminal Justice in Aceh, Asia Report No. 117, Jakarta: International Crisis Group.
20.
International Organisation for Migration, Harvard Medical School, and the World Bank (2007) A Psychosocial Needs Assessment of Communities in 14 Conflict-affected Districts in Aceh, 2007, Jakarta: International Organisation for Migration.
21.
JonesS. (2008) ‘Keeping the peace: Security in Aceh’Accord, Vol. 20: 72–75.
22.
KamaruzzamanS. (2008) ‘Agents for change: the roles of women in Aceh's peace process’Accord, Vol. 20: 70–71.
23.
KamaruzzamanS. (2010) ‘Assessing the implementation of UNSCR1325: Women and the peace process in the Aceh conflict’ Paper presented to the tenth Women in Asia Conference, Canberra, Australian National University, 29 September.
24.
LeathermanJ. (2011) Sexual Violence and Armed Conflict, London: Polity.
25.
Lee-KooK. (2007) ‘Security as enslavement, security as emancipation: gendered legacies and feminist futures in the Asia-Pacific’ in BurkeA., and McDonaldM. (2007) editors, Critical Security in the Asia-Pacific, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
26.
MillerM., and BunnellT. (2010) Urban-Rural Connections: Banda Aceh through Conflict Tsunami and Decentralization, Working Paper Series No. 138, Singapore: Asia Research Institute.
27.
NowakB., and CaulfieldT. (2008) Women and Livelihoods in Post-tsunami India and Aceh, Working Paper Series No. 104, Singapore: Asia Research Institute.
28.
OttoD. (2006) ‘A sign of “weakness”? Disrupting gender uncertainties in the implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325’Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 13: 113–175.
29.
PettmanJ. (1996) Worlding Women: A Feminist International Politics, London: Routledge.
30.
PorterE. (2007) Peacebuilding: Women in International Perspective, London: Routledge.
31.
ReidA. (2006) editor, Verandah of Violence: The Background to the Aceh Problem, Singapore: SUP.
32.
RossM. (2005) ‘Resources and rebellion in Aceh, Indonesia’ in CollierP., and SambanisN. (2005) editors, Understanding Civil War, Vol. 2, Washington: The World Bank.
33.
SchulzeK. (2006) ‘Insurgency and counter-insurgency: strategy and the Aceh Conflict, October 1976–May 2004’ in ReidA. (2006) editor, Verandah of Violence: The Background to the Aceh Problem, Singapore: SUP.
34.
SchulzeK. (2007) Mission Not So Impossible: The Aceh Monitoring Mission and Lessons Learned for the EU, Berlin: International Policy Analysis.
SiapnoJ.A. (2001) ‘Gender, nationalism, and the ambiguity of female agency in Aceh, Indonesia and East Timor’ in WallerM., and RycengaJ. (2001) editors, Frontline Feminisms: Women, War, and Resistance, New York: Routledge.
37.
SiapnoJ.A. (2002) Gender, Islam, Nationalism and the State in Aceh: The Paradox of Power, Co-optation and Resistance, London: Routledge Curzon.
38.
SiapnoJ.A. (2010) ‘The politics of reconstruction, gender, and re-integration in post-Tsunami Aceh’ in de AlwisA., and HedmanE. (2010) editors, Tsunami in a Time of War: Aid, Activism & Reconstruction in Sri Lanka & Aceh, Colombo: International Centre for Ethnic Studies.
39.
SukmaI. (2006) ‘Indonesia and the tsunami: responses and foreign policy implications’Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 60, No. 2: 213–228.
40.
TicknerJ.A. (2001) Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War World, Columbia: Columbia University Press.
41.
TrueJ., and HallN. (2009) ‘Gender mainstreaming in a post-conflict state: toward democratic peace in Timor-Leste?’ in D'CostaB., and Lee-KooK. (2009) editors, Gender and Global Politics in the Asia-Pacific, New York: Palgrave.
42.
UNDP (2010) Provincial Human Development Report, Aceh 2010, Jakarta: UNDP.
43.
UNFPA (2005) Gender-based Violence in Aceh, Indonesia, New York: UNFPA.
44.
UNORC (2009) Tsunami Recovery Indicator Package (TRIP): The Third Report for Aceh and Nias, Jakarta: UNORC.
