A fundamental result of the information technology (IT) and business performance literature is that IT is not a driver of performance per se. However, it can be associated with higher performance if accompanied by organizational change. The identification of the variables describing organizational change is still on-going work. This paper focuses on organizational absorptive capacity and analyses its effects on the relationship between IT and business performance in small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Organizational absorptive capacity measures the ability of an organization to complete a learning process. A significant learning effort is typically associated with IT, as it represents a complex technology. To cope with IT's complexity, implementation is typically incremental and is accompanied by a continuous integration effort of data and applications. The degree of integration of a company's information system (IS), called IS integration, is a proxy of IT maturity and quality. In this study, we explore the effect of IS integration on business performance through absorptive capacity, that is, we hypothesize that absorptive capacity has a mediation role between IS integration and business performance. The proposed research model is tested with data surveyed from 466 SMEs sited in Italy, for which exports constitute more than half of their revenues. Results indicate that organizational absorptive capacity has a mediation effect. Alternative models attributing to absorptive capacity a role different from mediation are found to be non-significant.
AikenM., BacharachS.B., and FrenchJ.L. (1980). Organizational Structure, Work Process and Proposal Making, Academy of Management Journal23: 631–652.
2.
AndersonJ.C., and GerbingD.W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin103(3): 411–423.
3.
ArmstrongC.P., and SambamurthyV. (1999). Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The influence of senior leadership and it infrastructures, Information Systems Research10(4): 304–327.
4.
BajwaD.S., GarciaJ.E., and MooneyT. (2004). An Integrative Framework for the Assimilation of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Phases, antecedents, and outcomes, Journal of Computer Information Systems44(3): 81–90.
5.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management17(1): 99–120.
6.
BaronR.M., and KennyD.A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
7.
BaruaA., KriebelC.H., and MukhopadhyayT. (1995). Information Technologies and Business Value - An analytic and empirical-investigation, Information Systems Research6(1): 3–23.
8.
BentlerP.M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models, Psychological Bulletin107(2): 238–246.
9.
BhattacherjeeA. (2001). Understanding Information System Continuance: An expectation-confirmation model, MIS Quarterly25(3): 351–370.
10.
BlackS.E., and LynchL.M. (2001). How to Compete: The impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity, Review of Economics and Statistics83(3): 434–445.
11.
BoarB. (1994). Information Technology and Business Alignment: A Strategic Assessment, in VossB., and WilleyD. (eds.), Handbook of Business Strategy, New York: Faulkner & Gray, pp. 173–188.
12.
BollenK.A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables, New York: John Wiley.
13.
BrownC.V., VesseyI., and PowellA. (2000). In The ERP Purchase Decision: Influential business and it factors, Paper Presented at the 6th Americas Conference on Information Systems (10–13th August, Long Beach, CA), pp. 1029–1032.
14.
BrownM.W., and CudeckR. (1993). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit, in BollenK.A., and LongJ.S. (eds.) Testing Structural Equation Models, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
BrynjolfssonE. (1993). The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology, Communications of the ACM36(12): 67–77.
16.
BrynjolfssonE., and HittL. (1996). Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending, Management Science42(4): 541–558.
17.
BrynjolfssonE., and HittL. (2000). Beyond Computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance, Journal of Economic Perspectives14(4): 23–48.
18.
BrynjolfssonE., HittL., and YangS. (2002). Intangible Assets: Computers and organizational capital, unpublished manuscript.
19.
BrynjolfssonE., RenshawA.A., and Van AlstyneM. (1997). The Matrix of Change, Sloan Management Review38(2): 37–54.
20.
CarminesE.G., and McIverS.P. (1981). Analyzing Models with Unobserved Variables: Analysis of covariance structures, in BohrnstedtG.W., and BorgattaE.F. (eds.) Social Measurement: Current issues, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
CavesR. (1980). Industrial Organization Corporate Strategy and Structure, Journal of Economic Literature18(1): 64–92.
22.
ClemonsE.K., and RowM.C. (1988). McKesson Drug Company: A case study of economost - A strategic information system, Journal of Management Information Systems5(1): 35–50.
23.
ClemonsE.K., and RowM.C. (1991a). Information Technology at Rosenbluth Travel: Competitive advantage in a rapidly growing global service company, Journal of Management Information Systems8(2): 53–79.
24.
ClemonsE.K., and RowM.C. (1991b). Sustaining IT advantage: The role of structural differences, MIS Quarterly15(3): 275.
25.
CohenW., and LevinthalD. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly35: 128–152.
26.
CooperB.L., WatsonH.J., WixomB.H., and GoodhueD.L. (2000). Data Warehousing Supports Corporate Strategy at First American Corporation, MIS Quarterly24(4): 547–567.
27.
CooperR.B., and QuinR.E. (1992). Management Information System Effectiveness: A competing value perspective, unpublished manuscript.
28.
CraggP.B., and KingM. (1993). Small-Firm Computing: Motivators and inhibitors, MIS Quarterly17(1): 47–60.
29.
CyertR.M., and MarchJ.G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2nd edn, Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Inc.
30.
DamanpourF. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, Academy of Management Journal34(3): 555–590.
31.
DavenportT.H. (1998). Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System, Harvard Business Review76(4): 121–131.
32.
DayG.S. (1984). Strategic Market Planning: The pursuit of competitive advantage, St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
33.
DeanJ.W.J., and SnellS.A. (1996). The Strategic Use of Integrated Manufacturing: An empirical examination, Strategic Management Journal17(6): 459–480.
34.
DessG. (1987). Consensus on Strategy Formulation and Organizational Performance: Competitors in a fragmented industry, Strategic Management Journal8(3): 259–277.
35.
DewanS., and KraemerK.L. (2000). Information Technology and Productivity: Evidence from country-level data, Management Science46(4): 548–562.
36.
DibbernJ., GolesT., HirschheimR., and JayatilakaB. (2004). Information System Outsourcing: A survey and analysis of the literature, The Data Base for Advances in Information System35(4): 6–102.
37.
FichmanR.G., and KemererC.F. (1999). The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations: An organizational learning perspective, Management Science43(10): 1345–1363.
38.
FrancalanciC., and GalalH. (1998). Information Technology and Worker Composition: Determinants of productivity in the life insurance industry, MIS Quarterly22(2): 227–241.
GarvinD. (1993). Building a Learning Organization, Harvard Business Review, July/August, 71: 4, 78–91.
43.
GattikerT.F., and GoodhueD.L. (2004). Understanding the Local-Level Costs and Benefits of ERP through Organizational Information Processing Theory, Information & Management41: 431–443.
44.
GattikerT.F., and GoodhueD.L. (2005). What Happens after ERP Implementation: Understanding the impact of inter-dependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes, MIS Quarterly29(3): 559–585.
45.
Gefen et al. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for research practice, Communications of the Association for Information Systems4(7): 1–78.
46.
GoodhueD.L., WyboM.D., and KirschL.J. (1992). The Impact of Data Integration on the Costs and Benefits of Information Systems, MIS Quarterly16(3): 293–311.
47.
GrandonE., and PearsonJ.M. (2004). E-Commerce Adoption: Perception of managers/owners of small and medium sized firms in Chile, Communications of the AIS13: 81–102.
48.
HageJ., and AikenM. (1973). Elite Value Versus Organizational Structure in Predicting Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly18: 279–291.
49.
HairJ.F., AndersonR.E., TathamR.L., and BlackW.C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 4th edn, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
50.
HalevyA.Y., AshishyN., BittonzD., CareyxM., DraperD., PollockkJ., Arnon RosenthalA., and SikkaV. (2005). Enterprise Information Integration: Successes, challenges and controversies, SIGMOD ‘05, (Baltimore, MA, USA).
51.
HallR. (1993). A Framework Linking Intangible Resources and Capabilities to Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Strategic Management Journal14(8): 607–618.
52.
HammerM., and ChampyJ. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A manifesto for business revolution, New York: Harper Business.
53.
HasselbringW. (2000). Information System Integration, Communications of the ACM43(6): 33–38.
54.
HittL.M., and BrynjolfssonE. (1996). Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three different measures of information technology value, MIS Quarterly20(2): 121–142.
55.
HuL., and BentlerP.M. (1999). Cut-off Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Matrix Analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling6(1): 1–55.
56.
IacovouC.L., BenbasatI., and DexterA.S. (1995). Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organization: Adoption and impact of technology, MIS Quarterly19(4): 465–485.
57.
JhingranA.D., MattosN., and PiraheshH. (2002). Information Integration: A research agenda, IBM System Journal41(4): 555–562.
58.
KanakamedalaK., KrishnakanthanV., and MarkD. (2006). CIO Spending in 2006, McKinsey on IT, Spring2006: 22–24.
59.
KeenP. (1993). Information Technology and the Management Difference: A fusion map, IBM System Journal8(4): 12–28.
60.
KellyS., GibsonN., HollandC.P., and LightB. (1999). Focus Issue on Legacy Information Systems and Business Process Change: A business perspective of legacy information systems, Communications of the AIS2: 2–27.
61.
KettingerW., GroverV., GuhaS., and SegarsA. (1994). Strategic Information Systems Revisited: A study in sustainability and performance, MIS Quarterly18(1): 31–58.
62.
KosteL.L., and MalhotraM.K. (1999). A Theoretical Framework for Analyzing the Dimensions of Manufacturing Flexibility, Journal of Operations Management18(1): 75–93.
63.
KraemerK.L., DedrickJ., and YamashiroS. (2000). Refining and Extending the Business Model With Information Technology: Dell Computer Corporation, The Information Society16(1): 5–21.
64.
KruegerA. (1993). How Computers Have Changed the Wage Structure: Evidence from Microdata, 1984–1989, Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 108: 33–59.
65.
LaneJ.L., KokaB., and PathakS. (2002). in, Thematic Analysis and Critical Assessment of Absorptive Capacity Research, Paper Presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings (Denver, CO), Vol. 6, pp. 1–7.
66.
LawrenceP., and LorschJ. (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing differentiation and integration, Homewood, IL: Irwin.
67.
LeeJ., SoongooH., and SiauK. (2003). Enterprise Integration with ERP and EAI, Communications of the ACM46(2): 54–60.
68.
LenoxM., and KingA. (2002). Absorptive Capacity, Information Provision, and the Diffusion of Practices within Firms, New York: New York University.
69.
LindseyD., and CheneyP.H. (1990). Telcot: An Application of Information Technology for Competitive Advantage in the Cotton Industry, MIS Quarterly14(4): 347–357.
70.
LovemanG.W. (ed.) (1994). An Assessment of the Productivity Impact of the Information Technologies, New York: Oxford University Press.
71.
MahmoodM., and MannG.M. (1993). Measuring the Organizational Impact of Information Technology Investment: An exploratory study, Journal of Management Information Systems10(1): 97–122.
72.
MalhotraA., GosainS., and El SawyO.A. (2005). Absorptive Capacity Configuration in Supply Chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation, MIS Quarterly29(1): 145–187.
73.
MarchJ.G., and SimonH.A. (1958). Organizations, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
74.
MarkusM.L., and RobeyD. (1988). Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal structure in theory and research, Management Science34(5): 583–598.
75.
MenvilleN., and KraemerK. (2004). Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance - An integrative model of it business value, MIS Quarterly28(2): 283–322.
76.
MooneyJ., GurbaxaniV., and KraemerK. (1996). A Process Oriented Framework for Assessing the Business Value of Information Technology, Database Advances in Information Systems27(2): 68–b1.
77.
MukhopadhyayT., RajivS., and SrinivasanK. (1997). Information Technology Impact on Process Output and Quality, Management Science43(12): 1645–1659.
78.
NgJ., IpW., and LeeT. (1999). A Paradigm for ERP and BPR Integration, International Journal of Production Research9: 2093–2108.
79.
PalanisamyS. (2004). Measurement and Enablement of Information System for Organizational Flexibility: An empirical study, Journal of Services Research3(2): 81–103.
80.
PorterM.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating & sustaining superior performance, New York, NY: The Free Press.
81.
PowellT.C., and Dent-MicallefA. (1997). Information Technology as Competitive Advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources, Strategic Management Journal18(5): 375–405.
82.
RobeyD. (1977). Computers and Management Structure: Some empirical findings reexamined, Human Relations30(11): 963–976.
83.
RumeltR.P. (1986). Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance, Boston: Harvard.
84.
SegarsA.H., and GroverV. (1993). Re-examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis, MIS Quarterly17(4): 517–529.
85.
SharifA.M., and IraniZ. (2005). Emergence of ERPII Characteristics within ERP Integration Context, Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, NE, USA.
86.
ShrivastavaP. (1983). A Typology of Organizational Learning Systems, Journal of Management Studies20: 7–29.
87.
SiegelD. (1997). The Impact of Computers on Manufacturing Productivity Growth: A multiple-indicators, multiple-causes approach, The Review of Economics and Statistics70(1): 68–78.
88.
SmithH.A., and McKeenJ.D. (1993). How Does Information Technology Affect Business Value - A reassessment and research propositions, Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration - Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences10(3): 229–240.
89.
StrassmannP.A. (1990). The Business Value of Computers, New Canaan, CT: Information Economics Press.
90.
SuarezF.F., CusumanoM.A., and FineC.H. (1996). An Empirical Study of Manufacturing Flexibility in Printed Circuit Board Assembly, Operations Research44(1): 223–240.
91.
SwinkM., NarasimhanR., and KimS.W. (2005). Manufacturing Practices and Strategy Integration: Effects on cost efficiency, flexibility, and market-based performance, Decision Sciences36(3): 427–457.
UptonD.M. (1995). Flexibility as Process Mobility: The management of plant capabilities for quick response manufacturing, Journal of Operations Management12(3/4): 205–224.
94.
UptonD.M. (1997). Process Range in Manufacturing: An empirical study of flexibility, Management Science43(8): 1079–1092.
95.
Van EverdingenY., Van HillegersbergJ., and WaartsE. (2000). ERP Adoption by European Midsize Companies, Communications of the ACM43(4): 27–31.
96.
WeillP. (1992). The Relationship between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector, Information Systems Research3(4): 301–331.
97.
WillcocksL.P. (1992). IT Evaluation: Managing the Catch 22, European Journal of Information Systems10(2): 220–229.
98.
WillcocksL.P., and LesterS. (1997). In Search of Information Technology Productivity: Assessment issues, Journal of the Operational Research Society48(11): 1082–1094.
99.
WilliamsM.L., and FrolickM.N. (2001). The Evolution of EDI for Competitive Advantage: The Fedex case, Information Systems Management18(2): 47–53.
100.
WilsonD. (1993). Assessing the Impact of Information Technology on Organizational Performance, in BankerR., KauffmanR., and MahmoodM.A. (eds.) Strategic Information Technology Management, Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group.
101.
WinterS. (1987). Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets, in TeeceD. (ed.) The Competitive Challenge, Berkeley: Center for Research in Management, pp. 159–184.
102.
WoodwardJ. (1965). Industrial Organization: Theory and practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
103.
ZahirI., ThemistocleousM., and LoveP.E.D. (2003). The Impact of Enterprise Application Integration on Information System Lifecycles, Information and Management41: 177–187.
104.
ZahraS.A., and GeorgeG. (2002a). Absorptive Capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension, Academy of Management Review27(2): 185–203.
105.
ZahraS.A., and GeorgeG. (2002b). The Net-Enabled Business Innovation Cycle and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities, Information Systems Research13(2): 147–150.
