This paper addresses deinstitutionalization from a longitudinal perspective. Drawing on the case of software exports policymaking in Costa Rica, it analyses deinstitutionalization, paying particular attention to formation of dissensus, understood as lack of unanimity on the value of an activity that is sufficient to destabilize institutional norms and activities. The role of cultural and political factors in deinstitutionalization or persistence is considered. Based on the empirical data, a framework for understanding political and cultural dynamics in deinstitutionalization is proposed.
Al-JaghoubS. (2004). Building a Knowledge Based Economy Using ICT for Development and the Role of the Nation State: A case study of Jordan, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester.
2.
Al-JaghoubS., and WestrupC. (2003). Jordan and ICT-led Development towards a Competition State?Information Technology & People16(1): 93–110.
3.
AroraA., ArunachalamV., AsundiJ., and FernandesR. (2001). The Indian Software Services Industry, Research Policy30: 1267–1287.
4.
AvgerouC. (2002). Information Systems and Global Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BaskervilleR., and Wood-HarperA.T. (1996). A Critical Perspective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research, Journal of Information Technology11: 235–246.
6.
BergerP., and LuckmannT. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Doubleday.
7.
BiesanzM.H., BiesanzR., and BiesanzK. (1998). The Ticos: Culture and social change in Costa Rica, San Jose: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
8.
CAMTIC (2006). The Costa Rica ICT Sector, in 3rd International Information and Communication Technologies Summit (San Jose, Costa Rica, 2006); San Jose: CAMTIC.
9.
CarmelC., and de FontenayC. (2004). Israel's Silicon Wadi: The forces behind cluster formation, in BresnahanT., and GambardellaA. (eds.) Building High-Tech Clusters Silicon Valley and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 40–77.
10.
CarmelE. (2003). Introduction to the Special Issue: The emergence of software exporting industries in dozens of developing and emerging economies, Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries13(1), [WWW document] http://www.ejisdc.org/ojs2/index.php/ejisdc/issue/view/73 (accessed 28th August 2009).
11.
CurrieW. (2009). Contextualising the IT Artefact towards a Wider Research Agenda for Using Institutional Theory, Information Technology and People22(1): 63–77.
12.
ChecklandP. (1991). From Framework through Experience to Learning the Essential Nature of Action Research, in NissenH., KleinH., and HirschheimR. (eds.) Information Systems Research Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 397–403.
13.
ChecklandP., and ScholesS.G. (1999). Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Chichester: Wiley.
14.
ChizemaA., and BuckT. (2006). Neo-institutional Theory and Institutional Change towards Empirical Tests on the Americanization of German Executive Pay, International Business Review15(5): 488–504.
15.
DacinM., and DacinP. (2008). Traditions and Institutionalised Practice: Implications for deinstitutionalization, in GreenwoodR., OliverC., SuddabyR., and Sahlin-AnderssonK. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, London: Sage.
16.
DacinM., VentrescaM., and BealB. (1999). The Embeddedness of Organizations Debates Dialogue & Directions, Journal of Management25(3): 317–356.
17.
DiMaggioP., and PowellW. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, American Sociological Review48: 147–160.
18.
DiMaggioP., and PowellW. (1991). Introduction, in DiMaggioP., and PowellW. (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–38.
Ein-DorP., MyersM., and RamanK. (1997). IT in Three Small Developed Countries, Journal of Management Information Systems13(4): 61–89.
21.
Ein-DorP., MyersM., and RamanK. (2004). IT Industry Development and the Knowledge Economy: A four country study, Journal of Global Information Management12(4): 23–49.
22.
ErakovicL., and PowellM. (2006). Pathways of Changes Organizations in Transition, Public Administration84(1): 31–58.
23.
FarjounM. (2002). The Dialectics of Institutional Development in Emerging and Turbulent Fields: The history of pricing conventions in the on-line database industry, Academy of Management Journal45(5): 848–874.
24.
HeeksR. (1999). Software Strategies in Developing Countries, Communications of the ACM142(6): 15–20.
25.
HeeksR., and NicholsonB. (2004). Software Export Success Factors and Strategies in Developing and Transitional Economies, Competition and Change8(3): 267–302.
26.
KambhampatiU. (2002). The Software Industry and Development: The case of India, Progress in Development Studies2(1): 23–45.
27.
KetelhoehnN., and PorterM. (2002). Building a cluster: Electronics and information technology in Costa Rica, Harvard Business School Case 9–703–422.
28.
KingJ.L., GurbaxaniV., KraemerK.L., McFarlanF.W., RamanK.S., and YapC.S. (1994). Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation, Information Systems Research5(2): 139–169.
29.
KoeneB. (2006). Situated Human Agency Institutional Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change, Journal of Organizational Change Management19(3): 365–382.
30.
LeidnerD., and KayworthT. (2006). Review of Culture in Information Systems Research toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict, MIS Quarterly30(2): 357–399.
31.
MaguireS., and HardyC. (2009). Discourse and Deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT, Academy of Management Journal52(1): 148–178.
32.
MeyerJ.W., and RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony, American Journal of Sociology83: 340–363.
33.
MorganG. (1986). Images of Organization, London: Sage.
34.
NoirC., and WalshamG. (2007). The Great Legitimizer: ICT as myth and ceremony in the Indian healthcare sector, Information Technology & People20(4): 313–333.
35.
O'HigginsE. (2002). Government and the Creation of the Celtic Tiger: Can management maintain the momentum?Academy of Management Executive16(3): 104–120.
36.
RiainS.O. (1997). An Offshore Silicon Valley?Competition and Change2: 175–212.
37.
OliverC. (1992). The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization, Organization Studies13: 563–588.
38.
OrlikowskiW.J., and BarleyS. (2001). Technology and Institutions: What can research on information technology and research learn from each other?MIS Quarterly25(2): 145–165.
39.
RodriguesS. (2006). The Political Dynamics of Organizational Culture in an Institutionalised Environment, Organizational Studies27(4): 537–557.
40.
RobertsP., and GreenwoodR. (1997). Integrating Transaction Cost and Institutional Theories: Towards a constrained efficiency framework for understanding organizational design adoption, Academy of Management Journal22(2): 346–373.
41.
RobeyD., and BoudreauM. (1999). Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications, Information Systems Research10(2): 167–185.
42.
RobeyD., and HolmstromJ. (2001). Transforming Municipal Governance in Global Context: A case study of the dialectics of social change, Journal of Global Information Technology Management4(4): 19–31.
43.
RorrerA. (2006). Eroding Inequality Straddling the Margin of Tolerance, Educational Policy20(1): 225–248.
44.
ScottW.R. (1987). The Adolescence of Institutional Theory, Administrative Science Quarterly32: 493–511.
45.
ScottW.R. (1994). Institution and Organizations toward a Theoretical Synthesis, in ScottW.R., and MeyerJ. (eds.) Institutional Environments and Organizations, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 55–80.
46.
ScottW.R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
47.
SilvaL., and BackhouseJ. (1997). Becoming Part of the Furniture: The institutionalisation of information systems, in LeeA.S., LiebenauJ., and DeGrossJ.I. (eds.) Information Systems and Qualitative Research, London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 389–414.
48.
SilvaL., and FigueroaE. (2002). Institutional Intervention and the Expansion of ICTs in Latin America: The case of Chile, Information Technology & People15(1): 8–25.
49.
WalshamG. (1995). The Emergence of Interpretivism in Information Systems Research, Information Systems Research6(4): 376–394.
50.
WalshamG. (2002). Cross-cultural Software Production and Use: A structurational analysis, MIS Quarterly26(4): 359–380.
51.
WindelsP., and ChristiaensJ. (2006). Management Reform in Flemish Public Centres for Social Welfare: Examining organizational change, Local Government Studies32(4): 389–411.
