In this paper, we investigate the dynamics of client-consultant relationships and analyze how power and knowledge are shared and negotiated between consultants and clients during the implementation of configurable technologies. Empirical evidence is provided by three case studies representing three classic types of client-consultant relationships. We draw on two complementary perspectives: possession view (i.e., power and knowledge are based on resources that can be owned or controlled by individuals) and practice view (i.e., power and knowledge are relational in nature and exercised in action). The paper develops a framework that shows that power and knowledge are closely intertwined and that the possession and practice views are complementary in understanding configurable technology projects. The paper also demonstrates the importance of the initial set-up of the project and how knowing/powering mechanisms can reinforce or change implementation trajectories, which, in turn, can affect project results.
AsaroP.M. (2000). Transforming Society by Transforming Technology: The science and politics of participatory design, Accounting, Management and Information Technology10(4): 257–290.
2.
AstleyW.G., and SachdevaP.S. (1984). Structural Sources of Interorganizational Power: A theoretical synthesis, Academy of Management Review9(1): 104–113.
3.
AvgerouC., and McGrathK. (2007). Power, Rationality, and the Art of Living through Socio-technical Change, MIS Quarterly31(2): 295–315.
4.
AvgerouC., and WalshamG. (2000). Information Technology in Context: Studies from the perspective of developing countries, Aldershot: Ashgate.
5.
BarrettM., and ObornE. (2010). Boundary Object use in Cross-cultural Software Development Teams, Human Relations63(8): 1199.
6.
BennettJ.L. (2001). The Next Professional Wave: Consultant/coach, Consulting to Management12(3): 6–8.
7.
BloomfieldB.P., and BestA. (1992). Management Consultants: Systems development, power and the translation of problems, The Sociological Review38: 533–559.
8.
BloomfieldB.P., and DanieliA. (1995). The Role of Management Consultants in the Development of Information Technology: The indissoluble nature of socio-political and technical skills, Journal of Management Studies32(1): 23–46.
9.
BloomfieldB.P., and VurdubakisT. (1994). Re-presenting Technology: IT consultancy reports as textual reality constructions, Sociology.28(2): 455–477.
10.
BoudreauM.C., and RobeyD. (2005). Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A human agency perspective, Organization Science16(1): 3–18.
11.
Bradshaw-CamballP., and MurrayV.V. (1991). Illusions and Other Games: A trifocal view of organizational politics, Organization Science.2(4): 379–398.
12.
CarlileP.R. (2002). A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development, Organization Science13(4): 442–455.
13.
ChanE., and MillsA. (2011). Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Software in a Major Construction Contracting Organization in Hong Kong, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business4(1): 168–178.
14.
ClarkT., and SalamanG. (1998). Telling Tales: Management gurus’ narratives and the construction of managerial utility, Journal of Management Studies35(2): 137–161.
15.
ContuA., and WillmottH. (2003). Re-embedding Situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory, Organization Science14(3): 283–296.
16.
CookS.D.N., and BrownJ.S. (1999). Bridging Epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing, Organization Science10(4): 381–400.
17.
CurrieG., and KerrinM. (2004). The Limits of a Technology Fix to Knowledge Management Epistemological, Political and Cultural Issues in the Case of Intranet Implementation, Management Learning35(1): 9–29.
18.
CzanderW., and EisoldK. (2003). Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Organizational Consulting: Transference and counter-transference, Human Relations56(4): 475–490.
19.
DenisJ.-L., LangleyA., and CazaleL. (1996). Leadership and strategic change under ambiguity, Organization Studies17(4): 673–689.
20.
FinchamR. (1992). Perspectives on Power: Processual, institutional and ‘internal’ forms of organizational power, Journal of Management Studies29(6): 741–759.
21.
FinchamR. (1999). The Consultant-client Relationship: Critical perspectives on the management of organizational change, Journal of Management Studies36(3): 335–351.
22.
FichmanR.G., and MosesS.A. (1999). An incremental process for software implementation, Sloan Management Review40(2): 39–52.
23.
FleckJ. (1993). Configurations: Crystallizing contingency, The International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing3(1): 15–36.
24.
FleckJ. (1994). Learning by Trying: The implementation of configurational technology, Research Policy23: 637–652.
25.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, New York: Pantheon Books.
26.
FrançoiseO., BourgaultM., and PellerinR. (2009). ERP Implementation through Critical Success Factors’ Management, Business Process Management Journal15(3): 371–394.
27.
GilbertK. (1998). Consultancy Fatigue: Epidemiology, symptoms and prevention, Leadership & Organization Development Journal19(6): 340–346.
28.
GlesneC. (1999). Becoming Qualitative Researchers, New York: Longman.
29.
GlickW.H., HuberG.P., MillerC.C., DotyD.H., and SutcliffeK.M. (1990). Studying Changes in Organizational Design and Effectiveness: Retrospective event histories and periodic assessments, Organization Science1(3): 293–312.
30.
GrayP.H. (2001). The impact of Knowledge Repositories on Power and Control in the Workplace, Information Technology & People14(4): 368–384.
31.
HandleyK., ClarkT., FinchamR., and SturdyA. (2007). Researching Situated Learning: Participation, identity and practices in client-consultant relationships, Management Learning38(2): 173–191.
32.
HardyC., and Leiba-O'SullivanS. (1998). The Power behind Empowerment: Implications for research and practice, Human Relations51(4): 451–483.
33.
HawariA., and HeeksR. (2010). Explaining ERP Failure in a Developing Country: A Jordanian case study, Journal of Enterprise Information Management23(2): 135–160.
34.
HislopD., NewellS., ScarbroughH., and SwanJ. (2000). Networks, Knowledge and Power: Decision making, politics and the process of innovation, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management12(3): 399–411.
35.
HowcroftD., and WilsonM. (2003). Paradoxes of Participatory Practices: The Janus role of the systems developer, Information & Organization13(1): 1–24.
36.
JaspersonJ., CarteT., and SaundersC. (2002). Review: Power and Information Technology Research: A metatriangulation review, MIS Quarterly26(4): 397–459.
37.
JohnsonG., LangleyA., MelinL., and WhittingtonR. (2007). The Practice of Strategy: Research directions and resources, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
JonesM. (2003). The Expert System: Constructing expertise in an IT/ management consultancy, Information and Organization13: 257–284.
39.
Kaarst-BrownM.L. (1999). Five Symbolic Roles of the External Consultant - Integrating change, power and symbolism, Journal of Organizational Change Management12(6): 540–561.
40.
KakabadseN., LouchartE., and KakabadseA. (2006). Consultant's Role: A qualitative inquiry from the consultant's perspective, Journal of Management Development25(5): 416–500.
41.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data, Academy of Management Review24(4): 691–710.
42.
LaveJ., and WengerE. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
LeeM. (2002). Management History as Told by Popular Culture: The screen image of the efficiency expert, Management Decision40(9): 881–894.
44.
LevinaN. (2005). Collaborating on Multiparty Information Systems Development Projects: A collective reflection-in-action view, Information Systems Research16(2): 109–130.
45.
LightB. (2002). Going beyond ‘Misfit’ as a Reason for ERP Package Customization, Computers in Industry56(6): 606–619.
46.
LlewellynR.N. (2002). When to Call the Organization Doctor, HR Magazine47(3): 79–83.
47.
LongC. (1999). To Create Value, First Understand Your Client, Journal of Management Consulting10(4): 12–19.
48.
LundbergC.C. (1994). Transactions and Games in Consultant-Client Relations, Journal of Management Consulting8(1): 3–9.
49.
MarkusM.L. (1983). Power, Politics and MIS Implementation, Communications of the ACM26(6): 430–444.
50.
MarshallN., and BradyT. (2001). Knowledge Management and the Politics of Knowledge: Illustrations from complex products and systems, European Journal of Information Systems10: 99–112.
51.
MarshallN., and RollinsonJ. (2004). Maybe Bacon Had a Point: The politics of interpretation in collective sensemaking, British Journal of Management15: S71–S86.
52.
NicoliniD. (2011). Practice as Site of Knowing: Insights from the field of telemedicine, Organization Science22(3): 602–620.
53.
OrlikowskiW.J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing, Organization Science13(3): 249–273.
OswickC., and MontgomeryJ. (1999). Images of an Organization: The use of metaphor in a multinational company, Journal of Organizational Change Management12(6): 501–523.
56.
PanS.L., and ScarbroughH. (1999). Knowledge Management in Practice: An exploratory case study, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management11: 359–374.
57.
PozzebonM., and PinsonneaultA. (2005). Global-Local Negotiations for Implementing Configurable Packages: The power of initial organization decisions, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Special Issue Understanding the Contextual Influences on Enterprise System Implementation (Part II)14(2): 121–145.
58.
PozzebonM., and Van HeckE. (2006). Local Adaptations of Generic Application Systems: The case of veiling Holambra in Brazil, Journal of Information Technology21: 73–85.
59.
RansonS., HiningsB., and GreenwoodR. (1980). The Structuring of Organizational Structures, Administrative Science Quarterly25: 1–17.
60.
RollandK.H., and MonteiroE. (2002). Balancing the Local and the Global in Infrastructural Information Systems, The Information Society Journal18(2): 87–100.
61.
SambamurthyV., and SubramaniM. (2005). Special Issue on Information Technologies and Knowledge Management, MIS Quarterly29(2): 193–196.
62.
ScheinE.H. (1988). Process Consultation: Its Role in Organization Development, Vol. I., 2nd edn, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
63.
ScheinE.H. (1999). Empowerment, Coercive Persuasion and Organizational Learning, The Learning Organization6(4): 163–172.
64.
SillinceJ.A.A., and MouakketS. (1997). Varieties of Political Process during Systems Development, Information Systems Research8(4): 368–397.
65.
SimpsonB. (2009). Pragmatism, Mead and the Practice Turn, Organization Studies30(12): 1329–1347.
66.
StakeR.E. (1998). Case Studies, in DenzinN.K., and LincolnY.S. (eds.) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, California: Sage Publications.
67.
SturdyA. (1997). The Consultancy Process - An insecure business?Journal of Management Studies34(3): 389–413.
68.
SturdyA., SchwarzM., and SpicerA. (2006). Guess Who's Coming to Dinner? Structures and Uses of Liminality in Strategic Management Consultancy, Human Relations59(7): 929–960.
69.
SuttonR.I., and HargadonA. (1996). Brainstorming Groups in Context: Effectiveness in a product design firm, Administrative Science Quarterly41(4): 685–718.
70.
SwanJ., NewellS., and RobertsonM. (2000). The Diffusion, Design and Social Shaping of Production Management Information Systems in Europe, Information Technology and People13(1): 27–45.
71.
TaminiauY., SmitW., and LangeA. (2009). Innovation in Management Consulting Firms through Informal Knowledge Sharing, Journal of Knowledge Management13(1): 42–55.
72.
WagnerE., ScottS., and GalliersR.D. (2006). The Creation of ‘Best Practice’ Software: Myth, reality and ethics, Information and Organization16(3): 251–275.
73.
WeickK. (2001). Making Sense of the Organization, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
74.
WengerE. (2000). Communities of Practices and Social Learning Systems, Organization.7(2): 225–246.
75.
WilliamsR. (1997). Universal Solutions or Local Contingencies? Tensions and Contradictions in the Mutual Shaping of Technology and Work Organization, in McLoughlinI., and HarrisM. (eds.) Innovation, Organization Change and Technology, London, UK: International Thomson Business Press, pp. 170–185.
76.
WilliamsR. (2001). The Client's Role in the Consulting Relationship: Is there ‘con’ in consulting?Managerial Auditing Journal16(9): 519–522.
77.
WilsonF.A. (1997). The Truth is Out there: The search for emancipatory principles in information systems design, Information Technology & People10(3): 187–199.
78.
YanowD. (2004). Translating Local Knowledge at Organizational Peripheries, British Journal of Management15: S9–S25.
