The impact of a discipline's research is constrained by its ability to articulate compelling problems. Well-crafted problems are the foundation for mobilizing the effort, resources, and attention essential to scientific progress and broader impact. We argue that Information Systems (IS) scholars, individually and collectively, must develop the practice of articulating and engaging large-scale, broad scope problems – or grand challenges. To support this position, we examine the role and value of grand challenge efforts in science and engineering based on a theory of grand challenges as socially constructed boundary objects. Conceptualizing grand challenges in these terms implies strategies and approaches for magnifying the impact of IS research by engaging these types of problems.
BaskervilleR.L., and MyersM.D. (2009). Fashion Waves in Information Systems Research and Practice, MIS Quarterly33(4): 647–662.
3.
BenbasatI., and ZmudR.W. (2003). The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties, MIS Quarterly27(2): 183–194.
4.
BergmanM., LyytinenK., and MarksG. (2007). Boundary Objects in Design: An ecological view of design artifacts, Journal of the Association for Information Systems8(11): 546–568.
5.
BrancheauJ.C., JanzB.D., and WetherbeeJ.C. (1996). Key Issues in Information Systems Management: 1994–95 SIM Delphi results, MIS Quarterly20(2): 225–242.
CollinsF.S., MorganM., and PatrinosA. (2003). The Human Genome Project: Lessons from large-scale biology, Science300: 286.
8.
Computing Research Association (2003). Grand Research Challenges in Information Systems, A Conference Series on Grand Research Challenges in Computer Science and Engineering, [www document] http://www.cra.org/Activities/grand.challenges (accessed 15th February 2010).
9.
FullerS.H., and MillettL.I. (2011). The Future of Computing Performance: Game over or next level?Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
10.
GomolskiB., GriggJ., and PotterK. (2001). IT Spending and Staffing Survey Results, Stamford, CT: Gartner Group.
11.
HoareT., and MilnerR. (2005). Grand Challenges for Computing Research, The Computer Journal48(1): 49–52.
12.
KingJ.L., and LyytinenK. (2006). The Future of the IS Field: Drawing directions from multiple maps, in KingJ.L., and LyytinenK. (eds.) Information Systems: The state of the field, Chichester, England: Wiley, pp. 345–354.
13.
LeviniaN., and VaastE. (2005). The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems, MIS Quarterly29(2): 335–363.
14.
LuftmanJ., and KempaiahR. (2009). Key Issues for IT Executives 2008, MIS Quarterly Executive8(3): 151–159.
15.
LyytinenK., and KingJ.L. (2004). Nothing in the Center?: Academic legitimacy in the information systems field, Journal of the Association for Information Systems5(6): 220–246.
16.
National Academy of Engineering (2008). Grand Challenges for Engineering, [www document] http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/ (accessed 15th February 2010).
National Science and Technology Council Subcommittee on Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Research Opportunities and Priorities (2009). Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research in the Federal Context, [www document] http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/prospectus_v10_3_17_09.pdf.
StarS.L., and GriesemerJ.R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39, Social Studies of Science19: 387–420.
21.
SwalesJ.M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
SwalesJ.M. (2004). Research Genres: Exploration and applications, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
VarmusH., KlausnerR., ZerhouniE., AcharyaT., DaarA. S., and SingerP. A. (2003). Public Health: Enhanced: Grand challenges in global health, Science302(5644): 398.
25.
WangP. (2010). Chasing the Hottest IT: Effects of information technology fashion on organizations, MIS Quarterly34(1): 63–85.
