Dysfunctional MIS is an important topic but one that has received comparatively little attention in the literature. This discussion paper attaches new literature to the subject. The new literature centres upon the epistemological status of certain forms of MIS. More specifically, it is argued that MIS, based upon metonymy (part for whole substitution), can seriously mislead managers because the representation gets mistaken for the reality. The demonstration is based on high level risk registers. Risk registers were selected for analysis because they are ubiquitous and important decision support systems. In theory, diligent use of risk registers should virtually eliminate unpleasant surprises. In practice, the result may be an illusion of control. Analysis draws upon sociology and psychology to explain why this may be so.
AllisonG., and ZelikowP. (1999). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, New York: Longman.
2.
AngellI.O., and IlharcoF.M. (2004). Solution is the Problem: A story of transitions and opportunities, in AvgerouC., CiborraC., and LandF. (eds.) The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology: Innovation, Actors, Contexts, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 38–61.
3.
BacharachS.B., and LawlerE.J. (1980). Power and Politics in Organizations, London: Jossey Bass.
4.
BarleyS.R. (1983). Semiotics and the Study of Occupational and Organizational Cultures, Administrative Science Quarterly28: 393–413.
5.
BaskervilleR.L., and LandF. (2004). Socially Self-destructing Systems, in AvgerouC., CiborraC., and LandF. (eds.) The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology: Innovation, Actors, Contexts, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 263–285.
6.
BazermanM.H., and WatkinsM.D. (2004). Predictable Surprises: Disasters you should have see coming and how to prevent them, New York: Harvard Business Press.
7.
BernsteinP.L. (1998). Against the Gods: The remarkable story of risk, New York: Wiley.
8.
BoothR. (2010). Toyota under Fire for Its Handling of Safety Recall, The Guardian, 6th February, p. 4.
9.
BreakwellG.M. (2007). The Psychology of Risk, Cambridge: Cambridge University.
10.
BrownR.H. (1976). Social Theory as Metaphor, Theory and Society3: 169–197.
11.
BrownR.H. (1977). A Poetic for Sociology, Cambridge: Cambridge University.
12.
BrownR.H. (1990). Rhetoric, Textuality, and the Postmodern Turn in Sociological Theory, Sociological Theory8: 188–197.
13.
Cadbury Report (1992). The Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, London: Gee and Co.
14.
CalàsM.B. (1993). Deconstructing Charismatic Leadership: Re-reading Weber from the darker side, Leadership Quarterly4: 305–328.
15.
ChaffinJ., and ClarkP. (2010). How Europe Flew into Uncharted Territory, Financial Times, 22nd April, p. 4.
16.
CornelissenJ.P., and KafourosM. (2008). Metaphors and Theory Building in Organization Theory: What determines the impact of a metaphor on theory?British Journal of Management19: 365–379.
17.
CrawfordM., and SteinW. (2004). Risk Management in UK Local Authorities, International Journal of Public Sector Management17: 498–512.
18.
DaftR.L., LengelR.H., and TrevinoL.K. (1987). Message Equivocality, Media Selection and Manager Performance: Implications for information systems, Management Information Systems Quarterly11: 355–368.
19.
DrummondH. (2005). What We Never Have We Never Miss? Decision Error and the Risks of Premature Termination, Journal of Information Technology20: 153–170.
20.
DrummondH., and HodgsonJ. (2003). ‘The Chimpanzees’ Tea Party: A new metaphor for project managers, Journal of Information Technology18: 151–158.
21.
DubinR. (1976). Theory Building in Applied Areas, in DunnetteM.D. (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 17–40.
22.
The Economist (2009). In Plato's Cave: greed – and fear: special report on the future of finance, 24th January, pp. 1–22.
23.
EdelmanM. (1971). Politics as Symbolic Action, Chicago: Markham.
24.
ElliottD., LetzaS., McGuinnessM., and SmallmanC. (2000). Governance, Control And Operational Risk: The Turnbull effect, Risk Management: An International Journal2: 47–59.
25.
FeldmanM.S., and MarchJ.G. (1981). Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol, Administrative Science Quarterly26: 171–186.
26.
GibbsR.W. (1979). Process and Products in Making Sense of Tropes, in OrtonyA. (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 252–276.
27.
GriffithS.B. (1971). Sun Tzu: The art of war, Oxford: Oxford University.
28.
GulerI. (2007). Throwing Good Money After Bad? Political and Institutional Influences of Decision-making in the Venture Capitalist Industry, Administrative Science Quarterly52: 248–288.
29.
Hampel Report (1998). Committee on Corporate Governance: The final report, London: Gee Publishing Ltd.
30.
HirschheimR., and NewmanM. (1991). Symbolism and Information Systems Development: Myth, metaphor and magic, Information Systems Research2: 29–62.
31.
HumeN. (2010). Gulf of Mexico Casts Long Shadow over BP's Future, Financial Times, 29th May, p. 25.
32.
ICAEW (1999). Internal Control: Guidance for directors on the combined code (Turnbull Report), London: ICAEW.
33.
KaplanR.S., and NortonD.P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard, Boston: Harvard Business School.
34.
LandF. (1987). Organizational Problems of Implementing a Distributed System, in SomogyiE.K., and GalliersR.D. (eds.) Towards Strategic Information Systems, London: Abacus, pp. 26–35.
35.
LangerE.J.1975. The Illusion of Control, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology32: 311–328.
36.
LangerE.J. (1983). The Psychology of Control, Beverly Hills: Sage.
37.
LaveL.B. (1987). Health and Safety Risk Analyses: Information for better decisions, Science236: 291–295.
38.
ManningP.K. (1979). Metaphors of the Field: Varieties of organizational discourse, Administrative Science Quarterly24: 660–667.
39.
MasuchM. (1985). Vicious Circles in Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly30: 14–33.
40.
McCraeM., and BalthazorL. (2000). Integrating Risk Management into Corporate Governance: The Turnbull guidance, Risk Management: An International Journal2: 35–45.
41.
MertonR.K. (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure, New York: Free Press.
42.
MintzbergH. (1972). The Myth of MIS, California Management Review15: 92–97.
43.
MintzbergH. (1975). The Manager's Job: Folklore and fact, Harvard Business Review53: 49–61.
44.
MorganG. (1980). Paradigms, Metaphors and Puzzle Solving in Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly25: 605–622.
45.
MorganG. (1983). More on Metaphor: Why we cannot control tropes in administrative science, Administrative Science Quarterly25: 605–622.
46.
MorganG. (1993). Imaginization: The art of creative management, London: Sage.
47.
MorganG. (1996). Images of Organization, London: Sage.
48.
MorganG., FrostP.J., and PondyL.R. (1983). Organizational Symbolism, in PondyL.R., FrostP.J., MorganG., and DandridgeT.C. (eds.) Organizational Symbolism, London: JAI. 3–35.
49.
MumfordE., and BanksO. (1967). The Computer and the Clerk, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
50.
NormanA., and JanssonU. (2004). Ericsson's Proactive Supply Chain Risk Management Approach after a Serious Sub-supplier Accident, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management34: 434–456.
51.
O'ReillyC.A.III (1980). Individuals and Information Over-load in Organizations: Is more necessarily better?Academy of Management Journal23: 684–696.
52.
OswickC., KeenoyT., and GrantD. (2002). Metaphor and Analogical Reasoning in Organization Theory: Beyond orthodoxy, Academy of Management Review27: 294–303.
53.
PerrowC. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with high risk technologies, New York: Basic Books.
54.
PfefferJ. (1981). Management as Symbolic Action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms, in CummingsL.L., and StawB.M. (eds.) Research in Organizational Behaviour, Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 1–52.
55.
PillingD. (2010). How Toyota Engineered Its Own Downfall, Financial Times, 11 February, p. 9.
56.
PinderC.C., and BourgeoisV.W. (1982). Controlling Tropes in Administrative Science, Administrative Science Quarterly27: 641–652.
57.
PlattJ. (1973). Social Traps, American Psychologist28(August): 641–651.
58.
RappeportA. (2010). Toyota Faces $16.4m Fine Over ‘Sticky Pedals’, Financial Times, 7 April, p. 16.
59.
SchwenkC. (1986). Information, Cognitive Bias and Commitment to a Course of Action, Academy of Management Review2: 298–310.
60.
StarbuckW.H. (1983). Organizations as Action Generators, American Sociological Review48: 91–102.
61.
StarbuckW.H., and MillkenF.J. (1988). Challenger: Fine-tuning the odds until something breaks, Journal of Management Studies25: 319–340.
62.
SuttonR.I., and StawB.M. (1995). What Theory isnot, Administrative Science Quarterly40: 371–384.
63.
TaitN., and WigginsJ. (2007). Cadbury in Record Pounds 1 Million Fine for Unsafe Chocolate, Financial Times, 17 July, p. 2.
64.
TalebN. (2008). The Black Swan: The impact of the highly improbable, London: Penguin.
65.
TaylorS.E. (1980). Positive Illusions, New York: Basic Books.
66.
TaylorS.E., and BrownJ. (1988). Illusion and Well Being: A social psychological perspective on mental health, Psychological Bulletin103: 193–210.
67.
TreasuryH.M. (2003). The Audit Committee Handbook, London: HMSO.
68.
The Protection of Children (2009). The Protection of Children in England: A progress report, The Lord Laming, HC 330, London, TSO.
69.
WeickK.E. (1985). Cosmos vs. Chaos: Sense and nonsense in electronic contexts, Organizational Dynamics14: 50–64.
70.
WeickK.E., and SutcliffeK.M. (2001). Managing the Unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
WilliamsR., BertschB., DaleB., van der WieleT., Van IwaardenJ., SmithM., and VisserR. (2006). Quality and Risk Management: What are the key issues, The TQM Magazine18: 67–86.
