What value does information technology (IT) create in governments and how does it do so? While business value of IT has been extensively studied in the information systems field, this has not been the case for public value. This is in part due to a lack of theoretical bases for investigating IT value in the public sector. To address this issue, we present a conceptual model on the mechanism by which IT resources contribute to value creation in the public-sector organizations. We propose that the relationship between IT resources and organizational performance in governments is mediated by organizational capabilities and develop a theoretical model that delineates the paths from IT resources to organizational performance, drawing upon public-value management theory. This theory asserts that public managers, on behalf of the public, should actively strive to generate greater public value, as managers in the private sector seek to achieve greater private business value. On the basis of the review of public-value management literature, we suggest that the following five organizational capabilities mediate the relationship between IT resources and public value - public service delivery capability, public engagement capability, co-production capability, resource-building capability, and public-sector innovation capability. We argue that IT resources in public organizations can enable public managers to advance public-value frontiers by cultivating these five organizational capabilities and to overcome conflicts among competing values.
AgranoffR. (2004). Leveraging Networks: A guide for public managers working across organizations, in KamenskyJ.M., and BurlinT.J. (eds.) Collaboration: Using Networks and Partnerships, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 61–102.
2.
AlfordJ. (2002). Defining the Client in the Public Sector, Public Administration Review62(3): 337–346.
3.
AlfordJ., and HughesO. (2008). Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management, American Review of Public Management38(2): 130–148.
4.
AlfordJ., and O'FlynnJ. (2009). Making Sense of Public Value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings, International Journal of Public Administration32(3): 171–191.
5.
AndersenK.N., HenriksenH.Z., MedagliaR., DanzigerJ.N., SannarnesM.K., and EnemærkeM. (2010). Fads and Facts of E-Government: A review of impacts of e-government (2003-2009), International Journal of Public Administration33(11): 564–579.
6.
AndersonM.C., BankerR.D., and RavindranS. (2006). Value Implications of Investments in Information Technology, Management Science52(9): 1359–1376.
7.
ArmstrongC.P., and SambamurthyV. (1999). Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures, Information Systems Research10(4): 304–327.
8.
BankerR.D., BardhanI.R., ChangH., and LinS. (2006). Plant Information Systems, Manufacturing Capabilities, and Plant Performance, MIS Quarterly30(2): 315–337.
9.
BannisterF. (2001). Dismantling the Silos: Extracting new value from IT investments in public administration, Information Systems Journal11(1): 65–84.
10.
BaruaA., KonanaP., and WhistonA.B. (2004). An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value, MIS Quarterly28(4): 585–620.
11.
Beck JørgensenT., and BozemanB. (2007). Public Values: An inventory, Administration & Society39(3): 354–381.
12.
BeningtonJ. (2011). From Private Choice to Public Value?, in BeningtonJ., and MooreM.H. (eds.) Public Value Theory and Practice, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 31–51.
13.
Beynon-DaviesP., and WilliamsM.D. (2003). Evaluating Electronic Local Governments in the UK, Journal of Information Technology18(2): 137–149.
14.
BharadwajA.S. (2000). A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly24(1): 169–196.
15.
BharadwajA.S., BharadwajS.G., and KonsynskiB.R. (1999). Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin'sq, Management Science45(7): 1008–1024.
16.
BharadwajA.S., SambamurthyV., and ZmudR.W. (1998). IT Capablities: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Operationalization, in HirchheimR., NewmanM., and DeGrossJ.I. (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland.
17.
BharadwajS., BharadwajA., and BendolyE. (2007). The Performance Effects of Complementarities between Information Systems, Marketing, Manufacturing, and Supply Chain Processes, Information Systems Research18(4): 437–453.
18.
BorinsS. (2002). Leadership and Innovation in the Public Sector, Leadership & Organization Development Journal28(8): 467–476.
19.
BozemanB., and BretschneiderS. (1986). Public Management Information Systems: Theory and prescription, Public Administration Review46(1): 475–487.
20.
BretschneiderS. (1990). Management Information Systems in Public and Private Organizations: An empirical test, Public Administration Review50(5): 536–545.
21.
BroussineM. (2003). Public Leadership, in BovaridT., and LofflerE. (eds.) Public Management and Governance, London, UK: Routledge, pp. 175–187.
22.
BrynjolfssonE. (1993). The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology, Communication of the ACM36(12): 67–77.
23.
BrynjolfssonE., and HittL. (1996). Paradox Lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending, Management Science42(4): 541–558.
24.
BrynjolfssonE., HittL.M., and YangS. (2002). Intangible Assets: Computers and organizational capital, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity1(1): 137–181.
25.
CaudleS.L. (1991). Key Information Systems Management Issues for the Public Sector, MIS Quarterly15(2): 171–188.
26.
CordellaA. (2007). E-Government: Towards the e-bureaucratic form?Journal of Information Technology22(3): 265–274.
27.
CordellaA., and BoninaC.M. (2012). A Public Value Perspective for ICT Enabled Public Sector Reforms: A theoretical reflection, Government Information Quarterly29(4): 512–520.
28.
CordellaA., and IannacciF. (2010). Information Systems in the Public Sector: The e-government enactment framework, Journal of Strategic Information Systems19(1): 52–66.
29.
CoxB., and GhoneimS. (1998). Strategic Use of EDI in the Public Sector: The HMSO case study, Journal of Strategic Information Systems7(1): 37–51.
30.
DanzigerJ.N., and AndersenK.V. (2002). The Impact of Information Technology on Public Administration: An analysis of empirical research from the ‘golden age’ of transformation, International Journal of Public Administration25(5): 591–627.
31.
DavisP., and WestK. (2009). What Do Public Values Mean for Public Action? Putting public values in their plural place, American Review of Public Management39(6): 602–618.
32.
DewanS., and MinC. (1997). The Substitution of Information Technology for Other Factors of Production: A firm level analysis, Management Science43(12): 1660–1675.
DonahueJ.D., and ZeckhauserR.J. (2011). Collaborative Governance: Private Roles for Public Goals in Turbulent Times, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
DunleavyP., MargettsH., BastowS., and TinkerJ. (2006). New Public Management Is Dead - Long live digital-era governance, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory16(3): 467–494.
37.
El SawyO.A., MalhotraA., ParkY., and PavlouP.A. (2010). Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It takes three to tango, Information Systems Research21(4): 835–848.
38.
FountainJ.E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change.Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC.
GrimsleyM., and MeehanA. (2007). E-Government Information Systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust, European Journal of Information Systems16(2): 134–148.
44.
HackneyR., JonesS., and LoschA. (2007). Towards an e-Government Efficiency Agenda: The impact of information and communication behavior on e-reserve auctions in public sector procurement, European Journal of Information Systems16(2): 178–191
45.
HartleyJ. (2011). Public Value through Innovation and Improvement, in BeningtonJ., and MooreM.H. (eds.) Public Value Theory and Practice, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 171–184.
46.
HeeksR., and BailurS. (2007). Analyzing E-Government Research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice, Government Information Quarterly24(2): 243–265.
47.
HenriksenH.Z., and DamsgaardJ. (2007). Dawn of E-Government - An institutional analysis of seven initiatives and their impact, Journal of Information Technology22(1): 13–23.
48.
HittL., and BrynjolfssonE. (1996). Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three different measures of information technology value, MIS Quarterly20(2): 121–142.
49.
HoA.T.-K. (2002). Reinventing Local Governments and the E-Government Initiatives, Public Administration Review64(4): 434–444.
50.
HuiG., and HayllarM.R. (2010). Creating Public Value in E-Government: A public-private-citizen collaboration framework in web 2.0, Australian Journal of Public Management69(S1): S120–S131.
KimS., and LeeJ. (2012). E-Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government, Public Administration Review72(6): 819–828.
53.
KlijnE.-H., and TeismanG.R. (2003). Institutional and Strategic Barriers to Public-Private Partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases, Public Money & Management23(3): 137–146.
54.
KlitgaardR., and TrevertonG.F. (2004). Assessing Partnerships: New forms of collaboration, in KamenskyJ.M., and BurlinT.J. (eds.) Collaboration: Using Networks and Partnerships, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 21–59.
55.
KohliR., and GroverV. (2008). Business Value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times, Journal of the Association for Information Systems9(2): 23–39.
56.
KraemerK.L., and DedrickJ. (1997). Computing and Public Organization, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory7(1): 89–112.
57.
KraemerK., and KingJ. (2003). Information Technology and Administrative Reform: Will the Time After E-Government Be Different?Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
58.
LeeG., and KwakY.H. (2012). An Open Government Maturity Model for Social Media-Based Public Engagement, Government Information Quarterly29(4): 492–503.
59.
LeeG., and PerryJ.L. (2002). Are Computers Boosting Productivity? A test of the paradox in state governments, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory12(1): 77–102.
60.
LehrW., and LichtenbergF.R. (1998). Computer Use and Productivity Growth in US Federal Government Agencies, 1987-1992, Journal of Industrial Economics46(2): 257–279.
61.
LimJ.H., and TangS.-Y. (2008). Urban E-Government Initiatives and Environmental Decision Performance in Korea, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory18(1): 109–138.
62.
LimE.T.K., TanC.-W., CyrD., PanS.L., and XiaoB. (2012). Advancing Public Trust Relationships in Electronic Government: The Singapore e-filing journey, Information Systems Research23(4): 1110–1130.
63.
LowryP., RomansD., and CurtisA. (2004). Global Journal Prestige and Supporting Disciplines: A scientometric study of information systems journals, Journal of the Association for Information Systems5(2): 29–75.
64.
Luna-ReyesL.F., PardoT.A., OchoateguiF.B., and SanabriaR.M. (2007). Bureau of Housing Service (BHS), in RocheleauB. (ed.) Case Studies on Digital Government, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, pp. 247–255.
65.
MajchrzakA., RiceR.E., KingN., MalhotraA., and BaS. (2000). Computer-Mediated Inter-Organizational Knowledge-Sharing: Insights from a virtual team innovating using a collaboration tool, Information Resource Management Journal13(1): 44–53.
66.
MelvilleN., KraemerK.L., and GurbaxaniV. (2004). Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An integrative model of it business value, MIS Quarterly28(2): 283–322.
67.
MithasS., RamasubbuN., and SambamurthyV. (2011). How Information Management Capability Influences Firm Performance, MIS Quarterly35(1): 237–256.
68.
MolinaA.D., and SpicerM.W. (2004). Aristotelian Rhetoric, Pluralism, and Public Administration, Administration & Society36(3): 282–305.
69.
MoonM.J. (2002). The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?Public Administration Review62(4): 424–433.
70.
MoonM.J., and NorrisD.F. (2005). Does Managerial Orientation Matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level, Information Systems Journal15(1): 43–60.
71.
MooreM.H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72.
MooreM.H., and BeningtonJ. (2011). Conclusions: Looking ahead, in BeningtonJ., and MooreM.H. (eds.) Public Value Theory and Practice, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 256–274.
73.
MooreM.H., and KhagramS. (2004). On Creating Public Value: What business might learn from government about strategic management, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Working Paper no. 3, Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
74.
MorgesonF.V., VanAmburgD., and MithasS. (2011). Misplaced Trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory21(2): 257–283.
75.
MukhopadhyayT., Javier LerchF., and MangalV. (1997). Assessing the Impact of Information Technology on Labor Productivity: A field study, Decision Support Systems19(2): 109–122.
NeoB.S. (1992). The Implementation of an Electronic Market for Pig Trading in Singapore, Journal of Strategic Information Systems1(5): 278–288.
83.
NewcomerK.E., and CaudleS.L. (1991). Evaluating Public Sector Information Systems: More than meets the eye, Public Administration Review51(5): 377–384.
NorrisD.F., and KraemerK.L. (1996). Mainframe and PC Computing in American Cities: Myths and realities, Public Administration Review56(6): 568–575.
87.
NorrisD.F., and MoonM.J. (2005). Advancing E-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or hare?Public Administration Review65(1): 64–75.
88.
NunnS. (2001). Police Information Technology: Assessing the effects of computerization on urban police functions, Public Administration Review61(2): 221–234.
89.
PavlouP.A., and El SawyO.A. (2006). From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The case of new product development, Information Systems Research17(3): 198–227.
90.
PembertonJ.D., StonehouseG.H., and BarberC.E. (2001). Competing with CRS-Generated Information in the Airline Industry, Journal of Strategic Information Systems20(1): 59–75.
91.
PiccoliG., and IvesB. (2005). Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature, MIS Quarterly29(4): 747–776.
92.
PorterM., and KramerM. (2011). Creating Shared Value, Harvard Business Review89(1/2): 62–77.
93.
RaiA., PatnayakuniR., and SethN. (2006). Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities, MIS Quarterly30(2): 225–246.
94.
RaiA., and TangX. (2010). Leveraging IT Capabilities and Competitive Process Capabilities for the Management of Interorganizational Relationship Portfolios, Information Systems Researcsh21(3): 516–542.
95.
RainerK., and MillerM. (2005). Explaining Differences across Journal Rankings, Communications of the ACM48(2): 91–94.
96.
RayG., MuhannaW.A., and BarneyJ.B. (2005). Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A resource-based analysis, MIS Quarterly29(4): 625–652.
97.
RhodesR.A.W., and WannaJ. (2007). The Limits to Public Value, or Rescuing Responsible Government from the Platonic Guardians, Australasian Journal of Public Administration66(4): 406–421.
98.
RhodesR.A.W., and WannaJ. (2009). Bringing the Politics Back in: Public value in Westminster parliamentary government, Public Administration87(2): 161–183.
99.
Rodríguez BolívarM.P., PerezC.C., and HernandezA.M.L. (2007). E-Government and Public Financial Reporting, American Review of Public Administration37(2): 142–177.
100.
RuuskaI., and TeiglandR. (2009). Ensuring Project Success through Collective Competence and Creative Conflict in Public-Private Partnership - A case study of Bygga Villa, a Swedish triple helix e-government initiative, International Journal of Public Management27(4): 323–334.
101.
SambamurthyV., BharadwajA., and GroverV. (2003). Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms, MIS Quarterly27(2): 237–263.
102.
SchultzJ.A., and TumaR. (2007). A Collaborative Communications Center and Public Safety Data Systems, in RocheleauB. (ed.) Case Studies on Digital Government, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, pp. 256–280.
103.
SeltsikasP., and O'KeefeR.M. (2010). Expectation and Outcomes in Electronic Identity Management: The role of trust and public value, European Journal of Information Systems19(1): 93–193.
104.
SmithM.L. (2011). Limitations to Building Institutional Trustworthiness through E-Government: A comparative study of two e-services in Chile, Journal of Information Technology26(1): 78–93.
105.
SmithR.F.I. (2004). Focusing on Public Value: Something new and something old, Australian Journal of Public Management63(4): 68–79.
106.
StokerG. (2006). Public Value Management: A new narrative for networked governance?American Review of Public Administration36(1): 47–51.
107.
StraubD. (2010). A Midterm MIS Quarterly Progress Report, MIS Quarterly34(2): iii–xii.
108.
SwillingM. (2011). Greening Public Value: The sustainability challenge, in BeningtonJ., and MooreM.H. (eds.) Public Value Theory and Practice, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 89–111.
109.
TanriverdiH. (2005). Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms, MIS Quarterly29(2): 311–334.
110.
TeoH.-H., TanB.C.Y., and WeiK.-K. (1997). Organizational Transformation Using Electronic Data Interchange: The case of tradenet in Singapore, Journal of Management Information Systems13(4): 139–165.
111.
ThomasJ.C., and StreibG. (2005). E-Democracy, E-Commerce, and E-Research: Examining the electronic ties between citizens and governments, Administration & Society37(3): 259–280.
112.
TolbertC.J., and MossbergerK. (2006). The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government, Public Administration Review66(3): 354–369.
113.
TrkmanP., McCormackK., de OliveiraM.P.V., and LadeiraM.B. (2010). The Impact of Business Analytics on Supply Chain Performance, Decision Support Systems49(3): 318–327.
114.
TsouhlouA., and MylonakisJ. (2011). Public Expenditure, Public Sector Size and Growth: The European Union marked structural differences, Review of European Studies3(2): 33–51.
115.
WadeM., and HullandJ. (2004). Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggests for future research, MIS Quarterly28(1): 107–142.
116.
WeissJ.A., and TschirhartM. (1994). Public Information Campaigns as Policy Instruments, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management13(1): 82–119.
117.
WelchE.W., HinnantC.C., and MoonM.J. (2004). Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15(3): 371–391.
118.
WestD. (2004). E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes, Public Administration Review64(1): 15–27.
119.
WilliamsI., and ShearerH. (2011). Appraising Public Value: Past, present, and futures, Public Administration89(4): 1367–1384.
120.
WilliamsT.A. (1994). Government Regulation through Voluntary Cooperation: The strategic impact of information technology, Journal of Strategic Information Systems3(2): 107–122.
