Studies for over 30 years have consistently indicated that enterprise-level Business-Information Technology (IT) alignment is a pervasive problem. While significant progress has been made to understand alignment, research on IT alignment is still plagued by several problems. First, most alignment models approach alignment as a static relationship in contrast to analyzing the scope and variance of activities through which the alignment is (or can be) attained. Second, most alignment models are not founded on strong theoretical foundations. Third, because of their static view, these models do not guide how organizations can improve alignment. This study addresses these weaknesses using a capability-based lens. It formulates and operationalizes a formative construct rooted in the theory of dynamic capabilities and defines the scope and nature of activities that contribute to alignment. The construct identifies six dimensions promoting alignment: (1) IT-Business Communications; (2) Use of Value Analytics; (3) Approaches to Collaborative Governance; (4) Nature of the affiliation/partnership; (5) Scope of IT initiatives; and (6) Development of IT Skills. The construct measures are validated in terms of their dimensionality, item pool sampling, and the nomological and predictive validity. The research uses Partial Least Squares (PLS) to statistically validate the construct using a dataset covering over 3000 global participants including nearly 400 Fortune 1000 companies. All construct dimensions contribute significantly to the level of alignment and the construct shows strong nomological and predictive validity by demonstrating a statistically significant impact on firm performance. Scholars can leverage this research to explore additional activity-based constructs of IT-business alignment.
AshillN.J. (2011). An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and the Partial Least Squares (PLS) Methodology, in EomS.B., and ArbaughJ.B. (eds.) Student Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in E-Learning: An introduction to empirical research, information science reference, pp. 110–129.
2.
BergeronF., RaymondL., and RivardS. (2001). Fit in Strategic Information Technology Management Research: An empirical comparison of perspectives, Omega29(2): 125–142.
3.
BergeronF., RaymondL., and RivardS. (2004). Ideal Patterns of Strategic Alignment, Information and Management41: 1003–1020.
4.
BohlanderG.W., and SnellS. (2007). Managing Human Resources.Cengage Learning.
5.
BollenK.A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
6.
BollenK.A. (2011). Latent Variables in Psychology and the Social Sciences, MIS Quarterly35(2): 359–372.
7.
BroadbentM., and KitzisE. (2005). Interweaving Business-Driven IT Strategy and Execution: Four foundation factors, Ivey Business Journal69(3): 1–6.
8.
BrownC., and MagillS. (1994). Alignment of the IS Functions with the Enterprise: Toward a model of antecedents, MIS Quarterly18(4): 371–403.
9.
BrynjolfssonE., and HirtL.M. (2000). Beyond Computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance, Journal of Economic Perspectives14(4): 23–48.
10.
ByrdT., LewisB., and BryanR. (2006). The Leveraging Influence of Strategic Alignment on IT Investment: An empirical examination, Information and Management43(3): 308–321.
11.
CenfetelliR.T., and BassellierG. (2009). Interpretation of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly33(4): 68–707.
12.
ChanY., SabherwalR., and ThatcherJ. (2006). Antecedents and Outcomes of Strategic IS Alignment: An empirical investigation, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management53(1): 27–47.
13.
ChanY.E., and ReichB.H. (2007a). IT Alignment: What have we learned?Journal of Information Technology22: 297–315.
14.
ChanY.E., and ReichB.H. (2007b). IT Alignment: An annotated bibliography?Journal of Information Technology22: 316–396.
15.
ChanY.E., HuffS., BarclayD., and CopelandD. (1997). Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment, Information Systems Research8(2): 125–150.
16.
ChapmanA.D. (2005). Principles of Data Quality.Global Biodiversity Information Facility.
17.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18.
ColtmanT.R., TalionP.P., SharmaR., and QueirozM. (2015). Strategic IT Alignment: Twenty-five years on, Journal of Information Technology: 91–100.
19.
CronbachL.J., and MeehlP.E. (1955). Construct Validity for Psychological Tests, Psychological Bulletin52: 281–302.
20.
CumpsB., ViaeneS., DedneG., and VandenbulckeJ. (2006). An Empirical Study on Business/ICT Alignment in European Organizations, in Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
21.
DiamantopoulosA., and WinklhoferH. (2001). Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An alternative to scale development, Journal of Marketing Research38: 269–277.
22.
EisenhardtK.M., and MartinJ.A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What are they?Strategic Management Journal21(10-11): 1105–1121.
23.
FosterR. (1986). Innovation: The attacker's advantage, New York: Summit Books.
24.
FullerR.J., GiovinazzoR., and TungY. (2014). The Stable ROE Portfolio: An alternative equity index strategy based on common sense security analysis, The Journal of Portfolio Management40(5): 135–145.
25.
GefenD., StraubD., and BoudreauM. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for research practice, Communications of AIS4(7): 1–78.
26.
GerowJ.E., GroverV., ThatcherJ.B., and RothP.L. (2014). Looking Toward the Future of IT-Business Strategic Alignment through the Past: A meta-analysis, MIS Quarterly38(4): 1059–1085.
27.
HairJ.F., BlackW., BabinB., and AndersonR. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th edn, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
HarrisS.Y., and KatzJ.L. (1991). Organizational Performance and Information Technology Investment Intensity in the Insurance Industry, Organization Science2(3): 263–295.
29.
HaslamS.A., RyanM.K., KulichC., TrojanowskiG., and AtkinsC. (2010). Investing with Prejudice: The relationship between women's presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance, British Journal of Management21: 484–497.
30.
HendersonJ., and VenkatramanN. (1993). Strategic Alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations, IBM Systems Journal32(1): 4–16.
31.
HuQ., and HuangC. (2005). Aligning IT with Firm Business Strategies Using the Balance Scorecard System, in Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; Hawaii: HICSS, pp. 1–10.
32.
HussinH., KingM., and CraggP. (2002). IT Alignment in Small Firms, European Journal of Information Systems11(2): 108–127.
33.
IttnerC.D., LarckerD.F., and RandallT. (2003). Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in Financial Services Firms, Accounting, Organizations and Society28(7): 715–741.
34.
KearnsG.S., and SabherwalR. (2007). Strategic Alignment Between Business and Information Technology: A knowledge-based view of behaviors, outcome, and consequences, Journal of Management Information Systems23(3): 129–162.
35.
KeenP. (1991). Shaping the Future, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
36.
KeenP. (1996). Do You Need An IT Strategy?, in LuftmanJ.N. (ed.) Competing in the Information Age, New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
KlineR. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd edn, New York: Guilford Press.
38.
LuftmanJ. (1996). Competing in the Information Age, New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
LuftmanJ. (2000). Assessing Business-IT Alignment Maturity, Communications of the Association of Information Systems4(14): 1–50.
40.
LuftmanJ. (2005). Key Issues for IT Executives (2004), MIS Quarterly Executive4(2): 269–285.
41.
LuftmanJ., and Ben-ZviT. (2010). Key Issues for IT Executives 2010: Judicious IT investments continue post-recession, MIS Quarterly Executive9(4): 263–273.
42.
LuftmanJ., and Ben-ZviT. (2011). Key Issues for IT Executives 2011: Cautious optimism in post economic downturn, MIS Quarterly Executive10(4).
43.
LuftmanJ., Ben-ZviT., DwivediR., and RigoniE.H. (2010). IT Governance: An alignment maturity perspective, The International Journal on IT/Business Alignment and Governance1(2): 13–25.
44.
LuftmanJ., DorociakJ., KempaiahR., and RigoniE.H. (2008). Strategic Alignment Maturity: A Structural Equation Model Validation, AMCIS 2008 Proceedings. Paper 53.
45.
LuftmanJ., and KempaiahR. (2008). Key Issues for IT Executives 2007, MIS Quarterly Executive7(2): 99–112.
46.
LuftmanJ., KempaiahR., and NashE. (2006). Key Issues for IT Executives 2005, MIS Quarterly Executive5(2): 81–99.
47.
LuftmanJ., LewisP., and OldachS. (1993). Transforming the Enterprise: The alignment of business and information technology strategies, IBM Systems Journal32(1): 198–221.
48.
LuftmanJ., and McLeanE. (2004). Key Issues for IT Executives, MIS Quarterly Executive3(2).
49.
LuftmanJ., PappR., and BrierT. (1999). Enablers and Inhibitors of Business-IT Alignment, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, (1), Article 11.
50.
LuftmanJ., WanderF., NathanM., and SutariaH. (2013). Drawing ‘Align’ in the sand: The cultural shift towards federating it at guardian life Insurance, MISQE, 3rd Quarter.
51.
LuftmanJ., and ZadehH. (2011). Key Information Technology and Management Issues 2010–11: An international study, Journal of Information Technology9(11): 193–204.
52.
MaesR., RijsenbrijD., TruijensO., and GoedvolkH. (2000). Redefining business-IT alignment through a unified framework. White Paper, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
53.
MarakasG., JohnsonR., and ClayP. (2007). The Evolving Nature of the Computer Self-Efficacy Construct: An empirical investigation of measurement construction, validity, reliability and stability over time, Journal of Association of Information Systems8(1): 16–46.
54.
MarchandD., KettingerW., and RollinsJ. (2001). Information Orientation: The link to business performance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
McAfeeA., and BrynjolfssonE. (2008). Investing in the IT That Makes a Competitive Difference, Harvard Business Review86(7/8).
56.
NashE.M. (2006). Assessing IT as a driver or enabler of transformation in the pharmaceutical industry employing the strategic alignment maturity model. PhD Dissertation, Stevens Institute of Technology.
57.
PalmerJ.W., and MarkusMX. (2000). Performance Impacts of Quick Response, Information Systems Research11(3): 241–259.
58.
PetterS., StraubD., and RaiA. (2007). Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly31(4): 623–656.
59.
PodsakoffP.M., MacKenzieS.B., and PodsakoffN.P. (2012). Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It, Annual Review Psychol63: 539–669.
60.
PrestonD.S., and KarahannaE. (2009). Antecedents of IS Strategic Alignment: A nomological network, Information Systems Research20(2): 159–179.
61.
PynesJ.E. (2008). Human Resources Management for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A strategic approach.John Wiley and Sons.
62.
RaghunathanT. (1992). Impact of the CEO's Participation on Information Systems Steering Committees, Journal of Management Information Systems8(4): 83–96.
63.
ReichB., and BenbasatI. (1996). Measuring the Linkage Between Business and Information Technology Objectives, MIS Quarterly20(1): 55–81.
64.
ReichB., and BenbasatI. (2000). Factors that Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives, MIS Quarterly24(1): 81–113.
65.
RockartJ.F., EarlM.J., and RossJ. (1996). Eight Imperatives for the New IT Organization, Sloan Management Review:43–55.
66.
SabherwalL., and ChanY. (2001). Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A study of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders, Information Systems Research12(1): 11–33.
67.
SabherwalR., and KirsP. (1994). The Alignment Between Organizational Critical Success Factors and Information Technology Capability in Academic Institutions, Decision Sciences25(2): 301–330.
68.
SledgianowskiD. (2003). Identification of factors affecting the maturity of IT-business strategic alignment. PhD Dissertation, Stevens Institute of Technology.
69.
SmacznyT. (2001). Is an Alignment Between Business and Information Technology the Appropriate Paradigm to Manage IT in Today's Organizations, Management Decision39(10): 797–802.
70.
SriramV., and StumpR. (2004). Information Technology Investments in Purchasing: An empirical investigation of communications, relationship and performance outcomes, Omega32: 41–55.
71.
TaiL.S. (2008). Synchronous and Lagged Relationships Between CEO Pay and Performance of Quality Companies, Managerial Finance34(8): 555–561.
72.
TanriverdiH. (2006). Performance Effects of Information Technology Synergies in Multibusiness Firms, MIS Quarterly30(1): 57–77.
73.
TeeceD., and PisanoG. (1994). The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An introduction, Industrial and Corporate Change3(3): 537–556.
74.
TeoT., and KingW. (1996). Assessing the Impact of Integrating Business Planning and IS Planning, Information and Management30(6): 309–321.
75.
TeoT., and KingW. (1997). Integration Between Business Planning and Information Systems Planning: An evolutionary-contingency perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems14(1): 185–214.
76.
VenkatramanN. (1989). The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence, Academy of Management Review14(3): 423–444.
77.
VenkatramanN., and RamanujamV. (1986). Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A comparison of approaches, Academy of Management Review11(4): 801–814.
78.
VinziE.V., ChinW.W., HenselerJ., and WangH. (eds.) (2010). Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
79.
WeillP. (1992). The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector, Information Systems Research3(4): 307–333.
80.
WeillP., and BroadbentM. (1998). Leveraging the New Infrastructure.Harvard Business School Press.
81.
YuT.T., JohnsonV., and ZhangM.M. (2009). Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance of Companies with Female CEOs and Companies Without Female CEOs, International Journal of Economics and Business Research1(2): 204–213.
