Recent years were marked by the implementation of many eHealth projects using information and communication technologies to provide health services in developing countries. While generating great expectations, these projects remain poorly documented and available data suggest high failure rates. This raises a practical question: How are such eHealth networks to be effectively designed and implemented? This paper addresses this question. Specifically, it presents an ethnographic study of the Pan-African e-Network, a project which connects many hospitals all across India and Africa, providing medical teleconsultations and distance learning services. The study investigates the low utilisation of the network, an issue undermining its potential and efficiency. Factors contributing to this situation include communication barriers, the presumed ego of doctors, poor awareness of the project, and a lack of flexibility to work with the specificities of the connected sites. Above all, these factors point towards a dichotomous approach across the project's design and implementation, and taking two distinct yet related forms: (a) an ontological divide between technical and ‘non-technical’ domains; (b) a political sorting out of what is and what is not the project, aimed at neutralising and accounting for heterogeneous processes and practices. In both cases, low utilisation reveals tensions between processes of closure and control, and the openness of a life that will not be contained. Ultimately, this paper intends to destabilise binary modes of thinking as they crystallise oppositions between design and implementation, project and context, technical and social worlds, efficacy and improvisation, mastery and unruliness, map and territory.
Al-ShorbajiN., and GeissbuhlerA. (2012). Establishing an Evidence Base For E-Health: The proof is in the pudding, Bulletin of the World Health Organization90(5): 322–322 A.
2.
Ami-NarhJ.T., and WilliamsP.A.H. (2012). A Revised UTAUT Model to Investigate E-health Acceptance of Health Professionals in Africa, Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences3(10): 1383–1391.
3.
AvgerouC. (2008). Information Systems in Developing Countries: A critical research review, Journal of Information Technology23(3): 133–146.
4.
AvgerouC. (2010). Discourses On ICT and Development, Information Technologies and International Development6(3): 1–18.
5.
BagayokoCO., MüllerH., and GeissbuhlerA. (2006). Assessment of Internet-Based Tele-Medicine in Africa (The RAFT Project), Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics30(6-7): 407–416.
6.
BanerjeeA., and DufloE. (2011). Poor Economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty, New York: PublicAffairs.
7.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
8.
BashshurR.L., and ShannonG.W. (2009). The History of Telemedicine: Evolution, context, and transformation, New Rochelle, NY: Mary Ann Liebert Incorporated.
9.
BhaskaranarayanaA., SatyamurthyL.S., and RemillaM. (2009). Indian Space Research Organization and Telemedicine in India, Telemedicine and e-Health15(6): 586–591.
10.
BlayaJ., FraserH.S.F., and HoltB. (2010). E-Health Technologies Show Promise In Developing Countries, Health Affairs29(2): 244–251.
11.
BloomfieldB.P., and VurdubakisT. (1994). Boundary Disputes: Negotiating the boundary between the technical and the social in the development of IT systems, Information Technology & People7(1): 9–24.
12.
BowkerG.C. (2005). Memory Practices in the Sciences, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
13.
BroadmanH.G. (2007). Africa's Silk Road: China and India's new economic frontier, Washington DC: The World Bank.
14.
BukachiF., and Pakenham-WalshN. (2007). Information Technology for Health in Developing Countries, Chest132(5): 1624–1630.
15.
CiborraC. (2005). Interpreting E-government and Development: Efficiency, transparency or governance at a distance?Information Technology & People18(3): 260–279.
16.
ColemanA., and ColemanM.F. (2013). Activity Theory Framework: A basis for e-health readiness assessment in health institutions, Journal of Communication4(2): 95–100.
17.
CordeliaA. (2002). Information Infrastructure: An actor-network perspective, International Journal of Actor-Network Theory and Technological Innovation2(1): 27–53.
18.
de LaetM., and MolA. (2000). The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology, Social Studies of Science30(2): 225–263.
19.
DentzerS. (2010). E-Health's Promise for the Developing World, Health Affairs29(2): 229.
20.
DuclosV. (2012). Building Capacities: The resurgence of Indo-African technoeconomic cooperation, India Review11(4): 209–225.
21.
DuclosV. (2014). Of Doctors and Wires: ICTs, healthcare, and India's telemedicine venture into Africa, Journal of Critical Southern Studies2(1): 7–34.
EmersonR., FretzR., and ShawL. (eds.) (1995). Processing Fieldnotes: Coding and memoing, in Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
GadC., JensenC.B., and WinthereikB.R. (2015). Practical Ontology: Worlds in STS and anthropology, NatureCulture3: 67–86.
26.
GanapathyK., and RavindraA. (2009). Telemedicine in India: The apollo story, Telemedecine and e-Health15(6): 576–585.
27.
GerberT., OlazabalV., BrownK., and Pablos-MendezA. (2010). An Agenda For Action On Global E-Health, Health Affairs29(2): 235–238.
28.
Gumucio-DagronA. (2003). Take Five: A handful of essentials for ICTs in development, in GirardB. (ed.) The One to Watch: Radio, new ICTs and interactivity, Rome, Italy: FAO, pp. 21–38.
29.
HayesN., and WestrupC. (2012a). Context and the Processes of ICT for Development, Information and Organization22(1): 23–36.
30.
HayesN., and WestrupC. (2012b). Power/Knowledge and Impact Assessment: Creating new spaces for expertise in international development, New Technology, Work and Employment27(1): 9–22.
HeeksR. (2002b). Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations, The Information Society: An International Journal18(2): 101.
33.
HuP.J., ChauP.Y.K., ShengO.R.L., and TarnK.Y. (1999). Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology, J. Manage. Inf Syst16(2): 91–112.
34.
IngoldT. (2011). Point, Line, Counterpoint. From Environment to Fluid Space, in Being Alive. Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description, London & New York: Routledge, pp. 77–88.
35.
IsabalijaS.R., MayokaK.G., RwashanA.S., and MbarikaV.W. (2011). Factors Affecting Adoption, Implementation and Sustainability of Telemedicine Information Systems in Uganda, Journal of Health Informatics in Developing Countries5(2): 299–316.
36.
JensenC.B. (2006). Technologic: Conceptualising health care transformation with the electronic patient record, Systems, Signs & Actions2(1): 41–59.
37.
JensenC.B. (2010). Ontologies for Developing Things, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
38.
KahnJ.G., YangJ.S., and KahnJ.S. (2010). ‘Mobile’ Health Needs And Opportunities In Developing Countries, Health Affairs29(2): 252–258.
39.
KhojaS., and NaseemA. (2009). E-Health in International Networks: New opportunities for collaboration, in WoottonR., PatilN.G., ScottR.E., and HoK. (eds.) Telehealth in the Developing World, Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, pp. 287–296.
40.
KhojaS., ScottR.E., CasebeerA.L., MohsinM., IshaqA.F.M., and GilaniS. (2007). e-Health Readiness Assessment Tools for Healthcare Institutions in Developing Countries, Telemedicine and e-Health13(4): 425–432.
41.
KrishnaS., and MadonS. (eds.) (2003). Introduction: Challenges of IT in the development context, in The Digital Challenge: Information technology in the development context, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited. pp 1–9.
42.
LatourB. (1996). Aramis, or the Love of Technology, Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
43.
LatourB. (1999). On Recalling ANT, in LawJ., and HassardJ. (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 15–25.
LawJ. (2002). Objects and Spaces, Theory, Culture & Society19(5-6): 91–105.
46.
LawJ., and LienM.E. (2013). Slippery: Field notes in empirical ontology, Social Studies of Science43(3): 363–378.
47.
MackenzieA. (2010). Wirelessness: Radical empiricism in network cultures, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
48.
MarcusG.E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the World System: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography, Annual Review of Anthropology24(1): 95–117.
49.
MarsM., and ScottR.E. (2010). Global E-Health Policy: A work in progress, Health Affairs29(2): 239–245.
50.
MerrellR.C., ConeS.W., and RafiqA. (2008). Telemedicine in Extreme Conditions: Disasters, war, remote sites, in LatifiR. (ed.) Current Principles and Practices of Telemedicine and e-Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press, pp. 99–116.
51.
MiscioneG. (2007). Telemedicine in the Upper Amazon: Interplay with local health care practices, MIS Quarterly31(2): 403–425.
52.
MishraS.K., SinghLP., and ChandE.D. (2011). Current Status of Telemedicine Network in India and Future Perspective, Proceeding of the Asia-Pacific Advanced Network32: 151–163.
53.
MolA. (2002). The Body Multiple. Ontology in Medical Practice, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
54.
MolA., MoserI., and PolsJ. (eds.) (2010). Care: Putting practice into theory, in Care in Practice. On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag, pp. 7–25.
55.
MortM., FinchT., and MayC. (2009). Making and Unmaking Telepatients: Identity and governance in new health technologies, Science Technology Human Values34(1): 9–33.
56.
MortM., and SmithA. (2009). Beyond Information: Intimate relations in sociotechnical practice, Sociology43(2): 215–231.
57.
MoserI., and LawJ. (2006). Fluids or Flows? Information and Qualculation in Medical Practice, Information Technology & People19(1): 55–73.
58.
MunsterA. (2013). An Aesthesia of Networks: Conjunctive experience in art and technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59.
O'ReillyK. (2008). Key Concepts in Ethnography, London: SAGE Publications.
60.
OudshoornN. (2012). How Places Matter: Telecare technologies and the changing spatial dimensions of healthcare, Social Studies of Science42(1): 121–142.
PickeringA. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, agency, and science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
PietteJ.D., LunK., MouraL.A., FraserH.S., MechaelP.N., PowellJ., and KhojaS.R. (2012). Impacts of E-health on the Outcomes of Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Where do we go from here?Bulletin of the World Health Organization90(5): 365–72.
64.
PrakashA., and DeR. (2007). Importance of Development Context in ICT4D Projects, Information Technology & People20(3): 262–281.
65.
RamirezR. (2003). Bridging Disciplines: The natural resource management kaleidoscope for understanding ICTs, Journal of Development Communication14(1): 51–64.
66.
ReardonT. (2005). Research Findings and Strategies for Assessing Telemedicine Costs, Telemedicine and e-Health11(3): 348–369.
67.
ReijswoudV.v. (2009). Appropriate ICT As a Tool to Increase Effectiveness in ICT4D: Theoretical considerations and illustrating cases, The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries38(9): 1–18.
68.
RigbyM. (2002). Impact of Telemedicine Must be Defined in Developing Countries, British Medical Journal324(7328): 47.
RoineR., OhinmaaA., and HaileD. (2001). Assessing Telemedicine: A systematic review of the literature, Canadian Medical Association Journal165(6): 765–771.
71.
SahayS., and WalshamG. (2006). Scaling of Health Information Systems in India: Challenges and approaches, Information Technology for Development12(3): 185–200.
72.
ScottJ.C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
73.
StraubD., LochK., and HillC. (2001). Transfer of Information Technology to Developing Countries: A test of cultural influence modeling in the arab world, Journal of Global Information Management9(4): 380–427.
74.
SuchmanL. (1993). Working Relations of Technology Production and Use, Computer Supported Cooperative Work2(1-2): 21–39.
75.
SuchmanL. (2002). Practice-Based Design of Information Systems: Notes from the hyperdeveloped world, The Information Society18(2): 139–144.
76.
UnwinT. (2009). ICT4D: Information and communication technologies for development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77.
Van DykL. (2014). A Review of Telehealth Service Implementation Frameworks, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health11(2): 1279–1298.
WalshamG., RobeyD., and SahayS. (2007). Foreword: Special issue on information systems in developing countries, MIS Quarterly31(2): 317–326.
80.
WhittenP.S., MairF.S., HaycoxA., MayC.R., WilliamsT.L., and HellmichS. (2002). Systematic Review of Cost Effectiveness Studies of Telemedicine Interventions, British Medical Journal324(7351): 1434–1437.
81.
WHO (2004). eHealth for Health-care Delivery: Strategy 2004–2007, Geneva: World Health Organization [www document] http://www.who.int/eht/en/eHealth_HCD.pdf (accessed 13 April 2015).
WHO (2010). Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in Member States. Report on the second global survey on eHealth, Geneva: World Health Organization [www document] http://www.who.int/goe/publications/ehealth_series_vol2/en/ (accessed 13 April 2015).
84.
WHO Regional Office for Africa (2008). The Algiers Declaration Ministerial Conference on Research for Health in the African RegionAlgiers: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Africa [www document] http://www.afro.who.int/en/regional-declarations.html (accessed 13 April 2015).
85.
WoolgarS., and LezaunJ. (2013). The Wrong Bin Bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies?Social Studies of Science43(3): 321–340.
86.
WoottonR. (2008). Telemedicine Support for the Developing World, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare14(3): 109–114.
87.
WoottonR., and BonnardotL. (2010). In What Circumstances is Telemedicine Appropriate in the Developing World?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Short Reports1(5): 37–48.
88.
WoottonR., GeissbuhlerA., JethwaniK., KovarikC., PersonD.A., VladzymyrskyyA., ZanaboniP., and ZolfoM. (2012). Long-Running Telemedicine Networks Delivering Humanitarian Services: Experience, performance and scientific output, Bulletin of the World Health Organization90(5): 099143.
