Government and industry initiatives to stimulate the diffusion of high-performance broadband telecommunications links have given a fresh impetus to debates over the social and economic implications of the growing use of the Internet and other information and communication technologies (ICTs). This paper analyses how outcomes tied to ICT innovation are shaped by choices about whether and how to use, or not use, the technology to reconfigure access to people, services, information and technologies in ways that significantly change the communicative power of individuals, communities, organisations, nations and regions. It explains why these outcomes are not predetermined by the technology, but unfold over time through the complex interplay among many actors, in many arenas. A framework is presented to assist in addressing the issue of digital divides and other areas of research, policy and practice affected by the design and use of broadband Internet and related ICTs.
BellD. (1999 [1973]). The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting, New York: Basic Books.
2.
BlumenthalM.S., and ClarkD.D. (2001). Rethinking the Design of the Internet: The end to end arguments vs the brave new world, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology1(1): 70–109.
3.
BruceR. (2003). Closing the Digital Divide: Perspectives on initiatives to encourage investment and innovation, in DuttonW.H., NashV., and PeltuM., (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position Papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 10–14 (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
Cabinet Office (1999). Modernising Government, Cm 4310, London: The Stationery Office.
7.
ChenW., and WellmanB. (2003). Digital Divides and Digital Dividends: Comparing socioeconomic, gender, life stage, and rural–urban internet access and use in eight countries, Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto: NetLab.
8.
ChilesheP., DandoS., MillerP., and OsmanA. (2002). Investing in Broadband: Perspectives on the political economy of broadband Investment in the UK, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.
9.
ClarkD., GillettS., LehrW., SirbuM., and FountainJ. (2002). Local Government Stimulation of Broadband: Effectiveness, e-government and economic development, A White Paper Prepared from a Proposal to the US National Science Foundation Cambridge, MA: MIT Program on Internet & Telecommunications Convergence, (http://itc.mit.edu/itel/pp.html).
10.
CrandallR.W., and JacksonC.L. (2001). The $500 Billion Opportunity: The potential economic benefit of widespread diffusion of broadband internet access, Washington, DC: Criterion Economics.
11.
CSTB (2002). Bringing Home the Bits, Report of Committee on Broadband Last Mile Technology, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board Committee (CSTB), Washington, DC: National Academies Press, (www.cstb.org).
12.
DevinsD., DarlowA., BurdenT., and PetrieA. (2003). Connecting Communities to the Internet: Evaluation of the wired up communities programme (2000–2002), Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds: Policy Research Institute, (www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR389.pdf).
13.
DTI (2000). Closing the Digital Divide: Information and communication technologies in deprived areas, London: Department of Trade and Industry (DTI).
14.
DuttonW.H. (1992). The Ecology of Games Shaping Telecommunications Policy, Communication Theory, 2: 303–328.
15.
DuttonW.H. (1999). Society on the Line: information politics in the digital age, Oxford: University Press.
16.
DuttonW.H. (2003). Historical–Cultural Contexts of Broadband Policy and Practice, in DuttonW.H., NashV., and PeltuM. (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position papers for OII international policy forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 20–21 (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
17.
DuttonW.H., GillettS.E., McKnightL.W., and PeltuM. (2003a). Broadband Internet: The power to reconfigure access, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
18.
DuttonW.H., NashV., and PeltuM. (eds.) (2003b). Broadband Divides: Position Papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
19.
FosterI., and KesselmanC. (eds.) (1998). The Grid: Blueprint for a new computing infrastructure, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
20.
GillettS.E. (2001). Berkshire Connect: A Case Study of Demand Aggregation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Program on Internet & Telecommunications Convergence, (http://itc.mit.edu/itel/pp.html).
21.
GillettS. (2003). In Praise of Policy Diversity, in DuttonW.H., NashV., and PeltuM. (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 22–25. [www.oii.ox.ac.uk (and http://itc.mit.edu/itel/docs/2003/localgovbrbd.pdf for an updated version)].
22.
JacksonC.C. (2003). Internet Bandwidth in the Broadband Social Divide, in DuttonW.H., NashV., and PeltuM. (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 26–27 (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
McKnightL. (2003). The Nomadicity Divide: Policy for wireless grids, in DuttonW.H., NashV., and PeltuM. (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 31–34 (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
25.
McKnightL.W., AniusD., and UzunerO. (2002). Virtual Markets in Wireless Grids: Peering policy prospects, Presented at Conference TPRC 2002, (www.tprc.org).
26.
NelsonM., and FeldmanS. (2003). The Grid and Public Policy, in DuttonW.H., NashV., PeltuM. (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position Papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 39–42 (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
27.
OsorioC. (2003). A Look at the Broadband Significance Divide, in DuttonW.H., NashV., and PeltuM. (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 42–45 (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
28.
PaltridgeS. (2003). The Social Divide: The deployment and adoption of broadband within nations and across nations and regions? in DuttonW.H., NashV., and PeltuM. (eds.) Broadband Divides: Position papers for OII International Policy Forum, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, pp. 45–50 (www.oii.ox.ac.uk).
29.
Socitm (2002). Broadband in Local Government: A snapshot in 2002, Northampton, UK: Society of Information Technology Managers (Socitm) Insight.
30.
WilliamsR., and EdgeD. (1996). The Social Shaping of Technology, in DuttonW.H. (ed.) Information and Communication Technologies - Visions and Realities, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 53–67.
