Information technology (IT) applications to support group decision processes have been of considerable interest over the years. With the emergence of virtual team arrangements and the advent of emerging information and networking technologies, an increasing amount of attention is now being aimed at understanding collaboration among group members, as they make decisions to accomplish tasks. Effective and efficient collaboration is critical from a decision quality and decision timeliness standpoint. Commonly known as collaborative information technologies (CITs), many technology solutions have the capability to enhance collaboration and facilitate group decisions in task accomplishment by enabling better communication, sharing of information, ideas, expertise, and evaluating alternatives, irrespective of time and distance barriers. Many studies have investigated such individual CIT solutions in different regional settings. However, despite the fact that no single medium can support collaboration in different types of tasks, there is a scarcity of research investigating the adoption and use of multiple CIT options across regions. This paper builds upon innovation diffusion theory and tests a research model to validate five antecedents of collective adoption and use of seven CITs in the US, Australia, and Hong Kong. Sub-sample analyses of data collected from 344 organizations in these three regions suggest that not only do adoption and use patterns of some CIT solutions vary across regions but so do the antecedents that explain their proliferation. Implications of our findings are discussed for practitioners and researchers.
BajwaD.S., and LewisL.F. (2003). Does Size Matter? An Investigation of Collaborative Information Technology Adoption by US Firms, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Practice5(1): 29–46.
2.
BharadwajA.S. (2000). A Resource-based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation, MIS Quarterly24(1): 169–196.
3.
CarlsonP.J., and DavisG.B. (1998). An investigation of Media Selection Among Directors and Managers: From ‘self’ to ‘other’ orientation, MIS Quarterly22(3): 335–362.
4.
DaftR.L. (1982). Bureaucratic Versus Non Bureaucratic Structure and the Process of Innovation and Change. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1, JAI Press, Inc.: Greenwich, Connecticut, USA.
5.
DaftR.L., and LengelR.H. (1986). Organization Information Requirements, Media Richness, and Structural Design, Management Science32(5): 554–571.
6.
DebraD.L., and SnyderN.T. (1999). Mastering Virtual Teams, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
DennisA.R., PootheriS.K., and NatarajanV.L. (1998). Lessons from the Early Adopters of Web Groupware, Journal of Management Information Systems14: 65–86.
9.
DennisA.R., WixomB.H., and VandenbergRJ. (2001). Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-analysis, MIS Quarterly25(2): 167–193.
10.
DeSanctisG., WrightM., and JiangL. (2001). Building a Global Learning Community, Communications of ACM44(12): 80–82.
11.
DewarR.D., and DuttonJ.E. (1986). The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis, Management Science32(11): 1422–1433.
12.
DustdarS., and HofstedeGJ. (1999). Videoconferencing Across Cultures - A conceptual framework for floor control issues, Journal of Information Technology14: 161–169.
13.
Ein-DorP., and SegevE. (1978). Organizational Context and the Success of Management Information Systems, Management Science24(10): 1064–1077.
14.
FichmanR.F. (1992). Information Technology Diffusion: A review of empirical research, Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems Dallas, Texas, December 11–14.
15.
GeorgeJ.F., NunamakerJ.F.Jr., and ValacichJ.S. (1992). Electronic Meeting Systems as Innovation: A study of the innovation process, Information and Management22: 187–195.
16.
GiddensA. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Blackwell Publishers.
17.
GoldA.H., MalhotraA., and SegarsA.H. (2001). Knowledge Management: An organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems18(1): 185–214.
18.
GoodmanP.S., and DarrE.D. (1998). Computer-aided Systems and Communities: Mechanisms for organizational learning in distributed environments, MIS Quarterly22(4): 417–440.
19.
GraetzK., BoyleE, ThompsonP., KimbleC., and GarlochJ. (1998). Information Sharing in Face-to-face, Teleconferencing and Electronic Chat Groups, Small Group Research29(6): 714–743.
20.
GroverV, FiedlerK.D., and TengJ.T. (1999). The Role of Organizational and Information Technology Antecedents in Reengineering Initiation Behaviour, Decision Sciences30(3): 749–781.
21.
GroverV., and GoslarM.D. (1993). The Initiation, Adoption, and Implementation of Telecommunications Technology in the U.S, Journal of Management Information Systems10(1): 141–163.
22.
HabermasJ. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and rationalisation of society, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
23.
KerstenH. (1999). Collaboration and Collaborative Information Technologies: A review of the evidence, Database for Advances in Information Systems30(2): 44–65.
24.
KimberleyJ., and EvaniskoM. (1981). Organizational Innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations, Academy of Management Journal24(4): 689–713.
25.
KettingerW.J., and GroverV. (1997). The Use of Computer-mediated Communication in an Interorganizational Context, Decision Sciences28(3): 513–555.
26.
KwonT.H., and ZmudR.W. (1987). Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information Systems Implementation, in BolandR.J., and HirschheimR.A. (eds.), Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, New York: John Wiley.
27.
LaiV.S. (2001). Intraorganization Communication with Intranets, Communications of the ACM44(7): 95–100.
28.
LeeA.S. (1992). Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation, MIS Quarterly18(2): 143–157.
29.
LewisL.F., GarciaJ.E., and KelemanK (2000). Continuing Obstacles and New Opportunities for Organizational Adoption of GSS, Abstracted in Proceedings of Group Decision and Negotiation Conference University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, July 3–7.
30.
MajchrzakA., RiceR.E., MalhotraA., and KingN. (2000). Technology Adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team, MIS Quarterly24(4): 569–600.
31.
MalhotraA., MajchrzakA., CarmanR., and LottV. (2001). Radical Innovation without Collocation: A case study at Boeing-Rocketdyne, MIS Quarterly25(2): 229–249.
32.
MarkusM.L. (1994). Electronic Mail as the Medium for Managerial Choice, Organization Science5(4): 502–527.
33.
NgwenyamaO.K., and LeeA.A. (1997). Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning, MIS Quarterly21(2): 145–167.
34.
PiccoliG., AhmadR., and IvesB. (2001). Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: A research framework and preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training, MIS Quarterly25(4): 410–426.
35.
PressL. (1992). Lotus Notes (Groupware) in context, Journal of Organizational Computing2: 315–320.
36.
RaiA., and BajwaD.S. (1997). An Empirical Investigation into Factors Relating to the Adoption of Executive Information Systems: An analysis of EIS for collaboration and decision support, Decision Sciences28(4): 939–974.
37.
RaymondL. (1985). Organizational Characteristics and MIS Success in the Context of Small Business, MIS Quarterly9(1): 37–52.
38.
RogersE.M. (1983a). Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd ed, New York: The Free Press.
39.
RogersE.M. (1983b). Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed, New York: The Free Press.
40.
SethiV., and KingW.R. (1991). Construct Measurement in Information Systems research: An illustration in strategic systems, Decision Sciences22(3): 455–472.
41.
SlykeC.V., LouH., and DayJ. (2002). The Impact of Perceived Innovation Characteristics on Intention to Use Groupware, Information Resource Management Journal15(1): 5–12.
42.
StraubD.W.Jr., and BeauclairR.A. (1988). Current and Future Uses of Group Decision Support System Technology: Report on a Recent Empirical Study, Journal of Management Information Systems5(1): 101–116.
43.
TuroffM., HiltzS.R., BahgatA.N., and RanaA.R. (1993). Distributed Group Support Systems, MIS Quarterly17: 399–417.
44.
WebsterJ. (1998). Desktop Videoconferencing: Experiences of complete users, wary users, and non-users, MIS Quarterly22(3): 257–286.
45.
YoaJ.E., XuX., LiuC., and LuJ. (2003). Organization Size: A significant predictor of IT innovation adoption, Journal of Computer Information Systems43(2): 76–82.
