This paper examines the influence of information technology (IT) on a distinct but closely related industry, the video game industry. We conceptualize the effects of IT as a process of translating three related dimensions of a technological frame - technology performance, industry practices, and use vision - from one industry to another. Through historical examples, we argue that the impact of IT on the video game industry is shaped and limited by this translation process, particularly when tensions between the two industries lead to the development of new complementary or replacement technologies, practices, or visions. Although heavily dependent on IT, the video game industry has had to ignore, postpone, or substantially modify important IT software tools, processors, storage media, graphics, and networking technologies because of these industry contradictions.
AllenJ.P. (2000). Information Systems as Technological Innovation, Information Technology & People13(3): 210–221.
2.
AndersK. (1999). Marketing and Policy Considerations for Violent Video Games, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing18(2): 270–273.
3.
Anonymous (2001). Sony Eyes Up the Benefits of Broadband, Strategic Direction17(9): 28–29.
4.
AoyamaY., and IzushiH. (2003). Hardware Gimmick or Cultural Innovation? Technological, Cultural, and Social Foundations of the Japanese Video Game Industry, Research Policy32: 423–444.
5.
BijkerW. (1995). Of Bicycles, Bakelite, and Bulbs: Towards a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Campbell-KellyM. (2003). From Airline Reservations to Sonic the Hedgehog: A History of the Software Industry, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
ChandlerA.D. (2001). Inventing the Electronic Century: The Epic Story of the Consumer Electronics and Computer Industries, New York: Free Press.
8.
CortadaJ.W. (2004). The Digital Hand: How Computers Changed the Work of American Manufacturing, Transportation, and Retail Industries, New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
DedrickJ., GurbaxaniV., and KraemerK.L. (2003). Information Technology and Economic Performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence, ACM Computing Surveys35(1): 1–28.
10.
FettoJ. (2002). Babes in Toyland, American Demographics24(9): 14–15.
11.
FoxR. (1997). Socializing Around Arcade Technology, Communications of the ACM40(8): 26–28.
12.
FreibergerP., and SwaineM. (2000). Fire in the Valley: The Making of the Personal Computer, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
FriedenbergM. (2005). Consumer Tech Will Change Business, InformationWeek1046: 60.
14.
GallagherS., and ParkS.H. (2002). Innovation and Competition in Standard-Based Industries: A historical analysis of the U.S. home video game market, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management49(1): 67–82.
15.
GawerA., and CusumanoM.A. (2002). Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
16.
GlaskowskiP.N. (2002). 2001: A graphics odyssey; Games get the spotlight, but PCs see more progress, Microprocessor Report16(1): 7–10.
17.
HemphillT.A. (2003). Self-Regulation, Public Issue Management and Marketing Practices in the US Entertainment Industry, Journal of Public Affairs3(4): 338–357.
18.
HittL., and BrynjolfssonE. (1996). Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three different measures of information technology value, MIS Quarterly20(2): 121–142.
19.
IpB., and JacobsG. (2004). Territorial Lockout - An International Issue in the Videogames Industry, European Business Review16(5): 511–521.
20.
KhaslavskyJ., and ShedroffN. (1999). Understanding the Seductive Experience, Communications of the ACM42(5): 45–49.
21.
KlineS., Dyer-WithefordN., and De PeuterG. (2003). Digital Play: The Interaction of Technology, Culture, and Marketing, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
22.
Korea Game Development, and Promotion Institute, (2004). KGDI Game Industry White Paper, Seoul: Korea Game Development and Promotion Institute.
23.
KrishnanJ., and PressE. (2003). The North American Industry Classification System and its Implications for Accounting Research, Contemporary Accounting Research20(4): 685–701.
24.
MähringM., HolmströmJ., KeilM., and MontealegreR. (2004). Trojan Actor-Networks and Swift Translation: Bringing actor-network theory to IT project escalation studies, Information Technology & People17(2): 210–238.
25.
MaloneC.K., and ElichirigoityF. (2003). Information as Commodity and Economic Sector: Its emergence in the discourse of industrial classification, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology54(6): 512–520.
26.
MarkusM.L., DuttaA., SteinfieldC.W., and WigandR.T. (2005). The Computerization Movement in the US Home Mortgage Industry, 1980–2004, in 2005 National Science Foundation Social Informatics Workshop (Irvine, CA, 2005); 473–503.
27.
MelvilleN., KraemerK., and GurbaxaniV. (2004). Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An integrative model of IT business value, MIS Quarterly28(2): 283–322.
28.
OudshoornN., and PinchT. (eds.) (2003). How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
PelegA., WilkieS., and WeiserU. (1997). Intel MMX for Multimedia PCs, Communications of the ACM40(1): 24–38.
30.
PooleS. (2000). Trigger Happy: Videogames and the Entertainment Revolution, New York: Arcade Publishing.
31.
ReynoldsC. (2004). Game Over, American Demographics26(1): 34–38.
32.
RogersD.L. (2002). The DMCA and Prohibitions of Technology, Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal14(4): 9–18.
33.
RosenP. (2002). Framing Production: Technology, Culture, and Change in the British Bicycle Industry, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
SchillingM.A. (2003). Technological Leapfrogging: Lessons from the U.S. video game console industry, California Management Review45(3): 6–32.
35.
ShankarV., and BayusB. (2003). Network Effects and Competition: An empirical analysis of the home video game industry, Strategic Management Journal24(4): 375–389.
36.
TakahashiD. (2002). Opening the Xbox: Inside Microsoft's Plan to Unleash an Entertainment Revolution, Roseville, CA: Prima Publishing.
37.
VenkatramanN., and LeeC.H. (2004). Preferential Linkage and Network Evolution: A conceptual model and empirical test in the U.S. video game sector, Academy of Management Journal47(6): 876–892.
38.
WalshD.A., and GentileD.A. (2001). A Validity Test of Movie, Television, and Video-Game Ratings, Pediatrics107(6): 1302–1308.
39.
WilliamsR., and EdgeD. (1996). The social shaping of technology. in DuttonWH (ed.) Information and Communication Technologies: Visions and Realities, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 53–67.
40.
WolfMJ.P. (2001). The Medium of the Video Game, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
