The 3DayCar programme reveals the principle source of delay during the order fulfilment process in the automotive industry as information processing not manufacturing. This suggests that information and communication technologies (ICT) are crucial in re-shaping industry structure towards customer responsiveness and building to order. This paper reports on the findings of a longitudinal study during a critical period for the industry where firms adopting web-enabled ICT seek to increase inter-organizational collaboration and gain competitive advantage over other supply chains. In all, 75 interviews across 28 firms examine the adoption of business-to-business (B2B) e-procurement and supply systems by vehicle manufacturers (VMs) and suppliers. Forms of organization are represented as a map of industry structure showing supply relationships and firm affiliation to B2B applications. VMs have tended to adopt a short-term price-driven approach using e-hubs and webEDI (electronic data interchange) in their attempts to control cost. Suppliers are concerned over an apparent disregard for firm autonomy, particularly those who have launched ICT projects of their own. Recommendations for the future are considered in light of what such large-scale efforts imply for design, deployment, and uses of ICT in industry settings.
ArrowK. (1974). The Limits of Organization, New York: Norton.
2.
BakosJ. (1998). The emerging role of electronic marketplaces on the Internet, Communications of the ACM41(8): 35–42.
3.
BischoffJ., and EsterhazyM. (2005). How will future collaborative planning and execution processes in auto supply networks look in 2015? A vision of ILIPT by the FlexNet team. www.ilipt.org.
4.
BowersoxD., and ClossD. (1996). Logistical Management: The Integrated Supply Chain Approach, New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
BowersoxD., ClossD., and StankT. (2000). Ten mega-trends that will revolutionize supply chain logistics, Journal of Business Logistics21(2).
6.
BrownA. (1998). Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation, Journal of Management Studies January: 35–58.
7.
BuhalisD. (2004). eAirlines: strategic and tactical use of ICTs in the airline industry, Information and Management41(7): 805–826.
8.
ChandlerA.D. (1962). Strategy and Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
ChandlerA.D. (1977). The Visible Hand. The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
10.
CiborraC.U. (1993). Teams, Markets, and Systems. Business Innovation and Information Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
ClemonsE.K., and RowM.C. (1992). Information technology & industrial cooperation: the changing economics of cooperation & ownership, Journal of Management Information Systems9(2): 9–28.
12.
Computerworld (2002). CPFR clamor persists, but adoption remains slow. June 28. www.computerworld.com.
13.
CousinsP. (2002). A conceptual model for managing long-term inter-organizational relationships, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management8: 71–82.
14.
CroomS.R. (2001). The dyadic capabilities concept: examining the processes of key supplier involvement in collaborative product development, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management6: 29–37.
15.
DasS., and Van de VenA. (2000). Competing with new product technologies: a process model of strategy, Management Science46(10): 1300–1316.
16.
DruckerP. (1946). The Concept of the Corporation, New York: John Day.
17.
EarlM. (1989). Management Strategies for Information Technology, Harlow: Prentice-Hall.
18.
Economist (2004a). Car Manufacturing - Ripe for Revolution. September 4.
19.
Economist (2004b). E-commerce takes off. May 15.
20.
EisenhardtK. (1989). Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review14(4): 532–550.
21.
FedorowiczJ., GelinasU., GoganJ., HowardM., MarkusL., UsoffC., and VidgenR. (2005). Extending business process modeling notation for successful implementation of interorganizational systems, 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, US.
22.
FeldC., and StoddardD. (2004). Getting IT right, Harvard Business Review February: 72–79.
23.
FineC. (1997). Power diffusion in automotive supply chains. International Motor Vehicle Program, Sloan School of Management. MIT White paper.web.mit.edu/ctpid/www/people/Fine.
24.
GalliersR. (2003). Editorial, Journal of Strategic Information Systems12: 3–5.
25.
HagelJ. (2002). Out of the Box - Strategies for Achieving Profits Today and Growth Tomorrow through Web Services, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
26.
HallR. (1993). The challenges of the three-day car, Target9(2): 21–29.
27.
HartP., and SaundersC. (1997). Power and trust: critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange, Organization Science8(1): 23–42.
28.
HelperS., and MacDuffieJ.P. (2004). B2B and modes of exchange: evolutionary and transformative effects, in KogutB. (ed.) The Global Internet Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
HinesP. (1994). Creating World Class Suppliers, London: Pitman Publishing.
30.
HollensteinH. (2004). Determinants of the adoption of information and communication technologies (ICT): an empirical analysis based on firm-level data for the Swiss business sector, Structural Change & Economic Dynamics15(3): 315–343.
31.
HolwegM., and PilF. (2001). Successful build-to-order strategies - start with the customer, Sloan Management Review Fall: 74–83.
32.
HolwegM., and PilF. (2004). The Second Century: Reconnecting Customer and Value Chain though Build-to-Order, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
HowardM., and HolwegM. (2004). Investigating the intangible: lessons learnt from research into automotive inter-organizational IT systems, International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management4(4): 354–373.
34.
HowardM., and VidgenR. (2004). Extending the value proposition in the automotive industry with a phased approach to e-business: from disjointed procurement to synchronous supply. White paper, University of Bath, School of Management.
35.
HowardM., VidgenR., and PowellP. (2003). Overcoming stakeholder barriers in the automotive industry: building to order with extra-organizational systems, Journal of Information Technology18(1): 27–43.
36.
HowardM., VidgenR., and PowellP. (2004). Exploring industry dynamics in e-procurement: sense making by collaborative investigation, in LeinoT., SaarinenT., and KleinS. (eds.) 12th European Conference on Information Systems, Turku, Finland.
37.
HowardM., VidgenR., and PowellP. (2006). Automotive e-Hubs: exploring motivations and barriers to collaboration and interaction, Journal of Strategic Information Systems (forthcoming).
38.
HowardM., VidgenR., PowellP., and GravesA. (2002). Are hubs the centre of things? Electronic procurement in the automotive industry. (Best of Track), in WryczaS., KautzK., De MarcoM., and GalliersR. (eds.) 10th European Conference on Information Systems, Gdansk, Poland. 1517–1526.
39.
IvesB., and LearmonthG. (1984). The information system as a competitive weapon, Communications of the ACM27: 1193–1201.
40.
JayaramJ., VickeryK., and DrogeC. (2000). The effects of information system infrastructure and process improvements on supply-chain time performance, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management30(3/4): 314–330.
41.
KanterR. (1994). Collaborative advantage: the art of alliances, Harvard Business Review July-August: 97–108.
42.
KisielR. (2002). Covisint gets one last chance, Automotive News, July 8, p. 3.
43.
KonsynskiB.R., and McFarlanW.F. (1990). Information partnerships - shared data, shared scale, Harvard Business Review Sept-Oct: 114–120.
44.
KumarK., and van DisselH. (1996). Sustainable collaboration: managing conflict and cooperation in inter-organizational systems, MIS Quarterly20(3): 279–307.
45.
KuroiwaS. (1999). Growing an open business environment from CALS, JIT and supply chain. Logistics in the Information Age, 4th Conference Proceedings, Florence, Italy. 353–358.
46.
LadoA., BoydN., and HanlonS. (1997). Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: a syncretic model, Academy of Management Review22(1): 110–141.
47.
LambeG. (2003). Ford sidesteps junk status, Financial Times - Business, December 2.
LauerW. (2000). Side effects of mandatory EDI order processing in the automotive supply chain, Business Process Management Journal6(5): 366–375.
51.
LaursenK. (2004). New and old economy: the role of ICT in structural change and economic dynamics, Structural Change & Economic Dynamics15(3): 241–244.
52.
LeeH., and WhangS. (1998). Information Sharing in the Supply Chain, Research Paper Series - Working paper, Stanford University.
53.
LevyM., LoebbeckeC., and PowellP. (2001). SMEs, Co-opetition and knowledge sharing: the IS role, Ninth European Conference on Information Systems, Bled, Slovenia. 640–652.
54.
LewisM. (1998). Iterative triangulation: a theory development process using existing case studies, Journal of Operations Management16: 455–469.
55.
LewisM., ShulverM., JohnstonR., MattsonJ., MilletB., and SlackN. (2004). Network parenting in international service development, British Journal of Management15: 23–38.
56.
LiF., and WilliamsH. (1999). Interfirm collaboration through interfirm networks, Information Systems Journal9: 103–115.
57.
LucchettiR., and SterlacchiniA. (2004). The adoption of ICTs among SMEs: evidence from an Italian survey, Small Business Economics23(2): 151–169.
58.
MackayD., and RosierM. (1996). Measuring organizational benefits of EDI diffusion: a case of the Australian automotive industry, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management26(10): 60–78.
59.
MaloneT., YatesJ., and BenjaminR. (1987). Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies, Communications of the ACM30(6).
60.
MarkusL. (1983). Power, politics & MIS implementation, Communications of the ACM26(6): 430–444.
61.
McCutcheonD., and MeredithJ. (1993). Conducting case study research in operations management, Journal of Operations Management11(3).
62.
McKinsey & Co (2002). How IT enables growth - information technology and productivity report. MGI Analysis, November. www.mckinsey.co.
63.
MiemczykJ., HowardM., HolwegM., EsserR., and BischoffJ. (2005). Integrating European research in operations: The case of the 5-Day Car initiative, 12th European Operations Management Association International Annual Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
64.
MilesM., and HubermanM. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, London: Sage.
65.
MukhopadhyayT., KekreS., and KalathurS. (1995). Business value of information technology: a study of electronic data interchange, MIS Quarterly19(2): 137–156.
66.
PerlowL., OkhuysenG., and RepenningN. (2002). The speed trap: exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context, Academy of Management Journal45(5): 931–955.
67.
PettigrewA. (1988). Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice, National Science Foundation Conference on Longitudinal Research Methods in Organizations, Austin, Texas.
68.
PorterM.E., and MillarV. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage, Harvard Business Review July-August: 149–160.
69.
RabinovichE., BaileyJ., and CarterC. (2003). A trans action-efficiency analysis of an Internet retailing supply chain in the music CD industry, Decision Science34(1): 131–172.
70.
RossE. (1994). The twenty-first century enterprise, agile manufacturing and something called CALS, World Class Design to Manufacture1(3): 5–10.
71.
RubinS., and FogartyT. (2000). Automotive B2B - the creation of B2B enterprises should add value for GM and Ford shareholders. Warburg Dillon Read, Global Equity Research.
72.
SakoM. (1992). Prices, Quality and Trust Inter-Firm Relations in Britain and Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73.
SigalaM. (2003). The information and communication technologies productivity impact on the UK hotel sector, International Journal of Operations & Production Management23(10): 1224–1245.
74.
SwatmanP.M., and SwatmanP.A. (1992). EDI System Integration: A Definition and Literature Survey, Information Society8: 169–205.
75.
TapscottD., TicollD., and LowyA. (2000). Digital Capital: Harnessing the Power of Business Webs, London: Nicholas Brealey.
76.
ThrelkelM., and KavanB. (1999). From traditional EDI to Internet-based EDI: managerial considerations, Journal of Information Technology14: 347–360.
77.
TsaiW. (2002). Social structure of ‘coopetition’ within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and intra-organizational knowledge sharing, Organizational Science13(2): 179–190.
WalshamG. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, Chichester: Wiley.
80.
WebsterJ. (1995). Networks of collaboration or conflict? Electronic data interchange and power in the supply chain, Journal of Strategic Information Systems4(1): 31–42.
81.
WernleB. (2003). Growing pressure from Ford starts to irritate Volvo, Automotive News Europe, February 24th: 1–28.
82.
WilliamsL., EsperT., and OzmentJ. (2002). The electronic supply chain - its impact on the current and future structure of strategic alliances, partnerships and logistics leadership, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management32(8): 703–719.
83.
WilliamsonO.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: The Free Press.
84.
WomackJ., JonesD, and RoosD. (1990). The Machine that Changed the World, Rawson Associates, Macmillan Publishing Co.
85.
WomackJ.P., and JonesD.T. (1996). Lean Thinking - Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, New York: Simon and Schuster.
86.
YinR. (1994). Case Study Research - Design and Methods, London: Sage.
87.
3DayCar, (2002). Towards a customer driven system - a summary of the 3DayCar research programme. Final report by the 3DayCar Research Team.www.3daycar.com.
