Claudio Ciborra's improvisation argument provides a realistic dynamic account of how organisational practices address technology. This was developed from the study of malleable open-ended technology, but little research has occurred to investigate the theory's validity within different settings. This paper seeks to address this gap, by examining improvisation in the context of a rigid highly structured technology. It presents findings from the successful implementation of an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system within a large international organisation, which was subsequently defined by the ERP vendor as being an ‘exemplary site’. Through the theoretical lens of Actor Network Theory, the paper reveals the improvisation, enactments and constant work around the plan that took place in dealing with the high contingencies of ERP implementation. The study extends the discussion on improvisation and contributes to an already illuminating argument. It invites practitioners to reflect on ERP implementation practice and review their evaluation methods.
Al-MudimighA., ZairiM., and Al-MashariM. (2001). ERP Software Implementation: An integrative framework, European Journal of Information Systems10: 216–226.
2.
AvgerouC. (2000). IT and Organizational change: an Institutionalist perspective, Information Technology & People13(4): 234–262.
3.
AvgerouC. (2002). Information Systems and Global Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BerlinerP.F. (1994). Thinking in Jazz: The Infinite Art of Improvisation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
5.
BrownC.V., and VesseyI. (1999). ERP Implementation Approaches: Toward a contingency framework, in Twentieth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), North Carolina: Charlotte, pp. 411–416.
6.
CadiliS., and WhitleyE.A. (2005). On the interpretive flexibility of hosted ERP systems, London: Working Paper Series No. 131, Department of Information Systems, The London School of Economics and Political Science.
7.
CallonM. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay, in LawJ. (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 196–233.
8.
CallonM., and LawJ. (1989). On the Construction of Sociotechnical Networks: Content and context revisited, Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Science Past and Present8: 57–83.
9.
CiborraC. (1994). The Grassroots of IT and Strategy, in CiborraC., and JelassiT. (eds.) Strategic Information Systems: A European Perspective, New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
10.
CiborraC.U. (1991). The Limits of Strategic Information Systems, International Journal of Information Resource Management2(3): 11–17.
11.
CiborraC.U. (ed.) (1996a). Groupware and Team Work: Invisible Aid or Technical Hindrance, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
12.
CiborraC.U. (1996b). What Does Groupware Mean for the Organizations Hosting It? in CiborraCU (ed.) Groupware and Team Work: Invisible Aid or Technical Hindrance, Chichester: John Wiey.
13.
CiborraC.U. (1999a). Hospitality and IT, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
14.
CiborraC.U. (1999b). Notes on Improvisation and Time in Organizations, Accounting, Management and Information Technology9(2): 77–94.
15.
CiborraC.U. (1999c). A Theory of Information Systems Based on Improvisation, in CurrieW., and GalliersB. (eds.) Rethinking Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
CiborraC.U. (2000a). Drifting: From Control to Drift, in BraaK., SorensenC., and DahlbomB. (eds.) Planet Internet, Sweden: Studentlitteratur, Lund.
17.
CiborraC.U. (2000b). From Alignment to Loose Coupling: From MedNet to www.Roche.Com, in CiborraC.U., and associates (eds.) From Control to Drift, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
CiborraC.U. (2002). The Labyrinth of Information, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
CiborraC.U., and associates (eds.) (2000). From Control to Drift, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
CiborraC.U., and FaillaA. (2000). Infrastructure as a Process: The Case of CRM in IBM, in CiborraC.U., and associates (eds.) From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructure, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
CiborraC.U., and HansethO. (1998). From Tool to Gestell Agendas for Managing the Information Infrastructure, Information Technology & People11(4): 305–327.
22.
DoolinB. (1999). Sociotechnical Networks and Information Management in Health Care, Accounting, Management and Information Technology9(2): 95–114.
23.
ElbannaA.R. (2003). Achieving Social Integration to Implement ERP systems, The 11th European Conference of Information Systems, Naples, Italy.
24.
GadamerH.G. (1976). The Historicity of Understanding, in ConnertonP. (ed.) Critical Sociology: Selected Readings, Harmondsworth: Benguin Books Ltd, pp. 117–133.
25.
HansethO., and BraaK. (2000). Who's in Control: Designers, Managers – or Technology? Infrastructure at Norsk Hydro, in CiborraCuao (ed.) From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructure, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 125–147.
26.
HansethO., CiborraC.U., and BraaK. (2001). The Control Devolution: ERP and the side effects of globalization, The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems32(4): 34–46.
27.
HirschheimR., KlienH.K., and LyytinenK. (1995). Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KallinikosJ. (2002). Re-Opening the Black Box of Technology: Artifacts and Human Agency, in Twenty Third International Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona, 14–16 December 2002, pp. 287–294.
29.
KaplanB., and MaxwellJ.A. (1994). Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems, in JayS.J. (ed.) Evaluating health care information systems: Methods and Applications, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 45–68.
30.
KleinH.K., and MyersM.D. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly23(1): 67–94.
31.
KrumbholzM., GalliersJ., CoulianosN., and MaidenN.A.M. (2000). Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning Packages in Different Corporate and National Cultures, Journal of Information Technology15: 267–279.
32.
LatourB. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
LatourB. (1988a). Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The scociology of a door-closer, Social Problems35(3): 298–310.
34.
LatourB. (1988b). The Pasteurization of France, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
35.
LatourB. (1990). Drawing Things Together, in LynchM., and WoolgarS. (eds.) Representation in Scientific Practice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 19–68.
36.
LatourB. (1996). Aramis or the Love of Technology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
LatourB. (2004). On Using ANT for Studying Information Systems: A (Somewhat) Socratic Dialogue, in AvgerouC., CiborraC.U., and LandF. (eds.) The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
LatourB. (ed.) (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
LawJ., and CallonM. (1988). Engineering and Sociology in a Military Aircraft Project: A network analysis of technological change, Social Problems35(3): 284–297.
40.
LawJ., and CallonM. (1992). The Life and Death of An Aircraft: A Network Analysis of Technical Change, in BijkerW.E., and LawJ. (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
Levi-StraussC. (1966). The Savage Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
MarkusL.M., AxlineS., PetrieD., and TanisC. (2000). Learning from Adopters’ Experiences with ERP: Problems encountered and success achieved, Journal of Information Technology15(4): 245–265.
43.
MintzbergH. (1987). Crafting Strategy, Harvard Business Review87(4): 66–75.
44.
MintzbergH. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, New York: Prentice-Hall.
45.
MintzbergH., and WatersJ.A. (1985). Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent, Strategic Management Journal6: 257–272.
46.
MintzbergH., and WestleyF. (2001). Decision Making: It's not what you think, Sloan Management Review Spring42(3): 89–93.
47.
MyersM.D. (1997). Interpretive Research in Information Systems, in StowellF. (ed.) Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline, London: McGraw-Hill, pp. 239–266.
48.
OrlikowskiWJ (1996). Improvising Organisational Transformation Over Time: A situated change perspective, Information Systems Research7(1): 63–92.
49.
OrlikowskiW.J., and GashB.C. (1994). Technological Frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations, ACM Transactions on Information Systems12(2): 174–207.
50.
ParrA., and ShanksG. (2000). A Model of ERP Project Implementation, Journal of Information Technology15: 289–303.
51.
RebstockM., and SeligJ.G. (2000). Development and Implementation Strategies for International ERP Software Projects, The 8th European Conference of Information Systems, Austria: Vienna.
52.
SchwandtTA (1994). Constructivist, Interpretivist Approaches to Human Inquiry, in DenzinN.K., and LincolnY.S. (eds.) Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
SuchmanL.A. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
SumnerM. (2000). Risk Factors in Enterprise-Wide/ERP Projects, Journal of Information Technology15: 317–327.
55.
VaughanD. (1996). The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at Nasa, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
WaemaT.M., and WalshamG. (1990). Information Systems Strategy Formulation, Information & Management18: 29–39.
57.
WalshamG. (1995). Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and method, European Journal of Information Systems (4): 74–81.
58.
WeickK.E. (1987). Substitutes for Strategy, in TeeceD.J. (ed.) The Competitive Challenge, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
59.
WeickK.E. (1989). Organized Improvisation: 20 Years of Organizing, Communication Studies40(4): 241–248.
60.
WeickK.E. (1990). Technology as Equivoque: Sensemaking in New Technologies, in GoodmanP.S., and SproullL.S. (eds.) Technology and Organisations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61.
WeickK.E. (1993). Organizational Redesign as Improvisation, in HuberG.P., and GlickW.H. (eds.) Organizational Change and Redesign, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 346–379.
62.
WeickK.E. (2001). Making Sense of the Organization, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
63.
YatesJ., OrlikowskiW.J., and OkamuraK. (1999). Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres: Electronic communication in a Japanese R&D organization, Organization Science10(1): 83–103.
64.
ZackM.H. (2000). Jazz Improvisation and Organizing: Once more from the top, Organization Science11(2): 227–234.
