Is the V-form the Next Generation Organisation? An Analysis of Challenges,Pitfalls and Remedies of ICT-enabled Virtual Organisations Based on Social Capital Theory
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2008
Is the V-form the Next Generation Organisation? An Analysis of Challenges,Pitfalls and Remedies of ICT-enabled Virtual Organisations Based on Social Capital Theory
ICT-enabled virtual organisations (VOs) are regarded as the appropriate organisational response to turbulent markets. Although much has been written about the structural characteristics and propositions of VOs, their inherent limitations and structural shortcomings remain largely unaddressed. Based on the structural properties of VOs, most frequently discussed in the literature, we introduce the V-form organisation as an ideal type of VOs. A conceptual analysis, however, reveals a mismatch between espoused benefits of the ideal type and preconditions in terms of collaborative practices needed to succeed in a turbulent environment. Dealing with complex tasks in a collaborative environment requires shared understanding, shared values and a level of social cohesion, which do not simply emerge in a virtual setting. Social capital theory addresses the social and cultural preconditions of collaboration. Our analysis shows preconditions for successful value creation in VOs and suggests management measures to foster and facilitate environments for the development of social capital.
AdlerP.S., and KwonS. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a new concept, Academy of Management Review27(1): 17–40.
2.
AnandV., ClarkM.A., and Zellmer-BruhnM. (2003). Team Knowledge Structures: Matching task to information environment, Journal of Managerial Issues15(1): 15–31.
3.
AndresH.P. (2002). A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Virtual Software Development Teams, Team Performance Management8(1/2): 39–48.
4.
AnielloV. (2001). The Competitive Mezzogiorno (Southern Italy): Some evidence from the clothing and textile industry in San Giuseppe Vesuviano, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25(3): 517–536.
5.
ArmstrongD.J., and ColeP. (2002). Managing Distances and Differences in Geographically Distributed Work Groups, in HindsP., and KieslerS. (eds.) Distributed Work, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 167–186.
6.
BartlettC.A., and GhoshalS. (1993). Beyond the M-Form: Toward a managerial theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal14: 23–46.
7.
BekkersV. (2003). E-Government and the Emergence of Virtual Organizations in the Public Sector, Information Polity8(3/4): 89–101.
8.
BleeckerS.E. (1994). The Virtual Organization, The Futurist2: 9–14.
9.
BlylerM., and CoffR.W. (2003). Dynamic Capabilities, Social Capital and Rent Appropriation: Ties that split pies, Strategic Management Journal24: 677–686.
10.
BrennanS.E. (1998). The Grounding Problem in Conversations with and through Computers, in FussellS.R., and KreuzR.J. (eds.) Social and Cognitive Approaches to Interpersonal Communication, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 201–225.
11.
BresnenM., EdelmanL., NewellS., ScarbroughH., and SwanJ. (2003). Social Practices and the Management of Knowledge in Project Environments, International Journal of Project Management21: 157–166.
12.
BreuK., and HemingwayC.J. (2004). Making Organisations Virtual: The hidden cost of distributed teams, Journal of Information Technology19(3): 191–202.
13.
BultjeR., and van WijkJ. (1998). Taxonomy of Virtual Organisations, Based on Definitions, Characteristics and Typology, VoNet Newsletter2(3): 7–21.
14.
ByrneJ., BrandtR., and PortO. (1993). The Virtual Corporation, Business Week, (February 8), pp. 36–40.
15.
ChiT., NystromP.C., and KircherP. (2003). Knowledge, Scope, and Internal Organization of the Multinational Corporation, in The 4th Annual International Business Research Forum (Philadelphia, March 2003), http://www.sbm.temple.edu/ibrf2003/TailanChi.pdf [Accessed 21 July 2006].
16.
ChildJ., and FaulknerD. (1998). Strategies of Cooperation: Managing Alliances, Networks and Joint Ventures, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
CiborraC.U. (1992). Innovation, Networks and Organizational Learning, in AntonelliC. (ed.) The Economics of Information Networks, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, BV, pp. 91–102.
18.
ClarkH.H., and BrennanS.E. (1991). Grounding in Communication, in ResnickL.B., LevineJ.M., and TeasleyS.D. (eds.) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 127–149.
19.
ClasesC., BachmannR., and WehnerT. (2003). Studying Trust in Virtual Organizations, Studies of Management & Organizations33(3): 7–27.
20.
CohenD., and PrusakL. (2001). In Good Company, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
21.
CohenS. (1997). On Becoming Virtual, Training & Development51(5): 30–35.
22.
CohenW.M., and LevinthalD.A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly35(1): 128–152.
23.
ColemanJ.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, American Journal of Sociology94: 95–120.
24.
CramtonCD. (2001). The Mutual Knowledge Problem and its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration, Organization Science12(3): 346–372.
25.
EbersM. (1999). Explaining Inter-Organizational Network Formation, in EbersM. (ed.) The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–40.
26.
FrankeU. (2001). The Concept of Virtual Web Organisations and its Implications on Changing Market Conditions, eJoV - the Journal for Networks and Virtual Organizations3(4): 43–64.
27.
GallivanM.J. (2001). Striking a Balance Between Trust and Control in a Virtual Organization: A content analysis of open source software case studies, Information Systems Journal11(4): 277–304.
28.
GoldmanS.L., NagelR.N., and PreissK. (1995). Agile Competitors and Virtual Organization: Strategies for Enriching the Customer, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
29.
GöranssonÅ., and SchuhG. (1997). Das Netzwerkmanagement in der virtuellen Fabrik, in Müller-StewensG. (ed.) Virtualisierung von Organisationen, Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, pp. 61–81.
30.
GrinterR.E., HerbslebJ.D., and PerryD.E. (1999). The Geography of Coordination: Dealing with distance in R&D work, in Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP ‘99)), New York: ACM Press. 306–315.
31.
HageJ. (1988). Innovating to Adapt Strategy and Human Resources to Rapid Technological Change, MA: Lexington Books.
32.
HallW. (1995). Managing Cultures - Making Strategic Relationships Work, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
33.
HeydebrandW. (1989). New Organisation Forms, Work and Occupations16: 323–357.
34.
HughesJ.A., O'BrienJ., RandallD., RouncefieldM., and TolmieP. (2001). Some ‘Real’ Problems of ‘Virtual’ Organisation, New Technology, Work and Employment16(1): 49–64.
35.
HuysmanM., and WulfV. (2006). IT to Support Knowledge Sharing in Communities, Towards a Social Capital Analysis, Journal of Information Technology21: 40–51.
36.
IntronaL.D. (2001). Recognising the Limits of Virtual Organizations, in HuntB., and BarnesS. (eds.) E-Commerce and V-business, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 268–278.
37.
IntronaL.D., and TiowB.L. (1997). Thinking About Virtual Organisations and the Future, in GalliersR., MurphyC., HansenH.R., O'CallaghanR., CarlssonS., and LoebbeckeC. (eds.), 5th European Conference on Information Systems, Cork: Cork Publishing.
38.
IrelandR.D., HittM.A., and VaidyanathD. (2002). Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management28(3): 413–446.
39.
JarvenpaaS.L., and LeidnerD.E. (1999). Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams, Organization Science10(6): 791–815.
40.
Kasper-FuehrerE.C., and AshkanasyN.M. (2001). Communicating Trustworthiness and Building Trust in Interorganizational Virtual Organizations, Journal of Management Information Systems27: 235–254.
41.
Kasper-FuehrerE.C., and AshkanasyN.M. (2004). The Interorganizational Virtual Organization, International Studies of Management & Organization33(4): 34–64.
42.
KatzyB.R., and SchuhG. (1998). The Virtual Enterprise, in MolinaA., SanchezJ.M., and KusiakA. (eds.) Handbooks of Life-Cycle Engineering: Concepts, Methods, and Tools, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
43.
KhalilO., and WangS. (2002). Information Technology Enabled Meta-Management for Virtual Organizations, International Journal of Production Economics75(1/2): 127–134.
44.
KieslerS., and CummingsJ.N. (2002). What do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research, in HindsP., and KieslerS. (eds.) Distributed Work, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 57–80.
45.
KraussR.M., and FussellS.R. (1990). Mutual Knowledge and Communicative Effectiveness, in GalegherJ., KrautR.E., and EgidoC. (eds.) Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 111–145.
46.
LarsenK.R.T., and McInerneyC.R. (2002). Preparing to Work in the Virtual Organization, Information & Management39: 445–456.
47.
LawtonT.C., and MichaelsK.P. (2001). Advancing to the Virtual Value Chain: Learning from the Dell model, Irish Journal of Management22(1): 91–112.
48.
LeanaC.R., and van BurenH.J.III (1999). Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices, Academy of Management Journal24(3): 538–555.
49.
LesterS.W., ReadyK.J., HostagerT.J., and BergmannM. (2003). The Human Side of Group Support Systems: Influences on satisfaction and effectiveness, Journal of Managerial Issues15(3): 317–337.
50.
LevineJ.M., and MorelandR.L. (1991). Culture and Socialization in Work Groups, in ResnickL.B., LevineJ.M., and TeasleyS.D. (eds.) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 257–279.
51.
LipnackJ., and StampsJ. (2000). Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries with Technology, 2nd edn, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
52.
MalhotraA., MajchrzakA., CarmanR., and LottV. (2001). Radical Innovation without Collocation: A case study at Boeing-Rocketdyne, MIS Quarterly25(2): 229–249.
53.
MarkusM.L., ManvilleB., and AgresC.E. (2000). What makes a Virtual Organization Work?Sloan Management Review42(1): 13–26.
54.
MeyersonD., WeickK.E., and KramerR.M. (1996). Swift Trust and Temporary Groups, in KramerR.M., and TylerT.R. (eds.) Trust in Organizations, London: SAGE Publications, pp. 166–195.
55.
MintzbergH., RaisinghaniD., and ThéoretA. (1976). The Structure of Unstructured Decision Processes, ASQ21: 246–275.
56.
MollerC. (1997). The Virtual Organisation, Automation in Construction6(1): 39–42.
57.
MowshowitzA. (1999). The Switching Principle in Virtual Organization, eJoV - the Journal for Networks and Virtual Organizations1: 6–18.
58.
NahapietJ., and GhoshalS. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage, Academy of Management Review23: 242–266.
59.
NardiB.A., and WhittakerS. (2002). The Place of Face-to-Face Communication in Distributed Work, in HindsP., and KieslerS. (eds.) Distributed Work, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 83–110.
60.
NohriaN., and EcclesR. (1992). Face-to-Face: Making network organizations work, in NohriaN., and EcclesR. (eds.) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Boston: HBS Press, pp. 288–308.
61.
NonakaI., and TakeuchiH. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
62.
OlsonG.M., and OlsonJ.S. (2000). Distance Matters, Human Computer Interaction15(2): 139–178.
63.
O'SullivanA. (2003). Dispersed Collaboration In A Multi-Firm, Multi-Team Product-Development Project, Journal of Engineering Technology Management20: 93–116.
64.
PauleenD.J., and YoongP. (2001). Relationship Building and the Use of ICT in Boundary-Crossing Virtual Teams: A facilitator's perspective, Journal of Information Technology16: 205–220.
65.
PihkalaT., VaramäkiE., and VesalainenJ. (1999). Virtual Organization and the SMEs: A review and model development, Entrepreneur ship & Regional Development11(4): 335–349.
66.
PihlH. (2002). A New Organisational form in Multinational Enterprises - From M-form to W-form, in EIBE 2002- European International Business Academy Conference (Athens), 3–5 December, http://www.aueb.gr/deos/EIBA2002.files/PAPERS/W21.pdf [Accessed 21 July 2006].
67.
PiscitelloL., and SgobbiF. (2004). Globalisation, E-Business and SMEs: Evidence from the Italian district of Prato, Small Business Economics22(5): 333–347.
68.
PlüssA., and HuberC. (2005). Virtuellefabrik.ch - A Source Network for VE in Mechatronics, in Camarinha-MatosL.M., AfsarmaneshH., and OllusM. (eds.) Virtual Organizations - Systems and Practices, New York: Springer, pp. 255–264.
69.
PortesA. (1998). Social Capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology, Annual Review of Sociology24(1): 1–24.
70.
PrusakL., and CohenD. (2001). How to Invest in Social Capital, Harvard Business Review79(6): 86–93.
71.
PutnamL. (2001). Distance Teamwork - The Realities of Collaborating with Virtual Colleagues, Online25(2): 54–58.
72.
RahmanZ., and BhattachryyaS.K. (2002). Virtual Organization: A stratagem, Singapore Management Review24(2): 29–45.
73.
ReagansR., and ZuckermanE.W. (2001). Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams, Organization Science12(4): 502–517.
74.
RiemerK., FrößlerF., and KleinS. (2007). Real Time Communication - Modes of use in distributed teams, in 15th European Conference on Information Systems, St. Gallen (CH), 07–09 June 2007.
75.
RiemerK., KleinS., and SelzD. (2001). Classification of Dynamic Organizational Forms and Coordination Roles, in E-work and E-commerce (Proceedings of the e2001 Conference on E-work and E-business) (Venice, 2001), Amsterdam: IOS Press.
76.
RitzerG. (1989). The Permanently New Economy: The case for veviving economic sociology, Work and Occupations16: 243–272.
77.
SaabeelW., VerduijnT., HagdornL., and KumarK. (2002). A Model of Virtual Organisation: A structure and process perspective, eJOV - the Journal for Networks and Virtual Organizations4(1): 1–17.
78.
SantoroR., and BifulcoA. (2005). Survey of Industry Case Studies, in Camarinha-MatosL.M., AfsarmaneshH., and OllusM. (eds.) Virtual Organizations - Systems and Practices, New York: Springer, pp. 201–220.
79.
ShinY. (2004). A Person-Environment Fit Model for Virtual Organizations, Journal of Management30(5): 725–743.
80.
TalukderM.I. (2003). The Perception of Professionals and Management Personnel on the Virtual Organization, The Journal of Computer Information Systems43(3): 92–99.
81.
TianfieldH., and UnlandR. (2002). IT Enabling: Essence of virtual organizations, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making1(3): 367–370.
82.
TravicaB. (2005). Virtual Organization and Electronic Commerce, Database for Advances in Information Systems36(3): 45–68.
83.
TumaA. (1998). Configuration and Coordination of Virtual Production Networks, International Journal of Production Economics56/57: 641–648.
84.
VenkatramanN., and HendersonJ.C. (1998). Real Strategies for Virtual Organizing, Sloan Management Review40(1): 34–49.
85.
Watson-ManheimM.B., ChudobaK.M., and CrowstonK. (2002). Discontinuities and Continuities: A new way to understand virtual work, Information, Technology & People15(3): 191–209.
86.
WehmeyerK., and RiemerK. (2007). Trust-Building Potential of Coordination Roles in Virtual Organizations, Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks (eJOV)8: 102–123.
87.
WigandR.T., PicotA., and ReichwaldR. (1997). Information, Organization and Management: Expanding Markets and Corporate Boundaries, New York: John Wiley.
