The efficacy of information and communication technology (ICT) projects and initiatives in developing countries, and how they may assist poverty reduction or otherwise improve the quality of life for communities in those countries, is still a topic of debate. Knowledge empowers people, while information technology integrates such knowledge for purposeful action and reaction. This paper describes a framework, based on social capital and knowledge management theories, which aims to further that debate in the field of information systems. The framework is primarily a sensitising device, designed to assist thinking about how social capital and knowledge theories facilitate ICT interventions for poverty reduction. The framework has four stages, the process of ICT development, the ICT intervention, the evaluation of the impact of the ICT intervention and the process of poverty reduction, which is the final and most contested stage of an ICT intervention. Each stage of the framework is discussed, using illustrations from various development projects. Finally, the paper draws some conclusions about the contribution of social capital and knowledge management theories to the issue of ICT intervention and evaluation in developing countries.
AdamM.S., and MyersM.D. (2003). Have You Got Anything to Declare? Neocolonialism, Information Systems, and the Imposition of Customs and Duties in a Third World Country, in KorpelaM., MontealegreR., and PoulymenakouA. (eds.) Organisational Information Systems in the Context of Globalisation, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2.
AdlerP.S., and KwonS.W. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a new concept, Academy of Management Review27(1): 17–40.
3.
AlaviM., and LeidnerD.E. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly25(1): 5–21.
4.
AvgerouC., and WalshamG. (2000). Introduction: IT in Developing Countries, in AvgerouC., and WalshamG. (eds.) Information Technology in Context: Studies from the Perspective of Developing Countries, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
5.
BhatnagarS. (2000). Social Implications of Information and Communication Technology in Developing Countries: Lessons from Asian success stories, Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries1(4): 1–9.
6.
BourdieuP. (1986). The Forms of Capital, in RichardsonJ.G. (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood, pp. 241–258.
7.
BraaJ., MacomeE., MavimbeJ.C., NhampossaJ.L., CostaJ.L., JoséB., ManaveA., and SitóiA. (2001). A Study of the Actual and Potential Usage of Information and Communication Technology at District and Provincial Levels in Mozambique with a Focus on the Health Sector, Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries5(2): 1–29.
8.
BurchJ., and GrudnitskiG. (1986). Information Systems: Theory and Practice, 4th edn, New York: Wiley.
9.
ChecklandP.B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester: Wiley.
10.
ChecklandP.B., and ScholesJ. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Chichester: Wiley.
11.
ChecklandP.B., and HolwellS. (1998). Information Systems and Information Systems - Making Sense of the Field, Chichester: Wiley.
12.
ChowdhuryN. (2000). Poverty Alleviation and Information/Communications Technologies, December. 2000. Towards a Motif for the United Nations ICT Task Force, http://www.eb2000.org/short_note_19.htm.
13.
ColemanJ.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, The American Journal of Sociology94(Supplement): S95–S120.
14.
CrawfordP., and Swete-KellyD. (2005). Monitoring and Evaluating Community Projects - Using Soft Systems Methodology to Define Requirements, Proceedings of the UN and Queensland Govt International Conference on Engaging Communities (Brisbane), 14–17 August 2005, http://www.engagingcommunities2005.org/abstracts/Swete-Kelly-David-final.pdf.
15.
CummingsS., HeeksR., and HuysmanM. (2003). Knowledge and Learning in Online Communities in Development: A social capital perspective, Institute for Development Policy and Management, Working Paper Series No.16, University of Manchester, http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/publications/wp/di/di_wpl6.htm.
16.
DeardenP. CIDT, JonesS., and SartoriousR. (2002). Tools For Development: A Handbook for Those Engaged in Development Activity, Department For International Development, UK Government, http://www.dfid.gov.uk/pubs/files/toolsfordevelopment.pdf.
17.
DymondA., and OestmannS. (2002). ICTs, Poverty Alleviation and Universal Access: Review of Status and Issues, ATPS Special Paper Series No. 9, African Technology Policy Studies Network, Nairobi, Kenya, http://www.atpsnet.org/.
18.
HarrissJ. (2002). Depoliticizing Development: The World Bank and Social Capital, London: Anthem Press.
19.
HumphreyJ. (2006). Prospects and Challenges for Growth and Poverty Reduction in Asia, Development Policy Review24(s1): s29–s490.
20.
HuyerS., and MitterS. (2003). ICTs, Globalisation and Poverty Reduction: Gender Dimensions of the Knowledge Society Part I, Poverty Reduction, Gender Equality and the Knowledge Society: Digital Exclusion or Digital Opportunity? accessed on 9th August 2006 from http://gab.wigsat.org/partI.pdf.
21.
HuysmanM.H. (2004). Design Requirements for Knowledge Sharing Tools: A need for social capital analysis, in HuysmanM.H., and WulfV. (eds.) Social Capital and Information Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
JalavaI., and PohjolaM. (2002). Economic Growth in the New Economy: Evidence from advanced economies, Information Economics and policy14(2): 189–210.
23.
KakabadseN.K., KouzminA., and KakabadseA. (2001). From Tacit Knowledge to Knowledge Management: Leveraging invisible assets, Knowledge and Process Management8(3): 137–154.
KennyC. (2002). Information and Communication Technologies for Direct Poverty Alleviation: Costs and benefits, Development Policy Review20: 141–157.
26.
KhasianiS.A. (2000). Enhancing Women's Participation in Governance: The case of Kakamega and Makueni Districts, Kenya, in RathgeberE.M., and AderaE.O. (eds.) Gender and the Information Revolution in Africa, Ottawa: International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Chapter 8. http://www.idrc.ca/books/focus/903/11-chp08.html.
27.
KleinH.K., and MyersM.D. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly23(1): 67–94.
28.
KraemerK.L., and DedrickJ. (2001). Information Technology and Productivity: Results and policy implications of cross-country studies, in PohjolaM. (ed.) Information Technology, Productivity, and Economic Growth, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 257–279.
29.
LappeF.M., and Du BoisP.M. (1997). Building Social Capital without Looking Backward, National Civic Review86: 119–128.
30.
LeeJ. (2001). Education for Technology Readiness: Prospects for developing countries, Journal of Human Development2(1): 115–151.
31.
LimE. (1999). Human Resource Development for the Information Society, Asian Libraries8(5): 143–161.
MarkerP., McNamaraK., and WallaceL. (2002). The Significance of Information and Communication Technologies for Reducing Poverty, Report of the UK Department for International Development, 2002, retrieved from http://www.dfid.gov.uk/pubs/files/ictpoverty.pdf.
34.
McNamaraK. (2003). Information and Communication Technologies, Poverty and Development: Learning from experience, Background paper for the infoDev Annual Symposium, December 2003, Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs, retrieved from www.infodev.org/en/Document.17.aspx.
35.
NahapietJ., and GhoshalS. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage, Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review23(2): 242–266.
36.
NonakaI., and TakeuchiH. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Countries Create the Dynamics of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
OkunoyeA. (2003). Organisational Information Technology Infrastructure in Developing Countries: A comparative analysis of national vs. international research organisations in two Sub-Saharan African countries, Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications5(2): 8–26.
38.
OkunoyeA., and KarstenH. (2002). Where the Global Needs the Local: Variation in enablers in the knowledge management process, Journal of Global Information Technology Management5(3): 12–31.
39.
Opoku-MensahA. (2000). ICTs as Tools of Democratization: African women speak out, in RathgeberE.M., and AderaE.O. (eds.) Gender and the Information Revolution in Africa, Ottawa: International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Chapter 7, retrieved from http://www.idrc.ca/books/focus/903/10-chp07.html.
40.
OrlikowskiW.J. (2002). Knowing in Practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing, Organization Science13(3): 249–273.
41.
PiggK.E., and CrankL.D. (2004). Building Community Social Capital: The potential and promise of information communications technologies, Journal of Community Informatics1(1): 58–73, retrieved from http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/184/132.
42.
PolyaniM. (1966). The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
43.
SchuurmanF.J. (2003). Social Capital: The polito-emancipatory potential of a disputed concept, Third World Quarterly24(6): 991–1010.
44.
SkuseA. (2000). Eliminating World Poverty: Making Globalization Work for the Poor, White Paper commissioned for DFID.
45.
van der VeldenM.V. (2002). Knowledge Facts, Knowledge Fiction: The role of ICTs in knowledge management for development, Journal of International Development14(1): 25–37.
46.
WalshamG., SahayS., and RobeyD. (2004). MIS Quarterly Call For Papers: Special Issue on Information Systems and Developing Countries, www.misq.org.
47.
WarschauerM. (2003). Social Inclusion and Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
