This is the first paper in a three part series to be published in successive issues of this journal. It discusses the implementation of an empirically based input—output model for the city of Peterborough for 1968. The nature of the model, the problems of definition, the development of control totals, the survey procedures, and the way in which the input—output table was constructed are considered in detail, both as an introduction to the later papers and because it is felt that these issues will be of sufficient interest to others engaged in similar research elsewhere.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Board of Trade, 1969, Board of Trade Journal, 197, No.3798, 1745–1792.
2.
Central Statistical Office, 1968a, Standard Industrial Classification (HMSO, London).
3.
Central Statistical Office, 1968b, Standard Industrial Classification: Alphabetical List of Industries (HMSO, London).
4.
CheneryH. B.ClarkP. G., 1959, Interindustry Economics (John Wiley, New York).
5.
City of Peterborough, 1970, Estimates 1970–1971 (City Treasurer's Department, Peterborough).
6.
Department of Employment and Productivity, 1969, Family Expenditure Survey 1968 (HMSO, London).
7.
EvansW. D.HoffenbergM., 1952, “The interindustry relations study for 1947”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 34, 97–142.
8.
General Register Office, 1969, Sample Census 1966 (HMSO, London).
9.
HancockT., 1966, Expansion of Peterborough—Consultant's Proposals for Designation (HMSO, London).
IsardW., 1953, “Some empirical results and problems of regional input—output analysis”, in Studies in the Structure of the American Economy, Ed. LeontiefW. (Oxford University Press, New York), pp. 116–181.
12.
IsardW., 1960, Methods of Regional Analysis (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.).
13.
LeontiefW., 1936, “Quantitative input—output relations in the economic system of the United States”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 18, 105–125.
14.
LeontiefW. (Ed.), 1953, “Interregional theory”, in Studies in the Structure of the American Economy (Oxford University Press, New York), pp. 93–115.
15.
LeontiefW., 1966, Input-Output Economics (Oxford University Press, New York).
16.
LeontiefW.StroutA., 1963, “Multiregional input—output analysis”, in Structural Interdependence and Economic Development, Ed. BarnaT. (Macmillan, London), pp. 119–150.
17.
MabeyR.WilliamsonC., 1970, “Incomes, earnings, wages and salaries: A note on the data services and their relevance for small areas”, unpublished paper, Research Section Secretariat, East Anglian Planning Board, London.
18.
MiernykW. H., 1965, The Elements of Input—Output Analysis (Random House, New York).
19.
MiernykW. H., 1967, Impact of the Space Program on a Local Economy (West Virginia University Library, Morgantown, West Virginia).
20.
MiernykW. H., 1968, “Long-range forecasting with an input—output model”, Western Economic Journal, 6, 165–176.
21.
MillerR. E., 1966, “Interregional feedbacks in input—output models: Some preliminary results”, Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 17, 105–125.
22.
MorrisonW. I., 1970, “The estimation of control totals and the calculation of direct coefficients for the distributive sectors in a local input—output study”, in CES-CP-1, Centre for Environmental Studies, London.
23.
Peterborough Development Corporation, 1969, First Annual Report for the Period Ended 31st March 1969 (HMSO, London).
24.
Peterborough Development Corporation, 1970, Greater Peterborough Master Plan (Peterborough Development Corporation, Peterborough).
25.
PolenskeK. R., 1970, “Empirical implementation of a multiregional input—output gravity trade model”, in Contributions to Input—Output Analysis, Eds. CarterA. P.BrodyA. (North-Holland, Amsterdam), pp. 143–163.
26.
TieboutC. M., 1957, “Regional and interregional input—output models; an appraisal”, Southern Economic Journal, 24, 140–147.
27.
TilanusC. B., 1967, “Marginal versus average coefficients in input—output forecasting”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81, 140–145.
28.
WellsH. W., 1963, Peterborough; An Expansion Study (H.W.Wells, London).
29.
YanC. -S., 1969, Introduction to Input—Output Economics (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).