This paper discusses the relationship between the highly disaggregated studies of spatial behaviour and perception, which are becoming more and more commonplace in the geographic and planning literature, and the basic tenets of the methods generally accepted within the parent disciplines of human geography and regional science. The argument is advanced that the relationship is an unfortunate one of dependence; that behavioural research in geography has accepted too easily a philosophy of science and an approach to problem formulation and hypothesis testing which is ‘handed down’ indirectly from the natural sciences; and that this limitation has effectively precluded a whole range of approaches to the study of human spatial behaviour, approaches which could be very fruitful indeed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AppleyardDCraikKKlappMKreimerA, 1974“The Berkeley environmental stimulator” WP-206 Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley
2.
BeckR, 1967“Spatial meaning, and the properties of the environment” in Environmental Perception and Behaviour Ed. LowenthalD, RP-109, Department of Geography, University of Chicago, pp 18–41
3.
ButtimerA, 1972“Social space and the planning of residential areas”Environment and Behaviour4279–318
CoxK RGolledgeR G, (Eds), 1969Behavioural Problems in Geography: A Symposium, Northwestern University Studies in Geography17
6.
CoxK RZannarasG, 1970“Designative perceptions of macro space”Environmental Design Research Association Proceedings2118–134
7.
CraikK, 1972“Psychological factors in landscape appraisal”Environment and Behaviour4255–266
8.
DouglasJ, 1971“Understanding everyday life” in Understanding Everyday Life Ed. DouglasJ (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 3–45
9.
DownsR, 1970“The cognitive structure of an urban shopping centre”Environment and Behaviour213–39
10.
DownsRSteaD, 1973“Cognitive maps and spatial behaviour: process and products” in Image and Environment Eds DownsRSteaD (Edward Arnold, London) pp 8–26
11.
GarfinkelH, 1967Studies in Ethnomethodology (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
12.
GolledgeRBrownL A, 1967“Search, learning and the market decision process”Geografisca Annaler49116–124
13.
GouldP R, 1969“Problems of space preferences, measures and relationships”Geographical Analysis134–44
14.
GouldP ROlaD, 1970“The perception of residential area desirability in the Western Region of Nigeria”Environment and Planning273–87
15.
HägerstrandT, 1970“What about people in regional science?”Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association247–21
16.
HägerstrandT, 1973“The domain of human geography” in Directions in Geography Ed. ChorleyR J (Methuen, London) pp 67–87
17.
HarrisonJSarreP, 1971“Personal construct theory in the measurement of environmental images”Environment and Behaviour3351–374
18.
HarveyD, 1970“Behavioural postulates and the construction of theory in human geography”Geographia Polonia1827–45
19.
HarveyD, 1973Social Justice and the City (Edward Arnold, London)
20.
HoinvilleG, 1971“Measuring environmental preferences”Environment and Planning333–50
21.
HortonF EReynoldsD R, 1971“Effects of urban spatial structure on individual behaviour”Economic Geography4736–48
22.
JacksonL EJohnstonR J, 1972“Structuring the image: an investigation of the elements of mental maps”Environment and Planning4415–427
23.
KatesR, 1967“The perception of storm hazard on the shores of megalopolis” in Environmental Perception and Behaviour Ed. LowenthalD, RP-109, Department of Geography, University of Chicago, pp 60–74
24.
KuhnT S, 1962The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago)
25.
LeeT, 1968“Urban neighbourhood as a socio-spatial schema”Human Relations21241–268
26.
LeeT, 1970“Perceived distance as a function of direction in the city”Environment and Behaviour240–51
27.
LowryI S, 1964Model of Metropolis RM-4125-RC, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif
28.
MichelsonW, 1973“Discretionary and non-discretionary aspects of activity and social contact in residential selection” in The Form of Cities in Central Canada Ed. BourneL S (University of Toronto Press, Toronto)
29.
MurdochI, 1968The Nice and the Good (Chatto and Windus, London)
30.
OlssonG, 1969“Inference problems in locational analysis” in Behavioural Problems in Geography: A Symposium Eds CoxK RGolledgeR GNorthwestern University Studies in Geography1714–34
31.
PiagetJ, 1970Structuralism (Basic Books, New York)
32.
PopperK, 1961The Poverty of Historicism (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London)
33.
SkinnerB F, 1953Science and Human Behavioursecond edition (Macmillan, New York)
34.
SonnenfeldJ, 1967“Environmental perception and adaptation level in the Arctic” in Environmental Perception and Behaviour Ed. LowenthalD, RP-109, Department of Geography, University of Chicago, pp 42–59
35.
SteaD, 1969“The measurement of mental maps: an experimental model for studying conceptual spaces” in Behavioural Problems in Geography: A Symposium Eds CoxK RGolledgeR GNorthwestern University Studies in Geography17228–253
36.
WeberM, 1922The Theory of Social and Economic Organization edited and translated by TalcottParsons (Oxford University Press, London)
37.
WilsonA G, 1972“Behavioural inputs to aggregative urban system models” in Papers in Urban and Regional Analysis (Pion, London) pp 71–90
38.
WolpertJ, 1965“Behavioural aspects of the decision to migrate”Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association15159–169
39.
WolpertJ, 1971“Micro urban research: priorities and hazards”paper delivered to the joint meeting of the Royal Geographical Society and Institute of British Geographers at the SSRC, London
