In this paper we apply the notion of the amorphous family nexus (AFN) to examine the underinvestigated implications of family-like ties existing between minor NGOs (m-NGOs) and communities in sustaining the momentum of developmental activities despite resource scarcity and weak institutional support. AFN embodies symbolic connectedness and meaningful associations that actors enjoy with each other within and independently of the family nexus. Focusing on Bundelkhand-based m-NGO Haritika's (a non-profit-making research consultancy) initiatives centred on improving water quality and availability, we analyse the emotional dynamics inherent in the carefully crafted social bonds existing amongst fieldworkers, community members, and volunteers. Our findings reveal how their kindred camaraderie and displays of affection and trust, a result of their long-standing affiliations, are able to activate latent resources and creative energy as they seek to involve each other as active partners in enacting their daily routines.
AdamsonW, 1997, “Gramsci and the politics of civil society”Praxis International7300–329
2.
AllardSTolmanR MRosenD, 2003, “Proximity to service providers and service utilization among welfare recipients: The interaction of place and race”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management22599–613
3.
AndrewsA, 2014, “Downward accountability in unequal alliances: Explaining NGO responses to Zapatista demands”World Development5499–113
4.
AppaduraiA, 2004, “‘The capacity to aspire’: Culture and the terms of recognition”, in Culture and Public Action Eds RaoVWaltonM, (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) pp 59–84
5.
BebbingtonS, 1997, “New states, new NGOs? Crises and transitions among rural development NGOs in the Andean region”World Development251755–1765
6.
BengstonV LRobertsR E L, 1991, “Intergenerational solidarity in ageing families: An example of formal theory construction”Journal of Marriage and Family53856–870
7.
BRGF, 2009A Note on the Backward Regions Grant Fund ProgrammeNational Institute of Rural Development, Hyderabad
8.
BryantR L, 2001, “Explaining state-environmental NGO relations in the Philippines and Indonesia”Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography22(1) 15–37
9.
Census, 2001, “Population projections for India and States 2001–2026”, Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India
10.
ChandrashekaraU MSankarS, 1999, “Ecology and management of sacred groves in Kerela, India”Forest Ecology and Management112 (1/2) 165–177
11.
CiavolellaR, 2012, “Huunde fof ko Politik: Everything is politics: Gramsci, Fulani, and the margins of the state in Mauritania”Africa Today58(3) 2–21
12.
CoxR, 1983, “Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method”Millennium: Journal of International Studies12162–175
13.
de CerteauM, 1984The Practice of Everyday Life Ed. RandallS, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
14.
DharA, 2012, “Whither Bundelkhand package?”The Hindu 12 February
15.
Directorate of Economics and Statistics,2010Madhya Pradesh Development ReportMinistry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Madhya Pradesh
16.
DolhinowR, 2005, “Caught in the middle: The state, NGOs, and the limits to grassroots organizing along the US-Mexico border”Antipode37559–578
17.
DrichelS, 2013, “Towards a ‘radical acceptance of vulnerability’: Postcolonialism and deconstruction”SubStance42(3)46–66
18.
DurkheimE, 1964/1893The Division of Labour in Society translated by SimpsonG, (The Free Press of Glencoe, New York)
19.
EdwardsMHulmeDWallaceT, 1999, “NGOs in a global future: Marrying delivery to worldwide leverage”Public Administration and Development19(2) 117–136
20.
EscobarA, 1995Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
21.
FeldmanS, 1997, “NGOs and civil society”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science5546–66
22.
FingermanK L, 2009, “Consequential strangers and peripheral ties: The importance of unimportant relationships”Journal of Family Theory and Review169–86
23.
GettingsSThakurR, 2007, “Feasibility study: Micro finance programme, Chhatarpur: Empowerment of women through micro finance”, Action for Social Advancement, Madhya Pradesh
24.
GledhillJ, 2005, “Citizenship and the social geography of deep neo-liberalization”Anthropologica47(1) 81–100
25.
GleitsmannB AMargaretKSteenhuisT, 2007, “Analysis of a rural water supply project in three communities in Mali: Participation and sustainability”Natural Resources Forum31142–150
26.
GopalA, 2010, “MGNREGA in UP Bundelkhand: Regular irregularities”, Centre For Environment and Food Security, Delhi
27.
GramsciA,1934, “Ai Margini della storia (Storia dei gruppi sociali subalterni)”, in Quaderni Dal Carcere Notebook25 (XXIII) (Einaudi, Turin)
28.
GramsciA,1935, “Osservazione sul folklore”, in Quaderni Dal Carcere Notebook27 (XI) (Einaudi, Turin)
29.
GuruG, 2011, “Bundelkhand suffers from low industrialisation and development”, http://www.bundelkhand.in
30.
HareliSParkinsonB, 2008, “What's social about social emotions?”Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour38(2) 131–156
31.
HarshMMbatiaPShrumW, 2010, “Accountability and inaction: NGOS and resource lodging in development”Development and Change41253–278
32.
HillT RNelE LIllgnerP, 2007, “Partnership for success—community-based economic development: A case study of Ngolowindo Cooperative, Malawi”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy25573–590
33.
HochschildA, 1979, “Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure”American Journal of Sociology85551–575
34.
IshkanianA, 2007, “En-gendering civil society and democracy-building: The anti-domestic violence campaign in Armenia”Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society14488–525
JohnJ, 2012, “Madhya Pradesh asks centre to declare nine more districts as Naxal affected”The Times of India 5 June
37.
JohnsonNLiljaNAshbyJ AGarciaJ A, 2004, “The practice of participatory research and gender analysis in natural resource management”Natural Resources Forum28189–200
38.
JohnstonC, 2012, “The political art of patience: Adivasi resistance in India”Antipode441268–1286
39.
JungeB, 2012, “NGOs as shadow pseudopublics: Grassroots community leaders' perceptions of change and continuity in Porto Alegre, Brazil”American Ethnologist39407–424
40.
KapoorD, 2005, “NGO partnerships and the taming of the grassroots in rural India”Development in Practice15210–215
41.
KeckM ESikkinkK, 1998Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
42.
KloekG Cvan LentheF Jvan NieropP W MKoelenM AMackenbachJ P, 2006, “Impact evaluation of a Dutch community intervention to improve health-related behaviour in deprived neighbourhoods”Health and Place12665–677
43.
KohlB, 2003, “Nongovernmental organizations as intermediaries for decentralization in Bolivia”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21317–331
44.
KrishnaA, 2001, “Moving from the stock of social capital to the flow of benefits: The role of agency”World Development29925–943
45.
McLoughlinC, 2011, “Factors affecting state–non-governmental organisation relations in service provision: Key themes from the literature”Public Administration and Development31240–251
46.
ManjulT, 2010, “Namaskar, Bundelkhand”The Indian Express 21 March
47.
MGNREGA, 2005, The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India
48.
MosseD, 2004, “Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice”Development and Change35639–671
49.
NagarRRajuS, 2003, “Women, NGOs and the contradictions of empowerment and disempowerment: A conversation”Antipode351–13
50.
NiaziS, 2008, “Caste difference contributes to violence against Dalit women—Central India”, Women News Network—WNN, 27 January
51.
O'ReillyK, 2011, “‘We are not contractors’: Professionalizing the interactive service work of NGOs in Rajasthan, India”Economic Geography87207–226
52.
PorterGLyonF, 2006, “Groups as a means or an end? Social capital and the promotion of cooperation in Ghana”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24249–262
53.
ReimannK, 2010The Rise of Japanese NGOs: Activism from Above (Routledge, London)
54.
RichardA M, 2009, “Mediating dilemmas: Local NGOs and rural development in neoliberal Mexico”PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review32166–194
55.
RoutledgeP, 2012, “Sensuous solidarities: Emotion, politics and performance in the clandestine insurgent Rebel Clown Army”Antipode44428–452
56.
SatpathyMMalikAGangulyUAryaV, 2002, “Who should manage Chandeli Tanks? Findings from a study of tanks in Tikamgarh”, IWMI-Tata Water Policy Programme, Gujarat
57.
SenSShahAKumarA, 2002, “Watershed development programmes in Madhya Pradesh: Present scenario and issues for convergence”, Gujarat Institute of Development Research, Forum for Watershed Research and Policy Dialogue
58.
ShahA, 2009Land Degradation and Migration in a Dry Land Region in India: Extent, Nature and Determinants (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
59.
SilversteinMBengstonV L, 1997, “Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child–parent relationships in American families”American Journal of Sociology103429–460
60.
SinghB, 2011, “Agonistic intimacy and moral aspiration in popular Hinduism: A study in the political theology of the neighbor”American Ethnologist38430–450
61.
SmithM BJenkinsK, 2012, “Existing at the interface: Indian NGO activists as strategic cosmopolitans”Antipode44640–662
62.
The Hindu2010, “Investors promised freebies in drought-prone Bundelkhand”, 6 March
63.
UvinPJainP SBrownD L, 2000, “Think large and act small: Toward a new paradigm for NGO scaling up”World Development281409–1419
64.
WebbJ WKistruckG MIrelandR DKetchenD J, 2010, “The entrepreneurship process in base of the pyramid markets: The case of multinational enterprise/nongovernment organization alliances”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34555–581
65.
WeenigM W HMiddenC J H, 1997, “Mass-media information campaigns and knowledge-gap effects”Journal of Applied Social Psychology27945–958
66.
WolfE, 2004, “Kinship, friendship, and patron–client relations in complex societies”, in The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies Ed. BantonM, (Routledge, London) pp 1–22
67.
YiyiL, 2007, “The autonomy of Chinese NGOs: A new perspective”China: An International Journal5173–203
68.
ZentnerE BAponteH J, 1970, “The amorphous family nexus”Psychiatric Quarterly44(1) 91–113
