Economics does not come in only one version. In order to understand the emergence of carbon markets, this paper turns to the offices of politics and administration and argues that carbon markets ought to be seen as an effect of different versions of economics. Hence, the paper suggests that, in analysing and exploring the emergence of carbon markets, it is not sufficient to focus on market devices. We must study a wider set of devices, such as modelling practices, planning documents, and paper trails. The basis for this analysis is a study of a particular office, the Norwegian Ministry of Finance. The paper traces how, within this office, the climate issue was transformed into an oil issue and how accounting and planning technologies took part in enacting the macroeconomy, rather than the environment, as an endangered object. Hence, when studying the performativity of economics, the macroeconomy must be included, the paper argues, and so must the study of the issue that is being enacted. In pursuing the analysis in this way, the paper seeks to demonstrate that the emergence of carbon markets pertained to not only an emergent climate issue but also to an emergent oil issue.
AsdalK, 1998Knappe ressurser? Økonomenes grep om miljøfeltet (Universitetsforlaget, Oslo)
2.
AsdalK, 2007, “Re-inventing politics of the state: Science and the politics of contestation”, in Technoscience: The Politics of Interventions Eds AsdalKBrennaBMoserI, (Unipub, Oslo) pp 309–326
3.
AsdalK, 2008, “Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into account/ing”Geoforum39123–132
4.
AsdalK, 2011a, “The office: The weakness of numbers and the production of non-authority”Accounting, Organizations and Society361–9
AsdalK, 2012, “Contexts in action—and the future of the past in STS”Science, Technology and Human Values37379–403
7.
AsdalK, 2014, “From commodification to co-modification: On innovation devices, value-practices and the modification of markets and bodies in aquaculture”, in Value Practices in the Life Sciences Eds DussaugeIHelgessonC-FLeeF, (Oxford University Press) forthcoming
8.
AsdalKMoserI, 2012, “Experiments in context and contexting”Science, Technology and Human Values37291–306
9.
BarryA, 2001Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society (Athlone Press, London)
10.
BarryASlaterD, 2002, “Introduction: The technological economy”Economy and Society31175–193
11.
BarryABellVRoseN, 1995, “Introduction”Economy and Society24485–488
12.
BeckU, 1997The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order (Polity Press, Cambridge)
13.
BeckerPClarkW, 2001, “Introduction”, in Little Tools of Knowledge: Historical Essays on Academic and Bureaucratic Practices Eds BeckerPClarkW, (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor MI) pp 1–34
14.
BlokA, 2011, “Clash of the eco-sciences: Carbon marketization, environmental NGOs and performativity as politics”Economy and Society40451–476
15.
BoltanskiLThévenotL, 2006On Justification: Economies of Worth (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
16.
BoydE, 2009, “Governing the clean development mechanism: Global rhetoric versus local realities in carbon sequestration projects”Environment and Planning A412380–2395
17.
BoykoffM TBumpusALivermanDRandallsS, 2009, “Theorizing the carbon economy: Introduction to the special issue”Environment and Planning A412299–2304
18.
CallonM, 1998The Laws of the Markets (Blackwell, Oxford)
19.
CallonM, 2009, “Civilizing markets: Carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments”Accounting, Organizations and Society34(3–4) 535–548
20.
CallonMLawJ, 1982, “On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment”Social Studies of Science12615–625
21.
CallonMMilloYMuniesaF, 2007, “An introduction to market devices”, in Market Devices Eds CallonMMilloYMuniesaF, (Blackwell, Malden, MA) pp 1–39
22.
CookA, 2009, “Emission rights: From costless activity to market operations”Accounting, Organizations and Society34(3–4) 456–468
23.
Dagens Næringsliv1988a, “Miljøet har måttet vike”, 9 July
24.
Dagens Næringsliv1988b, “Miljømøte i Oslo”, 11 July
25.
DamroCMéndezP L, 2003, “Emissions trading at Kyoto: From EU resistance to Union innovation”Environmental Politics12(2) 71–94
26.
DeleuzeG, 1989, “Qu'est-ce qu'un dispositif?”, in Michel Foucault philosophe: Rencontre internationale Paris 9, 10, 11, janvier 1988 (Seuil, Paris) pp 185–195
27.
DésrosièresA, 1998The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
28.
DeweyJ, 1927The Public and its Problems (Henry Holt, New York)
29.
ErichsenE, 1971, “Må vi velge mellom økonomisk vekst og naturvern?”, in Økonomi og politikk: 15 artikler Eds BjerveP JMyrvollO, (Aschehoug, Oslo) pp 51–66
30.
FergusonJ, 1994The Anti-politics Machine: “Development,” Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
31.
Finansdepartementet, 1988–89, “Stortingsmelding nr 4 1988–89: Langtidsprogrammet 1990–1993”Stortingsforhandlinger 1988–89
32.
FoucaultM, 2007Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78 (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
33.
HajerM AWagenaarH, 2003, “Introduction”, in Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society Eds HajerM AWagenaarH, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
34.
HaydenC P, 2003When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
35.
HonigB, 1993Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
36.
HopwoodA G, 1987, “The archaeology of accounting systems”Accounting, Organizations and Society12(3) 207–234
37.
HopwoodA G, 2009, “Accounting and the environment”Accounting, Organizations and Society34(3–4) 433–439
38.
Knorr-CetinaK, 1995, “Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science”, in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies Eds JasanoffSMarkleG EPetersenJ CPinchT, (Sage, London) pp 140–166
39.
LatourB, 1987Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
40.
LatourB, 2005, “From realpolitik to dingpolitik, or how to make things public”, in Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy Eds LatourBWeibelP, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 4–31
41.
LatourB, 2007, “Turning around politics: A note on Gerard de Vries' paper”Social Studies of Science37811–820
42.
LatourBWoolgarS, 1986, “An anthropologist visits the laboratory”, in Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 43–104
43.
LaveRMirowskiPRandallsS, 2010, “Introduction: STS and neoliberal science”Social Studies of Science40659–675
44.
LawJ, 1986, “Editor's introduction: Power/knowledge and the dissolution of the sociology of knowledge”, in Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Ed. LawJ, (Routledge, London) pp 1–19
45.
LieE, 1995Ambisjon og tradisjon: Finansdepartementet 1945–1965 (Universitetsforlaget, Oslo)
46.
LieERoll-HansenH, 2001Faktisk talt. Statistikkens historie i Norge [The history of statistics in Norway] (Scandinavian University Press, Oslo)
47.
LohmannL, 2006, “Carbon trading: A critical conversation on climate change, privatisation and power”Development Dialogue484–359
48.
LohmannL, 2009, “Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: The cases of carbon and cost-benefit”Accounting, Organizations and Society34(3–4) 499–534
49.
LovellHLivermanD, 2010, “Understanding carbon offset technologies”New Political Economy15255–273
50.
MacKenzieD, 2007, “The political economy of carbon trading”London Review of Books29(7) 29–31
51.
MacKenzieD, 2009, “Making things the same: Gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets”Accounting, Organizations and Society34(3–4) 440–455
52.
MarresN, 2005No Issue, No Public: Democratic Deficits after the Displacement of Politics PhD thesis, Faculty of Humanities, University of Amsterdam
53.
MarresN, 2007, “The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy”Social Studies of Science37759–780
54.
MarresN, 2008, “The making of climate publics: Eco-homes as material devices of publicity”Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory9(1) 27–46
55.
MarresN, 2012Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
56.
Miljøavgiftsutvalget, 1992NOU 1992:3 Mot en mer kostnadseffektiv miljøpolitikk i 1990-årene: Prinsipper og forslag til bedre prising av miljøet: Endelig innstilling fra MiljøavgiftsutvalgetNorges Offentlige Utredninger, Oslo
57.
MillerP, 1994, “Accounting and objectivity: The invention of calculating selves and calculable spaces”, in Rethinking Objectivity Ed. MegillA, (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 239–264
58.
MitchellT, 2011Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil (Verso, London)
59.
NelsonJ A, 2008, “Economists, value judgments, and climate change: A view from feminist economics”Ecological Economics65441–447
60.
NilsenY, 2001En felles plattform? Norsk oljeindustri og klimadebatten i Norge fram til 1998 PhD thesis, Det humanistiske fakultet, Universitetet i Oslo
61.
O'RiordanTJägerJ, 1996Politics of Climate Change: A European Perspective (Routledge, London)
RandallsS, 2011b, “Optimal climate change: Economics and climate science policy histories (from heuristic to normative)”Osiris26(1) 224–242
64.
ReitanM, 1998Interesser og institusjoner i miljøpolitikken PhD thesis, Institutt for statsvitenskap, Universitetet i Oslo
65.
RoseN, 1999Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
66.
RoseNMillerP, 1992, “Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government”The British Journal of Sociology43173–205
67.
SIMEN, 1989SIMEN: Studier av industri, miljø og energi fram mot år 2000Statistisk Sentralbyrå, Oslo
68.
SternN H, 2007The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
69.
StrickertS, 2009, “Politics in the making: From national green taxes to a global clearing-house”, master's thesis, Senter for teknologi, innovasjon og kultur, University of Oslo
70.
United Nations, 1987Our Common Future (World Commision on Environment and Development) (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
71.
WeberM, 1968, “Bureaucracy”, in Economy and Society, Volume 3 Eds RothGWittichC, (Bedminster Press, New York) pp 956–1005
72.
WoolgarS, 1981, “Interests and explanation in the social study of science”Social Studies of Science11365–394
