Further Discussion on Distance-Deterrence Parameters and the Competing Destinations Model

Ewing G O , 1986, “Spatial pattern in distance deterrence parameters and Fotheringham's theory of competing destinations” Environment and Planning A 18 547–551

Fotheringham A S , 1981, “Spatial structure and distance-decay parameters” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 71 425–436

Fotheringham A S , 1983a, “A new set of spatial-interaction models: The theory of competing destinations” Environment and Planning A 15 15–36

Fotheringham A S , 1983b, “Some theoretical aspects of destination choice and their relevance to production-constrained gravity models” Environment and Planning A 15 1121–1132

Fotheringham A S , 1984, “Spatial flows and spatial patterns” Environment and Planning A 16 529–543

Fotheringham A S , 1985a, “Marketing analysis and hierarchical destination choice: Replacing the gravity model formulation” paper presented at the 1985 ORSA/TIMS Annual Conference; manuscript available from the author Fotheringham A S , 1985b, “Spatial competition and agglomeration in urban modelling” Environment and Planning A 17 213–230

Fotheringham A S , 1986, “Modelling hierarchical destination choice” Environment and Planning A 18 401–418