Conventional literature on union growth and decline has failed to deal adequately with the local context of union elections, and has tended to rationalize the complexity of decentralized labor relations. This paper begins with a statement on the relevance of the topic for location theory, and the theory of regional growth and decline. Recent patterns in US unionization are considered before a review of early literature on unionization in relation to local labor markets structure. The institutional context of unionization is noted, with concentration on the role of the National Labor Relations Board, and state-level right-to-work legislation. The process of union representation elections is described with reference to the related literature. Suggestions are made for an empirical strategy which would deal more adequately with the local representation process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ, 1979, “Local union participation: A re-examination”Industrial Relations1818–31
2.
AndersonJBusmanGO'ReillyC, 1982, “The decertification process: Evidence from California”Industrial Relations21178–195
3.
AshenfelterOPencavelJ, 1969, “American trade union growth: 1900–1960”Quarterly Journal of Economics83434–448
4.
BeckerBMillerR, 1981, “Patterns and determinants of union growth in the hospital industry”Journal of Labor Research2309–328
5.
BellD, 1953, “The next American labor movement”Fortune April issue, pp 120–123, 201–206
6.
BernsteinI, 1954, “The growth of American unions”American Economic Review54301–318
7.
BernsteinI, 1961, “The growth of American unions, 1945–1960”Labor History2131–157
8.
BiermanLYoungbloodS, 1984, “Employment-at-will and the South Carolina experiment”Industrial Relations Law Journal728–39
9.
BlockRRoomkinM, 1982, “Determinants of voter participation in union certification elections”Monthly Labor Review April issue, pp 45–47
10.
BokD, 1971, “Reflections on the distinctive character of American labor laws”Harvard Law Review841394–1463
11.
BortsGSteinJ, 1964Economic Growth in Free Market (Columbia University Press, New York)
12.
ChafetzIFraserC, 1979, “Union decertification: An exploratory analysis”Industrial Relations1859–69
13.
ClarkGL, 1981, “The employment relation and spatial division of labor”Annals of the Association of American Geographers71412–424
14.
ClarkGL, 1986a, “Restructuring the US economy: The NLRB, the Saturn Project, and economic justice”Economic Geography65 (forthcoming)
15.
ClarkGL, 1986b, “The geography of employment: A progress report”Progress in Human Geography10416–426
16.
ClarkGLGertlerMWhitemanJ, 1986Regional Dynamics: Studies in Adjustment Theory (George Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
17.
CookeP, 1985, “Class practices as regional markers: A contribution to labour geography”, in Social Relations and Spatial Structures Eds GregoryDUrryJ, (Macmillan, London) pp 213–241
18.
CookeW, 1985, “The failure to negotiate first contracts: Determinants and policy implications”Industrial and Labor Relations Review38163–194
19.
CoxA, 1954, “Federalism in the law of labor relations”Harvard Law Review671297–1348
20.
CoxADunlopJ, 1950, “Regulation of collective bargaining by the National Labor Relations Board”Harvard Law Review63389–432
DickensWT, 1983, “The effect of company campaigns on certification elections: Law and Reality once again”Industrial and Labor Relations Review36560–575
23.
DickensWTLeonardJ, 1985, “Accounting for the decline in union membership, 1950–1980”Industrial and Labor Relations Review38323–334
24.
DickensWTWholeyDRobinsonJ, 1985, “Bargaining unit, union, industry, and locational correlates of union support in certification and decertification elections” mimeo National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
25.
DownsA, 1957An Economic Theory of Democracy (Harper and Row, New York)
26.
DunlopJ, 1948, “The development of labor organizations: A theoretical framework”, in Insights into Labor Issues Eds LesterRAShisterJ, (Macmillan, New York) pp 163–193
27.
DunlopJ, 1986, “On the legal framework of industrial relations in the United States” in The Labor Board at Mid-Century Ed. MooreC, (Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC) (forthcoming)
28.
EllwoodDFineG, 1983, “Effects of right-to-work laws on union organizing” mimeo National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
29.
ElsheikhFBainG, 1978, “American trade union growth: An alternative model”Industrial Relations1775–79
30.
FärberH, 1984, “Right-to-work laws and the extent of unionization”Journal of Labor Economics2319–352
31.
FärberH, 1985, “The extent of unionization in the United States” in Challenges and Choices Facing American Labor Ed. KochanT, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 15–43
32.
FioritoJ, 1982, “American trade union growth: An alternative model”Industrial Relations21123–127
33.
FioritoJGreerC, 1982, “Determinants of US unionism: Past research and future needs”Industrial Relations211–32
34.
FreemanR, 1985, “The effect of the union wage differential on management opposition and union organizing success” mimeo, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
35.
FreemanRMedoffJ, 1984What Do Unions Do? (Basic Books, New York)
36.
FreibergBDickensW, 1985, “The impact of the runaway office on union certification elections in clerical units” mimeo, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
37.
GouldW, 1982A Primer on American Labor Law (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
38.
GregoryD, 1981, “Alfred Weber and location theory” in Geography, Ideology and Social Concern Ed. StoddartDR, (Basil Blackwell, Oxford) pp 165–185
39.
GregoryDUrryJ, (Eds), 1985Social Relations and Spatial Structures (Macmillan, London)
40.
HenemanHSandverM, 1983, “Predicting the outcome of union certification elections: A review of the literature”Industrial and Labor Relations Review36537–559
41.
HirschBAddisonJ, 1986The Economic Analysis of Unions: New Approaches and Evidence (George Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
42.
HirschBBergerM, 1984, “Union membership determination and industry characteristics”Southern Economic Journal50665–679
43.
HyclakT, 1982, “Union-nonunion wage changes and voting trends in representation elections” in Proceedings of the Thirty-fourth Annual Winter MeetingIndustrial Relations Research Association, Madison, WI, pp 334–350
44.
IsardW, 1956Location and Space-Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
45.
JohnstonK, 1986, “Judicial adjudication and the spatial structure of production: Two decisions by the National Labor Relations Board”Environment and Planning A1827–39
46.
KokkelenbergESockellD, 1985, “Union membership in the United States, 1973–1981”Industrial and Labor Relations Review38497–543
47.
KolchinMHyclakT, 1984, “Participation in union activities: A multivariate analysis”Journal of Labor Research5255–261
48.
KornhauserR, 1961, “Some social determinants and consequences of union membership”Labor History230–61
LahneHKovnerJ, 1955, “Local union structure: Formality and reality”Industrial and Labor Relations Review924–31
51.
LawlerJJ, 1984, “The influence of management consultants on the outcome of union certification elections”Industrial and Labor Relations Review3838–51
52.
Le LouranJ-Y, 1980, “Predicting union vote from worker attitudes and perceptions” in Proceedings of the Thirty-second Winter MeetingIndustrial Relations Research Association, Madison, WI, pp 72–82
53.
LynchLSandverM, 1984, “Determinants of the decertification process: Evidence from employer initiated elections” mimeo, Faculty of Management and Human Resources, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
54.
MasseyD, 1984Spatial Divisions of Labor: Social Structures and the Geography of Production (Macmillan, London)
55.
MooreWJNewmanRJ, 1975, “On the prospects for American trade union growth: A cross-section analysis”The Review of Economics and Statistics57435–445
56.
MooreWJNewmanRJThomasRW, 1975, “Determinants of the passage of right-to-work laws: An alternative interpretation”Journal of Law and Economics18197–211
57.
MurgGScharmanC, 1982, “Employment-at-will: Do the exceptions overwhelm the rule?”Boston College Law Review23329–384
58.
MurphyWP, 1986, “The representation process” in The Labor Board at Mid-century Ed. MorrisCJ, (Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC) forthcoming
59.
National Labor Relations (Wagner) Act, 1935, 49 Stat. 449, as amended, 29 USC section 151–166
60.
National Labor Relations Board, various years, “Annual report of the National Labor Relations Board” (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
61.
NeumannGRissmanE, 1984, “Where have all the union members gone?”Journal of Labor Economics2175–192
62.
NobleK, 1985, “Decline in industrial unions cited”New York Times number 46573, 25 October, page Al8
63.
PalombaNAPalombaCA, 1971, “Right-to-work laws: A suggested economic rationale”Journal of Law and Economics14475–483
64.
ProstenR, 1979, “The rise in NLRB election delays: Measuring business' new resistance”Monthly Labor Review102(2) 38–40
65.
ReesA, 1973The Economics of Trade Unions (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
66.
RoomkinMBlockR, 1981, “Case processing time and the outcome of representation elections: Some empirical evidence”University of Illinois Law Review 1981 pp 75–97
67.
RottenbergS, 1956, “On choice in labor markets”Industrial and Labor Relations Review9183–199
68.
SamuelsonP, 1983, “Thunen at two hundred”Journal of Economic Literature211468–1488
69.
SeeberRCookeW, 1983, “The decline in union success in NLRB representation elections”Industrial Relations2234–44
70.
SchlossbergSScottJ, 1983Organizing and the Law3rd edition (Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC)
71.
Schneider (Representative), 1985Legislative History of the National Labor Relations Act (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC) volume 2, pp 3228–3231
72.
ScottA, 1985, “Location processes, urbanization, and territorial development: An exploratory essay”Environment and Planning A17479–501
73.
ScottAStorperM, (Eds), 1986Production, Work, Territory: The Geographical Anatomy of Industrial Capitalism (George Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
74.
ScovilleJ, 1971, “Influences on unionization in the US in 1966”Industrial Relations10354–361
75.
ShisterJ, 1953, “The logic of union growth”Journal of Political Economy61413–433
76.
SmithD, 1981Industrial Location2nd edition (John Wiley, New York)
77.
SmithL, 1983, “The effect of right-to-work laws on the level of unionization in regional economies” mimeo, Department of Economics, Baldwin-Wallace College, Berea, OH
78.
StoneK, 1981, “The post-war paradigm in American labor law”Yale Law Journal901509–1580
79.
StorperMWalkerR, 1983, “The theory of labor and the theory of location”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research71–41
TollefsonJPichlerJ, 1975, “A comment on right-to-work laws: A suggested rationale”Journal of Law and Economics18193–196
82.
TroyLSheflinN, 1985Union Sourcebook: Membership, Structure, Finance, DirectoryIndustrial Relations Data and Information Services, PO Box 226WOB, West Orange, NJ 07052
83.
Von ThunenJ, [1823], 1962 The Isolated State translated by HallP, (Edward Arnold, London) Wagner Act – see National Labor Relations Act
84.
WalkerRA, 1985, “Technological determination and determinism: Industrial growth and location” in High Technology, Space, and Society Ed. CastellsM, (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) pp 226–264
85.
WardeA, 1985, “Spatial change, politics and the division of labor” in Social Relations and Spatial Structures Eds. GregoryDUrryJ, (Macmillan, London) pp 190–212
86.
WeberA, 1929Theory of the Location of Industries translated by FriedrichC J, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
87.
WeilerP, 1983, “Promises to keep: Securing workers' rights to self organization under the NLRA”Harvard Law Review961769–1827
88.
WilcockRSobelI, 1955, “Secondary labor force mobility in four midwestern shoe towns”Industrial and Labor Relations Review8520–540
89.
YoungbloodSMobleyWDeNisiA, 1982, “Attitudes, perceptions, and intentions to vote in a union certification election: An empirical investigation” in Proceedings of the Thirty-fourth Annual Winter MeetingIndustrial Relations Research Association, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, pp 244–257
