Since the early 1970s over 200 cities in the United States of America have enacted rent control. Currently 10% of the nation's renters are covered by some form of rent regulation, yet little is known about the economic consequences of rent control. Most evidence suggests that modern rent controls have little or no impact on the amount of investment in rental housing. Such a finding is primarily because of the nonrestrictive nature of most current rent control ordinances, which typically exempt newly constructed housing, guarantee a fair and reasonable return on investment, and allow for annual rent adjustments to cover increases in operating costs. Although this relatively mild type of rent control succeeds in limiting extreme rent increases, it does not result in significant relief from high rents in most regulated cities. Only with strong rent control ordinances will rents be significantly impacted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchtenbergE P, 1975, “Critique of the Rental Housing Association rent control study: An analysis of the realities of rent control in the Greater Boston area”, Urban Planning Aid, 100 Arlington St, Boston, MA 02116
2.
Apartment and Office Building Association, 1977, “Fact sheet—deterioration and abandonment in rent control. Report by National Association of Realtors”, AOBA, 1413 K Street, Washington, DC 2005
3.
AppelbaumR, 1983, “The effects of rent control on the Santa Monica rental housing market”, paper presented at the November 1983 Colloquium on rent control, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA 02138
4.
AppelbaumR, 1984, “Analysis of HUD report on Homelessness in America”, Congressional Record, Banking Committee serial number 98–81, 24 May 1984; reprinted 1986 in Housing the HomelessEriksonJWilhelmC (Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 162–179
5.
AppelbaumR, 1985, “Further analysis of HUD report on Homelessness in America”, Congressional Record, Banking Committee serial number 99–56, 4 December 1985
6.
AppelbaumR, 1986, “An analysis of rent control in Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Berkeley, and West Hollywood under current rent control and A.B.483”, Department of Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
7.
AppelbaumRGilderbloomJ I, 1983, “Housing supply and regulation: A study of the rental housing market”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science19(1) 1–18
8.
AtlasJ, 1981, “Writing a strong but legal rent control law”, in Rent Control: A Source Book Ed. GilderbloomJ I, Foundation for National Progress, Housing Information Center, San Francisco, CA, pp 121–126
9.
BaarK, 1983, “Guidelines for drafting rent control laws: Lessons of a decade”Rutgers Law Review35721–885
10.
BaarKKeatingD, 1981, “Fair return standards and hardship appeal procedures: A guide for New Jersey rent leveling boards”, National Housing Law Project, 1950 Addison St, Berkeley, CA 94704
11.
BartletDLawsonR, 1982, “Rent control and abandonment: A second look at the evidence”Journal of Urban Affairs4(4) 49–64
12.
ClarkWHeskinA, 1982, “The impact of rent control on tenure discounts and residential mobility”Land Economics58109–117
13.
ClarkWHeskinAManuelL, 1980, “Rental housing in the city of Los Angeles”, Institute for Social Science Research, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
14.
DaugherbaughD, 1975, “Anchorage Rent Review Program”, mimeo (Alaska Public Interest Research Group, Anchorage, AK)
15.
deJouvenelB, 1948No VacanciesFoundation for Economic Education, Irvington-on-Hudson, NY)
16.
DevineR J, 1986, “Who Benefits from Rent Control?”, Center for Community Change, Oakland, CA
17.
DownsA, 1983Rental Housing in the 1980sBrookings Institute, Washington, DC)
18.
EckertJ, 1977The Effect of Rent Control on Assessment Policies, Differential Incidence of Taxation, and Income Adjustment Mechanisms for Rental Housing in Brookline, Massachusetts PhD dissertation, Department of Economics, Tufts University, Medford, MA
19.
FischO, 1983, “The impact of rent control on effective tax bias and on structural changes of residential buildings”, paper delivered at November 1983 colloquium on rent control, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA 02138
20.
FriedmanMStiglerG, 1972, “USA: Roofs or ceilings? The current housing problem”, in Verdict on Rent Control Ed. SeldonA (Cormorant Press, Worthing, Sussex, England)
21.
GilderbloomJ I, 1978, “The impact of moderate rent control in the United States: A review and critique of existing literature”, Department of Housing and Community Development, Sacramento, CA
22.
GilderbloomJ I, 1980, “Moderate rent control: The experience of US cities”, Public Policy Report 3, National Center for Policy Alternatives, 2000 Florida Ave., Washington, DC 20009
23.
GilderbloomJ I, 1981, “Moderate rent control: Its impact on the quality and quantity of the housing stock”Urban Affairs Quarterly17123–142
24.
GilderbloomJ I, 1982Toward an Understanding of Inter-city Rent Differentials: A Sociological Contribution PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
25.
GilderbloomJ I, 1983, “The impact of moderate rent control in New Jersey: An empirical study of 26 rent controlled cities”Urban Analysis: An International Journal7135–154
26.
GilderbloomJ I, 1986, “The impact of rent control on rent in New Jersey communities”Sociology and Social Research71(1) 11–14
27.
GilderbloomJ IAppelbaumR P, 1988Rethinking Rental HousingTemple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
28.
GilderbloomJ ICapekS (forthcoming) Community versus Commodity: Tenants and the American CityState University of New York Press, Albany, NY)
29.
GilberbloomJ IKeatingD, 1982, “An evaluation of rent control in Orange, New Jersey”, Housing Information Center, Foundation for National Progress, San Francisco, CA
30.
GruenCGruenN, 1977, “Rent control in New Jersey: The beginnings”, California Housing Council, 1225 Eigth St, Sacramento, CA 95814
31.
HartmanC, 1984The Transfortnation of San FranciscoRowman and Allanheld, Totowa, NJ)
32.
HayekF A, 1972, “Austria: The repercussions of rent restrictions”, in Verdict on Rent Control Ed. SeldonA (Cormorant Press, Worthing, Sussex, England)
33.
HeffleyDSanterreR, 1985, “Rent control as an expenditure constraint: Some empirical results”, paper presented on 23 March at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Economic Association, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
34.
HUD, 1984Homelessness in AmericaDepartment of Housing and Urban Development (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
35.
JacobM, 1977, “Understanding landlording”, California Housing Action and Information Network, Oakland, CA
36.
KearlJ RPopeCWhitingGWimmerL, 1979, “A confusion of economists?”American Economic Review69(2) 28–37
37.
KeatingE, 1976, “Rent and eviction controls: A selected annotated bibliography”, Council of Planning Librarians, Exchange Bibliography, 1136 (October)
38.
LawsonR, 1984, “Owners of last resort: An assessment of the track records of New York City's early low income housing cooperative conversions”, Office of Program and Management Analysis, Department of Housing Preservation and Development, New York City, NY
39.
LettM, 1976Rent Control: Concepts, Realities, and MechanismsCenter for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, Brunswick, NJ)
40.
Los Angeles Community Development Department, 1979, “Rent stabilization study”, Community Development Department, 215 West 6th St, Los Angeles, CA 90014
41.
Los Angeles RSD, 1985a, “Rental housing study: Housing production and performance under rent control”, Rent Stabilization Division, 215 West 6th St, Los Angeles, CA 90014
42.
Los Angeles RSD, 1985b, “Rental housing study: The rent stabilization system: Impacts and alternatives”, Rent Stabilization Division, 215 West 6th St, Los Angeles, CA 90014
43.
MarcuseP, 1979, “Rental housing in the city of New York”, Graduate School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Columbia University, New York, NY
44.
MarcuseP, 1981a, “The strategic potential of rent control”, in Rent Control: A Source Book Ed. GilderbloomJ (Foundation for National Progress, San Francisco, CA) pp 86–94
45.
MarcuseP, 1981b, “Housing abandonment: Does rent control make a difference?”, National Center for Policy Alternatives, 2000 Florida Ave., Washington, DC 20009
46.
Massachusetts Department of Corporations and Taxation, 1974, “A study of rent and eviction controls for the commonwealth of Massachusetts”, Joint Legislative Committee on Local Affairs, State House, Boston, MA 02133
47.
MollenkopfJPynoosJ, 1973, “Boardwalk and park place: Property ownership, political structure and housing policy at the local level”, in Housing Urban America Eds PynoosJSchafferRHartmanC (Aldine Publishing, Chicago, IL) pp 55–74
48.
National Urban League, 1971, “National survey of housing abandonment”, National Urban League, 500 East 62nd St, New York, NY 10021
49.
PaishF W, 1972, “The economics of rent restriction”, in Verdict on Rent Control Ed. SeldonA (Cormorant Press, Worthing, Sussex, England) pp 43–60
50.
PennanceF G, 1972, “Introduction”, in Verdict on Rent Control Ed. SeldonA (Cormorant Press, Worthing, Sussex, England)
51.
President's Commission on Housing, 1983Final ReportUS Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
52.
Revenue and Rent Study Committee, 1974, Minutes of Meeting, 19 April, Revenue and Rent Study Committee, Town Hall, 333 Washington St, Brookline, MA 02146
53.
RoistacherE, 1972The Distribution of Tenant Benefits Under Rent Control unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
54.
RydellC P, 1981The Impact of Rent Control on the Los Angeles Housing MarketRand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA)
55.
RydenfeltS, 1972, “Rent control thirty years on”, in Verdict on Rent Control Ed. SeldonA (Cormorant Press, Worthing, Sussex, England) pp 61–68
56.
SamuelsonP, 1967Economics: An Introductory AnalysisMcGraw-Hill, New York)
57.
Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 1979, “Proposed general rent adjustment”, Rent Control Office, City Hall, Santa Monica, CA
58.
SeldonA, 1972, “Preface”, in Verdict on Rent Control Ed. SeldonA (Cormorant Press, Worthing, Sussex, England)
59.
ShulmanD, 1980, “Real estate valuation under rent control: The case of Santa Monica”, mimeo, Business Forecasting Project, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
60.
SorensenB, 1983, “The Alaska emergency residential rent regulation and control program”, paper presented at the November 1983 colloquium on rent control, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA 02138
61.
SternliebG, 1974The Realities of Rent Control in the Greater Boston AreaCenter for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ)
62.
SternliebG, 1975Fort Lee Rent ControlCenter for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ)
63.
TuckerW, 1987a, “Where do the homeless come from?”, Associates Memo 5, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, 42 East 71st St, New York, NY 10021
64.
TuckerW, 1987b, “Where do the homeless come from?”National Review25 September, pp 32–43
65.
Urban Planning Aid, 1975, “Critique of the Rental Housing Association rent control study: An analysis of the realities of rent control in the Greater Boston area”, Urban Planning Aid, Cambridge, MA
66.
VitalianoD F, 1983, “The economic consequences of rent control: Some evidence from New York State”, paper presented at the November 1983 colloquium on rent control, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA 02138
67.
WillisW, 1950, “Short history of rent control laws”, Cornell Law Q36 (Fall) 54–92
68.
WolfeM F, 1983, “An empirical examination of landlord behavior and implications for rental housing policies”, paper presented at the twenty-fifth Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning; copy available from PO Box 413, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201
