In this paper the pattern of labor-market activity associated with major high-technology agglomerations within the USA are examined, drawing upon the results of a mailed questionnaire survey of firms in the semiconductor industry. The analysis is focused upon the cluster of specialized semiconductor firms in Silicon Valley, to determine the contribution of local labor-market processes to the growth and development of this high-technology production complex. Fluid employment relations and efficiencies in search and mobility within the local labor market provide Silicon Valley firms remarkable flexibility in meeting their labor demands and help to ensure a rapid circulation of knowledge and information within the production complex. The accelerated transfer of technological knowledge allows Silicon Valley firms to build cumulatively upon a common stock of technological successes and failures, contributing significantly to the innovative dynamism of the region.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvarez-TorrezR, 1986, “More companies rent workers to fill gaps”San Jose Mercury News 28 September, page C1
2.
AminA, 1989, “Flexible specialization and small firms in Italy: Myths and realities”Antipode2113–34
3.
AngelD P, 1989, “The labor market for engineers in the U.S. semiconductor industry”Economic Geography6599–112
4.
AydalotPKeebleD, 1988High Technology Industry and Innovative Environments: The European Experience (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, New York)
5.
BarkleyD, 1988, “The decentralization of high technology manufacturing to non-metropolitan areas”Growth and Change1912–30
6.
BarronJGilleyO, 1981, “Job search and vacancy contacts”American Economic Review71747–752
7.
BollingerLHopeKUtterbackJ, 1983, “A review of literature and hypotheses on high technology firms”Research Policy121–14
8.
CastellsM, 1988, “The new industrial space: Information technology, manufacturing and spatial structure in the United States”, in America's New Market Geography Eds SternliebGHughesJ (Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 43–100
9.
ClarkG, 1987, “Job search theory and indeterminate information”, in Regional Labour Markets Eds FischerMNijkampP (North-Holland, New York) pp 169–188
10.
ClarkPStauntonN, 1989Innovation in Technology and Organization (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, New York)
11.
CohenSZysmanJ, 1987Manufacturing Matters: The Myth of the Post-industrial Economy (Basic Books, New York)
12.
DorfmanN, 1983, “Route 128: The development of a regional high technology economy”Research Policy12299–316
13.
DosiG, 1988a, “The nature of the innovative process”, in Technical Change and Economic Theory Eds DosiGFreemanCNelsonRSilverbergGSoeteL (Frances Pinter, New York) pp 221–238
14.
DosiG, 1988b, “Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation”Journal of Economic Literature261120–1171
15.
Electronics News, 1968, “Signetics”, 25 February, page 3 Ettlie J, 1980, “Manpower flows and the innovation process”Management Science261086–1095
16.
FloridaRKenneyM, 1988, “Venture capital, high technology, and regional development”Regional Studies2233–48
17.
FloridaRKenneyM, 1990, “High-technology restructuring in the USA and Japan”Environment and Planning A22233–252
18.
FreemanC, 1982The Economics of Innovation (Frances Pinter, London)
19.
GalbriathC, 1985, “High technology location and development: The case of Orange County”California Management Review2899–109
20.
GlasmeierAHallPMarkusenA, 1983, “Recent evidence on high technology industries' spatial tendencies”, working paper, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley, CA
21.
HallPBrehencyMMcQuaidRHartD, 1987Western Sunrise: The Genesis and Growth of Britain's Major High Tech Corridor (Allen and Unwin, Winchester, MA)
22.
HarringtonJ, 1985, “Intraindustry structural change and location change: US semiconductor manufacturing, 1958–80”Regional Studies19343–352
23.
HekmanJ, 1980, “The future of high technology industry in New England”New England Economic Review (January/February) 5–17
24.
HoeflerD, 1968, “Semiconductor family tree”Electronics News 8 July, page 1
25.
HooverEVernonR, 1959Anatomy of a Metropolis (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
26.
JohnsonCTysonLZysmanJ, 1989Politics and Productivity (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA)
27.
JordeTTeeceD, 1989, “Innovation, cooperation and antitrust”High Technology Law Journal41–112
28.
KimS, 1987, “Diversity in urban labor markets and agglomeration economies”Papers of the Regional Science Association6257–70
29.
MacgregorBLangridgeRAdleyJChapmanB, 1986, “The development of high technology industry in Newbury District”Regional Studies20433–448
30.
MackayDBoddyDBrackJDiackJJonesN, 1971Labor Markets under Different Employment Conditions (Allen and Unwin, London)
31.
MaleckiE J, 1984, “High technology and local economic development”Journal of the American Planning Association50262–269
32.
MaleckiE J, 1987, “The R&D location decision of the firm and ‘creative’ regions: A survey”Technovation6205–222
33.
MaleckiE J, 1989, “What about people in high technology?: Some research and policy considerations”Growth and Change2067–79
34.
MaleckiE JNijkampP, 1988, “Technology and regional development: Some thoughts on policy”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy6383–399
35.
MarkusenABlochR, 1985, “Defensive cities: Military spending, high technology and human settlements”, in High Technology, Space and Society Ed. CastellsM (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
36.
MillerRCotéM, 1987Growing the Next Silicon Valley: A Guide for Successful Regional Planning (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA)
37.
MorrisJ, 1988, “New technologies, flexible work practices, and regional sociospatial differentiation: Some observations from the United Kingdom”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6301–319
38.
OakeyR, 1984High Technology Small Firms (St Martin's Press, New York)
39.
OakeyR, 1985, “High technology industry and agglomeration economies”, in Silicon Landscapes Eds HallPMarkusenA (Allen and Unwin, Winchester, MA) pp 94–117
40.
OakeyRCooperS, 1989, “High technology industry, agglomeration, and the potential for peripherally sited small firms”Regional Studies23347–360
41.
OECD, 1986Labour Market Flexibility: Report by a High Level Group of Experts to the Secretary General (OECD, Paris)
42.
PioreM, 1986, “Perspectives on labor market flexibility”Industrial Relations25147–166
43.
PollertA, 1988, “Dismantling flexibility”Capital and Class3442–75
44.
PremusR, 1982Location of High Technology Firms and Regional Economic Development (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
45.
RichieRHeckerDBurganJ, 1983, “High technology today and tomorrow: A small slice of the employment pie”Monthly Labor Review1150–58
46.
RogersELarsenJ, 1984, Silicon Valley Fever (Basic Books, New York)
47.
RosenbergN, 1982Inside the Black Box (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
48.
SangerD, 1987, “A peek at IBM's trump card”New York Times 8 March, page C1
49.
SaxenianA, 1983, “The urban contradictions of Silicon Valley”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research17237–261
50.
SaxenianA, 1989a, “In search of power: The organization of business interests in Silicon Valley and Route 128”Economy and Society1825–50
51.
SaxenianA, 1989b, “Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley”, WP-508, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, CA
52.
ScottA J, 1986, “High technology industry and territorial development: The rise of the Orange County complex, 1955–84”Urban Geography73–45
53.
ScottA J, 1988aStudies in Society and Space 3. New Industrial Spaces (Pion, London)
54.
ScottA J, 1988bMetropolis (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
55.
ScottA J, 1988c, “Flexible production systems and regional development: The rise of new industrial spaces in North America and western Europe”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23171–185
56.
ScottA JAngelD P, 1987, “The US semiconductor industry: A locational analysis”Environment and Planning A19875–912
57.
ScottA JAngelD P, 1988, “The global assembly-operations of US semiconductor firms: A geographical analysis”Environment and Planning A201047–1067
58.
ScottA JPaulA S, 1990, “Collective order and economic coordination in industrial agglomerations: The technopoles of Southern California”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy8179–193
59.
ScottA JStorperM, 1987, “High technology industry and regional development: A theoretical critique and reconstruction”International Social Science Journal34215–232
60.
SegalM, 1960Wages in the Metropolis (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
61.
ShaikenHHersenbergSKuhnS, 1986, “The work process under more flexible production”Industrial Relations25167–183
62.
SiegelLBorockH, 1982Background Report on Silicon Valley report to the US Commission on Civil Rights (Pacific Studies Center, Mountain View, CA)
63.
SnowR, 1983, “The new international division of labor and the US work force; the case of the electronics industry”, in Women, Men, and the International Division of Labor Eds NashJFernandez-KellyM (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) pp 39–69
64.
StorperMChristophersonS, 1987, “Flexible specialization and regional industrial agglomeration: The case of the US motion picture industry”Annals of the Association of American Geographers77104–117
65.
StuartC, 1979, “Search and the spatial organization of trading”, in Studies in the Economics of Search Eds LippmanSMcCallJ (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 17–33
66.
ThompsonC, 1989, “High-technology theories and public policy”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy7121–152
67.
von HippelE, 1988The Sources of Innovation (Oxford University Press, New York)
