Despite its importance for housing-market forecasts, residential demand segmentation has received only little systematic scrutiny. In this paper a hierarchical approach is proposed whereby households are segmented by three levels determined by the likelihood of household shifting among strata as defined within the level.
First, households are differentiated according to societal constraints (the most difficult to overcome). Second, groups facing similar constraints are stratified by the basic life-style choices made by households. Last, households are stratified according to their situation, which includes their stage in the life cycle and income (the most likely to change over time).
An empirical comparison of a hierarchical segmentation which includes life-style elements (the least understood level of the hierarchy) with cross-sectional sociodemographic segmentation shows the hierarchical approach to perform better on several criteria.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AitkenS CBjorklundE M, 1988, “Transactional and transformational theories in behavioral geography”The Professional Geographer4054–64
2.
AldenderferM SBlashfieldR K, 1984Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 44. Cluster Analysis (Sage, Beverley Hills, CA)
BrownL AMooreE A, 1970, “The intra-urban migration process: A perspective”Geografiska Annaler52B1–13
5.
ClarkW A V, 1989, “Revealed preference and neighborhood transitions in a multi-ethnic setting”Urban Geography10434–444
6.
ClarkW A VDeurlooM CDielemanF M, 1984, “Housing consumption and residential mobility”Annals of the Association of American Geographers7429–43
7.
ClarkW A VOnakaJ L, 1985, “An empirical test of a joint model of residential mobility and housing choice”Environment and Planning A17915–930
8.
ClarkW A VSmithT, 1982, “Housing market search behavior and expected utility theory 2. The process of search”Environment and Planning A14717–737
9.
ClarkW A VVan LieropW F J, 1986, “Residential mobility and household location modeling”, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics Volume 1 Ed. NijkampP (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 97–132
10.
DesbaratsJ, 1983a, “Spatial choice and constraints on behavior”Annals of the Association of American Geographers73340–357
11.
DesbaratsJ, 1983b, “Constrained choice and migration”Geografiska Annaler65B11–22
12.
EagleT C, 1988, “Context effects in consumer spatial behavior”, in Behavioral Modelling in Geography and Planning Ed. GolledgeR GTimmermansH (Croom Helm, Andover, Hants) pp 299–324
13.
FeitelsonE, 1989The Spatial Effects of Land Use Regulations: The Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Case PhD dissertation, Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
14.
FeitelsonE, 1992, “Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for water-related residences in non-urban settings: A vignette analysis”Regional Studies2649–68
GoodmanA C, 1989, “Identifying willingness-to-pay for heterogeneous goods with factorial survey methods”Journal of Experimental Economics and Management1658–79
17.
GoodmanJ L, 1976, “Housing consumption disequilibrium and local residential mobility”Environment and Planning A8855–874
18.
HawkinsD IBestR JConeyK A, 1983Consumer Behavior: Implications for Marketing Strategy (Business Publications, Piano, TX)
19.
van der HeijdenR E C MTimmermansH J P, 1988“The spatial transferability of a decompositional multi-attribute preference model”Environment and Planning A20 1013–1025
20.
HensherD ABeesleyM E, 1987, “Identification of segmentation criteria for the improvement of population forecasts”Environment and Planning A19807–818
21.
HuffJ O, 1986, “Geographic regularities in residential search behavior”Annals of the Association of American Geographers76208–227
22.
JonesCMcLennanD, 1987, “Building societies and credit rationing: An empirical examination of redlining”Urban Studies24205–216
23.
KainJ FQuigleyJ N, 1985Housing Markets and Racial Discrimination (NBER, Slough, Berks)
24.
KleckaW R, 1980Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 19. Discriminant Analysis (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
25.
LiebetrauA M, 1983Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 32. Measures of Association (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
26.
LloydRHooperH, 1991, “Urban cognitive maps: Computation and structure”The Professional Geographer4315–28
27.
LouviereJ J, 1981, “A conceptual and analytical framework for understanding spatial and travel choices”Economic Geography57304–314
28.
LouviereJTimmermansH, 1990, “Hierarchical information integration applied to residential choice behavior”Geographical Analysis22127–144
29.
MunroMLamontD, 1985, “Neighborhood perception preference and household mobility in the Glasgow private housing market”Environment and Planning A17 1331–1350
30.
NicolaidisG CWachsMGolobT F, 1977, “Evaluation of alternative market segmentations for transportation planning”Transportation Research Record64923–31
31.
OnakaJ L, 1983, “A multiple-attribute housing disequilibrium model of residential mobility”Environment and Planning A15751–765
32.
OnakaJClarkW A V, 1983, “A dissaggregate model of residential mobility and housing choice”Geographical Analysis15287–304
33.
PalmR, 1985, “Ethnic segmentation of real estate agent practice in the urban housing market”Annals of the Association of American Geographers7558–68
34.
PhippsA GCarterJ E, 1985, “Individual differences in the residential preferences of inner-city homeowners”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Social Geografie7632–42
PrestonVTaylorS M, 1981, “The family life cycle, leisure activities and residential area evaluation”Canadian Geographer2546–59
37.
QuigleyJ M, 1979, “What have we learned about urban housing markets?”, in Current Issues in Urban Economics Eds MieszkowskiPStrazheimM (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 391–429
38.
RossiP H, 1955Why Families Move? (Free Press, Glencoe, IL)
39.
RossiP HAndersonA B, 1982, “The factorial survey approach: An introduction”, in Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach Eds RossiP HNockS L (Sage, Beverley Hills, CA) chapter 1
40.
RossiP HBerkR A, 1985, “Varieties in normative consensus”American Sociological Review50333–347
41.
SalomonI, 1980Life Styles as a Factor in Explaining Travel Behavior PhD dissertation, CTS RAMP 80–4, Center for Transportation Studies, MIT, Cambridge, MA
42.
SalomonI, 1983, “Life style—a broader perspective on travel behavior”, in Recent Advances in Travel Demand Analysis Eds CarpenterSJonesP (Gower, Aldershot, Hants) pp 290–310
43.
SalomonIBen-AkivaM, 1983, “The use of the life style concept in travel demand models”Environment and Planning A15623–638
44.
SchreuderY, 1989, “Labor segmentation, ethnic division of labor and residential segregation in American cities in the early twentieth century”The Professional Geographer41131–142
45.
ShlayA B, 1985, “Castles in the sky: Measuring housing and neighborhood ideology”Environment and Behavior17593–626
46.
ShlayA B, 1986, “Taking apart the American dream: The influence of income and family composition on residential evaluations”Urban Studies23253–270
47.
SmithTClarkW A V, 1982, “Housing market search behavior and expected utility theory 1. Measuring preferences for housing”Environment and Planning A14681–698
48.
TimmermansH, 1984, “Decompositional multiattribute preference models in spatial choice analysis: A review of some recent developments”Progress in Human Geography8189–221
49.
TyeW B, 1979, “Consumer segmentation”, in Behavioral Travel Modelling Eds HensherD AStopherP R (Croom Helm, Andover, Hants) pp 262–275
50.
YingerJ C, 1979, “Prejudice and discrimination in the urban housing market”, in Current Issues in Urban Economics Eds MieskowskiPStraszheimM (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 430–468
