BourdieuPWacquantL, 1992An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
10.
CallebautW, 1993Taking the Naturalistic Turn: How Real Philosophy of Science is Done (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
11.
CollinsHYearleyS, 1992, “Epistemological chicken”, in Science as Practice and Culture Ed. PickeringA (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 301–326
12.
GarfinkelH, 1967Studies in Ethnomethodology (Polity Press, Cambridge)
13.
GouldnerA, 1971The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology (Heinemann, London)
14.
GruenbergB, 1978, “The problem of reflexivity in the sociology of science”Philosophy of the Social Sciences8321–343
15.
HardingS, 1991Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? (Open University Press, Milton Keynes)
16.
HardingS, 1993a, “Feminism, science and the anti-Enlightlenment critiques”, in Feminism/Postmodernism Ed. NicholsonL (Routledge, New York) pp 83–106
17.
HardingS, 1993b, “Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is strong objectivity?”, in Feminist Epistemologies Eds AlcoffLPotterE (Routledge, London) pp 49–82
18.
JenkinsR, 1992Pierre Bourdieu (Routledge, London)
19.
LashS, 1990, “Modernisation and postmodernisation in the work of Pierre Bourdieu”, in The Sociology of Postmodernism (Routledge, London) pp 237–265
20.
LashSUrryJ, 1994Economies of Signs and Space (Sage, London)
21.
LatourB, 1988, “The politics of explanation: An alternative”, in Knowledge and Reflexivity: Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge Ed. WoolgarS (Sage, London) pp 155–176
22.
LatourB, 1992, “One more turn after the social turn …”, in The Social Dimensions of Science Ed. McMullinE (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN) pp 272–294
23.
LiPumaE, 1993, “Culture and the concept of culture in a theory of practice”, in Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives Eds CalhounCLiPumaEPostoneM (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 14–34
24.
LonginoH, 1990Science as Social Knowledge (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
25.
LonginoH, 1993, “Essential tensions—phase two: Feminist philosophical and social studies of science”, in A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity Eds AntonyLWittC (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 257–272
26.
MehanHWoodH, 1975The Reality of Ethnomethodology (John Wiley, New York)
27.
PickeringA (Ed.), 1992Science as Practice and Culture (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
28.
PinchTPinchT, 1988, “Reservations about reflexivity and new literary forms, or why let the devil have all the good tunes?”, in Knowledge and Reflexivity Ed. WoolgarS (Sage, London) pp 178–199
29.
PollnerM, 1991, “Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity”Americal Sociological Review56370–380
30.
RadderH, 1992, “Normative reflections on constructivist approaches to science and technology”Social Studies of Science22141–173
31.
ReinharzS, 1992Feminist Methods in Social Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
32.
SheppardEBarnesT, 1990The Capitalist Space Economy (Unwin Hyman, London)
33.
StanleyL, 1983Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research (Routledge, London)
34.
WoolgarS, 1988a, “Reflexivity is the ethnographer of the text”, in Knowledge and Reflexivity: Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge Ed. WoolgarS (Sage, Beverley Hills, CA) pp 15–34
35.
WoolgarS, 1988bScience: The Very Idea (Tavistock, London)