The Hoover index, calculated across counties and larger spatial units, is again declining—signalling a renewal of population deconcentration in the United States. After increasing for several decades, the index declined in the 1970s when nonmetropolitan population growth surged past metropolitan-area growth, but the index rose in the 1980s as metropolitan population growth recovered and surpassed nonmetropolitan growth. We update these trends, introducing careful controls for changes in metropolitan-area boundaries, and we incorporate a ‘functional urban region’ approach. Although the nonmetropolitan population growth rate is still below the metropolitan rate, we conclude that in the 1990s some features of the ‘turnaround’ of the 1970s have returned.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChampionA G (Ed.), 1989Counterurbanization: The Changing Pace and Nature of Population Deconcentration (Edward Arnold, London)
2.
ChampionA G, 1994, “Population change and migration in Britain since 1981: evidence for continuing deconcentration”Environment and Planning A101501–1520
3.
CoombesMDalla LongaRRaybouldS, 1989, “Counterurbanization in Britain and Italy: a comparative critique of the concept, causation, and evidence”Progress in Planning3226–49
4.
DunnE, 1980The Development of the US Urban System. Volumes 1 and 2 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
5.
FieldingA J, 1982, “Counterurbanization in Western Europe”Progress in Planning173–52
6.
FieldingA J, 1989, “Migration and urbanization in western Europe since 1950”The Geographical Journal15560–69
7.
FreyW H, 1995a, “Immigration and internal migration ‘flight’: a California case study”Population and Environment16353–375
8.
FreyW H, 1995b, “The new geography of population shifts: trends toward balkanization”, in State of the Union: America in the 1990s Ed. FarleyR (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) pp 271–336
9.
FuguittG VBealeC L, 1996, “Recent trends in nonmetropolitan migration: toward a new turnaround?”, Growth and Change27156–174
10.
FuguittG VBrownD LBealeC L, 1989Rural and Small Town America (Russell Sage Foundation, New York)
11.
GordonP, 1979, “Deconcentration without a ‘clean break’”Environment and Planning A11281–290
12.
HallPHayD, 1980Growth Centres in the European Urban System (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
13.
HooverE M, 1941, “Interstate redistribution of population, 1850–1940”Journal of Economic History1199–205
14.
JohnsonKBealeC, 1994, “The recent revival of widespread population growth in nonmetropolitan areas of the United States”Rural Sociology59655–667
15.
KanaroglouP SBraunG O, 1992, “The pattern of counterurbanization in the Federal Republic of Germany, 1977–85”Environment and Planning A24481–496
16.
KontulyTWiardSVogelsangR, 1986, “Counterurbanization in the Federal Republic of Germany”Professional Geographer38170–181
17.
LongLDeAreD, 1988, “US population redistribution: a perspective on the nonmetropolitan turnaround”Population and Development Review14433–450
18.
NucciALongL, 1995, “Spatial and demographic dynamics of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan territory in the United States”International Journal of Population Geography165–181
19.
RichterK, 1985, “Nonmetropolitan growth in the late 1970s: the end of the turnaround?”Demography22245–263
20.
SantMSimonsP, 1993, “The conceptual basis of counterurbanization: critique and development”Australian Geographical Studies31113–126
21.
SchaefferP V, 1992, “Deconcentration, counter-urbanization, or trend reversal? The population distribution of Switzerland, 1900–1980”Socio-Economic Planning Science2689–102
22.
ViningD RJrStraussA, 1977, “A demonstration that the current deconcentration of population in the United States is a clean break with the past”Environment and Planning A9751–758
23.
ViningDPalloneRPlaneD, 1981, “Recent migration patterns in the developed world: a clarification of some differences between our and IIASA's findings”Environment and Planning A13243–250
