A growing body of evidence points toward the distinctiveness of the state's political and military policies and of the impact of these policies on economic processes. Regional scientists have been stressing the importance of new industrial districts, with an emphasis on interfirm relationships and the regional economy in which firms are embedded. In this paper, we document the state's role in regional growth and offer a reminder of the external and political actors which have influenced growth of industrial districts. We have acquired information from the US General Services Administration on each piece of property owned by the United States, including data on the agency controlling the installation and the functions performed at this location. Our examination of employment growth from 1970 to 1990 provides evidence that federal installations did stimulate growth in the regions in which they were located. More specifically, we find that NASA installations and the military's industrial facilities exerted a positive influence on employment growth over the period. However, despite the large budgets commanded by Department of Energy installations and their highly educated labor force, we found that the Department of Energy installations inhibited employment growth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrowningC, 1981, “Federal outlays and regional development”, in Federalism and Regional Development: Case Studies on the Experience in the United States and the Federal Republic of Germany Ed. HoffmanG, (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX) pp 125–153
2.
Business Week1976, “The second war between the states”, 17 May, pages 92–98
3.
CastellsM, 1985, “High technology, economic restructuring and urban — Regional process in the United States”, in High Technology, Space, and Society Ed. CastellsM, (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 11–40
4.
CrumpJ, 1989, “The spatial distribution of military spending in the United States, 1941–1985”Growth and Change2050–62
5.
FoxEW, 1971History in a Geographic Perspective: The Other France (W W Norton, New York)
6.
GanslerJ, 1980Defense Industry (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
7.
GenoveseEDHochbergL, (Eds), 1989Geographic Perspectives in History (Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA)
8.
GottdienerM, 1990, “Crisis theory and state-financed capital: The new conjuncture in the USA”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research14383–403
9.
GrossHWeinsteinB, 1986, “Technology, structural change, and the industrial policy debate”, in Technology, Regions and Policy Ed. ReesJ, (Praeger, New York) pp 251–267
10.
GSA, 1983Detailed Listing of Real Property Owned by the United States and Used by the Department of Defense for Military Functions throughout the World as of September 30, 1983 US General Services Administration (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
11.
HarrisonB, 1994, “Concentrated power and Silicon Valley”Environment and Planning A26307–328
12.
HooksG, 1991Forging the Military — Industrial Complex: World War II's Battle of the Potomac (University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL)
13.
HooksG, 1993, “The weakness of strong theories: The US state's dominance of the World War II investment process”American Sociological Review5837–53
14.
HooksG, 1994, “Regional processes in the hegemonic nation: The determinants and consequences of World War II commercial and military investments”American Sociological Review59746–773
15.
HooksGBloomquistL, 1992, “The legacy of World War II for regional growth and decline: The cumulative effects of wartime investments on US manufacturing, 1947–1972”Social Forces71303–337
16.
HooksGMcLauchlanG, 1992, “The institutional foundation of warmaking: Three eras of US warmaking, 1939–1989”Theory and Society21757–788
17.
IrwinMKasardaJ, 1991, “Air passenger linkages and employment growth in US metropolitan areas”American Sociological Review56524–537
18.
IvyRLFikTJMaleckiEJ, 1995, “Changes in air service connectivity and employment”Environment and Planning A27165–179
19.
JacobG, 1992, “The legacy of the Pentagon: The myth of the peace dividend”, in The Pentagon and the Cities Ed. KirbyA, (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 154–170
20.
KirbyA, 1992a, “Preface”, in The Pentagon and the Cities Ed. KirbyA, (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp vii–x
21.
KirbyA, 1992b, “The Pentagon versus the cities?”, in The Pentagon and the Cities Ed. KirbyA, (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
22.
LandKDeaneG, 1992, “On the large-sample estimation of regression models with spatial- or network-effects terms: A two-stage least squares approach”, in Sociological Methodology 1992 Ed. MarsdenP, (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA) pp 221–248
23.
LandKDeaneGBlauJ, 1991, “Religious pluralism and church membership: A spatial diffusion model”American Sociological Review56237–249
24.
LoveringJ, 1990, “Fordism's unknown successor: A comment on Scott's theory of flexible accumulation and the re-emergence of regional economics”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research14159–174
25.
MaleckiE, 1982, “Federal R&D spending in the United States of America: Some impacts on metropolitan economies”Regional Studies1619–35
26.
MaleckiE, 1986, “Research and development and the geography of high-technology complexes”, in Technology, Regions and Policy Ed. ReesJ, (Praeger, New York) pp 51–74
27.
MannM, 1986The Sources of Social Power (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
28.
MarkusenA, 1986, “Defense spending and the geography of high tech industries”, in Technology, Regions and Policy Ed. ReesJ, (Praeger, New York) pp 94–119
29.
MarkusenAYudkenJ, 1992Dismantling the Cold War Economy (Basic Books, New York)
30.
MarkusenAHallPCampbellSDeitrickS, 1991The Rise of the Gunbelt: The Military Remapping of Industrial America (Oxford University Press, New York)
31.
MarkusenAHallPGlasmeierA, 1986High Tech America: The What, How, Where, and Why of the Sunrise Industries (Allen and Unwin, Winchester, MA)
32.
MilwardA, 1977War, Economy, and Society (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
ParkSOMarkusenA, 1995, “Generalizing new industrial districts: A theoretical agenda and an application from a non-Western economy”Environment and Planning A2781–104
35.
PioreMJSabelCF, 1984The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (Basic Books, New York)
36.
ReesJ, 1981, “The impact of defense spending on regional industrial change in the United States”, in Federalism and Regional Development: Case Studies on the Experience in the United States and the Federal Republic of Germany Ed. HoffmanG, (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX) pp 193–222
37.
ReesJ, 1986, “Introduction” in Technology, Regions and Policy Ed. ReesJ, (Praeger, New York) pp 1–20
38.
SaleK, 1975Power Shift: The Rise of the Southern Rim and Its Challenge to the Eastern Establishment (Random House, New York)
39.
ScottAJ, 1988The New Industrial Spaces: Flexible Production Organization and Regional Development in North America and Western Europe (Pion, London)
40.
ScottAJ, 1992, “The collective order of flexible production: Lessons for local economic development policy and strategic choices”Economic Geography68219–233
41.
ScottAJ, 1993Technopolis: High-technology Industry and Regional Development in Southern California (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
42.
StorperM, 1989, “The transition to flexible specialization in industry: External economies, the division of labor and the crossing of industrial divides”Cambridge Journal of Economics13273–305
43.
TillyC, 1975, “Reflections on the history of European state-making”, in The Formation of National States in Western Europe Ed. TillyC, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 3–83
44.
TillyC, 1990Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1990 (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA)
45.
van CreveldM, 1989Technology and War: From 2000 BC to the Present (Free Press, New York)
46.
WeinsteinBGrossHReesJ, 1985Regional Growth and Decline in the United StatesSecond edition (Praeger, New York)
