Distance decay in spatial demand usually is taken as axiomatic. There are, however, a number of situations in which distance decay cannot be taken for granted. In recreational pursuits, for example, spatial interaction is often marked by a confounding distance effect in which nearby and more distant destinations are equally attractive. The research reported in this paper concerns an examination of the distance effect in the spatial demand for a specific type of recreation: the use of national parks in the USA. The paper contains a review of the related spatial demand literature, including the travel cost model used in calculating economic values of national parks and related places. A central-place-type model of park use is described and put into operation in the form of two linear spatial demand models. One focuses on regional demand for park use and the other focuses on a national market. The initial model specifications are expanded in order to examine the drift of their distance parameters over two variables intended to quantify park quality: age and area. Empirical tests of the models indicate distance decay in the demand for park use is pronounced when distance is considered in the context of park quality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonGDBishopRC, 1986, “The valuation problem”, in Natural Resource Economics: Policy Problems and Contemporary Analysis Ed. BromleyDW (Kluwer Nijhof, Boston, MA) pp 89–137
2.
BaxterMJ, 1979, “The interpretation of the distance and attractiveness components in models of recreational trips”Geographical Analysis11311–315
3.
BenhabibJRustichiniA, 1991, “Vintage capital, investment, and growth”Journal of Economic Theory55323–339
4.
BockstaelNE, 1995, “Travel cost models” in Handbook of Environmental Economics Ed. BromleyDW (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 653–671
5.
CasettiE, 1972, “Generating models by the expansion method: Applications to geographical research”Geographical Analysis481–91
6.
CesarioFJ, 1975, “A new method for analyzing outdoor recreation trip data”Journal of Leisure Research7200–215
7.
CesarioFJKnetschJL, 1976, “Recreation site demand and benefit estimation model”Regional Studies1097–104
8.
ClawsonMKnetschJL, 1966Economics of Outdoor Recreation (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
9.
CuddingtonJTJohnsonFRKnetschJL, 1981, “Valuing amenity resources in the presence of substitutes”Land Economics57526–535
10.
EldridgeJJonesJPIII, 1991, “Warped space: A geography of distance decay”Professional Geographer43500–511
11.
EnglinJMendelsohnR, 1991, “A hedonic travel cost analysis for valuation of multiple components of site quality: The recreation value of forest management”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management21275–290
12.
EnglinJShonkwilerR, 1995, “Modeling recreation demand in the presence of unobservable travel costs: Toward a travel price model”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management29368–377
13.
FikTJMulliganGF, 1990, “Spatial flows and competing central places: Towards a general theory of hierarchical interaction”Environment and Planning A22527–549
14.
FosterSA, 1991, “The expansion method: Implications for geographic research”The Professional Geographer43131–142
15.
FotheringhamAS, 1981, “Spatial structure and distance decay parameters”Annals of the Association of American Geographers71425–436
16.
FotheringhamAS, 1983, “A new set of spatial-interaction models: The theory of competing destinations”Environment and Planning A1515–36
17.
FreemanAMIII, 1985, “Methods for assessing the benefits of environmental programs”, in Handbook of Natural Resources and Energy Economics, volume 1 Eds KneeseAVSweeneyJL (Elsevier, Amsterdam) pp 223–270
18.
GordonIRPitfieldDE, 1982, “A multi-stream approach to the analysis of hierarchically differentiated spatial interactions”Papers of the Regional Science Association4923–35
19.
HaninkDM, 1995a, “The economic geography in economic issues: A spatial-analytic approach”Progress in Human Geography19372–387
20.
HaninkDM, 1995b, “Evaluation of wilderness in a spatial context”Growth and Change26425–441
21.
HansonS, 1980, “Spatial diversification and multipurpose travel: Implications for choice theory”Geographical Analysis12245–257
IseJ, 1961Our National Park Policy (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
24.
JohanssonP-O, 1987The Economic Theory and Measurement of Environmental Benefits (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
25.
JonesJPIIIHanhamRQ, 1995, “Contingency, realism, and the expansion method”Geographical Analysis27185–207
26.
LoomisJB, 1993Integrated Public Lands Management (Columbia University Press, New York)
27.
LöschA, 1954The Economics of Location2nd revised edition; translated by WoglomWStolperW (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
28.
McConnellKE, 1985, “The economics of outdoor recreation”, in Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, Volume II Eds KneeseAVSweeneyJL (Elsevier, Amsterdam) pp 677–722
29.
MealeySP, 1988, “U.S. Forest Service wilderness management: Challenge and opportunity”, in Ecosystem Management for Parks and Wilderness Eds AgeeJKJohnsonDR (University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA) pp 193–215
30.
MillsASWestoverTN, 1987, “Structural differentiation: A determinant of park popularity”Annals of Tourism Research14486–498
31.
PoolerJ, 1987, “Measuring geographical accessibility: A review of current approaches and problems in the use of population potentials”Geoforum18269–289
32.
RandMcNally, 1993Road Atlas (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL)
33.
RettieDF, 1995Our National Park System (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL)
34.
RylanderJ, 1997, “Showdown for national parks”AMC Outdoors63(2) 16–17
35.
SilbermanJGerlowskiDAWilliamsNA, 1992, “Estimating existence value for users and nonusers of New Jersey beaches”Land Economics68226–236
36.
SmithVKKoppRJ, 1980, “The spatial limits of the travel cost recreational demand model”Land Economics5664–72
37.
SmithVKDesvousgesWHMcGivneyMP, 1983, “The opportunity cost of travel time in reaction demand models”Land Economics59259–278
38.
StottlemyerR, 1987, “External threats to ecosystems of US national parks”Environmental Management1187–89
39.
StynesDJSpottsDMStrunkJR, 1985, “Relaxing assumption of perfect information in park visitation models”Professional Geographer3721–28
40.
SutherlandRJ, 1982, “A regional approach to estimating recreation benefits of improved water quality”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management9229–247
41.
SutherlandRJWalshRG, 1985, “Effect of distance on the preservation value of water quality”Land Economics61281–291
42.
SwaneyJAWardFA, 1985, “Optimally locating a national public facility: An empirical application of consumer surplus theory”Economic Geography61172–180
43.
USDC, 1988Statistical Abstract of the United States, US Department of Commerce (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
44.
USDC, 1995Statistical Abstract of the United States, US Department of Commerce (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
45.
USNPS, 1980NPS Statistical Abstract: 1980 Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Washington DC
46.
USNPS, 1986NPS Statistical Abstract: 1986Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Washington, DC
