The primary purpose of this paper is to determine the degree to which nonmetropolitan and small metropolitan areas participate in the US information economy. It has long been known that large metropolitan areas have become integrated among themselves into the national economy, but it has been assumed that small centers remain focused on local and regional links. This study uses 1996 data from Federal Express Corporation to measure flows of packages to and from 18 pickup and delivery zones for the area served by Atlanta's Hartsfield International Airport to 41 large US metropolitan areas. Although the rural and small pickup and delivery zones do not generate or attract the high magnitude of flows of large metropolitan areas, the data show that, by a variety of measures, the small centers are remarkably strongly tied to the uppermost level of the US metropolitan hierarchy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllesPEsparzaALucusS, 1994, “Telecommunications and the large city—small city divide: Evidence from Indiana cities”Professional Geographer46307–316
2.
BeauregardR, 1989Atop the Urban Hierarchy (Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ)
3.
BeyersW BLindahlD P, 1996, “Lone eagles and high fliers in rural producer services”Rural Development Perspectives112–10
4.
BorchertJ R, 1978, “Major control points in American economic geography”Annals of the Association of American Geographers68214–232
5.
BrownD LDeaversK L, 1988, “Rural change and the rural economic political agenda for the 1980s”, in Rural Development Research Report 69 Ed. BrownD L (Economic Development Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC) pp 1–28
6.
DillmanD, 1991, “Telematics and rural development”, in Rural Conditions and Trends Eds FloraC BChristiansonJ A (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 292–306
7.
EsparzaAKrmenecA J, 1996, “The spatial markets of cities organized in a hierarchical system”Professional Geographers48367–378
8.
FotheringhamA S, 1983, “Some theoretical aspects of destination choice and their relevance to production-constrained gravity models”Environment and Planning A151121–1132
9.
FotheringhamA S, 1984, “Spatial flows and spatial patterns”Environment and Planning A16529–543
10.
FuguittG VBealeC, 1996, “Recent trends in nonmetropolitan migration: Toward a new turnaround?”Growth and Change29156–174
11.
FujiiTHartshornT A, 1995, “The changing metropolitan structure of Atlanta, Georgia: Locations of functions and regional structure in a multinucleated urban area”Urban Geography16680–707
12.
GottmannJ, 1983The Coming of the Transactional City Monograph 2, Institute for Urban Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
13.
GrahamS, 1997, “Cities in the real-time age: The paradigm challenge of telecommunications to the conception of planning of urban space”Environment and Planning A29105–127
14.
GrahamSMarvinS, 1996Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places (Routledge, New York)
15.
GreenM B, 1981, “The corporate interlocking directorate as an urban spatial information network”Urban Geography2148–160
16.
GreenM B, 1983, “The interurban corporate interlocking directorate network of Canada and the United States: A spatial perspective”Urban Geography4338–354
17.
GreenM B, 1990Mergers and Acquisitions: Geographical and Spatial Perspectives (Routledge, New York)
18.
GreenM B, 1993, “A geography of institutional stock ownership in the United States”Annals of the Association of American Geographers8366–89
19.
HepworthM, 1990Geography of the Information Economy (Guilford Press, New York)
20.
HepworthM, 1992, “Telecommunications and the future of London”Policy Studies1331–45
21.
HollowayS RWheelerJ O, 1991, “Corporate headquarters relocation and changes in metropolitan corporate dominance, 1980–1987”Economic Geography6754–74
22.
HudsonH EParkerE B, 1990, “Information gaps in rural America: Telecommunications policies for rural development”Telecommunications Policy14193–205
23.
JohnsonK MBealeC L, 1994, “The recent revival of widespread population growth in nonmetropolitan areas of the United States”Rural Sociology15179–198
24.
KnoxP L, 1995, “World cities and the organization of global space”, in Geographies of Global Change: Remapping the World in the Late Twentieth Century Eds JohnstonR JTaylorP JWattsM J (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 232–247
25.
KreslP KGappertG (Eds), 1995North American Cities and the Global Economy: Challenges and Opportunities (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
26.
MitchelsonR LWheelerJ O, 1994, “The flow of information in a global economy: The role of the American urban system in 1990”Annals of the Association of American Geographers8487–109
27.
NucciALongL, 1995, “Spatial and demographic dynamics of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan territory in the US”International Journal of Population Geography1165–181
28.
ÓhuallacháinBReidN, 1991, “The location and growth of business and professional services in American metropolitan areas, 1976–1986”Annals of the Association of American Geographers81254–270
29.
SempleR KGreenM BMartzD J F, 1985, “Perspectives on corporate headquarters relocation in the United States”Urban Geography6370–391
30.
SuiD ZWheelerJ O, 1993, “The location of office space in the metropolitan service economy of the United States, 1985–1990”Professional Geographer4533–43
31.
WarfB, 1989, “Telecommunications and the globalization of financial services”Professional Geographer41257–271
32.
WarfB, 1995, “Telecommunications and the changing geographies of knowledge transmission in the late 20th century”Urban Studies32361–378
33.
WarfBWijeC, 1991, “The spatial structure of large U.S. law firms”Growth and Change22157–174
34.
WarfBEricksonR, 1996, “Introduction: Globalization and the US. city system”Urban Geography171–4
35.
WheelerJ O, 1990, “The corporate role of New York City in the metropolitan hierarchy”Geographical Review80370–381
36.
WheelerJ OMitchelsonR L, 1989a, “Atlanta's role as an information center: Intrametropolitan spatial links”Professional Geographer41162–172
37.
WheelerJ OMitchelsonR L, 1989b, “Information flows among major metropolitan areas in the United States”Annals of the Association of American Geographers79523–543
