A growing body of research examining the social and political implications of geographic information systems (GIS) considers the extent to which the use of this technology may empower or disempower different actors and institutions. However, these studies have tended not to articulate a clear conceptualization of empowerment. Thus, in this paper, I develop a multidimensional conceptual framework for assessing empowerment (and disempowerment), and employ it in examining the impacts of GIS use by community-based organizations engaged in urban planning and neighborhood revitalization. Drawing on a case study conducted with a Minneapolis, Minnesota, neighborhood organization, I show how this multidimensional framework fosters a more complete analysis of empowerment, and therefore, development of a more detailed explanation of the impacts of this new technology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AitkenSMichelS, 1995, “Who contrives the ‘real’ in GIS? Geographic information, planning, and critical theory”Cartography and Geographic Information Systems2217–29
2.
AlinskyS, 1946Reveille for Radicals (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
3.
AlinksyS, 1989Rules for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals (Vintage Books, New York)
4.
AllenJ, 1993, “Friends and neighbors: knowledge and campaigning in London”, in Mobilizing the Community: Local Politics in the Era of the Global City Eds FisherRKlingJSage, London) pp 223–245
5.
AllenM, 1999, “A participatory model of information system design: a case study of the economic human rights documentation info-management system of the Kensington Welfare Rights Union”, paper presented at the First International Conference on Geographic Information and Society, 20 – 22 June, Minneapolis, MN, copy available from the author, Department of Geography and Urban Studies, Temple University, 1115 West Berks Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122
6.
AlspachA, 1999, “Integration of GIS in regional participatory development projects”, paper presented at the First International Conference on Geographic Information and Society, 20 – 22 June, Minneapolis, MN
7.
BarberB, 1984Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
8.
BarndtMCraigW, 1994, “Data providers empower community GIS efforts”GIS World749–51
9.
BoyteH, 1989Common Wealth: A Return to Citizen Politics (Free Press, New York)
10.
ClarkM, 1998, “GIS—democracy or delusion?”Environment and Planning A30303–316
11.
CoxK, 1998, “Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics”Political Geography17(1) 1–23
12.
CraigW, 1994, “Data to the people: North American efforts to empower communities with data and information”, in AGI94 ProceedingsAssociation for Geographic Information (London) pp 111–115, copy available from the author, Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota, 301 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455
13.
ElwoodS, 2000Information for Change: The Social and Political Impacts of Geographic Information Technologies PhD dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Minnesota, 414 Social Sciences Building, 267 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455
14.
FainsteinSHirstC, 1996, “Neighborhood organizations and community planning: the Minneapolis Neighborhood Revitalization Program”, in Revitalizing Urban Neighborhoods Eds KeatingWKrumholzNStarPUniversity Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS) pp 96–111
15.
Fals-BordaORahmanM, 1991Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research (Apex, New York)
16.
FettermanDKaterarianSWandersmanA (Eds), 1996Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
17.
FisherR, 1994Let the People Decide: Neighborhood Organizing in Americasecond edition (Maxwell Macmillan, New York)
18.
FreireP, 1970Pedagogy of the Oppressed (Seabury, New York)
19.
FriedmannJ, 1992Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA)
20.
GansH, 1991People, Plans, and Policies: Essays on Poverty, Racism, and Other National Urban Problems (Columbia University Press, New York)
21.
GaventaJ, 1993, “The powerful, the powerless, and the experts: knowledge struggles in an information age”, in Voices of change: Participatory Research in the United States and Canada Eds ParkPBrydon-MillerMHallBJacksonTBergin & Garvey, Westport, CT) pp 21–40
22.
GhoseR, 2001, “Use of information technology for community empowerment: transforming geographic information systems into community information systems”Transactions in GIS5(2) 141–163
23.
GhoseRHuxholdW, 2001, “The role of local contextual factors in building public participation GIS: the Milwaukee experience”Cartography and Geographic Information Systems28(3) 195–208
24.
HandlerJ, 1996Down From Bureaucracy: The Ambiguity of Privatization and Empowerment (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
25.
HarrisTWeinerD, 1998, “Empowerment, marginalization, and community-oriented GIS”Cartography and Geographic Information Systems25(2) 67–76
26.
HarrisTWeinerD, 2002, “Implementing a community-integrated GIS: perspectives from South African fieldwork”, in Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems Eds CraigWHarrisTWeinerDTaylor and Francis, London) forthcoming
27.
HarrisTWeinerDWarnerTLevinR, 1995, “Pursuing social goals through participatory GIS: redressing South Africa's historical political ecology”, in Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems Ed. PicklesJGuilford, New York) pp 196–221
28.
HassonSLeyD, 1994Neighbourhood Organizations and the Welfare State (University of Toronto Press, Toronto)
29.
HeimanM, 1997, “Science by the people: grassroots environmental monitoring and the debate over scientific expertise”The Journal of Planning Education and Research16(4) 291–299
30.
JacobsB, 1992Fractured Cities: Capitalism, Community, and Empowerment in Britain and America (Routledge, New York)
31.
JordanG, 2002, “GIS for community forestry user groups in Nepal: putting people before the technology”, in Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems Eds CraigWHarrisTWeinerDTaylor and Francis, London) forthcoming
32.
KrygierJ, 2002, “A praxis of public participation GIS and visualization”, in Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems Eds CraigWHarrisTWeinerD (Taylor and Francis) forthcoming
33.
KyemP, 2001, “Promoting local community participation in forest management through a PPGIS application in Southern Ghana”, in Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems Eds CraigWHarrisTWeinerDTaylor and Francis, London) forthcoming
34.
LakeR, 1993, “Planning and applied geography: positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems”Progress in Human Geography17404–413
35.
LakeR, 1994, “Negotiating local autonomy”Political Geography13423–442
36.
LeitnerHElwoodSSheppardEMcMasterSMcMasterR, 2000, “Modes of GIS provision and their appropriateness for neighborhood organizations: examples from Minneapolis and St Paul, Minnesota”The URISA Journal12(4) 43–56
37.
LuptonMMatherC, 1997, “‘The anti-politics machine’: GIS and the reconstruction of the Johannesburg local state”Political Geography16565–580
38.
McClendonB, 1993, “The paradigm of empowerment”Journal of the American Planning Association59145–147
39.
MasucciM, 1999, “Virtuality and reality: an examination of power relationships within geographic/information technology partnership approaches”, paper presented at the First International Conference on Geographic Information and Society, 20 – 22 June, Minneapolis, MN, copy available from the author, Department of Geography and Urban Studies, Temple University, 1115 West Berks Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122
40.
NickelD, 1995, “The progressive city? Urban redevelopment in Minneapolis”Urban Affairs Review30355–377
41.
ObermeyerN, 1998, “The evolution of public participation GIS”Cartography and Geographic Information Systems25(2) 65–66
42.
OpenshawS, 1991, “A view on the GIS crisis in geography, or, using GIS to put Humpty-Dumpty back together again”Environment and Planning A23621–628
43.
PerkinsDZimmermanM, 1995, “Empowerment theory, research, and application”American Journal of Community Psychology23569–579
44.
PicklesJ, 1995, “Representations in an electronic age: geography, GIS, and democracy”, in Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems Ed. PicklesJGuilford, New York) pp 1–30
45.
RamasubramanianL, 1998Knowledge Production and Use in Community-based Organizations: Examining the Impacts and Influence of Information Technologies PhD dissertation, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee, PO Box 413, WI 53201
46.
RappaportJ, 1984, “Studies in empowerment: introduction to the issue”Prevention in Human Services3(2/3) 1–7
47.
RegaladoJMartinezG, 1991, “Reapportionment and coalition building: a case study of informal barriers to Latino empowerment in Los Angeles County”, in Latinos and Political Coalitions: Political Empowerment for the 1990s Eds VillarealRHernandezNGreenwood Press, New York) pp 126–143
48.
RochaE, 1997, “A ladder of empowerment”Journal of Planning Education and Research1731–44
49.
RundstromR, 1995, “GIS, indigenous peoples, and epistemological diversity”Cartography and Geographic Information Systems2245–57
50.
SawickiDCraigW, 1996, “The democratization of data: bridging the gap for community groups”Journal of the American Planning Association62512–523
51.
SheppardE, 1995, “GIS and society: towards a research agenda”Cartography and Geographic Information Systems225–16
52.
SieberR, 1997Computers in the Grassroots: Environmentalists, Geographic Information Systems, and Public Policy PhD dissertation, Department of Urban Planning and Policy Development, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
53.
SieberR, 2002, “Geographic information systems in the environmental movement”, in Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems Eds CraigWHarrisTWeinerDTaylor and Francis, London) forthcoming
54.
StonichS, 1998, “Information technologies, advocacy, and development: resistance and backlash to industrial shrimp farming”Cartography and Geographic Information Systems25(2) 113–122
55.
SwyngedouwE, 1997, “Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale”, in Space of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local Ed. CoxKGuilford Press, London) pp 137–167
56.
TaylorPOvertonM, 1991, “Commentary: further thoughts on geography and GIS”Environment and Planning A231087–1094
57.
TinkerI, 1990Persistent Inequalities (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
58.
YapaL, 1991, “Is GIS appropriate technology?”International Journal of Geographical Information Systems5(1) 41–58
59.
YoungI, 1990Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
60.
ZimmermanM, 1990, “Taking aim on empowerment research: on the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions”American Journal of Community Psychology18(1) 169–177
