‘Following the money’ has become a popular strategy for many NGOs trying to change corporate and institutional practice. Individual shareholders, pension funds, banks, and other investors capitalize projects that cause ecological degradation or social injustice. Pressuring shareholders to divest, invest responsibly, or encourage executives to alter undesirable practices has become de rigueur for civil-society groups working for social change. Such strategies produce value or norm change, greater accountability, activist networks across national boundaries, and improvements in environmental management. Disinvestment helped bring down apartheid in South Africa. But how far can these ‘disciplining’ strategies go in terms of significantly ameliorating ecological destruction and violations of human rights? I explore this question using the case study of the campaign by Friends of the Earth against the operations of Freeport – McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. in Irian Jaya (West Papua).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlstonL JEggertssonTNorthD C (Eds), 1996Empirical Studies in Institutional Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
2.
BernsteinM, 1955Regulating Business by Independent Commission (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
3.
BryceR, 1997, “Another fine pay day for Jim Bob: Moneybags Moffett”The Austin Chronicle 25 April
4.
CaronG A, 1987, “Comment, SEC Disclosure Requirements for Contingent Environmental Liability 14”Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Reviewnumber 729
5.
CharkhamJSimpsonA, 1999Fair Shares: The Future of Shareholder Power and Responsibility (Oxford University Press, New York)
Corporate Watch UK, 2000b, “A day of protest, action and carnival, in financial centres across the globe, on 18th June 1999”, Corporate Watch UK, 166 Cherwell Street, Oxford OX4 1BG; see also www.corporatewatch.org.uk/magazine/issue8/cw8glob6.html
EnderleGPetersG, 1998A Strange Affair? The Emerging Relationships Between NGOs and Transnational CompaniesPrice Waterhouse Coopers and the University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN
12.
FrancoV, 1998, “FDI regulation and corporate accountability: a discussion of policy options”, discussion paper for Working Group II. Toward a Progressive International Economy, 9 – 10 December, International Forum on Globalization, Washington, DC, http://www.foe.org/progressive-economy/tncs.html
13.
Freeport – McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc., 1999Annual Report 1615 Poydras Street, New Orleans, LA 70112
14.
Freeport – McMoran Copper & Gold Inc., 2000Annual Report 1615 Poydras Street, New Orleans, LA 70112
15.
GanziJTannerJ, 1997, “Global survey on environmental politics and practices of the financial services industry: the private sector”, sponsored by the National Wildlife Federation, International Office, Suite 501, 1400 16th Street, Washington, DC 20036, www.nwf.org/finance/survey.html visited on 3 June 2000
16.
HenwoodD, 1998Wall Street: How It Works (Verso, New York)
17.
KarlinerJ, 1997The Corporate Planet: Ecology and Politics in the Age of Globalization (Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, CA)
18.
KuttnerR, 1999Everything for Sale: The Virtues and Limits of Markets (University of Chicago Press, Chicago)
McCrawT K, 1984Prophets of Regulation (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
21.
McMenaminB, 1996, “Environmental imperialism: antibusiness activists follow US firms abroad and harass them on foreign turf. And you, the taxpayer, are paying for the harassment”Forbes 20 May, 124–136
22.
McMillanL RII, 1996, “Freeport – McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. Request to omit stockholder proposal pursuant to Rule 14a-8”, letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission 31
23.
December, Freeport – McMoran Copper & Gold Inc., 1615Poydras Street, New Orleans, LA 70112
24.
ManheimJ, 2000Corporate Conduct Unbecoming: Codes of Conduct and Anti-corporate Strategy (Tred Avon Institute Press, St Michaels, MD)
25.
MokhiberRWeissmanR, 1999Corporate Predators: The Hunt for Mega-profits and the Attack on Democracy (Common Courage Press, Monroe, ME)
26.
MolA P JSonnenfeldD (Eds), 2000, “Ecological modernisation around the world: an introduction”, in Ecological Modernisation Around the World: Perspectives and Critical Debates (Frank Cass, London) pp 3–16
27.
NorthD C, 1990Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
28.
OplerT CSokobinJ, 1998, “Does coordinated institutional shareholder activism work? An analysis of the Council of Institutional Investors”, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, and Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, http://www.cob.ohio-state.edu/_fin/faculty/opler/ciiweb/
29.
PoundJ, 1992, “Beyond takeovers: politics comes to corporate control”Harvard Business Review March, 83–92
30.
RamphalS, 1998, “Forward to the survey of NGOs on business”, in A Strange Affair: The Emerging Relationship between NGOs and Transnational Companies Eds PetersSEnderleG, Price Waterhouse Coopers, London
31.
RoeM J, 1994Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
32.
UNDP, 1999Human Development Report 1999United Nations Development Programme (Oxford University Press, New York)
33.
US Office of Management and Business, 1996Accounting for Revenue and other Financing Sources and Concepts for Reconciling Budgetary and Financial AccountingUS Office of Management and Business, Washington, DC
34.
WapnerP, 1996Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY)
35.
WilliamsC A, 1999, “The Securities and Exchange Commission and corporate social transparency”Harvard Law Review1121197–1311
