Increasingly, geographers are adopting so-called ‘new institutional’ approaches in order to examine scalar processes of socioeconomic and political restructuring. The authors build on this development by showing how a new institutional analysis of policy implementation transcending different politico-geographic scales might be undertaken. Using contemporary public policy theories, they show how new institutional analyses can be fine-tuned to identify common scalar themes for detailed examination at local through to supranational scales. Drawing on a case study of agri-environmental policy implementation in central Spain between 1992 and 1998, the authors use this nuanced new institutional approach to elucidate the flows of knowledge, territorial representation, and power between multiscalar policy elites. They demonstrate how the interplay between the political strategies of these scalar elites, and the presence of ‘historically sedimented’ institutional forms in the central Spanish region of Castilla la Mancha, have shaped local agri-environmental policy outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgnewJ, 2001, “How many Europes? The European Union, eastward enlargement and uneven development”European Urban and Regional Studies829–38.
2.
CobelasM AlvarezCirujanoS, 1996Las Tablas de Daimiel Ecología Acuática y Sociedad [Las Tablas de Daimiel: Aquatic ecology and society] Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-CSIC Madrid.
3.
AminA, 1999, “An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23365–378.
4.
AminAThriftN J, (Eds), 1994Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
5.
AminAThriftN J, 1995, “Globalization, institutional thickness and the local economy”, in Managing Cities: The New Urban Context Eds HealeyPCameronSDavoudiSGrahamSMadinpourA, (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 91–108.
6.
AminAThriftN J, 2000, “What kind of economic theory for what kind of economic geography?”Antipode324–9.
7.
BaldockD MLoweP D, 1996, “The development of European agri-environmental policy”, in The European Environment and CAP Reform: Policies and Prospects for Conservation Ed. WhitbyM C, (CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon) pp 8–25.
8.
BaldockD MBeaufoyGClarkJ R A, (Eds), 1994The Nature of Farming (Institute for European Environmental Policy/World Wide Fund for Nature/Joint Nature Conservation Committee, London).
9.
BarnesTShepperdE, (Eds), 2000A Companion to Economic Geography (Blackwell, Oxford).
10.
BenningtonJHarveyJ, 1999, “Networking in Europe”, in The New Management of British Local Governance Ed. StokerG, (Macmillan, London) pp 197–221.
11.
BenzAEberleinB, 1999, “The Europeanization of regional policies: Patterns of multi-level governance”Journal of European Public Policy6329–348.
12.
BorzelT A, 1999, “Towards convergence in Europe? Institutional adaptation to Europeanisation in Germany and Spain”Journal of Common Market Studies37573–596.
BullerHHollAWilsonG A, (Eds), 2000Agri-environmental Policy in Europe (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants).
15.
CastreeN, 2000, “What kind of critical geography for what kind of politics?”Environment and Planning A322091–2095.
16.
CEC, 1992, “Council Regulation EEC number 2078/92 of 30 June 1992 on agricultural production methods compatible with the requirements of the protection of the environment and the maintenance of the countryside”Official Journal L215 85–90 (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels).
17.
CEC, 1996The Cork Declaration: A Living Countryside summary document of the conference “Rural Europe—Future Perspectives”, Cork, Ireland, 7–9 November 1996 (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels).
18.
CHG, 1995Informe sobre la Situación Hidrológica del Acuífero de la Mancha Occidental [Report on the hydrological situaiton of the Mancha Occidental Aquifer] Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana, Ciudad Real, copy available from authors.
19.
ClarkG LGertlerM SFeldmanM P, 2000The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
20.
ClarkJ R AJonesA, 1998, “Agricultural élites, agrarian beliefs, and their impact on the evolution of agri-environment policies: An examination of the British experience, 1981–92”Environment and Planning A302227–2243.
21.
ClarkJ R AJonesA, 1999, “From policy insider to policy outcast? Comité des Organisations Professionnelles Agricoles, EU policymaking, and the EU's ‘agri-environment’ regulation”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy17637–653.
22.
ClarkJ R AJonesAPotterC ALobleyM, 1997, “Conceptualising the evolution of the European Union's agri-environment policy: A discourse approach”Environment and Planning A291869–1885.
23.
CoEC, 1991a, “Rapport complémentaire: From the Agriculture Structures Group to the Special Committee on Agriculture concerning the accompanying measures of the CAP reforms”, Agriculture Council Working Document 9945/91 (Council of the European Communities, Brussels), copy available from the authors.
24.
CoEC, 1991b, “Aide-mémoire: For the Agriculture Structures Group concerning the accompanying measures of the CAP reforms”, Agriculture Council Working Document 9463/91 (Council of the European Communities, Brussels), copy available from the authors.
25.
CoEC, 1992, “Aide-mémoire on COM (91) 415 Final for the attention of the President of the Agriculture Structures Group”, 16 January 1992 (Council of the European Communities, Brussels), copy available from the authors.
26.
CrucesJHenandezJ MLópezGRosellJ, 1998De la Noria a la Bomba: Conflictos Sociales y Ambientales en la Cuenca Alta del Rio Guadiana [From the wheel to the pump: Social and environmental conflicts in the Upper Guadiana River Basin] (Bakeaz, Bilbao).
27.
ElgstromOSmithM, 2001, “Negotiation and policy-making in the EU—processes, system and order”Journal of European Public Policy7673–683.
28.
GarridoFMoyanoE, 1996, “Spain”, in The European Environment and CAP Reform: Policies and Prospects for Conservation Ed. WhitbyM C, (CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon) pp 86–105.
29.
GenieysW, 1998, “Autonomous communities and the state in Spain”, in Regions in Europe Eds Le GalèsPLequesneC, (Routledge, London) pp 166–180.
30.
GiordanoB, 2001, “Institutional thickness, political sub-culture and the resurgence of (the ‘new’) regionalism in Italy—a case study of the Northern League in the province of Varese”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series2625–41.
31.
GrandeE, 1996, “The state and interest groups in a framework of multi-level decision-making: The case of the European Union”Journal of European Public Policy3318–338.
32.
HallP A, 1986Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France (Oxford University Press, New York).
33.
Hayes-RenshawFWallaceH, 1997The Council of Ministers (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
34.
HixS, 1998, “The study of the European Union. II: The ‘new governance’ agenda and its rival”Journal of European Public Policy538–65.
35.
HoggartK, 1997, “Uncertainty washed with conviction in the investigation of public policy”Progress in Human Geography21109–118.
36.
HoogheLKeatingM, 1994, “The politics of European Union regional policy”Journal of European Public Policy2367–393.
37.
HudsonR, 1994, “Institutional change, cultural transformation, and economic regeneration: Myths and realities from Europe's old industrial regions”, in Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe Eds AminAThriftN J, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 196–216.
38.
HudsonR, 1997, “Putting policy into practice: Policy implementation problems, with special reference to the European Mediterranean”Journal of Mediterranean Studies7104–114.
39.
HudsonR, 2000, “One Europe or many? Reflections on becoming European”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series25409–426.
40.
ImrieRRacoM, 1999, “How new is the new local governance? Lessons from the United Kingdom”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series2445–64.
41.
JessopB, 1994, “Post-fordism and the state”, in Post-Fordism Ed. AminA, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 251–279.
42.
JessopB, 2000, “The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of global capitalism”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24323–360.
43.
JonesAClarkJ R A, 1998, “The agri-environment Regulation EC 2078/92: The role of the European Commission in policy shaping and setting”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1651–68.
44.
JonesAClarkJ R A, 2000, “Of vines and policy vignettes: Sectoral evolution and institutional thickness in the Languedoc”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series25333–357.
45.
JonesAClarkJ R A, 2001The Modalities of European Union Governance: New Institutionalist Explanations of EU Agri-environmental Policy (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
46.
JonesMMacLeodG, 1998, “Towards a regional renaissance? Reconfiguring and rescaling England's economic governance”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series24295–313.
47.
JordanA, 1999, “The implementation of EU environmental policy: A policy problem without a political solution?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1769–90.
48.
LópezG, 1997, “Irrigated agriculture in the Guadiana high river basin of Castilla la Mancha, Spain: Environmental and socioeconomic impacts”, paper presented at conference ‘The Use of Water in Sustainable Agriculture’, 2–4 June 1998, Albacete, Spain; copies available from the authors.
49.
LoveringJ, 1999, “Theory led by policy: The inadequacies of the new regionalism (illustrated from the case of Wales)”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23379–395.
50.
MacLeodG, 1998, “In what sense a region? Place hybridity, symbolic shape, and institutional formation in (post) modern Scotland”Political Geography7833–863.
51.
MacLeodG, 1999, “‘Institutional thickness’ and industrial governance in lowland Scotland”Area29299–311.
52.
MacLeodGGoodwinM, 1999, “Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: On the state, politics, scale, and explanation”Political Geography18697–730.
53.
MarkusenA, 1999, “Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies”Regional Studies33869–884.
54.
MarshDRhodesRAW, (Eds), 1992Policy Networks in British Government (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
55.
MarshDSmithM, 2000, “Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach”Political Studies484–21.
56.
MartinR L, 1999, “The ‘new economic geography’: Challenge or irrelevance?”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series24387–391.
57.
MartinR L, 2000, “Institutional approaches in economic geography”, in A Companion to Economic Geography Eds BarnesTSheppardE(Blackwell, Oxford) pp 1–28.
58.
MartinR L, 2001, “Geography and public policy: The case of the missing agenda”Progress in Human Geography forthcoming.
59.
MartinR LSunleyPWillsJ, 1996Union Retreat and the Regions: The Shrinking Landscape of Organised Labour (Jessica Kingsley, London).
60.
MatlandR E, 1995, “Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory5145–175.
61.
NugentN, 1999The Government and Politics of the European Community3rd edition (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
62.
OnateJ JMaloJ ESuárezFPecoB, 1998, “Regional and environmental aspects in the implementation of Spanish agri-environmental schemes”Journal of Environmental Management52227–240.
63.
PaasiA, 2001, “Europe as a social process and discourse. Considerations of place, boundaries and identity”European Urban and Regional Studies87–28.
64.
PainterJ, 1995Politics, Geography, and Political Geography: A Critical Perspective (Edward Arnold, London).
65.
PainterJ, 2001, “Space, territory and the European project: Reflections on Agnew and Paasi”European Urban and Regional Studies842–43.
66.
PaniaguaJ, 2001, “European processes of environmentalization in agriculture: A view from Spain”, in Agricultural Transformation, Food and Environment Eds BullerHHoggartK, (Ashgate, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 131–164.
67.
PeckJ, 1999, “Grey geography?”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series24131–135.
68.
PetersonJ, 1995, “Decisionmaking in the European Union: Towards a framework for analysis”Journal of European Public Policy269–93.
69.
RacoM, 1998, “Assessing ‘institutional thickness’ in the local context: A comparison of Cardiff and Sheffield”Environment and Planning A30975–996.
70.
RhodesRAW, 1986European Policy Making, Implementation and Sub-central Governments (European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht).
71.
RhodesRAW, 1997Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability (Open University Press, Buckingham).
72.
SadlerD, 2000, “Organising European labour: Governance, production, trades unions and the production of scale”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series25135–152.
73.
SaintenyG, 1995, “French communism: The challenge of environmentalism and ecologism”West European Politics18110–129.
74.
SeguraA R, 1996, “Reflexiones sobre el reglamento agroambiental Europea y el programa nacional Español”Quercus12546–48.
75.
SmithM J, 1990The Politics of Agricultural Support in Britain: The Development of the Agricultural Policy Community (Dartmouth, Aldershot, Hants).
76.
SwyngedouwE, 1999, “Modernity and hybridity: Nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape 1890”Annals of the Association of American Geographers89443–465.
77.
SwyngedouwE, 2000“Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1863–76.
78.
VelascoM, 1998Los Nuevos Regardios y Ruidera: Un Modelo Desarrollo Insostenible en el Campo de Montiel [New irrigation systems and Ruidera: An unsustainable model of development in Campo de Montiel]Instituto de Estudios Albacetenses, Diputación de Albecete, Albacete, Spain.
79.
ViladomiuLRosellJ, 1995, “Medio ambiente y PAC: Una primera aproximación a los programas agroambientales espanoles” [Environment and the CAP: A preliminary assessment of Spanish agri-environment programmes]Boletín Económico del Ministerio de Comercio y Turismo number 2484, 49–58.
80.
WeickK E, 1976, “Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems”Administrative Science Quarterly211–16.
81.
WrightV, 1996, “The national co-ordination of European policy-making: Negotiating the quagmire”, in European Union Power and Policymaking Ed. RichardsonJ J, (Routledge, London) pp 148–169.
