Niklas Luhmann was one of the most innovative and productive social theorists of the 20th century. He developed a comprehensive and distinctive social theory and his ideas have enriched many disciplines. Yet, only few geographers have engaged with his work. Convinced of its qualities, our intention is to stimulate a critical reception of his theory among human geographers. Here an introduction into his theory of social systems is provided, and the possibilities for a geography of social systems is explored. A key element of our proposal is a differential notion of space as a possibility of distinction, which complements Luhmann's epistemological notion of time. Our conclusion is that a geography of social systems would have to set out conceptually from accessibility systems, which are systems that encompass communications, their necessary physical and ecological environment, as well as their coordination in various dimensions of space and time.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertM, 1999, “Observing world politics: Luhmann's systems theory of society and international relations”Journal of International Studies28239–265
2.
ArnoldiJ, 2001, “Niklas Luhmann”Theory, Culture and Society181–13
3.
BahrenbergGKuhmK, 1999, “Weltgesellschaft und Region—eine systemtheoretische Perspektive” [World society and a region—a perspective of systems theory]Geographische Zeitschrift87193–209
4.
BaileyK D, 1997, “The autopoiesis of social systems: assessing Luhmann's theory of self-reference”Systems Research and Behavioral Science1483–100
5.
BeierC, 1995Dezentralisierung und Entwicklungsmanagement in Indonesien [Decentralization and management of development in Indonesia] (Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik, Saarbrücken)
6.
GrenM, 1994Earth Writing: Exploring Representation and Social Geography in Between Meaning/Matter Department of Geography, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg
7.
HabermasJLuhmannN, 1971Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie—Was leistet die Systemforschung? [Social theory or social technology—what is the performance of system research?] (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main)
8.
HardG, 1986, “Der Raum—einmal systemtheoretisch gesehen” [Space—once regarded from a systems theory point of view]Geographica Helvetica4177–83
9.
HardG, 1999, “Raumfragen” [Questions of space], in Handlungszentrierte Sozialgeographie Ed. MeusburgerP (Steiner, Stuttgart) pp 133–162
10.
KlagenfurtK, 1995Technologische Zivilisation und transklassische Logik [Technological civilization and transclassical logic] (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main)
11.
KlüterH, 1986, “Raum als Element sozialer Kommunikation” [Space as an element of social communication], Giessener geographische Schriften no. 60, Department of Geography, University of Giessen, Giessen
12.
KlüterH, 1994, “Raum als Objekt menschlicher Wahrnehmung und Raum als Element sozialer Kommunikation” [Space as an object of human perception and space as an element of social communication], in Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaftnumber 136, 143–178
13.
KlüterH, 1999, “Raum und Organisation” [Space and organization], in Handlungszentrierte Sozialgeographie Ed. MeusburgerP (Steiner, Stuttgart) pp 187–212
14.
KrauseD, 1999Luhmann-Lexikon [Luhmann encyclopaedia] (Enke, Stuttgart)
15.
LatourB, 1993We Have Never Been Modern (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
16.
LatourB, 1999Politiques de la Nature (La Découverte, Paris)
17.
LuhmannN, 1989Ecological Communication (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
18.
LuhmannN, 1995Social Systems (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
19.
LuhmannN, 1996Die Realität der Massenmedien [The reality of mass media] (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen)
20.
LuhmannN, 1997aDie Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft [The society of the society]2 volumes (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main)
21.
LuhmannN, 1997b“Globalization or world society: how to conceive of modern society?”International Review of Sociology767–79, http://www.libfl.ru/Luhmann/Luhmann2.html
22.
LuhmannN1998, “Der Staat des politischen Systems” [The state of the political system], in Perspektiven der Weltgesellschaft Ed. BeckU (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main) pp 345–380
23.
LuhmannN, 2000Organisation und Entscheidung [Organization and decision] (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen)
24.
MaturanaHVarelaF, 1980Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (D Riedel, Dordrecht)
25.
MaturanaHVarelaF, 1987The Tree of Knowledge (Shambhala, Boston, MA)
26.
MingersJ, 1995Self-producing Systems (Plenum, New York)
27.
PottageA, 1998, “Power as an art of contingency: Luhmann, Deleuze, Foucault”Economy and Society271–27
28.
PredA, 1977, “The choreography of existence”Economic Geography53207–221
29.
RaschWWolfeC (Eds), 2000Observing Complexity: Systems Theory and Postmodernity (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
30.
RortyR, 1979The Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
31.
SimmonsI, 1993Interpreting Nature: Cultural Constructions of the Environment (Routledge, New York)
32.
StäheliU, 2000a, “Writing action: double contingency and normalization”Distinction139–48
33.
StäheliU, 2000bSinnzusammenbrüche [Breakdowns of meaning] (Velbrück, Weilerswist)
34.
TeubnerG, 2001, “Economics of gift–positivity of justice”Theory, Culture and Society1829–47
35.
Von FörsterH, 1985Observing System (Intersystems, Seaside, CA)
