Within the debate about positive effects of foreign multinational branch plants on host regions in less developed countries questions of technological learning and upgrading rank at the top. This paper describes forces and mechanisms which, under favourable conditions, promote dissemination of know-how through the dynamics of regional cycles of learning. Enriching earlier insights into the local embedding of subsidiaries and processes of cumulative causation, it emphasises why and how agglom-erating branches of globally operating technology companies engage in upgrading their less developed locality: effects are triggered by a combination of increasing regional labour-cost pressure and corresponding reactions of firms which relate to their branch activities and affect the institutional framework. Two models of regional cycles of learning are introduced which depict crucial distinctions between spatial clusters of technology firms with and without foreign affiliates. Empirical evidence is provided by comparing two technology regions in developing Asia: Bangalore, India, and Bandung, Indonesia. Both are well endowed with universities, research institutions, and firms in technology sectors, but differ with regard to the presence of foreign firms, and accordingly, display divergent qualitative developments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikatDSinghalA, 1993, “Think global, act local: India's Bangalore technopolis: A Case study of communication technology transfer in India's Silicon Valley”, paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Convention, Kansas City; copy available from D Aikat, School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
2.
AltbachP G, 1993, “The dilemma of change in Indian higher education”, in Higher Education Reform in India: Experience and Perspectives Eds ChitnisSAltbachP G (Sage, New Delhi) pp 13–37.
3.
AminAThriftN, 1994, “Living in the global”, in Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe Eds AminAThriftN (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 1–22.
4.
AminABradleyDGentleCHowellsJTomaneyJ, 1994, “Regional incentives and the quality of mobile investment in the less favoured regions of the EC”Progress in Planning411–112.
5.
AsheimB T, 1996, “Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: A Condition for prosperity”European Planning Studies4379–400.
6.
BalasubramanyamVBalasubramanyamA, 1997, “International trade in services: The case of India's computer software”The World Economy20829–843.
7.
BalasubramanyamVBalasubramanyamA, 2000, “The software cluster in Bangalore”, in Regions, Globalization, and the Knowledge-based Economy Ed. DunningJ H (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 349–363.
8.
Barba NavarettiGCarraroC, 1999, “From learning to partnership: Multinational R&D cooperation in developing countries”Economics of Innovation and New Technology: EINTEO8137–173.
9.
BellAAlbuM, 1999, “Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries”World Development271715–1734.
10.
BlomströmMGlobermanSKokkoA, 1999, “The determinants of host country spillovers from foreign direct investment: Review and synthesis of the literature”, WP 339, Series in Economics and Finance, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm.
11.
BPPT, STAID, 1995Indikator Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Indonesia 1994 [Indicators of Science and Technology in Indonesia 1994]2nd edition, BPPT—Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology, Jakarta; STAID (Science and Technology for Industrial Development Project).
12.
CantwellJ A, 1987, “The reorganization of European industries after integration: Selected evidence on the role of multinational enterprise activity”Journal of Common Market Studies26127–151.
13.
CantwellJ A (Ed.), 1994Transnational Corporations and Innovatory Activities (Routledge, London).
14.
CantwellJ A (Ed.), 1995“The globalisation of technology: What remains of the product cycle model?”Cambridge Journal of Economics19155–174.
15.
ChenE K Y, 1996, “Transnational corporations and technology transfer to developing countries', in Transnational Corporations and World Development Ed. UNCTAD (International Thomson Business Press, London) pp 181–214.
16.
DarmonegoroSHarahapG, 1992, “Developing research and technology transfer capability in third world countries: A View from Indonesia”, in Land Use, Development and Globalisation, Selected Proceedings of the 6th World Conference on Transport Research,Volume 1 (World Conference on Transport Research Society, Lyon) pp 641–651.
17.
DickenP, 1998Global Shift: Transforming the World Economy3rd edition (Paul Chapman, London).
18.
DickenPForsgrenMMalmbergA, 1994, “The local embeddedness of transnational corporations”, in Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe Eds AminAThriftN (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 23–45.
19.
DriffieldNMundayM, 2000, “Industrial performance, agglomeration and foreign manufacturing investment in the UK”Journal of International Business Studies3121–37.
20.
DunningJ H, 1994, “Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity”Research Policy2367–88.
21.
DunningJ H, 1998Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy6th edition (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Berks).
22.
Echeverri-CarroloE L, 1994, “Flexible linkages and offshore assembly facilities in developing countries”International Regional Science Review1749–73.
23.
EnosJ LLallSMikyungY, 1997, “Transfer of technology: An update”Asian-Pacific Economic Literature156–66.
24.
EvansP B, 1998, “Transnational corporations and Third World states: From the old internationalization to the new”, in Transnational Corporations and the Global Economy Eds Kozul-WrightRRowthornR E (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 195–223.
25.
FirmanT, 1996, “Urban development in Bandung Metropolitan Region: A Transformation to Desa-Kota Region”Third World Planning Review181–22.
26.
FirnJ R, 1975, “External control and regional development: The case of Scotland”Environment and Planning A7393–414.
27.
FröbelFHeinrichsJKreyeO, 1980The New International Division of Labour (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
28.
Fromhold-EisebithM, 1999, “Bangalore—a network model of innovation-oriented regional development in NICs?”, in Making Connections: Technological Learning and Regional Economic Change Eds MaleckiE JOinasP (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 231–260.
29.
Fromhold-EisebithM, 2000, “Eine asiatische Technologieregion als neue Variante des kreativen Milieus? Anwendung des Konzepts auf Latecomer-Regionen am Beispiel des indischen Bangalore” [An Asian technology region as new variant of the creative milieu? Application of the concept to latecomer regions—example of Bangalore, India]Geographische Zeitschrift88147–160.
30.
Fromhold-EisebithM, 2001aTechnologieregionen in Asiens Newly Industrialised Countries: Strukturen und Beziehungssysteme am Beispiel von Bangalore, Indien, und Bandung, Indonesien [Technology regions in Asian newly industrialised countries: structures and relationships—examples of Bangalore, India, and Bandung, Indonesia] (LIT-Verlag, Münster).
31.
Fromhold-EisebithM, 2001b, “Verfehlte Ansätze, verpasste Chancen: Eine Bewertung der Technologiepolitik Indonesiens aus raumwissenschaftlicher Sicht” [Misguiding approaches, missed opportunities: Evaluating Indonesia's technology policy from regional science perspective]Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie4515–30.
32.
Fromhold-EisebithMEisebithG, 1999, “Technologieregion Bangalore—ein neues Modell der technologieorientierten Regionalentwicklung?” [Technology region of Bangalore—a new model of technology-oriented regional development?]Geographische Rundschau5196–102.
33.
Fromhold-EisebithMEisebithG, 2002, “The Indonesian technology region of Bandung: High potential, low profile”International Development Planning Review2441–57.
34.
GammeltoftP, 1999, “A survey of technological capability in the Indonesian electronics industry” WP 1/1999, International Development Studies, Roskilde University, Roskilde.
35.
GlassA JSaggiK, 1999, “Multinational firms and technology transfer”, WP 2067, World Bank Series on International Economics, Trade, Capital Flows, World Bank, Washington, DC.
36.
GothN C, 1997, “Bottlenecked in Bangalore: India's obstacles to global software trade”The Red Herring: Inside Technology and Entertainment Business February, 24–27.
37.
HeeksR, 1996India's Software Industry: State Policy, Liberalisation and Industrial Development (Sage, New Delhi).
38.
HeitzmanJ, 1997, “High technology entrepreneurship and development in Bangalore”Management Review (Indian Institute of Management Bangalore)9(4)85–96.
39.
HeitzmanJ, 1999, “Corporate strategy and planning in the Science City: Bangalore as ‘Silicon Valley’”Economic and Political Weekly 30 January, pp PE 2–11.
40.
JamesJ, 1994, “Microelectronics and the Third World”, in Technology and Innovation in the International Economy Ed. CooperC (Edward Elgar, Brookfield, VT) pp 149–230.
41.
KumarN, 1998, “Foreign direct investments and technology transfers in an era of globalization and prospects for developing countries: A Policy postscript”, in Globalization, Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfers: Impacts on and Prospects for Developing Countries Ed. KumarN (Routledge, London) pp 197–215.
42.
LallS, 1996, “Transnational corporations and economic development”, in Transnational Corporations and World Development Ed. UNCTAD (International Thomson Business Press, London) pp 44–72.
43.
LessardD RAmsdenA H, 1998, “The multinational enterprise as a learning organization”, in Contemporary Economic Issues, Volume 3: Trade, Payments and Debt Ed. CohenD (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 65–81.
44.
MadonS, 1997, “Information-based global economy and socioeconomic development: The case of Bangalore”The Information Society13227–243.
45.
MaleckiE J, 1997Technology and Economic Development: The Dynamics of Local, Regional and National Competitiveness2nd edition (Longman, Harlow, Essex).
46.
MaskellPEskelinenHHannibalssonIMalmbergAVatneE (Eds), 1997Competitiveness, Localised Learning and Regional Development (Routledge, London).
47.
MathewJChoD-S, 2000Tiger Technology: The Creation of a Semiconductor Industry in East Asia (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
48.
MerchantK, 1999, “ ‘Garden City’ is feeling the strain”Financial Times Survey ‘India: Information Technology’, 1 December, page 5.
49.
MontesM F, 1997, “Direct foreign investment and technology transfer in ASEAN”ASEAN Economic Bulletin14176–189.
50.
NarulaRDunningJ H, 1999, “Developing countries versus multinational enterprises in a globalising world: The dangers of falling behind”Forum for Development Studies2261–287.
OECD, 1996Networks of Enterprises and Local Development: Competing and Cooperation in Local Productive Systems (OECD, Paris).
53.
OracleI D C, 1996The India Dimension of a Global Vision (Oracle India Development Center, Bangalore).
54.
PearceR DSinghS, 1992Globalizing Research and Development (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
55.
PerezT, 1997, “Multinational enterprises and technological spillovers: An evolutionary model”Journal of Evolutionary Economics7169–192.
56.
PhelpsN A, 1997Multinationals and European Integration: Trade, Investment and Regional Development (Jessica Kingsley, London).
57.
PhelpsN AFullerC, 2000, “Multinationals, intra-corporate competition and regional development”Economic Geography76224–243.
58.
PrabhakarM, 1996, “Great expectations: The entry of new players has recharged the Bangalore job scene, and turned it towards negotiable pay packets”Business India 9–22 September, pp 166–167.
59.
RajeshY P, 1995, “Bangalore going bust. The silicon rush is over. India's paradise city is cracking under all the microchips on its shoulders”Outlook 5 22 November, pp 50–55.
60.
RasiahR, 1996, “The changing organisation of work in Malaysia's electronics industry”Asia Pacific Viewpoint3721–27.
61.
ReddyP, 1997, “New trends in globalization of corporate R&D and implications for innovation capability in host countries: A Survey from India”World Development251821–1837.
62.
RodgersC, 1996, “The new Silicon Valley? TI India taps high-tech talent in an ancient country”Semisphere8(June) 12–13.
63.
SaggiK, 2000, “Trade, foreign direct investment, and international technology transfer: A Survey”, WP 2349, World Bank series on International Economics, Trade, Capital Flows, World Bank, Washington, DC.
64.
SallehJ M D, 1995, “Foreign direct investment and technology transfer in the Malaysian electronics industry”, in The New Wave of Foreign Direct Investment in Asia Nomura Research Institute, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore and Tokyo, pp 133–159.
65.
SchwareR, 1992, “Software industry entry strategies for developing countries: A ‘walking on two legs’ proposition”World Development20143–164.
66.
SinghM S, 1995, “Formation of local skills space and skills networking: The experience of the electronics and electrical sector in Penang”, in Human Resources and Industrial Spaces: A Perspective on Globalization and Localisation Eds KnaapG ALe HeronR (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 197–226.
67.
StremlauJ, 1996, “Dateline Bangalore: Third World technopolis”Foreign Policy102(Spring) 152–168.
68.
The Economist2000, “The world's view of multinationals”, 29 January–4 February, pp 19–20.
69.
TilakJ B G, 1996, “Education: Towards improving equity and efficiency”, in India Development Policy Imperatives Eds KelkarV LBhanoji RaoV V (Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi) pp 85–136.
70.
Wall Street Journal Europe2000, “Bangalore's $4 billion baby: born free, Indian infotech goes global”, 16 February, page 11.
71.
WellsL T, 1998, “Multinationals and the developing countries”Journal of International Business Studies29101–114.
72.
YoungSHoodNPetersE, 1994, “Multinational enterprises and regional economic development”Regional Studies28657–677.
