Neighborhood involvement in urban governance remains a pressing goal in an era of globalization. Cities have instituted a variety of structures to facilitate this involvement, including quasi-formal neighborhood or district councils. At the same time, urban populations are changing rapidly because of multiple dynamics operating at multiple scales. Immigration, for example, continues to transform inner-city neighborhoods despite the emergence of suburban immigrant enclaves. Existing research inadequately addresses the interaction between efforts to organize neighborhood political involvement and the dynamic nature of urban populations. We examine St Paul, Minnesota—a locale with a well-established neighborhood district-council system and a vibrant and rapidly growing immigrant community. Indeed, immigrants from Southeast Asia and East Africa are moving into neighborhoods that up until the early 1990s were predominantly white. Using a multimethod empirical analysis, we argue that the district-council system, while recognizing and empowering local-level organization, fails to provide adequate resources for neighborhoods to address social dynamics that operate at much broader scales. An index of ethnic and racial diversity computed with census data shows that St Paul experienced a significant overall increase in diversity during the 1990s. Although inner-city neighborhoods remained the most diverse, residential areas developed after World War 2 also diversified considerably. Interviews with neighborhood organizers based in part on tabular and cartographic displays revealed a wide variety of strategies and responses to changing ethnic and racial diversity. Predominant, however, was a mismatch between the scale at which demographic change occurs, and the scale of ‘neighborhood’ action embedded within the district-council system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbaRNeeV, 1997, “Rethinking assimilation theory for a new century”International Migration Review31826–874.
2.
AlbaR DLoganJ RStultsB JMarzanGZhangW Q, 1999, “Immigrant groups in the suburbs: A Reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation”American Sociological Review64446–460.
3.
BeauregardR B, 2000, “Neither embedded nor embodied: Critical pragmatism and identity politics”, in Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society Ed. BurayidiM A (Praeger, Westport, CT) pp 53–66.
4.
BennettL, 1987, “The dilemmas of building a progressive urban coalition: The linked development debate in Chicago”Journal of Urban Affairs9263–276.
5.
BrubakerR, 2001, “The return of assimilation? Changing perspectives on immigration and its sequels in France, Germany, and the United States”Ethnic and Racial Studies24531–548.
6.
BurayidiM A (Ed.), 2000Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society (Praeger, Westport, CT).
7.
ChiswickB RSullivanT A, 1995, “The new immigrants”, in State of the Union: America in the 1990s. Volume Two: Social Trends Ed. FarleyR (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) pp 211–270.
8.
ClavelP, 1986The Progressive City: Planning and Participation, 1969–1984 (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ).
9.
DelaneyDLeitnerH, 1997, “The political construction of scale”Political Geography1693–97.
10.
EllisM, 2000, “‘Mark one or more’: Counting and projecting by race on US Census 2000 and beyond”Social and Cultural Geography1183–195.
11.
EylesJ, 1988, “Interpreting the geographical world: Qualitative approaches in geographical research”, in Qualitative Methods in Human Geography Eds EylesJSmithD M (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 1–16.
12.
FraserN, 1997Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition (Routledge, New York).
13.
GoldbergD T, 1997Racial Subjects: Writing on Race in America (Routledge, New York).
14.
GordonM M, 1964Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins (Oxford University Press, New York).
15.
HACER, 2001Latinos on the East Side of St. PaulHispanic Advocacy and Community Empowerment through Research, 330 HHH Center, 301 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
16.
HollowayS R, 2000, “Identity, contingency, and the urban geography of ‘race”’Social and Cultural Geography1197–208.
17.
HollowayS RWylyE K, 2002, “Empirical destabilization of racial categories: Implications for civil rights enforcement in mortgage lending”The Review of Black Political Economy3057–89.
18.
JamesA, 2000, “Demographic shifts and the challenge for planners: Insights from a practitioner”, in Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society Ed. BurayidiM A (Praeger, Westport, CT) pp 15–35.
19.
JessopB, 1998, “The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development”International Social Science Journal5029–46.
20.
JonasAEGWilsonD (Eds), 1999The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives, Two Decades Later (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY).
21.
LakeR W, 1994, “Negotiating local autonomy”Political Geography13423–442.
22.
LauriaM, 1997, “Introduction: Reconstructing urban regime theory”, in Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory Ed. LauriaM (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 1–9.
23.
LiW, 1998a, “Anatomy of a new ethnic settlement: The Chinese Ethnoburb in Los Angeles”Urban Studies35479–501.
24.
LiW, 1998b, “Los Angeles's Chinese Ethnoburb: from ethnic service center to global economy outpost”Urban Geography19502–517.
25.
LongresJ F, 1990Human Behavior in the Social Environment (F E Peacock, Itasca, IL).
26.
LukermannB, 2002Assessment of the East Side Community Outreach Partnership CenterCenter for Urban and Regional Affairs, 330 HHH Center, 301 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
27.
McAdamD, 1982Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
28.
McAdamDMcCarthyJ DZaldM N, 1996Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
29.
MacKinnonD, 2001, “Regulating regional spaces: State agencies and the production of governance in the Scottish Highlands”Environment and Planning A33823–844.
30.
MasseyD SDentonN A, 1985, “Spatial assimilation as a socioeconomic outcome”American Sociological Review5094–106.
31.
MartinD, 1999Claiming Place and Community: Place Identity and Place-based Organizing in Inner-city Neighborhoods unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
32.
MeeganRMitchellA, 2001, “‘It's not community round here, it's neighbourhood’: Neighbourhood change and cohesion in urban regeneration policies”Urban Studies382167–2194.
33.
MiyaresI, 1998The Hmong Refugee Experience in the United States: Crossing the River (Garland, New York).
34.
NagelC, 2002, “Constructing difference and sameness: The politics of assimilation in London's Arab communities”Ethnic and Racial Studies25258–287.
35.
ParkR E, 1914, “Racial assimilation in secondary groups with particular reference to the Negro”American Journal of Sociology19606–623.
36.
PeckJ, 1995, “Moving and shaking: Business elites, state localism and urban privatism”Progress in Human Geography1916–46.
37.
PendallR, 1999, “Opposition to housing: NIMBY and beyond”Urban Affairs Review35112–136.
38.
RacoM, 2000, “Assessing community participation in local economic development—lessons for the new urban policy”Political Geography19573–599.
39.
RacoMFlintJ, 2001, “Communities, places and institutional relations: Assessing the role of area-based community representation in local governance”Political Geography20585–612.
40.
RumbautR G, 1994, “Origins and destinies: Immigration to the United States since World War II”Sociological Forum9583–621.
41.
SmithN, 1992, “Geography, difference, and the politics of scale”, in Postmodernism and the Social Sciences Eds DohertyJGrahamEMalekM (Macmillan, London) pp 57–79.
42.
SmithN, 1993, “Homeless/global: Scaling places”, in Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change Eds BirdJCurtisBPutnamTRobertsonGTicknerL (Routledge, New York) pp 87–119.
43.
SmithR A, 2000, “Measuring the stability of multi-racial, multicultural neighborhoods”, in Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society Ed. BurayidiM A (Praeger, Westport, CT/London) pp 235–256.
44.
StokerG, 1998, “Governance as theory: Five propositions”International Social Science Journal5017–28.
45.
StoneC, 1989Regime Politics (Lawrence University Press, Lawrence, KS).
46.
StraussA, 1987Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
47.
TarrowS, 1983, “Struggle, politics, and reform: collective action, social movements, and cycles of protest”, Western Societies Paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
48.
TarrowS, 1994Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
49.
TheilHFinizzaA J, 1971, “A note on the measurement of racial integration in schools”Journal of Mathematical Sociology1187–193.
50.
TillyC, 1978From Mobilization to Revolution (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
51.
WolchJ, 1990The Shadow State: Government and Voluntary Sector in TransitionThe Foundation Center, 79 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003.
52.
WrightREllisM, 2000, “Race, region and the territorial politics of immigration in the US”International Journal of Population Geography6197–211.
53.
ZelinskyWLeeB A, 1998, “Heterolocalism: An alternative model of the behaviour of immigrant ethnic communities”International Journal of Population Geography4281–298.
