‘For some, networks have ontological status, being associated with the embeddedness of social life in general and the necessary embeddedness of firms in their industries and regions in particular. For others less certain about ontology, networks are vital ingredients in firm-specific competitive strategies and long-term growth prospects. In this paper we approach the issue with reference to firm-specific competitive strategies, reporting the results of a large-scale pan-European survey of small and medium-sized enterprises' (SMEs) network-related responses to changing market conditions. Distinguishing between different types of production network (supply and distribution) operating at various geographical scales (regional, national, EU, and global), it is shown that the scope and scale of firm networks are strategic issues. All things being equal, firms adopt advanced technologies in response to changing market conditions, enabling their networks to change in scope and geographical scale. We also show that the significance of local as opposed to national and EU networks is changing with less ‘localism’ and wider geographical scope becoming increasingly important. Using probit models for different types of networks, we identify and distinguish between predictive variables driving network formation, including the type of SME ownership. Implications are drawn for the theoretical status of networks in industrial organisation and their significance for European economic development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllsoppCArtisM, 2003, “The assessment: EMU, four years on”Oxford Review of Economic Policy19(1) 1–29.
2.
AsheimB, 2000, “Industrial districts: The contributions of Marshall and beyond”, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography Eds ClarkG LGertlerM SFeldmanM (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 413–431.
3.
BarroRSala-i-MartinX, 1995Economic Growth (McGraw-Hill, New York).
4.
BatheltHGlücklerJ, 2000, “Netzwerke, Lernen und evolutionäre Regionalentwicklung” [Networks, learning and evolutionary regional development]Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie44167–182.
5.
BatheltHGlücklerJ, 2002Wirtschaftsgeographie: Ökonomische Beziehungen in raumlicher Perspektive [Economic geography: economic relations in spatial perspective] (Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart).
6.
BatheltHGlücklerJ, 2003, “Toward a relational economic geography”Journal of Economic Geography3117–144.
7.
BatheltHTaylorM, 2002, “Clusters, power and place: Inequality and local growth in time – space”Geografiska Annaler8493–109.
8.
BrezisE SKrugmanPTsiddonD, 1993, “Leap-frogging in international competition: A Theory of cycles in national technological leadership”American Economic Review831211–1219.
9.
ChandlerA, 1977The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
10.
ChandlerA, 1990Scale and Scope: The Industrial Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
11.
ClarkG L, 1993, “Global interdependence and regional development: Business linkages and corporate governance in a world of financial risk”Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, New Series18309–325.
12.
ClarkG LTraceyP, 2004Global Competitiveness and Innovation (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke).
13.
ClarkG LGertlerM SWhitemanJ, 1986Regional Dynamics: Studies in Adjustment Theory (Allen and Unwin, London).
14.
ClarkG LPalaskasTTraceyPTsampraM, 2004, “Globalization and competitive strategy in Europe's vulnerable regions: Firm, industry and country effects in labour-intensive industries”Regional Studies forthcoming.
15.
CrouchCLe GalesPTrigiliaCVoelzkowH (Eds), 2001Local Production Systems: Rise or Demise? (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
16.
DjankovSGlaeserELa PortaRLopez-de-SilanesFShleiferA, 2003, “The new comparative economics”, mimeo, Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
17.
EttlingerN, 2003, “Cultural economic geography and a relational and microspace approach to trusts, rationalities networks and change in collaborative workplaces”Journal of Economic Geography3145–171.
18.
FeldmanM, 2000, “Location and innovation: The new economic geography of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration”, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography Eds ClarkG LGertlerM SFeldmanM (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 373–394.
19.
GertlerM, 1995, “‘Being there’: Proximity, organisation, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies”Economic Geography711–26.
20.
GertlerM, 2004Manufacturing Cultures (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
21.
GrabherG (Ed.), 1993The Embedded Firm: On the Socio-economics of Industrial Districts (Routledge, London).
22.
GrandoriASodaG, 1995, “Inter-firm networks: Antecedents, mechanisms and forms”Organization Studies16183–214.
23.
GrangerC W J, 1999Empirical Modelling in Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
24.
GreenwaldBStiglitzJ, 1990, “Asymmetric information and the new theory of the firm: Financial constraints and risk behaviour”American Economic Review80160–165.
25.
GreenwaldBStiglitzJ, 1995, “Labor-market adjustment and the persistence of unemployment”American Economic Review85219–225.
26.
GreenwaldBStiglitzJWeissA, 1984, “Informational imperfections in the capital market and macroeconomic fluctuations”American Economic Review74194–199.
27.
HawawiniGSubramanianVVerdinP, 2000, “Is profitability driven by industry- or firm-specific factors? A new look at the evidence”, WP 2000/80/FIN (INSEAD, Fontainebleau).
28.
HessM, 2004, “‘Spatial’ relationships? Towards a re-conceptualisation of embeddedness”Progress in Human Geography28(2) 165–186.
29.
Hotz-HartB, 2000, “Innovation networks, regions, and globalization”, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography Eds ClarkG LGertlerM SFeldmanM (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 432–453.
30.
JanesickV J, 1994, “The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry and meaning”, in Handbook of Qualitative Research Eds DenzinN KLincolnY S (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
31.
JensenM, 2000A Theory of the Firm: Governance, Residual Claims, and Organizational Forms (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
32.
MartinR, 2000, “Local labour markets: Their nature, performance, and regulation”, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography Eds ClarkG LGertlerM SFeldmanM (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 455–475.
33.
NohriaN, 1992, “Is a network perspective a useful way of studying organisations?”, in Networks and Organizations Eds NohriaNEcclesR G (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) pp 1–22.
34.
PorterM, 1990The Competitive Advantages of Nations (Macmillan, London).
35.
PowellW WKoputK WSmith-DoerrLOwen-SmithJ, 1999, “Network position and firm performance: Organizational returns to collaboration in the biotechnology industry”Research in the Sociology of Organizations16129–159.
36.
RauchJ, 2001, “Business and social networks in international trade”Journal of Economic Literature391177–1203.
37.
RingP SVan de VenA H, 1994, “Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships”Academy of Management Review1990–118.
38.
ScottA, 1999Regions and the World Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
39.
ShillerR, 2003The New Financial Order: Risk in the 21st Century (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
40.
SimmieJ (Ed.), 1996Innovation, Networks, and Learning Regions (Jessica Kingsley, London).
41.
StorperMSalaisR, 1997Worlds of Production (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
42.
SwyngedouwE, 2000, “Elite power, global forces, and the political economy of ‘glocal’ development”, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography Eds ClarkG LGertlerM SFeldmanM (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 541–558.
43.
Tsui-AuchL S, 1999, “Regional production relationships and development impacts: A Comparative study of three production networks”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23345–359.
