This paper reflects on the conceptual issues involved in developing a methodology to study the role of computer-based technologies, and particularly farm planning and management software, in governing the practices of farmers. It represents the first stage of a larger project that explores how farm planning and management practices are governed through, and reconfigured by, such technology. In recent years, computer software has been encouraged by a range of government and nongovernment agencies and organisations as a useful technical means of supporting farm decisionmaking and improving farmers' managerial capacities, thereby improving their competitive position. The key question of this paper is how to conceptualise and study this link. Existing literature in the area tends to draw on either rationalist – technological determinist or social constructionist accounts which, we suggest, are limited in understanding such software as a type of governmental technology that has productive effects. We argue that a methodology drawing upon insights from governmentality and actor-network theory enables the role of software in programmes of agricultural governance to be more robustly explored as a sociotechnical process. Specifically, a ‘sociology of translation’ is outlined to demonstrate how computer software can be analysed as a material technology of government that constitutes and shapes the capacities of ‘users’ as calculable agents. In order to demonstrate how such a methodology might work in practice, we apply a translation methodology to decision-support software designed to improve the planning practices of dairy farmers in the State of Victoria, Australia.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AudiracWBeaulieuL, 1986, “Microcomputers in agriculture: A proposed model to study their diffusion/adoption”Rural Sociology51(1) 60–77.
2.
BarbierMLémeryB, 2000, “Learning through processes of change in agriculture: A methodological framework”, in Cow Up a Tree. Knowing and Learning for Change in Agriculture: Case Studies from Industrialised Countries Eds CerfMGibbonDHubertBIsonRJigginsJPaineMProostJRölingN (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris) pp 381–393.
3.
BarlettP F, Ed, 1980Agricultural Decision-making: Anthropological Contributions to Rural Development (Academic Press, New York).
4.
BarryA, 2001Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society (Athlone Press, London).
5.
BennettJ W, 1982Of Time and the Enterprise: North American Family Farm Management in a Context of Resource Marginality (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
BowersJ, 1992, “The politics of formalism”, in Contexts of Computer-mediated Communication Ed. LeaM (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hampstead, Herts) pp 232–261.
8.
BryantL, 1999Computers on the Farm: Farmers' Usage Patterns and Impacts on Farm ManagementRural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Level 1, AMA House, 42 Macquarie Street, Barton, ACT 2600.
9.
ButtelFLarsonOGillespieG, 1990The Sociology of Agriculture (Greenwood, Westport, CT).
10.
CallonM, 1986a, “Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay”, in Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Ed. LawJ (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 196–233.
11.
CallonM, 1986b, “The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle”, in Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World Eds CallonMLawJRipA (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 19–34.
12.
CallonM, 1991, “Techno-economic networks and irreversibility”, in A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination Ed. LawJ (Routledge, London) pp 132–161.
13.
CallonMLatourB, 1981, “Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so”, in Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-sociologies Eds Knorr-CetinaKCicourelA V (Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston, MA) pp 277–303.
14.
CallonMLatourB, 1992, “Don't throw the baby out with the Bath School! A reply to Collins and Yearley”, in Science as Practice and Culture Ed. PickeringA (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL) pp 343–368.
15.
ClarkJMurdochJ, 1997, “Local knowledge and the precarious extension of scientific networks: A reflection on three case studies”Sociologia Ruralis3738–60.
16.
DeanM, 1999Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society (Sage, London).
17.
FederGUmaliD L, 1993, “The adoption of agricultural innovations: A review”Technological Forecasting and Social Change43215–239.
18.
GibbonJWarrenM F, 1992, “Barriers to adoption of on-farm computers in England”Farm Management8(1) 37–45.
19.
HenmanP, 2003, “E-government and the electronic transformation of modes of rule: The case of partnerships”, paper presented at Building the E-Nation: E-Community, E-Government, E-Commerce, NSW State Library, Sydney, 23–24 April; copy available from HenmanP, Macquarie University, Sydney.
20.
HigginsV, 2001, “Calculating climate: ‘advanced liberalism’ and the governing of risk in Australian drought policy”Journal of Sociology37299–316.
21.
HigginsV, 2002a, “Self-reliant citizens and targeted populations: The case of Australian agriculture in the 1990s”ARENA journal19161–177.
22.
HigginsV, 2002bConstructing Reform: Economic Expertise and the Governing of Agricultural Change in Australia (Nova Science, New York).
23.
HigginsVLockieS, 2002, “Re-discovering the social: Neo-liberalism and hybrid practices of governing in rural natural resource management”Journal of Rural Studies18419–428.
24.
HubertBIsonR LRölingN, 2000, “The ‘problematique’ with respect to industrialised-country agricultures”, in Cow Up a Tree. Knowing and Learning for Change in Agriculture: Case Studies from Industrialised Countries Eds CerfMGibbonDHubertBIsonRJigginsJPaineMProostJRölingN (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris) pp 13–29.
25.
Jofre-GiraudoEStreeterD HLazarusW, 1990, “The impact of computer information systems on farm management decisions”Agribusiness6463–474.
26.
KittoSHigginsV, 2003, “Online university education: Liberating the student?”Science as Culture12(1) 23–58.
27.
LatourB, 1987Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
28.
LatourB, 1990, “Drawing things together”, in Representation in Scientific Practice Eds LynchMWoolgarS (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 19–68.
29.
LawJ, 1992, “Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity”Systems Practice5379–393.
LeeuwisC, 1993aOf Computers, Myths and Modelling: The Social Construction of Diversity, Knowledge, Information and Communication Technologies in Dutch Horticulture and Agricultural Extension Wageningen Studies in Sociology 36, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
32.
LeeuwisC, 1993b, “Towards a sociological conceptualization of communication in extension science: On Giddens, Habermas and computer-based communication technologies in Dutch agriculture”Sociologia Ruralis33281–305.
33.
LockieS, 1999, “The state, rural environments, and globalisation: ‘action at a distance’ via the Australian Landcare program”Environment and Planning A31597–611.
34.
LockieSKittoS, 2000, “Beyond the farm gate: Production-consumption networks and agri-food research”Sociologia Ruralis403–19.
35.
McMasterTVigdenR TWastellD G, 1997, “Technology transfer: Diffusion or translation?”, in Facilitating Technology Transfer through Partnership: Learning from Practice and Research Eds McMasterTMumfordESwansonEWarboysDWastellD (Chapman and Hall, London) pp 64–75.
36.
MichaelM, 1998, “Co(a)gency and the car: Attributing agency in the case of ‘road rage’”, in Machines, Agency and Desire Eds BrennaBLawJ, TMV Centre for Technology and Culture, University of Oslo, Oslo, pp 125–144.
37.
MichaelM, 2000Reconnecting Culture, Technology and Nature: From Society to Heterogeneity (Routledge, London).
38.
MillerPRoseN, 1990, “Governing economic life”Economy and Society19(1) 1–31.
39.
MurdochJ, 1995, “Governmentality and the politics of resistance in UK agriculture: The case of the Farmers' Union of Wales”Sociologia Ruralis35187–205.
40.
MurdochJWardN, 1997, “Governmentality and territoriality: The statistical manufacture of Britain's ‘national farm?’”Political Geography16307–324.
41.
NuthallP LBishop-HurleyG J, 1995, “Farm computer uptake and practices in New Zealand”Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics63330–339.
42.
ÖhlmerB, 1991, “On-farm computers for farm management in Sweden: Potentials and problems”Agricultural Economics5279–286.
43.
O'MalleyP, 1996, “Indigenous governance”Economy and Society25310–326.
44.
O'MalleyPWeirLShearingC, 1997, “Governmentality, criticism, politics”Economy and Society26501–517.
45.
PhillipsE, 1998The Social and Cultural Construction of Farming Practice: “Good” Farming in Two New South Wales Communities unpublished doctoral thesis, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga.
46.
RogersE M, 1995Diffusion of Innovations (The Free Press, New York).
47.
RölingN, 1988Extension Science: Information Systems in Agricultural Development (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
48.
RoseN, 1999Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
49.
RoseNMillerP, 1992, “Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government”British Journal of Sociology43173–205.
50.
ScoonesIThompsonJ (Eds), 1994Beyond Farmer First: Rural People's Knowledge, Agricultural Research and Extension Practice (Intermediate Technology Publications, London).
51.
SingletonVMichaelM, 1993“Actor-networks and ambivalence: General practitioners in the UK cervical screening programme”Social Studies of Science23227–264.
52.
StarS L, 1991, “Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions”, in A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination Ed. LawJ (Routledge, London) pp 26–56.
53.
StubbsA KMarkhamN KStrawW M, 1998Personal Computers for Farmers: Current and Future UseRural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Level 1, AMA House, 42 Macquarie Street, Barton, ACT 2600.
54.
VanclayFLawrenceG, 1995The Environmental Imperative: Eco-social Concerns for Australian Agriculture (Central Queensland University Press, Rockhampton).
55.
WhatmoreSThorneL, 1997, “Nourishing networks: Alternative geographies of food”, in Globalising Food: Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring Eds GoodmanDWattsM (Routledge, London) pp 287–304.
56.
WinterM, 1997, “New policies and new skills: Agricultural change and technology transfer”Sociologia Ruralis37363–381.
57.
WoolgarS, 1991, “Configuring the user: The case of usability trials”, in A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination Ed. LawJ (Routledge, London) pp 58–99.
58.
WynneB, 1992, “Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science”Public Understanding of Science1281–304.
