This paper sets out a sympathetic critique of a series of writings that we refer to as new regionalist approaches to the city. We review the recent work on state restructuring/rescaling and the associated work on the new regionalism, on the one hand, and that on ‘global’ city-regions, on the other. We identify key points of overlap and divergence between these two literatures and suggest that each understates the role of class interests, political alliance formation, and conflicts around the management of collective consumption and social reproduction. We proceed to outline the framework of an alternative and complementary approach in which causal emphasis is placed on the shaping of subnational state geographies by actually existing struggles and strategies developed around particular geographies of public and private investment and collective consumption, and their associated state fiscal, electoral, and regulatory arrangements. We argue that working from this position we are better able to understand why the city-region continues to constitute a strategically vital arena for managing conflict and struggle in contemporary capitalism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminA, 1999, “An institutionalist perspective on regional development”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23365–378.
2.
AminAGrahamS, 1997, “The ordinary city”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series22411–429.
3.
AminAThriftN, 1994, “Holding down the global”, in Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe Eds AminAThriftN, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 257–260.
BouchardL, 2001, “Quebec in an era of global city-regions”, in Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy Ed. ScottA, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 50–58.
6.
BrennerN, 1998, “Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16459–481.
7.
BrennerN, 2001, “The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration”Progress in Human Geography25591–614.
8.
BrennerN, 2002, “Decoding the newest ‘metropolitan regionalism’ in the USA: A critical overview”Cities193–21.
9.
BrennerNTheodoreN, (Eds), 2002Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe (Blackwell, Oxford).
10.
BrennerNJessopBJonesMMacLeodG, 2003, “Introduction: State space in question”, in State/Space: A Reader Eds BrennerNJessopBJonesMMacLeodG, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 1–26.
CastellsM, 1983The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-cultural Theory of Urban Social Movement (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
13.
CastellsM, 1996The Rise of the Network Society (Blackwell, Oxford).
14.
CisnerosH, 1995Regionalism: The New Geography of Opportunity (US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC).
15.
CookePMorganK, 1998The Associational Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
16.
CoxK R, 1993, “The local and the global in the new urban politics: A critical view”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11433–448.
17.
CoxK R, 2001, “Territoriality, politics and the ‘urban’”Political Geography20745–762.
18.
CoxK RJonasA E G, 1993, “Urban development, collective consumption and the politics of metropolitan fragmentation”Political Geography128–37.
19.
CoxK RMairA, 1991, “From localised social structures to localities as agents”Environment and Planning A23197–213.
20.
DeasIWardK, 2000, “From the ‘new localism’ to the ‘new regionalism’? Interpreting Regional Development Agencies”Political Geography19273–292.
21.
DunfordM, 1988Capital, the State and Regional Development (Pion, London).
22.
FloridaR, 2002The Rise of the Creative Class and How It Is Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life (Basic Books, New York).
23.
GordonI, 1999, “Internationalisation and urban competition”Urban Studies361001–1016.
24.
GoughJ, 2002, “Neoliberalism and socialisation in the contemporary city: Opposites, complements and instabilities”Antipode34405–426.
25.
HallP, 2001, “Global city-regions in the twenty-first century”, in Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy Ed. ScottA, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 59–77.
26.
HamiltonD, 2002, “Regimes and regional governance: The case of Chicago”Journal of Urban Affairs24403–424.
27.
HarveyD, 1982The Limits to Capital (Blackwell, Oxford).
28.
HarveyD, 1985aThe Urbanization of Capital (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
29.
HarveyD, 1985bConsciousness and the Urban Experience (Blackwell, Oxford).
HoranCJonasA E G, 1998, “Governing Massachusetts: Uneven development and politics in metropolitan Boston”Economic Geography special issue for the 1998 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Boston, Massachusetts, 25–29 March, pp 83–95.
32.
JessopB, 1990State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in their Place (Polity Press, Cambridge).
33.
JessopB, 1998, “The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development”International Social Science Journal15529–45.
34.
JessopBSumN L, 2000, “An entrepreneurial city in action: Hong Kong's emerging strategies in and for (inter-) urban competition”Urban Studies372287–2313.
35.
JessopBPeckJTickellA, 1999, “Re-tooling the machine: Economic crisis, state restructuring and urban politics”, in The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later Eds JonasA E GWilsonD, (SUNY Press, Albany, NY) pp 141–162.
36.
JonasA E G, 1991, “Urban growth coalitions and urban development policy: Postwar growth and the politics of annexation in metropolitan Columbus”Urban Geography12197–226.
37.
JonasA E G, 1994, “The scale politics of spatiality”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12257–264.
38.
JonasA E G, 1996, “Local labour control regimes: Uneven development and the social regulation of production”Regional Studies30323–338.
39.
JonasA E G, 1997, “Regulating suburban politics: ‘suburban-defense transition’, institutional capacities and territorial reorganization in Southern California”, in Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy Ed. LauriaM, (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 206–299.
40.
JonasA E GWardK, 2002, “A world of regionalisms: Towards a US–UK urban and regional policy framework comparison”Journal of Urban Affairs24377–402.
41.
JonesM R, 1997, “Spatial selectivity of the state? The regulationist enigma and local struggles over economic governance”Environment and Planning A29831–864.
42.
JonesM R, 2001, “The rise of the regional state in economic governance: ‘partnerships for prosperity’ or new scales of state power?”Environment and Planning A331185–1211.
43.
JonesM RMacLeodG, 1999, “Towards a regional renaissance? Reconfiguring and rescaling England's economic governance”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series24295–313.
44.
JonesM RWardK, 2002, “Excavating the logic of British urban policy: Neoliberalism as the ‘crisis’ of crisis management”Antipode34473–494.
45.
JonesM RWardK, 2004, “Capitalist development and crisis theory: Towards a ‘fourth cut’”Antipode36 forthcoming.
46.
JonesRGoodwinMJonesMSimpsonG, 2004, “Devolution, state personnel, and the production of new territories of governance in the United Kingdom”Environment and Planning A3689–109.
47.
KantorP, 2000, “Can regionalism save poor cities? Politics, institutions and interests in Glasgow”Urban Affairs Review35794–820.
48.
KeatingM, 1998The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos).
49.
KeatingM, 2001Nations against the State: The New Politics of Nationalism in Quebec, Catalonia and Scotland (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
50.
KeatingMLoughlinJ, (Eds), 1997The Political Economy of Regionalism (Frank Cass, London).
51.
KreslPSinghB, 1999, “Competitiveness and the urban economy: Twenty four large US metropolitan areas”Urban Studies351017–1027.
52.
LeibovitzJ, 2003, “Institutional barriers to associative city-region governance: The politics of institution-building and economic governance in Canada's Technology Triangle”Urban Studies402613–2642.
53.
LeitnerHSheppardE, 1999, “Transcending inter-urban competition: Conceptual issues and policy alternatives in the European Union”, in The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later Eds JonasA E GWilsonD, (SUNY Press, Albany, NY) pp 227–246.
54.
LeitnerHSheppardE, 2002, “‘The city is dead, long live the net’: Harnessing European interurban networks for a neoliberal agenda”Antipode34495–518.
55.
LipietzA, 1993, “The local and the global: Regional individuality or interregionalism”Transaction of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series188–18.
56.
LoganJMolotchH, 1987Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
57.
LoveringJ, 1999, “Theory led by policy? The inadequacies of the ‘new regionalism’ in economic geography illustrated from the case of Wales”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23379–395.
58.
McCannE, 2003, “The urban as an object of study in global cities literatures: Representational practices and conceptions of place and scale”, in Geographies of Power: Placing Scale Eds HerodAWrightM, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 61–84.
59.
McCarthyL, 2000Competitive Regionalism: Beyond Individual CompetitionEconomic Development Administration, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
60.
MacLeodG, 2001, “The new regionalism reconsidered: Globalization, regulation and the recasting of political economic space”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25804–829.
61.
MarkusenA, 2003, “Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies”Regional Studies37701–718.
62.
MasseyD, 1979, “In what sense a regional problem?”Regional Studies13233–243.
63.
MorganK, 1997, “The learning region: Institutions, innovation and region renewal”Regional Studies31491–503.
64.
OhmaeK, 1995The End of the Nation State (HarperCollins, London).
65.
OhmaeK, 2001, “How to invite prosperity from the global economy into a region”, in Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy Ed. ScottA, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 33–43.
66.
PaasiA, 1991, “Deconstructing regions: Notes on the scales of spatial life”Environment and Planning A23239–256.
67.
PeckJ, 2002, “Political economies of scale: Fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare”Economic Geography78331–361.
68.
PeckJTickellA, 1995, “The social regulation of uneven development: ‘regulatory deficit’, England's South East, and the collapse of Thatcherism”Environment and Planning A2715–40.
PorterM, 2001, “Regions and the new economics of competition”, in Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy Ed. ScottA, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 139–157.
71.
PorterM, 2003, “The economic performance of regions”Regional Studies37549–579.
72.
PurcellM, 2002, “The state, regulation and global restructuring: Reasserting the political in political economy”Review of International Political Economy9284–318.
73.
Regional Studies2003, “Special issue: Rethinking the regions”37(6/7).
74.
SasakiM, 2003, “Kanazawa: A creative and sustainable city”Policy Science1017–30.
75.
SassenS, 2001, “Global cities and global city-regions: A comparison”, in Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy Ed. ScottA, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 78–95.
76.
SaundersP, 1981Social Theory and the Urban Question (Holmes and Meier, New York).
77.
SavitchHVogelR, 1996Regional Politics: America in a Post-city Age (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
78.
SaxenianA, 1994Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
79.
ScottA, 1998Regions and the World Economy: The Coming Shape of Global Production, Competition and Political Order (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
SmithN, 1984Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space (Blackwell, Oxford).
82.
StohrW, 1990Global Challenge and Local Response: Initiatives for Economic Regeneration (Mansell, London).
83.
StohrWTaylorP, 1981Development from Above or Below? The Dialectics of Regional Planning in Developed Countries (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex).
84.
StoneC, 1989Regime Politics: The Governing of Atlanta 1946–1988 (University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, KA).
85.
StorperM, 1995, “The resurgence of regional economies ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependences”European Urban and Regional Studies2191–221.
86.
StorperM, 1997The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy (Guilford Press, London).
87.
StorperMSalaisR, 1997Worlds of Production: The Action Frameworks of the Economy (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
88.
StrenR, 2001, “Local governance and social diversity in the developing world: New challenges for globalizing city-regions”, in Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy Ed. ScottA, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 193–213.
89.
SwanstromT, 1996, “Ideas matter: Reflections on the new regionalism”Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research25–21.
90.
SwyngedouwE, 1992, “The Mammon quest, ‘glocalisation’, interspatial competition and the monetary order: The construction of new spatial scales”, in Cities and Regions in the New Europe: The Global-Local Interplay and Spatial Development Strategies Eds DunfordMKafkalasG, (Belhaven Press, London) pp 39–67.
91.
SwyngedouwE, 1997, “Excluding the other: The production of scale and scaled politics”, in Geographies of Economies Eds LeeRWillsJ, (Arnold, London) pp 167–176.
92.
SwyngedouwE, 2000, “Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1863–76.
93.
TickellAPeckJ, 2003, “Making global rules: Globalisation or neoliberalisation”, in Remaking the Global Economy: Economic-geographical Perspectives Eds PeckJYeungH W C, (Sage, London) pp 163–181.
94.
WardK, 1996, “Retreading urban regime theory: A sympathetic critique”Geoforum27427–438.
95.
WardK, 2000, “From rentiers to rantiers: ‘active entrepreneurs’, ‘structural speculators’ and the politics of marketing the city”Urban Studies371101–1115.
96.
WardK, 2003a, “Entrepreneurial urbanism, state restructuring and civilizing ‘New’ East Manchester”Area35116–127.
97.
WardK, 2003b, “The limits of contemporary urban redevelopment: ‘doing’ entrepreneurial urbanism in Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester”City7199–211.
98.
WhileAJonasA E GGibbsD C, 2004, “Unblocking the city? Growth pressures, collective provision, and the search for new spaces of governance in Greater Cambridge, England”Environment and Planning A36279–304.
99.
WolfensohnJ D, 2001, “The World Bank and global city-regions: Reaching for the poor”, in Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy Ed. ScottA, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 44–49.
