The Government Offices for the English regions were established in 1994 to coordinate the regional activities of three central government departments. A decade on, regional government in England is greatly expanded, and two other institutions of regional governance, the Regional Development Agencies and the Regional Assemblies, have also been created. In 2002 the Labour government proposed that this ‘triad’ of regional governance should be further reformed and strengthened, in some places being brought to democratic account. In this paper, we argue that academic research on the English regions has generally focused on the Regional Development Agencies and to a lesser extent the Regional Assemblies, to the exclusion of the Government Offices. This focus has led some to overstate the extent to which regional government represents the real decentralisation of power. Focusing on the role of the Government Offices, we argue that central government retains a great deal of power over the ‘triad’ institutions, which in their current form may be unable to challenge the structure of power in the English state.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenJMasseyDCochraneA, 1998Rethinking the Region (Routledge, London).
2.
AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesM, 2000, “Spatial dimensions and institutional uncertainties of planning and the ‘new regionalism’”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy18711–726.
3.
AminA, 1999, “An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23365–378.
4.
AminA, 2002, “Spatialities of globalisation”Environment and Planning A34385–399.
5.
AminAThriftN, 1992, “Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research16571–587.
6.
BakkerIMillerR, 1996, “Escape from Fordism: The emergence of alternative forms of state administration and outcome”, in States Against Markets: The Limits of Globalisation Eds BoyerRDracheD (Routledge, London) pp 334–356.
7.
BogdanorV, 2001Devolution in the United Kingdom (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
8.
BoyerRDracheD (Eds), 1996States Against Markets: The Limits of Globalisation (Routledge, London).
9.
BradburyJMawsonJ (Eds), 1997British Regionalism and Devolution: The Challenges of State Reform and European Integration (Jessica Kingsley, London).
10.
BrennerNJessopBJonesMMacLeodG (Eds), 2003State/Space: A Reader (Blackwell, Oxford).
11.
BridgeJ, 1999, “21st century regions: Creating new paradigms”, in Proceedings of the Regional Studies Association Annual Conference, London, November (Regional Studies Association, London) pp 15–18.
Cabinet Office, DTLR, 2002Your Region, Your Choice: Revitalising the English Regions Cm 5511 (The Stationery Office, London).
14.
CochraneA, 1993Whatever Happened to Local Government? (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks).
15.
CounsellDHaughtonG, 2003, “Regional planning tensions: Planning for economic growth and sustainable development in two contrasting English regions”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21225–239.
16.
CurticeJ, 2003, “Devolution meets the voters: The prospects for 2003”, in The State of the Nations 2003. The Third year of Devolution in the United Kingdom Ed. HazellR (Imprint Academic, Exeter).
17.
DabinettG, 2002, “Regions do matter—reshaping or transforming local and regional governance in England?”, in Our Regions, Our Choice Eds BenneworthPMcInroyN, CLES Policy Paper, available from Centre for Local Economic Strategies, 1 George Leigh Street, Manchester M4 5DL.
18.
DeasIWardK, 1999, “The song has ended but the melody lingers. Regional Development Agencies and the lessons of the Urban Development Corporation ‘experiment’”Local Economy14114–132.
19.
DickenPTickellA, 1992, “Competitors or collaborators? The structure and relationships of inward investment in northern England”Regional Studies2699–106.
20.
EvansRHardingA, 1997, “Regionalisation, regional institutions and economic development”Policy and Politics25(1) 19–30.
GibbsDJonasAEG, 2001, “Rescaling and regional governance: The English Regional Development Agencies and the environment”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy19269–288.
23.
GoodwinMJonesMJonesRPettKSimpsonG, 2002, “Devolution and economic governance in the UK: Uneven geographies, uneven capacities?”Local Economy17200–215.
24.
GoughJ, 2003, “The genesis and tensions of the English Regional Development Agencies”European Urban and Regional Studies1023–38.
25.
HalkierHDansonMDamborgC (Eds), 1998Regional Development Agencies in Europe (Jessica Kingsley, London).
26.
HallRvan der WeeM, 1995, “The regions in an enlarged Europe”, in An Enlarged Europe: Regions in Competition? Eds HardySHartMAlbrechtsLAnastasoisK (Jessica Kingsley, London) pp 8–21.
27.
HardingA, 2002Its There a Missing Middle in English Regional Governance? (New Local Government Network, London).
28.
HardingAWilks-HeggSHutchinsM, 1999, “Regional Development Agencies and English regionalisation: The question of accountability”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy17669–683.
29.
HarvieC, 1994The Rise of Regional Europe (Routledge, London).
30.
HC, 2003, House of Commons debates Hansard 16 June, columns 23–26.
31.
HM Treasury, DTI, ODPM, 2003A Modern Regional Policy for the United Kingdom HM Treasury/Department of Trade and Industry and Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (The Stationery Office, London).
32.
HogwoodBKeatingM, 1982Regional Government in England (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
33.
JeffreyCMawsonJ, 2002, “Beyond the white paper on the English regions”Regional Studies36715–720.
34.
JessopB, 1997, “Capitalism and its future: Remarks on regulation, government and governance”Review of International Political Economy4561–581.
35.
JessopB, 1999, “Narrating the future of the national economy and the national state? Remarks on remapping regulation and reinventing governance”, in State/Culture: State Formation After the Cultural Turn Ed. SteinmetzG (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) pp 378–405.
36.
JessopB, 2000, “The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of globalising capital”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24323–360.
37.
JohnPWhiteheadA (Eds), 1997, “Special issue: Regionalism in England: Current trends and future prospects”Policy and Politics253–98.
38.
JohnPMussonSTickellA, 2002, “England's problem region: Regionalism in the south east”Regional Studies36733–741.
39.
JohnPMussonSTickellA, 2003, “London and the South East”, paper presented at European Consortium for Political Research second general conference, Marburg, Germany, 18–21 September; copy available from the authors.
40.
JonesMMacLeodG, 1999, “Towards a regional renaissance? Reconfiguring and rescaling England's economic governance”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers24295–313.
41.
JonesRGoodwinMJonesMSimpsonG, 2004, “Devolution, state personnel, and the production of new territories of governance in the United Kingdom”Environment and Planning A3689–109.
42.
KeatingM, 1998The New Regionalism in Western Europe (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos).
43.
KeatingM, 2002, “Devolution and public policy in the United Kingdom: Divergence or convergence?”, in Devolution in Practice: Public Policy Differences Within the UK Eds AdamsJRobinsonP (Institute for Public Policy Research, London) pp 3–15.
LloydP E, 1999, “The Regional Development Agencies and social inclusion: Widening the agenda”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy17701–713.
46.
LoveringJ, 1999, “Don't follow us! Welsh lessons for English RDAs”New Economy6137–140.
47.
LynchP, 1999, “New Labour and the English Regional Development Agencies: Devolution as evolution”Regional Studies3373–89.
48.
MacLeodG, 1999, “Entrepreneurial spaces, hegemony, and state strategy: The political shaping of privatism in Lowland Scotland”Environment and Planning A31345–375.
49.
MacLeodGGoodwinM, 1999, “Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: On the state, politics, scale and explanation”Political Geography18697–730.
50.
MarshallJHopkinsWRichardsonR, 1997, “The civil service and the regions: Geographical perspectives on civil service restructuring”Regional Studies31607–613.
51.
MartinRRowthornB (Eds), 1986The Geography of Deindustrialization (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
52.
MasseyD, 1984Spatial Divisions of Labour (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
53.
MawsonJ, 1999, “Devolution: The English regions and the challenge of regional governance”, in Proceedings of the Regional Studies Association Annual Conference, London, November (Regional Studies Association, London) pp 4–10.
54.
MawsonJSpencerK, 1997, “The government offices for the English regions: Towards regional governance?”Policy and Politics2571–84.
55.
MohanJ, 1999A United Kingdom? Economic, Social and Political Geographies (Arnold, London).
56.
MorganK, 1999a, “England's unstable equilibrium: The challenge of the RDAs”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy17663–668.
57.
MorganK (Ed.), 1999b, “Theme issue: Regional Development Agencies”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy17663–729.
58.
OhmaeK, 1995The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies (HarperCollins, London).
59.
PeckJ, 2001, “Neoliberalizing states: Thin policies/hard outcomes”Progress in Human Geography25445–455.
60.
PeckJ, 2002, “Political economies of scale: Fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare”Economic Geography78331–360.
61.
PeckJTickellA, 1992, “Local modes of social regulation? Regulation theory, Thatcherism and regional development”Geoforum23347–364.
62.
PeckJTickellA, 1995a, “The social regulation of uneven development: ‘regulatory deficit’, England's South East and the collapse of Thatcherism”Environment and Planning A2715–40.
63.
PeckJTickellA, 1995b, “Business goes local—dissecting the business agenda in Manchester”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research1955–78.
64.
PIU, 2000Reaching Out: The Role of Central Government at Local and Regional Level Policy and Innovation Unit (The Stationery Office, London).
65.
RCU, 2003, “GO! The 2002–2003 report on the work of the Government Offices for the English regions”, Regional Co-ordination Unit, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 26 Whitehall, London SW1A 2WH.
66.
Regional Assemblies (Preparations) Act, 2003Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 10, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (The Stationery Office, London).
67.
Regional Development Agencies Act, 1998, Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 45, Department of Trade and Industry (The Stationery Office, London).
68.
Regional Studies Association, 1999, “New regional strategies: Devolution, RDAs and regional chambers”, in Proceedings of the Regional Studies Association Annual Conference, November (Regional Studies Association, London).
69.
RobertsMLloydP, 2000, “Regional Development Agencies in England: New strategic regional planning issues?”Regional Studies3475–79.
70.
RobsonBHoldenAPeckJ, 2000Regional Agencies and Area-based Regeneration (Policy Press, Bristol).
SandfordM, 2001, “Further steps for regional chambers”, UCL Constitution Unit, report available from the Constitution Unit, School of Public Policy, University College London, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9QU.
73.
SandfordM, 2002, “What place for England in an asymmetrically devolved UK?”Regional Studies36789–798.
74.
ScottA, 1998Regions in the World Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
75.
SnapeSAshworthRAulakhSDobbsLMooreC, 2003, “The development of regional scrutiny”, project report; available from INLOGOV, School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT.
76.
StewartJStokerG (Eds), 1995Local Government in the 1990s (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
77.
StorperM, 1997The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy (Guildford Press, New York).
78.
SwyngedouwE, 2000, “Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1863–76.
79.
ThomasK, 2000, “Creating regional cultures of innovation? The regional innovation strategies in England and Scotland”Regional Studies34190–198.
80.
TickellAPeckJ, 1996, “The return of the Manchester Men: Men's words and men's deeds in the remaking of the local state”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series21595–616.
81.
TickellAPeckJDickenP, 1995, “The fragmented region: Business, the state and economic development in north west England”, in The Regions and the New Europe: Patterns in Core and Periphery Development Ed. RhodesM (Manchester University Press, Manchester) pp 247–272.
82.
TomaneyJ, 1996, “Regional government and economic development: Possibilities and limits”Local Economy1127–37.
83.
TomaneyJ, 1999, “New Labour and the English question”Political Quarterly7075–82.
84.
TomaneyJ, 2002, “The evolution of regionalism in England”Regional Studies36721–732.
85.
TomaneyJHetheringtonP, 2001a, “The English regions: quarterly monitoring report 3, May 2001”, Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne.
86.
TomaneyJHetheringtonP, 2001b, “The English regions: quarterly monitoring report 4, August 2001”, Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne.
87.
TomaneyJHetheringtonP, 2003, “The English regions: quarterly monitoring report 10, February 2003”, Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne.
88.
TomaneyJWardN, 2000, “England and the ‘new regionalism”’Regional Studies34471–478.
89.
TraversT, 2002, “Decentralization London-style: The GLA and London governance”Regional Studies36779–788.
90.
TraversT, 2004The Politics of London: Governing an Ungovernable City (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
91.
TrenchA, 2001The State of the Nations 2001: The Second Year of Devolution in the United Kingdom (Imprint Academic, Exeter).
92.
WardNLowePBridgesT, 2003, “Rural and regional development: The role of the Regional Development Agencies in England”Regional Studies37201–214.
93.
WatersRLawton-SmithH, 2002, “Regional development agencies and local economic development: Scale and competitiveness in high-technology Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire”European Planning Studies10633–649.
94.
WebbDCollisC, 2000, “Regional development agencies and the ‘new regionalism’ in England”Regional Studies34857–864.
95.
WhiteheadM, 2003, “In the shadow of hierarchy: Meta-governance, policy reform and urban regeneration in the West Midlands”Area356–14.
