This paper explores the remarkable congruence between the proliferation of community forestry initiatives in North America in recent years and the ascendance of particular forms of neoliberalism. In it I argue that, in the United States in particular, such initiatives are best understood as hybrids between ‘rollout’ neoliberalism and contemporaneous trends in the management of protected areas and state-owned forests. This interpretation contributes to recent arguments that the environment has been understudied as an arena through which neoliberalism has been actively constituted, rather than simply a passive recipient of ‘impacts’. Moreover, surprisingly little academic work has explored the imbrications of specific changes in environmental governance and evolving neoliberalism in the latter's ‘First World’ geographic hearths, such as the USA and the United Kingdom. In this paper I undertake such an investigation with respect to community forestry in the United States. The paper traces the major antecedents, introduction, and institutionalizations of community forestry in the United States, and shows how their conceptualizations and enactments of ‘community’ are structured by hegemonic neoliberal ideas, making community forestry in this context supplementary, rather than oppositional, to neoliberal restructurings. Exploration of the current Bush administration's enthusiastic adoption of central elements of community forestry bolsters this interpretation. Finally, the conclusion draws implications from this case for debates in political ecology.
References
1.
AbrahamsenR, 2000Disciplining Democracy: Development Discourse and Good Governance (Zed Books, London).
2.
AgarwalAGibsonC, 1999, “Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation”World Development27629–649.
3.
BacaJ, 1995, “People for the West!: Challenges and opportunities”, in Let the People Judge Eds EcheverriaJEbyR (Island Press, Washington, DC) pp 53–56.
4.
BadenJSnowD (Eds), 1997The Next West: Public Lands, Community, and Economy in the American West (Island Press, Washington, DC).
5.
BarrowEGichohiHInfieldM, 2000, “Rhetoric or reality? A review of community conservation policy and practice in East Africa”, IUCN, PO Box 68200, Nairobi.
6.
BeaverEBrynerGGodarPKalmanowitzIKenneyDMutzKPetersA, 2000, “Seeing the Forest Service for the trees: a survey of proposals for changing National Forest policy”, RR 25, Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law, Boulder, CO.
7.
Belden Russonello and Stewart, 2001, “Collaborative processes: better outcomes for all of us”, report for the Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation, Belden Russonello and Stewart Research and Communications, 1320 19th Street, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20036.
8.
BhogalR KSarinMSinghN MSundarN, 2003, “Devolution as a threat to democratic decision-making in forestry? Findings from three states in India”, WP 197, Overseas Development Institute, 111 Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7JD.
9.
BradshawB, 2003, “Questioning the credibility and capacity of community-based resource management”The Canadian Geographer47(2) 137–150.
10.
BraunB, 2002The Intemperate Rainforest: Nature, Culture, and Power on Canada's West Coast (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
11.
BrendlerTCareyH, 1998, “Community forestry defined”Journal of Social Forestry96(3) 21–23.
12.
BrennerNTheodoreN, 2002, “From the ‘new localism’ to the spaces of neoliberalism”Antipode34341–347.
13.
BrickPSnowDVan De WeteringS (Eds), 2001Across the Great Divide: Explorations in Collaborative Conservation and the American West (Island Press, Washington, DC).
14.
BrosiusJTsingAZernerC, 1998, “Representing communities: Politics and histories of community-based resource management”Society and Natural Resources11157–168.
15.
BrownB, 2001, “Challenges facing community forestry: the role of low-income forest workers,” Bulletin 2 (September), Jefferson Center for Education and Research, Wolf Creek, OR.
16.
BurawoyM, 2003, “For a sociological Marxism: The complementary convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi”Politics and Society31193–261.
CesteroB, 1999Beyond the Hundredth Meridian: A Field Guide to Collaborative Conservation on the West's Public Lands (The Sonoran Institute, Tucson, AZ).
19.
ChangH, 2002Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective (Anthem Press, London).
20.
CogginsG, 2001, “Of Californicators, quislings, and crazies: Some perils of devolved collaboration,” in Across the Great Divide: Explorations in Collaborative Conservation and the American West Eds BrickPSnowDVan de WeteringS (Island Press, Washington, DC) pp 163–171.
21.
Committee of Scientists, 1999, “Sustaining the people's lands: recommendations for stewardship of the National Forests and Grasslands into the next century” (US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC).
22.
CrononW, 1995, “The trouble with wilderness”, in Uncommon Ground Ed. CrononW (W W Norton, New York) pp 69–90.
23.
DaggetD, 1995Beyond the Rangel and Conflict: Toward a West that Works (Gibbs-Smith, Layton, UT).
24.
DalbySMackenzieF, 1997, “Reconceptualising local community: Environment, identity and threat”Area2999–108.
25.
DanaS T, 1956Forest and Range Policy: Its Development in the United States (McGraw-Hill, New York).
26.
DeereCEstyD (Eds), 2002Greening the Americas: NAFTA's Lessons for Hemispheric Trade (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
27.
DickenP, 1998Global Shift (Paul Chapman, London).
28.
DoornbosMSaithAWhiteB (Eds), 2000Forests: Nature, People, Power (Blackwell, Oxford).
29.
DowieM, 1996Losing Ground: American Environmentalism at the Close of the Twentieth Century (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
30.
DryzekJ, 1996Democracy in Capitalist Times: Ideals, Limits, and Struggles (Oxford University Press, New York).
31.
DuaneT, 1997, “Community participation in ecosystem management”Ecology Law Quarterly24771–797.
32.
DuinkerPMatakalaPChegeFBouthillierL, 1994, “Community forests in Canada: An overview”Forestry Chronicle70711–720.
33.
DukesEFirehockK, 2001, “Collaboration: A guide for environmental advocates”, Institute for Environmental Negotiation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
34.
Endangered Species Act, 1973, 7 USC 136; 16 USC 460 et seq. (1973).
35.
FairfaxSSouderJ, 1996State Trust Lands: History Management, and Sustainable Use (University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS).
36.
FairfaxSFortmannLHawkinsAHuntsingerLPelusoNWolfS, 1999a, “The federal forests are not what they seem: Formal and informal claims to federal lands”Ecology Law Quarterly25630–646.
37.
FairfaxSHuntsingerLAdelburgC, 1999b, “Lessons from the past: Old conservation models provide new insight into community-based land management”Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy14(2) 84–88.
38.
FrankDHironakaASchoferE, 2000, “The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century”American Sociological Review65(1) 96–116.
39.
GauldR, 2000, “Maintaining centralized control in community-based forestry: Policy construction in the Philippines”, in Forests: Nature, People, Power Eds DoornbosMSaithAWhiteB (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 223–248.
40.
GeislerCBedfordB, 1998, “Ecosystem management: Who's entitled?”, in Who Owns America Ed. JacobsH (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI) pp 131–156.
41.
GrayG, EnzerMKuselJ (Eds), 2001Understanding Community-based Ecosystem Management in the United States (Haworth Press, New York).
42.
HarawayD, 1991Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (Routledge, London).
43.
HattamJ, 2001, “Wise use movement, R.I.P.?”Sierra May/June, pp 20–21.
44.
HearnJ, 2001, “The ‘uses and abuses’ of civil society in Africa”Review of African Political Economy8743–53.
45.
JacobsH, 1998 (Ed.) Who Owns America: Social Conflict over Property Rights (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI).
46.
JacobyK, 2001Crimes Against Nature: Squatters, Poachers, Thieves, and the Hidden History of American Conservation (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
47.
JessopB, 1990State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place (Polity, Cambridge).
48.
JessopB, 1994, “Post-Fordism and the state”, in Post-Fordism: A Reader Ed. AminA (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 251–279.
49.
JessopB, 2002, “Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A State-theoretical perspective”Antipode34452–472.
50.
JosephM, 2002Against the Romance of Community (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
51.
JuddR, 1997Common Lands, Common People: The Origins of Conservation in Northern New England (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
52.
KellertRMehtaJEbbinSLitchfieldL, 2000, “Community natural resource management: Promise, rhetoric, and reality”Society and Natural Resources13705–715.
53.
KemmisD, 1992Community and the Politics of Place (University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK).
54.
KemmisD, 2001This Sovereign Land: A New Vision for Governing the West (Island Press, Washington, DC).
55.
KenneyD, 2000, “Arguing about consensus: examining the case against Western watershed initiatives and other collaborative groups active in natural resource management”, Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law, Boulder, CO.
56.
KloosterD, 2000, “Community forestry and tree theft in Mexico: Resistance or complicity in conservation?”, in Forests: Nature, People, Power Eds DoornbosMSaithAWhiteB (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 275–298.
57.
KoontzT, 2002Federalism in the Forest: National versus State Resource Policy (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC).
58.
KrogmanNBeckleyT, 2002, “Corporate ‘bail-outs’ and local ‘buyouts’: Pathways to community forestry?”Society and Natural Resources15109–127.
59.
LarnerW, 2003, “Neoliberalism?”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space21509–512.
60.
LatourB, 1993We Have Never Been Modern (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
61.
LeahyM, 2003, “Agency and industry interests trump communities and environment, again”Western Forester (Society of American Foresters, Portland, OR) January/February, pp 3–4.
62.
LiT, 1996, “Images of community: Discourse and strategy in property relations”Development and Change27501–528.
63.
LittleJ, 2003, “Coming of age—seven years after the Seventh American Forest Congress”Communities and Forests7(1) (Newsletter of the Communities Committee of the Seventh American Forest Congress), http://www.communitiescommittee.org/.
64.
McCarthyJ, 1998, “Environmentalism, Wise Use, and the nature of accumulation in the rural West”, in Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium Eds BraunBCastreeN (Routledge, London) pp 126–149.
65.
McCarthyJ, 2002a, “First World political ecology: Lessons from the Wise Use movement”Environment and Planning A341281–1302.
66.
McCarthyJ, 2002b, “Community-based forestry in the United States: antecedents and new directions”, report to the Ford Foundation; copy available from the author.
67.
McCarthyJPrudhamS, 2004, “Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism”Geoforum35275–283.
68.
McCloskyM, 1999, “Local communities and the management of public forests”Ecology Law Quarterly25624–629.
69.
MirandaJ, 2002Against the Romance of Community (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
70.
National Community Forestry Center, 2001, “Who's planning for forests? Results from a region-wide context”, National Community Forestry Center, Northern Forest Region, 228 South Main Street, St Albans, VT 05478.
71.
National Environmental Policy Act, 1969, 42 USC s/s 4321 et seq. (1969).
72.
National Forest Dependent Rural Communities Economic Diversification Act, 1990, 7 USC 6601, Public Law 101–624 (1990).
73.
NeumannR, 2001, “Disciplining peasants in Tanzania: From state violence to self-surveillance in wildlife conservation”, in Violent Environments Eds PelusoNWattsM (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) pp 305–327.
74.
NortonG, 2002a, “Helping citizens conserve their own land—and America's”New York Times 20 April, page A17.
75.
NortonG, 2002b, “Era of citizen conservationists”The Washington Times 5 March, page A18.
76.
O‘Connor Center, 2000, “Reclaiming NEPA's potential: can collaborative processes improve environmental decision making?”, report from workshop on National Environmental Policy Act, March 1999, O'Connor Center for the Rocky Mountain West, University of Montana, Missoula, MT.
77.
OstromE, 1990Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
78.
PaehlkeR, 2001, “Spatial proportionality: Right-sizing environmental decision-making,” in Governing the Environment: Persistent Challenges, Uncertain Innovations Ed. ParsonE (University of Toronto Press, Toronto) pp 73–124.
79.
PeckJ, 2001, “Neoliberalizing states: Thin policies/hard outcomes”Progress in Human Geography25445–455.
80.
PeckJ, 2002, “Political economies of scale: Fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare”Economic Geography78331–360.
81.
PeetRHartwickE, 1999Theories of Development (Guilford Press, New York).
82.
PeetRWattsM (Eds), 1996Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements (Routledge, London).
83.
PiggS L, 1992, “Inventing social categories through place: Social representations and development in Nepal”Comparative Studies in Society and History34491–513.
84.
PoffenbergerM, 1996Communities and Forest Management: Report of the IUCN Working Group on Community Involvement in Forest ManagementIUCN, 219c Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL.
85.
PolanyiK, 1944The Great Transformation (Rinehart, New York).
86.
RichardTBurnsS, 1998, “Beyond 'scoping’: Citizens and San Juan National Forest managers, learning together”Journal of Forestry96(4) 39–43.
87.
RisenJ, 2001, “Vote lifts conservative land groups”New York Times 31 January, page A15.
88.
RobinsonJ, 2002, “Global and world cities: A View from off the map”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26531–554.
89.
SchroederR, 1999, “Community, forestry and conditionality in the Gambia”Africa69(1) 1–22.
90.
ScottJ, 1998Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
SivaramakrishnanK, 2000Modern Forests: Statemaking and Environmental Change in Colonial Eastern India (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
95.
Society of American Foresters, 1999, “Forests of discord: options for governing our national forests and federal public lands”, http://www.safnet.org/.
96.
SundarN, 2000, “Unpacking the ‘joint’ in joint forest management”, in Forests: Nature, People, Power Eds DoornbosMSaithAWhiteB (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 249–273.
97.
SwyngedouwE, 1997, “Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale”, in Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local Ed. CoxK (Guilford Press, New York) pp 137–166.
98.
TickellAPeckJ, 1995, “Social regulation after Fordism: Regulation theory, neoliberalism and the global–local nexus”Economy and Society24357–386.
99.
TickellAPeckJ, 2003, “Making global rules: Globalization or neoliberalization?”, in Remaking the Global Economy: Economic–Geographical Perspectives Eds PeckJWai-Chung YeungH (Sage, London) pp 163–181.
100.
VigNKraftM (Eds), 1984Environmental Policy in the 1980s: Reagan's New Agenda (Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington, DC).
101.
VothDJardonMMcCauleyCMoonZFrentzI, 1999, “Linking community development with National Forest planning and management in the South”, Southern Rural Development Center, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AK.
102.
WalkerP, 2003, “Reconsidering ‘regional’ political ecologies: Towards a political ecology of the rural American West”Progress in Human Geography27(1) 7–24.
103.
WeberE, 2000, “A new vanguard for the environment: Grass-roots ecosystem management as a new environmental movement”Society and Natural Resources13237–259.
104.
WeberE, 2003Bringing Society Back In: Grassroots Ecosystem Management, Accountability, and Sustainable Communities (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
105.
WeinsteinJ, 2001, “Some critics see unholy alliance in forestland deal but the Nature Conservancy insists it can work with business to protect land”Maine Sunday Telegram 1 September, page 1A.
106.
WhatmoreS, 2002Hybrid Geographies (Sage, London).
107.
WilliamsR, 1976Keywords (Oxford University Press, New York).
108.
WondolleckJ MYaffeS L, 2000Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management (Island Press, Washington, DC).
109.
World Resources Institute, 1995, “Jobs, competitiveness, and environmental regulation”, World Resources Institute, 10 G Street, NE, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20002.
110.
YaffeeS LPhilipsA FFrentzI CHardyP WMaleckiS MThorpeB E, 1996Ecosystem Management in the United States: An Assessment of Current Experience (Island Press, Washington, DC).
111.
YoungR, 2001Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction (Blackwell, Oxford).
